This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Mad Max
Pages: 1 ... 454647 4849 ... 251
1381
« on: May 27, 2015, 12:53:50 AM »
Do whatever you want, but good luck getting a job.
1382
« on: May 26, 2015, 05:09:50 PM »
one could only hope so.
1383
« on: May 26, 2015, 02:16:13 PM »
The contents of my bank accounts, so...that'd be bad.
1384
« on: May 26, 2015, 11:23:12 AM »
I thought anarchy was done with?
1385
« on: May 26, 2015, 10:34:39 AM »
People still sign their kids up for that bullshit Boyscouts shit?
LOL
Can anyone that was ever in Boyscouts, till the very end, say it was worth it? Like.. did they really become a better person and learn many useful things?
Eagle scout here. Yes, it was worth it. I'll encourage my kids to participate in scouting as well, if I have any.
Why was it worth it?
1386
« on: May 25, 2015, 08:41:37 PM »
People still sign their kids up for that bullshit Boyscouts shit?
LOL
1387
« on: May 25, 2015, 08:40:58 PM »
OH NO BREAKING THE RULES RESULTS IN A WARNING OR BAN
WHO WOULD HAVE THOUGHT?!
You're missing the point.
Calling someone a faggot is offensive and against the rules. Why would you complain about getting smacked with a warning or ban when you clearly break the rules?
lol, faggot
I'm the faggot because I can understand the rules of a website? lolok.
1388
« on: May 21, 2015, 11:36:19 PM »
Groups? For what purpose? There's only like two dozen frequent users here. It's just going to divide everyone up.
1389
« on: May 21, 2015, 11:24:04 PM »
1390
« on: May 21, 2015, 07:09:07 PM »
but more Millenials relate to her for some reason.
Fucked if I know why, though. She'll say the things we want to hear, but I have zero faith in her following through on a single thing. And Republicans would rather she fuck off with Bill, so there will never be compromise on anything between the White House and Congress. Even less than there is now.
1391
« on: May 21, 2015, 06:14:23 PM »
I'll still likely vote for her.
not sure if srs...
The way I look at it, and justify voting for her, is this: Whoever wins could leave one of the longest lasting legacies for this generation via the Supreme Court.
Come 2016, in a year and a half, roughly 3-4 of the justices will be in their 80's. Assuming the next President, be it Democrat or Republican, serves out a full eight years in office, there is a strong likelyhood that they will have the opportunity to nominate at least two people, if not more, to the bench. As much as I may prefer others over Clinton, the fact is that I agree with her ideologically far more than I agree with any of the GOP candidates - and I would prefer to see her put someone of similar ideological thinking on the court for the remainder of their lives.
Selfish, maybe. But SCOTUS has had an increasing role in recent years, so they do come into play.
Why Hillary and not Bernie?
Because Bernie has three things that are going hold him back from winning the primary, and even moreso, the general: Money, Political Affiliation, and Age.
Bernie's biggest campaign foundation is the fact he doesn't answer to billionaires like Hillary does. Of course he'll be running on fewer campaign funds, but at least it's honest money [comparatively] What's wrong with his political affiliation? He's been an independent for so long, but running under the democrats. Age? Yeah, he's older. I don't think he'll die in office or anything, though.
1392
« on: May 21, 2015, 06:12:25 PM »
Yes. As long as they aren't ACTUALLY harming people, they aren't doing anything wrong. Wrong.
They're not necessarily doing anything illegal, but it most certainly is wrong.
Well, that's what I mean. As long as they aren't breaking the law, I'll let it fly. I don't have to like it or agree with it, but I recognize the legality of what they're doing.
They should be deported.
If they're so in love with a Caliphate, for example, why are they afraid to be deported back to where ISIS is creating a caliphate? Dream come true right?
I think it'd teach these people to shut the fuck up.
If we deported all the people who didn't like what the government was doing, that's not a great way to handle your citizens.
"the government"
More like deporting people who say "death to America".
..who do you think will be doing the deporting? You can't "CITIZEN'S ARREST" someone out of the country.
1393
« on: May 21, 2015, 06:03:33 PM »
I'll still likely vote for her.
not sure if srs...
The way I look at it, and justify voting for her, is this: Whoever wins could leave one of the longest lasting legacies for this generation via the Supreme Court.
Come 2016, in a year and a half, roughly 3-4 of the justices will be in their 80's. Assuming the next President, be it Democrat or Republican, serves out a full eight years in office, there is a strong likelyhood that they will have the opportunity to nominate at least two people, if not more, to the bench. As much as I may prefer others over Clinton, the fact is that I agree with her ideologically far more than I agree with any of the GOP candidates - and I would prefer to see her put someone of similar ideological thinking on the court for the remainder of their lives.
Selfish, maybe. But SCOTUS has had an increasing role in recent years, so they do come into play.
Why Hillary and not Bernie?
1394
« on: May 21, 2015, 05:55:48 PM »
I'll still likely vote for her.
not sure if srs...
1395
« on: May 21, 2015, 03:57:47 PM »
I'm INTJ when I took this last week.
1396
« on: May 21, 2015, 02:41:55 PM »
If we deported all the people who didn't like what the government was doing, that's not a great way to handle your citizens.
There's a difference between annoying the government and then actively calling for the abolition of the British or American state on the basis of some medieval ideology.
So? It's not illegal to do that.
1397
« on: May 21, 2015, 02:25:11 PM »
Yes. As long as they aren't ACTUALLY harming people, they aren't doing anything wrong. Wrong.
They're not necessarily doing anything illegal, but it most certainly is wrong.
Well, that's what I mean. As long as they aren't breaking the law, I'll let it fly. I don't have to like it or agree with it, but I recognize the legality of what they're doing.
They should be deported.
If they're so in love with a Caliphate, for example, why are they afraid to be deported back to where ISIS is creating a caliphate? Dream come true right?
I think it'd teach these people to shut the fuck up.
If we deported all the people who didn't like what the government was doing, that's not a great way to handle your citizens.
1398
« on: May 21, 2015, 02:11:10 PM »
Yes. As long as they aren't ACTUALLY harming people, they aren't doing anything wrong. Wrong.
They're not necessarily doing anything illegal, but it most certainly is wrong.
Well, that's what I mean. As long as they aren't breaking the law, I'll let it fly. I don't have to like it or agree with it, but I recognize the legality of what they're doing.
1399
« on: May 21, 2015, 02:05:57 PM »
The right of prisoners to have the vote. No, people currently serving time should not vote. The right of prisoners to have children via artificial insemination. No, people currently serving time should not have children while they are in prison. The right of individuals who promote hatred and intolerance to not be deported if their original country will not respect their human rights. Yes. As long as they aren't ACTUALLY harming people, they aren't doing anything wrong. The right to not be sentenced to life in prison. No, life in prison needs to be available for sentencing.
1400
« on: May 21, 2015, 12:32:10 PM »
Could that stick be any further up your arse?
I'm just pointing out the rules are clear, and "fgt" breaks the rules, so being slapped with a warning or ban should not be a surprise.
1401
« on: May 21, 2015, 12:21:42 PM »
OH NO BREAKING THE RULES RESULTS IN A WARNING OR BAN
WHO WOULD HAVE THOUGHT?!
You're missing the point.
Calling someone a faggot is offensive and against the rules. Why would you complain about getting smacked with a warning or ban when you clearly break the rules?
If you think being called a faggot is offensive, get off the Internet. Also, Luis was merely joking. There was no malicious intent with what he said, making it an unjust ban.
It doesn't matter if I find it offensive or not - faggot is a slur against homosexuals and using it breaks the Bungie.net rules.
But saying "fgt" shouldn't result in a ban
Nope. It's the same word breaking the same rule.
1402
« on: May 21, 2015, 12:15:08 PM »
OH NO BREAKING THE RULES RESULTS IN A WARNING OR BAN
WHO WOULD HAVE THOUGHT?!
You're missing the point.
Calling someone a faggot is offensive and against the rules. Why would you complain about getting smacked with a warning or ban when you clearly break the rules?
If you think being called a faggot is offensive, get off the Internet. Also, Luis was merely joking. There was no malicious intent with what he said, making it an unjust ban.
It doesn't matter if I find it offensive or not - faggot is a slur against homosexuals and using it breaks the Bungie.net rules.
1403
« on: May 21, 2015, 10:45:16 AM »
OH NO BREAKING THE RULES RESULTS IN A WARNING OR BAN
WHO WOULD HAVE THOUGHT?!
You're missing the point.
Calling someone a faggot is offensive and against the rules. Why would you complain about getting smacked with a warning or ban when you clearly break the rules?
shut up faggot
Gee, another quality post from the sep7agon machine. Such a lovely place here.
oh fuck off max
K.
1404
« on: May 21, 2015, 10:44:52 AM »
$50 we'll never see it state-side... 
1405
« on: May 21, 2015, 10:42:26 AM »
OH NO BREAKING THE RULES RESULTS IN A WARNING OR BAN
WHO WOULD HAVE THOUGHT?!
You're missing the point.
Calling someone a faggot is offensive and against the rules. Why would you complain about getting smacked with a warning or ban when you clearly break the rules?
shut up faggot
Gee, another quality post from the sep7agon machine. Such a lovely place here.
1406
« on: May 21, 2015, 10:35:38 AM »
OH NO BREAKING THE RULES RESULTS IN A WARNING OR BAN
WHO WOULD HAVE THOUGHT?!
You're missing the point.
Calling someone a faggot is offensive and against the rules. Why would you complain about getting smacked with a warning or ban when you clearly break the rules?
1407
« on: May 21, 2015, 10:21:35 AM »
I've mostly given up on both bnet and here.
1408
« on: May 21, 2015, 10:20:51 AM »
OH NO BREAKING THE RULES RESULTS IN A WARNING OR BAN
WHO WOULD HAVE THOUGHT?!
1409
« on: May 21, 2015, 10:16:03 AM »
I really don't think any individuals, no matter how much power they have, are going to defy public opinion like this.
Then you haven't been paying attention over the last decade, or even the last 2 years, because that's exactly what's happening.
1410
« on: May 20, 2015, 09:16:44 PM »
Holy shit, calm down bro.
Pages: 1 ... 454647 4849 ... 251
|
Show Posts