Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Deesbee

Pages: 1 ... 456 78 ... 83
151
Gaming / Re: Halo 5 Memories of Reach Update Details
« on: April 30, 2016, 10:01:34 AM »



Hmmm, has a LOT more content compared to Ghosts of Meridian, which I am positively sure was only composed of skins. I see that the infused nostalgia by fully blocking out a req with the ONI symbol. My guess is honestly either the Falcon or the Reach DMR.

Then again, I don't dare want to see that terrible bloom and iron sights again, so I will pray that it's indeed a falcon.
The hidden one is obviously armor locke.

152
Gaming / Re: best game water youve ever seen
« on: April 30, 2016, 07:08:52 AM »
Minecraft

153
The Flood / Re: What 'triggers' you?
« on: April 29, 2016, 11:38:37 PM »
People who think anything other than the action make BvS any good. And are willing to say it is better than Civil War.

154
Gaming / Re: Halo 5 Memories of Reach Update Details
« on: April 29, 2016, 11:31:24 PM »
Do they acutaly we cant tell what Noble Team's armor looks like through the blurr
There are clear images of I think all of them around already.

155
Gaming / Re: Halo 5 Memories of Reach Update Details
« on: April 29, 2016, 11:29:58 PM »


ummm
There was also 2 sharktooth assault rifles. Bravo rushed the team to get him the graphic and is getting them to fix it now. St8 savage.

156
Gaming / Re: Halo 5 Memories of Reach Update Details
« on: April 29, 2016, 11:29:07 PM »
I'd rather we not remember Reach at all
I remember when Alpha Zombies were not a thing when it first came out.

157
Gaming / Halo 5 Memories of Reach Update Details
« on: April 29, 2016, 11:13:04 PM »
https://www.halowaypoint.com/en-us/community/blog-posts/memories-of-reach-preview

Quick summary of everything in it:
Infection, with medals and a new custom game option called "last squad standing"
Most of Noble's armor returning (I finally get to wear the best scout helmet again!)
Post Game Medals and stats
New Forge stuff (dead bodies, pestilence effect)
Remix of a map nobody likes
What seems to be the Focus Rifle (or Jorge's MG)?
A new legendary req (Falcon???)
Brute Plasma Rifle
Balance of weapons (mostly reqs)
Update will not be out next week as there is still final testing that needs to happen

Super hyped for that forge stuff and armor. Having post game medals back will also be nice I guess.

158
Gaming / Re: 2 very short Halo Wars 2 clips
« on: April 29, 2016, 10:09:42 PM »
So where's the gameplay
What is gameplay? Is that a new term for AWESOME CGI CUTSCENES????????
They need to focus on the gameplay before they make anything else
I agree, more CGI cutscenes.

159
Gaming / Re: 2 very short Halo Wars 2 clips
« on: April 29, 2016, 09:03:10 PM »
So where's the gameplay
What is gameplay? Is that a new term for AWESOME CGI CUTSCENES????????

160
Gaming / 2 very short Halo Wars 2 clips
« on: April 29, 2016, 08:18:24 PM »
Spartans getting BFTO
http://imgur.com/a/QKbWl

161
Gaming / Re: What Country has the best gamers?
« on: April 29, 2016, 06:58:21 AM »
South Korea easily

Then it's australians for gitting gud against the crippling lag ;-;7

An aussie with a Korean connection would be unstoppable.
I'm Australian with an American connection does that count?
Maybe, how long did you train in the outback?
3 years till I moved to freedom land.
I'd say that gives you a pretty good level of pointnshooty
I'm gonna go tell my mom i'm good at something for once in my life!

162
Gaming / Re: What Country has the best gamers?
« on: April 29, 2016, 06:48:48 AM »
South Korea easily

Then it's australians for gitting gud against the crippling lag ;-;7

An aussie with a Korean connection would be unstoppable.
I'm Australian with an American connection does that count?
Maybe, how long did you train in the outback?
3 years till I moved to freedom land.

163
Gaming / Re: What Country has the best gamers?
« on: April 29, 2016, 06:39:23 AM »
South Korea easily

Then it's australians for gitting gud against the crippling lag ;-;7

An aussie with a Korean connection would be unstoppable.
I'm Australian with an American connection does that count?

164
Gaming / Re: CoD: Infinite Seque- er Warfare comes with CoD 4
« on: April 29, 2016, 06:33:54 AM »
Just so everyone knows it has been confirmed that MW remaster contain only 10 of the 20 maps.
Are you fucking kidding me

Source?
http://charlieintel.com/2016/04/29/clear-call-duty-infinite-warfare-poster-leaked/

dat sweet every other map sold as DLC action

165
Gaming / Re: CoD: Infinite Seque- er Warfare comes with CoD 4
« on: April 29, 2016, 06:27:51 AM »
Just so everyone knows it has been confirmed that MW remaster contain only 10 of the 20 maps.

166
Gaming / Re: What Country has the best gamers?
« on: April 29, 2016, 06:24:55 AM »
>god tier
that's because vidya is all you guys do
Can't hear you from my golden throne pleb 8)

167
Gaming / What Country has the best gamers?
« on: April 29, 2016, 06:18:51 AM »
From personal Experience this is what I have learned

God tier: Korean, some Japs, some Americans
Good tier: Most of the world in general
Shit tier: UK, Everyone in America's South

Anyone else that deserves God tier and Shit tier?

Spoiler
Australia was not able to participate in this study due to connection issues.

168
Still have my Hasa Diga Eebowai shirt.

169
Gaming / Re: The Original Official Soulsborne Super Ultra Megathread
« on: April 28, 2016, 03:39:03 AM »
The Pvp hitboxes in 3 are fucking stupid. It's a reason I dislike having to do pvp when I am not summoning any partners or going for actual pvp.

170
Gaming / Re: CoD: Infinite Seque- er Warfare comes with CoD 4
« on: April 27, 2016, 07:59:36 PM »
Not gonna keep funding any IW or Sledgehammer games, even if it means it get to play the second best COD again.

171
The Flood / Re: It's always nice when an ex tries to reconnect
« on: April 27, 2016, 12:13:41 PM »
Jesus, what did you do supposedly?

That's still very antagonistic.
Oh I was an actual asshole to her in the relationship I wasn't over a girl and I pretty much let her fall for me while I still chased the other girl. So she's justified. I just found how it was just out of nowhere and so harsh after 3 years funny

172
The Flood / It's always nice when an ex tries to reconnect
« on: April 27, 2016, 12:09:46 PM »

Spoiler
This is an actual message an ex sent me last night 3 years after we broke up.

173
Gaming / Re: halo 5 now ha sa file browser
« on: April 27, 2016, 03:58:45 AM »
You are still giving no proof at fucking all. You are just annoying me at this point. If you aren't gonna give any proof then just shut up dude.



Proof of what? It's using common sense.
You are hitting a pretty high level of autism. Your common sense is as logical as 9/11 theorys.

174
Gaming / Re: halo 5 now ha sa file browser
« on: April 26, 2016, 08:34:33 PM »
Most of those are new content? It's not like you can just reskin all the shit from past games idiot.
What was 343's reason for releasing Halo 5 which was cut up worse than a Michael Myers victim when Bungie manged to release Halo 3 on a new system without butchering it?  Even Halo 2 managed to launch with all the game types and playlists than Halo 5 despite how rushed it was.
It was never cut up, my god.
Then what's the appropriate word to use for the way it launched? 343 still had to cut the game into pieces for its launch and what is being released after.
Quote
Every game has a release schedule made by both the devs and publishers. So to account for the time they had, they put in all core features to keep a fun game for the time needed and added in the features they couldn't get in
Like I said above Bungie managed to launch Halo 2 with more playlists and game modes than Halo 5 despite the game being rushed. Since Halo 5 was not rushed then there's no good reason at all other than stupidity for the way it launched. It's pathetic that Halo 2 which basically got scrapped near launch ended up launching with more content than what Halo 5 did. 
Quote
for launch for free.
It sure is nice of them to not charge us for content which has been included in the other games which they launched with.
Quote
There was never any cut content or features.
If there was never cut content then why was grifball recently added as a game type and we're soon to get the infection game type? I it wasn't cut then it would have been already in the game since release. For features we ended up getting forge some months after the game came out. We're hardly getting new content, we're getting content over a period of months which already has been made for previous Halo's.
Quote
The only thing that has come out about the game is that there might have been some major story changes late in the game.
Just like Halo 2 which had a far better launch content wise.
How about you show any proof for you claims, like, at all?
What do I need proof of to back up my claims?
That any content was cut from the game? The furthest you could go is Forge and even then it was told from before launch and given a date of release. Nothing was cut, because it wasn't fucking made you fucking idiot.

Maybe cut is the wrong wording then.

343 Industries launched a game that was missing key core gametypes and features unique and special to the Halo franchise. Instead of giving worthwhile DLC, they instead "sell" these key core gametypes and features to us as "Free DLC", instead of a normal DLC line we would see and expect from a regular Halo game. Instead of giving a full package that the fans expected up front, we are being given the game a piece at a time.

Does that make sense to you now?
In that case. REFER TO THE FIRST POINT I MADE ON THIS TOPIC =

Woah, calm down there bucko.

I don't get the "delay the game" argument with Halo 5. The game was finished. It had enough content to ship and all other content is being released for free over time. It was still gonna take the same amount of time to finish other content either way so why not just give the game to people anyway since it was ready? I really don't get how delaying a finished game would have changed anything. We get the same amount of content either way, but in this situation we get the content sooner rather than later.

Your first point is based upon the thought that if the game had been delayed that it still would've taken the same amount of time to develop the content. That is just blatantly false. The "DLC" we receive is not given to us as soon as it is finished. It is given out at certain periods of time to ensure that the game tries to keep a stable population, so they can milk those REQ packs as long as possible.

For example, the Halo CE pistol. We saw evidence of that as early as the first half of 2015, yet we didn't even receive the DLC "pack" it was in until February of 2016. That DLC pack contained grifball, a new map, a pelican in Forge, and weapon and armor skins. Using this data, we can assume that as of right now, 343 has all the DLC completed and is just testing between now and the set release date by Microsoft.

Unless 343 Industries are so incompetent that they require 9 months to develop 2 weapons from previous games, a pelican model, 1 map, and some skins, a delayed Halo 5 would've only set the game back to March of 2016. But, that's counting ALL content, while the only thing we're complaining about is content that was in previous Halo games, but not in this one.

So, if we're just talking about gametypes and Forge here, then the game would probably only need to be delayed until mid January at the ABSOLUTE LATEST. If this had happened, Halo 5 would be more in line with previous Halo games, have better player retention, have a larger custom game community, and just overall greater support for the game and not having the fans feel cheated or ripped off.
You are still giving no proof at fucking all. You are just annoying me at this point. If you aren't gonna give any proof then just shut up dude.

175
Gaming / Re: halo 5 now ha sa file browser
« on: April 26, 2016, 08:03:48 PM »
Most of those are new content? It's not like you can just reskin all the shit from past games idiot.
What was 343's reason for releasing Halo 5 which was cut up worse than a Michael Myers victim when Bungie manged to release Halo 3 on a new system without butchering it?  Even Halo 2 managed to launch with all the game types and playlists than Halo 5 despite how rushed it was.
It was never cut up, my god.
Then what's the appropriate word to use for the way it launched? 343 still had to cut the game into pieces for its launch and what is being released after.
Quote
Every game has a release schedule made by both the devs and publishers. So to account for the time they had, they put in all core features to keep a fun game for the time needed and added in the features they couldn't get in
Like I said above Bungie managed to launch Halo 2 with more playlists and game modes than Halo 5 despite the game being rushed. Since Halo 5 was not rushed then there's no good reason at all other than stupidity for the way it launched. It's pathetic that Halo 2 which basically got scrapped near launch ended up launching with more content than what Halo 5 did. 
Quote
for launch for free.
It sure is nice of them to not charge us for content which has been included in the other games which they launched with.
Quote
There was never any cut content or features.
If there was never cut content then why was grifball recently added as a game type and we're soon to get the infection game type? I it wasn't cut then it would have been already in the game since release. For features we ended up getting forge some months after the game came out. We're hardly getting new content, we're getting content over a period of months which already has been made for previous Halo's.
Quote
The only thing that has come out about the game is that there might have been some major story changes late in the game.
Just like Halo 2 which had a far better launch content wise.
How about you show any proof for you claims, like, at all?
What do I need proof of to back up my claims?
That any content was cut from the game? The furthest you could go is Forge and even then it was told from before launch and given a date of release. Nothing was cut, because it wasn't fucking made you fucking idiot.

Maybe cut is the wrong wording then.

343 Industries launched a game that was missing key core gametypes and features unique and special to the Halo franchise. Instead of giving worthwhile DLC, they instead "sell" these key core gametypes and features to us as "Free DLC", instead of a normal DLC line we would see and expect from a regular Halo game. Instead of giving a full package that the fans expected up front, we are being given the game a piece at a time.

Does that make sense to you now?
In that case. REFER TO THE FIRST POINT I MADE ON THIS TOPIC =

176
Gaming / Re: halo 5 now ha sa file browser
« on: April 26, 2016, 07:52:08 PM »
Most of those are new content? It's not like you can just reskin all the shit from past games idiot.
What was 343's reason for releasing Halo 5 which was cut up worse than a Michael Myers victim when Bungie manged to release Halo 3 on a new system without butchering it?  Even Halo 2 managed to launch with all the game types and playlists than Halo 5 despite how rushed it was.
It was never cut up, my god.
Then what's the appropriate word to use for the way it launched? 343 still had to cut the game into pieces for its launch and what is being released after.
Quote
Every game has a release schedule made by both the devs and publishers. So to account for the time they had, they put in all core features to keep a fun game for the time needed and added in the features they couldn't get in
Like I said above Bungie managed to launch Halo 2 with more playlists and game modes than Halo 5 despite the game being rushed. Since Halo 5 was not rushed then there's no good reason at all other than stupidity for the way it launched. It's pathetic that Halo 2 which basically got scrapped near launch ended up launching with more content than what Halo 5 did. 
Quote
for launch for free.
It sure is nice of them to not charge us for content which has been included in the other games which they launched with.
Quote
There was never any cut content or features.
If there was never cut content then why was grifball recently added as a game type and we're soon to get the infection game type? I it wasn't cut then it would have been already in the game since release. For features we ended up getting forge some months after the game came out. We're hardly getting new content, we're getting content over a period of months which already has been made for previous Halo's.
Quote
The only thing that has come out about the game is that there might have been some major story changes late in the game.
Just like Halo 2 which had a far better launch content wise.
How about you show any proof for you claims, like, at all?
What do I need proof of to back up my claims?
That any content was cut from the game? The furthest you could go is Forge and even then it was told from before launch and given a date of release. Nothing was cut, because it wasn't fucking made you fucking idiot.

177
Gaming / Re: halo 5 now ha sa file browser
« on: April 26, 2016, 07:43:46 PM »
Most of those are new content? It's not like you can just reskin all the shit from past games idiot.
What was 343's reason for releasing Halo 5 which was cut up worse than a Michael Myers victim when Bungie manged to release Halo 3 on a new system without butchering it?  Even Halo 2 managed to launch with all the game types and playlists than Halo 5 despite how rushed it was.
It was never cut up, my god.
Then what's the appropriate word to use for the way it launched? 343 still had to cut the game into pieces for its launch and what is being released after.
Quote
Every game has a release schedule made by both the devs and publishers. So to account for the time they had, they put in all core features to keep a fun game for the time needed and added in the features they couldn't get in
Like I said above Bungie managed to launch Halo 2 with more playlists and game modes than Halo 5 despite the game being rushed. Since Halo 5 was not rushed then there's no good reason at all other than stupidity for the way it launched. It's pathetic that Halo 2 which basically got scrapped near launch ended up launching with more content than what Halo 5 did. 
Quote
for launch for free.
It sure is nice of them to not charge us for content which has been included in the other games which they launched with.
Quote
There was never any cut content or features.
If there was never cut content then why was grifball recently added as a game type and we're soon to get the infection game type? I it wasn't cut then it would have been already in the game since release. For features we ended up getting forge some months after the game came out. We're hardly getting new content, we're getting content over a period of months which already has been made for previous Halo's.
Quote
The only thing that has come out about the game is that there might have been some major story changes late in the game.
Just like Halo 2 which had a far better launch content wise.
How about you show any proof for you claims, like, at all?

178
Gaming / Re: halo 5 now ha sa file browser
« on: April 26, 2016, 02:27:06 PM »
Most of those are new content? It's not like you can just reskin all the shit from past games idiot.
What was 343's reason for releasing Halo 5 which was cut up worse than a Michael Myers victim when Bungie manged to release Halo 3 on a new system without butchering it?  Even Halo 2 managed to launch with all the game types and more playlists than Halo 5 despite how rushed it was.
It was never cut up, my god. Halo 5 was not rushed. Every game has a release schedule made by both the devs and publishers. So to account for the time they had, they put in all core features to keep a fun game for the time needed and added in the features they couldn't get in for launch for free. There was never any cut content or features. The only thing that has come out about the game is that there might have been some major story changes late in the game.

179
Gaming / Re: halo 5 now ha sa file browser
« on: April 26, 2016, 02:31:40 AM »
I don't get the "delay the game" argument with Halo 5. The game was finished. It had enough content to ship and all other content is being released for free over time. It was still gonna take the same amount of time to finish other content either way so why not just give the game to people anyway since it was ready? I really don't get how delaying a finished game would have changed anything. We get the same amount of content either way, but in this situation we get the content sooner rather than later.

"Released for free overtime"

You know, when 343 said we'd get free DLC, I honestly thought they meant original quality content. Not ripping out old options that have been in Halo as early as Combat Evolved and as late as Halo 3 and "selling" it back to us as new content. Fuck me as a consumer, right?
>Ripping out options
>Ignoring all content they have added to the game
There is no point in trying to show a person who chooses to blindfold themselves the light. But hey have fun being an asshole for no reason other than to be an asshole :)

Yes, let us look at all the new content we have for us, shall we? I'll color code it too, to make it simple to understand.

Green = New and original content
Yellow = Content that was available at launch in previous Halo games
Orange = Map remixes (not original, but still new kind of)

**I am not counting weapons skins or armor, as this adds nothing new to the game itself**

Warzone Maps
Forge
Grifball
Forge Map remakes
Halo 5 Arena Map remixes
New Halo 5 Arena Maps
Theater (Theater was broken and took until mid Febuary to fix, 343 didn't talk about it and slipped it in with update patch notes)
File Share
Infection
Oddball
Assault
Snipers
Big Team Battle

Sorry to say, but there isn't much green there. And this is just what 343 has added to the game. This isn't even going into the limited custom game options, the rudimentary forging options, and all the gamemodes 343 has decided to leave out as of now.
Most of those are new content? It's not like you can just reskin all the shit from past games idiot. How about you read the fucking point. It takes time to get all that into games. There is an abundance of new weapons and armor. There are new maps. Snipers and Theatre were both in from the start. You obviously are complaining for the sake of complaining. You don't understand how a game is made nor how content releasing works. Kys.
Are you a 343i spokesperson or something.
No, I just care about the game franchise and I am willing to make points to defend it where it deserves to be defended. I think there is a large amount of bs in Halo 5, but I am also gonna defend what 343 has done right. It's this cool new thing called caring about your investments and being a logical human being.
Reskining old content is not New content...
>Being this stupid

You shouldn't be so hard on yourself.
This nigga must play Destiny cause he is desperate for his Last Word to drop.
That must be the cause of your salt... if you're good enough, you'l get it someday.
Way to make no sense at all. 10/10

180
Gaming / Re: halo 5 now ha sa file browser
« on: April 25, 2016, 11:47:58 PM »
I don't get the "delay the game" argument with Halo 5. The game was finished. It had enough content to ship and all other content is being released for free over time. It was still gonna take the same amount of time to finish other content either way so why not just give the game to people anyway since it was ready? I really don't get how delaying a finished game would have changed anything. We get the same amount of content either way, but in this situation we get the content sooner rather than later.

"Released for free overtime"

You know, when 343 said we'd get free DLC, I honestly thought they meant original quality content. Not ripping out old options that have been in Halo as early as Combat Evolved and as late as Halo 3 and "selling" it back to us as new content. Fuck me as a consumer, right?
>Ripping out options
>Ignoring all content they have added to the game
There is no point in trying to show a person who chooses to blindfold themselves the light. But hey have fun being an asshole for no reason other than to be an asshole :)

Yes, let us look at all the new content we have for us, shall we? I'll color code it too, to make it simple to understand.

Green = New and original content
Yellow = Content that was available at launch in previous Halo games
Orange = Map remixes (not original, but still new kind of)

**I am not counting weapons skins or armor, as this adds nothing new to the game itself**

Warzone Maps
Forge
Grifball
Forge Map remakes
Halo 5 Arena Map remixes
New Halo 5 Arena Maps
Theater (Theater was broken and took until mid Febuary to fix, 343 didn't talk about it and slipped it in with update patch notes)
File Share
Infection
Oddball
Assault
Snipers
Big Team Battle

Sorry to say, but there isn't much green there. And this is just what 343 has added to the game. This isn't even going into the limited custom game options, the rudimentary forging options, and all the gamemodes 343 has decided to leave out as of now.
Most of those are new content? It's not like you can just reskin all the shit from past games idiot. How about you read the fucking point. It takes time to get all that into games. There is an abundance of new weapons and armor. There are new maps. Snipers and Theatre were both in from the start. You obviously are complaining for the sake of complaining. You don't understand how a game is made nor how content releasing works. Kys.
Are you a 343i spokesperson or something.
No, I just care about the game franchise and I am willing to make points to defend it where it deserves to be defended. I think there is a large amount of bs in Halo 5, but I am also gonna defend what 343 has done right. It's this cool new thing called caring about your investments and being a logical human being.
Reskining old content is not New content...
>Being this stupid

You shouldn't be so hard on yourself.
This nigga must play Destiny cause he is desperate for his Last Word to drop.

Pages: 1 ... 456 78 ... 83