61
Serious / Re: Successful Suicide
« on: October 25, 2016, 08:11:17 PM »
Zombie
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 62
Serious / Re: so i just had a small discussion with a girl (taxing women hygiene products)« on: October 25, 2016, 08:10:09 PM »yeah exactlyI do think you should be allowed to buy them with "food stamps" (along with some other essentials)like diapers and such im guessing? the food stamp idea does seem pretty useful When I had food stamps I always thought it was stupid as fuck I could theoretically buy twinkies or icecream but not things we actually needed 63
Serious / Re: so i just had a small discussion with a girl (taxing women hygiene products)« on: October 25, 2016, 07:32:37 PM »
I do think you should be allowed to buy them with "food stamps" (along with some other essentials)
I mean it's more important that your daughter have pads than that she has candy and junk food which is concerned 64
Serious / Re: so i just had a small discussion with a girl (taxing women hygiene products)« on: October 25, 2016, 07:30:19 PM »
Toilet paper is taxed too
So is toothpaste So is soap Personal hygiene products are always taxed why make an exception 66
The Flood / Re: Why are people so up in arms about Challenger?« on: October 25, 2016, 06:00:00 PM »You guys sure were quick to jump on his case. You may be in the right, though. It's been so long since he was allowed to post, I can hardly remember who he was.who? 68
The Flood / Re: One of the mods is a dumb faggot« on: October 25, 2016, 02:36:17 PM »I don't recognize you without your tiger avatarI don't recognize myself 69
The Flood / One of the mods is a dumb faggot« on: October 25, 2016, 02:02:59 PM »
Jk most of them are
70
The Flood / Re: Why did chally get banned« on: October 25, 2016, 02:01:27 PM »in the time you spent being a huge faggot you could have linked the threadIt wasn't on the front page when I posted.How about the only one on the front page? 71
Serious / Re: Alright, lets have one of these threads again...« on: October 25, 2016, 01:57:03 PM »no you don't.what do you know 72
Gaming / Re: Can you name a worse year for gaming than 2016?« on: October 24, 2016, 10:00:06 PM »thanks for the gold kind strangerdestiny was hot garbage until TTKDestiny was the best game ever shut your mouth 74
Gaming / Re: Can you name a worse year for gaming than 2016?« on: October 24, 2016, 04:30:09 PM »destiny was hot garbage until TTKI'd say 2014 for sureDestiny :^) 75
Gaming / Re: Can you name a worse year for gaming than 2016?« on: October 24, 2016, 03:31:47 PM »
I'd say 2014 for sure
The best games of the year being dark souls 2 and dragon age Everything else sucked or was a remaster 76
The Flood / Re: Least Spoopy October thus far!« on: October 24, 2016, 03:24:43 PM »
I'm being a slutty cat
79
Serious / Re: A rebuttal of a defense of Clinton's email scandal« on: October 23, 2016, 06:00:17 PM »and trump will start another holocaust if he's electedif we're lucky 80
The Flood / Re: Gotta Talk« on: October 23, 2016, 04:46:11 PM »I think the worst part about losing all your friends, apart from the brutal loneliness, is the fact that you know you'll never make more. You get to a point where you push people away and you don't open up to people. Then you get all the fake bullshit pity from people, like us. Even if we have gone through what you've been through, who the fuck cares. "Oh wow that sucks man". Fuck off. Fuck you.lol 81
Serious / Re: A rebuttal of a defense of Clinton's email scandal« on: October 23, 2016, 04:33:06 PM »it is just watch "the clips"So... the FBI saying they had nothing chargeable means nothing now. Some guys online says she's guilty lets just skip over the investigation that's already done and just string her upit never meant anything, FBI is bought and paid for by obummer and the Clinton Foundation Literally admitting to voter fraud 82
Serious / Re: A rebuttal of a defense of Clinton's email scandal« on: October 23, 2016, 04:05:20 PM »So... the FBI saying they had nothing chargeable means nothing now. Some guys online says she's guilty lets just skip over the investigation that's already done and just string her upit never meant anything, FBI is bought and paid for by obummer and the Clinton Foundation 83
Serious / Re: A rebuttal of a defense of Clinton's email scandal« on: October 23, 2016, 04:04:24 PM »
She broke the law and mishandled classified information she should be jailed
84
Serious / Re: Did Trump run to launch Trump TV?« on: October 22, 2016, 08:10:09 PM »
And they say the right makes up crazy conspiracy theories
85
Serious / Re: Alright, lets have one of these threads again...« on: October 22, 2016, 07:10:42 PM »what do you know 86
Serious / Re: Alright, lets have one of these threads again...« on: October 22, 2016, 10:49:09 AM »I find it interesting how close they all are in % 87
Serious / Re: "Politifact is reliable and unbiased"« on: October 22, 2016, 10:26:11 AM »no you're a puppetyes it doesWell, you see, a tax rate of zero still implies that the tax exists, which Dr Paul would be wrong about, where as Jim Webb is more correct in saying that a tax created by the 1913 Federal Reserve act didn't exist before the act.no it doesn't 88
Serious / Re: Alright, lets have one of these threads again...« on: October 22, 2016, 10:23:45 AM »yeah he's basically a poor mans mitt Romney so naturally Utah loves himEvan McMuffinThat bald cucky looking guy? lol 89
Serious / Re: Alright, lets have one of these threads again...« on: October 22, 2016, 09:47:26 AM »![]() For anyone wondering Evan McMuffin is probably going to win Utah, and should the electoral college tie the house will probably pick him 90
Serious / Re: "Politifact is reliable and unbiased"« on: October 22, 2016, 09:38:10 AM »Well, you see, a tax rate of zero still implies that the tax exists, which Dr Paul would be wrong about, where as Jim Webb is more correct in saying that a tax created by the 1913 Federal Reserve act didn't exist before the act.no it doesn't |