This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Mad Max
Pages: 1 ... 646566 6768 ... 251
1951
« on: March 14, 2015, 10:17:50 PM »
 noice.
1952
« on: March 13, 2015, 04:41:28 PM »
Yup <.<
If they actually did give a shit about this kind of thing, I expect I would have had a knock on the door after the first few Takbirs.
Wrong. State governments are usually the ones to act, but government take threats like this seriously. Dozens of people are arrested a year because they post stupid shit like this on Twitter. Stop comforting him for the sake of forum likability.
You mean things like the guy who got arrested for tweeting he was going to blow up an airport because his plane was delayed? There is something they can do about that since it could be an actual threat, someone on a forum saying 'lol when I die I'm taking all you fuckers with me' clearly isn't. If he'd said 'On April the 32nd I'm going to walk into springfield elementary and see how many kids I can bag before bluiciding' then yeah that'd get him a knock at the door.
Ever heard of YikYak? It's an anonymous public messaging app for college students. A couple months ago a kid said he was going to kill a bunch of people and he got arrested for it.
Murder threats are not funny jokes, Mr P.
>"lol when I die I'm taking all you fuckers with me"
>Take away the "lol" because he didn't write that in his post and then yes, you can arrested for that.
I thought you were leaving
1953
« on: March 13, 2015, 04:17:01 PM »
I wonder if the 1970's gas crisis led to lower emissions, which is why we're seeing a stalling right now.
1954
« on: March 13, 2015, 01:21:54 PM »
Oh look, more sheep in the U.S and feminists. "BCUZ SHE'Z TEH FWIST FEMAIL PWESIDENT LOL!"
Where is that happening, because it sure isn't in this thread.
It's these types of people in a nutshell who vote when they didn't do their research on the president, same thing with the 2008 elections.
It happens in literally every election.
At least Abraham Lincoln did something good and people voted him for that.
...I don't see what that has to do with anything
Lincoln abolished slavery and made slavery illegal.
...ok? How does that pertain to this discussion?
It relates to the Civil War and how to north won.
..which has absolutely nothing to do with this thread.
1955
« on: March 13, 2015, 01:11:34 PM »
Oh look, more sheep in the U.S and feminists. "BCUZ SHE'Z TEH FWIST FEMAIL PWESIDENT LOL!"
Where is that happening, because it sure isn't in this thread.
It's these types of people in a nutshell who vote when they didn't do their research on the president, same thing with the 2008 elections.
It happens in literally every election.
At least Abraham Lincoln did something good and people voted him for that.
...I don't see what that has to do with anything
Lincoln abolished slavery and made slavery illegal.
...ok? How does that pertain to this discussion?
1956
« on: March 13, 2015, 01:08:06 PM »
Oh look, more sheep in the U.S and feminists. "BCUZ SHE'Z TEH FWIST FEMAIL PWESIDENT LOL!"
Where is that happening, because it sure isn't in this thread.
It's these types of people in a nutshell who vote when they didn't do their research on the president, same thing with the 2008 elections.
It happens in literally every election.
At least Abraham Lincoln did something good and people voted him for that.
...I don't see what that has to do with anything
1957
« on: March 13, 2015, 11:17:38 AM »
yeah i saw one that criticized Sony's obvious partnership with Netflix because they have Frank playing a PS4 and talking about the Vita
I wonder if people even notice how much product placement apple does <.<
iPhones and Macs everywhere
The Samsung tablet one was even worse. "Here, let me throw this up on the monitor" *Swipes fingers across tablet, clearly displaying Samsung logo*
1958
« on: March 13, 2015, 11:07:19 AM »
Why would they have? You have to pass a bill to find out what's in it.
I know you're poking fun at Congress, but the FCC doesn't work the same way.
1959
« on: March 13, 2015, 12:24:02 AM »
Welp, here it is, now. PDF warning http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2015/db0312/FCC-15-24A1.pdftl;dr § 8.5 No blocking.
A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not block lawful content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices, subject to reasonable network management.
Section 8.7 is amended to read as follows:
§ 8.7 No throttling.
A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not impair or degrade lawful Internet traffic on the basis of Internet content, application, or service, or use of a non-harmful device, subject to reasonable network management.
§ 8.9 No paid prioritization.
(a) A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not engage in paid prioritization.
(b) “Paid prioritization” refers to the management of a broadband provider’s network to directly or indirectly favor some traffic over other traffic, including through use of techniques such as traffic shaping, prioritization, resource reservation, or other forms of preferential traffic management, either (a) in exchange for consideration (monetary or otherwise) from a third party, or (b) to benefit an affiliated entity. ederal Communications Commission FCC 15-24 285
(c) The Commission may waive the ban on paid prioritization only if the petitioner demonstrates that the practice would provide some significant public interest benefit and would not harm the open nature of the Internet.
New section 8.11 is added to read as follows:
§ 8.11 No unreasonable interference or unreasonable disadvantage standard for Internet conduct.
Any person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not unreasonably interfere with or unreasonably disadvantage (i) end users’ ability to select, access, and use broadband Internet access service or the lawful Internet content, applications, services, or devices of their choice, or (ii) edge providers’ ability to make lawful content, applications, services, or devices available to end users. Reasonable network management shall not be considered a violation of this rule.
Section 8.13 is amended by revising paragraph (a)(4), revising paragraphs (b), (b)(1) and (b)(2), removing paragraph (b)(3), redesignating paragraphs (c) and (d) as paragraphs (d) and (e), and adding new paragr
1960
« on: March 13, 2015, 12:13:06 AM »
1961
« on: March 12, 2015, 05:44:08 PM »
I guess I'm just surprised that anyone in this day and age starts smoking.
I understand people who got hooked before we knew how bad it was, but now? There's no reason to start smoking. It's terrible for you and expensive. I don't see the up side to starting smoking.
I'm pretty sure 99% of smokers are aware that smoking is detrimental to their health, but they still do it anyway. Not to mention that state regulation only encourages a black market to open up, as has been repeated throughout history time and time again. The prohibition period and the War On Drugs can attest to that.
Honestly Max, for someone who's a proponent of Marijuana legalisation, I'm pretty surprised you're in support of this.
I'm not going to stop someone from smoking, but I just don't understand why someone would start.
1962
« on: March 12, 2015, 05:28:20 PM »
I have accounts on pretty much everything, but I mostly just use facebook, twitter, instagram
1963
« on: March 12, 2015, 05:20:04 PM »
I guess I'm just surprised that anyone in this day and age starts smoking.
I understand people who got hooked before we knew how bad it was, but now? There's no reason to start smoking. It's terrible for you and expensive. I don't see the up side to starting smoking.
1964
« on: March 12, 2015, 05:12:43 PM »
..do you post in anything other than gravity falls?
1965
« on: March 12, 2015, 05:12:02 PM »
what steam skin is that?
1966
« on: March 12, 2015, 05:02:14 PM »
Good, it's time we stop giving ourselves cancer. While I understand the whole "it's my body so I can do whatever I want," you have to think of your family. Your family doesn't want to lose you any sooner than they have to.
Also consider the millions upon millions of cigarette butts that get washed out to the ocean because people toss them out their car windows or while they're walking down the street.
"Think of your family, man" isn't a legitimate reason to illegalize something. Neither is "some people who use this product choose to litter".
But it's not just "some people" it's a fuckton of people.
1967
« on: March 12, 2015, 04:59:11 PM »
Good, it's time we stop giving ourselves cancer. While I understand the whole "it's my body so I can do whatever I want," you have to think of your family. Your family doesn't want to lose you any sooner than they have to.
I know a guy who was hit by a car.
For the love of God, ban cars. No, don't be stupid. Families are horizontal, co-operative units. If my family wants to coerce me into doing something I don't want to do unless it's immediately life threatening, they can go fuck themselves.
..but smoking IS life threatening. At least cars serve a useful purpose. Cigarettes do not.
1968
« on: March 12, 2015, 04:58:39 PM »
Good, it's time we stop giving ourselves cancer. While I understand the whole "it's my body so I can do whatever I want," you have to think of your family. Your family doesn't want to lose you any sooner than they have to.
Also consider the millions upon millions of cigarette butts that get washed out to the ocean because people toss them out their car windows or while they're walking down the street.
1969
« on: March 12, 2015, 04:55:48 PM »
Enjoy paying for lung cancer.
What does that have to do with the EU directive here?
I don't care that you're not paying for an unhealthy product, so surely you must not care that I am unless I go around blowing smoke over people's faces? Unless, of course, you're that petty and spiteful.
I just think it's odd that someone smart like you does something stupid like smoke. I'm not going to smack the cigarette out of your hands.
1970
« on: March 12, 2015, 04:54:43 PM »
tbh has been around long before b.net...
1971
« on: March 12, 2015, 04:49:56 PM »
Good.
No, fuck you.
I like my menthols.
Enjoy paying for lung cancer.
1972
« on: March 12, 2015, 04:40:28 PM »
Good.
1973
« on: March 12, 2015, 03:41:22 PM »
That said, I can't say much about Bush, Rubio, or Walker since I don't know a lot about their policies, but what has really rubbed me the wrong way about Rubio goes of his way to slam Obama. The whole Tea Party "Obama and democrats are the worst" annoys the shit out of me.
Rubio is also a climate change denier.
But of course he is. Spoiler That wasn't supposed to sound sarcastic. I read that way to me...
1974
« on: March 12, 2015, 03:40:45 PM »
>Implying I live in a backwards ass state with sales tax.
That shit is just stupid, sales tax is for niggers.
Oh look, some newshit trying to be cool.
1975
« on: March 12, 2015, 02:20:58 PM »
>Land of the Lazy
I'm sorry, who's too lazy to calculate tax in their head?
Sorry, 7.75% of $84.53 isn't something I'm going to do in my head.
1976
« on: March 12, 2015, 02:07:55 PM »
If Republicans knew what was good for them we'd see Jon Huntsman again. I strongly considered voting for him in the last run.
That's the second time I've seen you mention Huntsman, what do you like about him? What makes him better than Bush or Rubio or Walker?
Huntsman's strength is foreign policy, especially with China. He supports LGBT equality, campaign finance reform, education reform, and a few other more liberal positions that other republicans seem to be afraid of being associated with. He doesn't push the "sanctity of marriage" or pander to "your freedoms are in danger" or "America is #1 forever" bullshit. So many other republicans are down in the mud, busy dragging everyone through it, and Huntsman is more high-road material. That said, I can't say much about Bush, Rubio, or Walker since I don't know a lot about their policies, but what has really rubbed me the wrong way about Rubio goes of his way to slam Obama. The whole Tea Party "Obama and democrats are the worst" annoys the shit out of me.
1977
« on: March 12, 2015, 01:52:41 PM »
Oh look, more sheep in the U.S and feminists. "BCUZ SHE'Z TEH FWIST FEMAIL PWESIDENT LOL!"
Where is that happening, because it sure isn't in this thread.
It's these types of people in a nutshell who vote when they didn't do their research on the president, same thing with the 2008 elections.
It happens in literally every election.
1978
« on: March 12, 2015, 01:46:25 PM »
Oh look, more sheep in the U.S and feminists. "BCUZ SHE'Z TEH FWIST FEMAIL PWESIDENT LOL!"
Where is that happening, because it sure isn't in this thread.
1979
« on: March 12, 2015, 01:29:23 PM »
how much the government is stealing from you Calm down, camnator.
1980
« on: March 12, 2015, 01:23:30 PM »
Because different states have different taxes. A multi-state business would have to create a special advertisement and price for each state.
Pages: 1 ... 646566 6768 ... 251
|
Show Posts
