Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - N/A

Pages: 1 ... 192021 2223 ... 261
601
The Flood / Re: Moral Dilemma
« on: May 29, 2016, 01:15:22 PM »
I'm not giving you information to label me within one of kohlberg's stages.

602
The Flood / Re: Does this guy still post on Bnet?
« on: May 28, 2016, 10:37:08 PM »
That's A Cheese Potato
no it isn't, petitminou is Canadian, cheese potato is Australian.

603
The Flood / Re: Cheat don't fucking allow this
« on: May 28, 2016, 09:07:11 PM »
I swear if Cheat makes dislikes public in going to kill myself
I call first with your body.

604
The Flood / Re: Do you think these questions sum up your state?
« on: May 28, 2016, 06:58:42 PM »
Stuff about Disney and wondering why people hate Florida, seems right to me.

605
Can I make it a cage instead and be a sissy slut?
No because then you could still milk your prostate. Totes cheating
oh, that's lame. Still, one million is worth it.

606
Can I make it a cage instead and be a sissy slut?

607
The Flood / Re: If you've never roleplayed as a Japanese girl
« on: May 28, 2016, 03:59:02 PM »
Tfw I'm not cute enough to wear a Japanese school girl outfit and be a slut for cock.
That doesn't stop Ian.
Be nice to Ian!

608
The Flood / Re: If you've never roleplayed as a Japanese girl
« on: May 28, 2016, 02:03:33 PM »
Tfw I'm not cute enough to wear a Japanese school girl outfit and be a slut for cock.

609
The Flood / Re: *hugs everyone*
« on: May 28, 2016, 01:15:14 PM »
*gets aids*
I don't have aids :(

610
The Flood / *hugs everyone*
« on: May 28, 2016, 01:07:15 PM »
*hugs*

611
The Flood / Re: >immensely sleepy
« on: May 28, 2016, 08:32:11 AM »
Spoiler

No sleep for two days
Damn, you gonna be okay?
Gonna die man
Oh. Well, I'll keep your body somewhere where Das can't get it.

612
The Flood / Re: >immensely sleepy
« on: May 28, 2016, 08:25:47 AM »
Spoiler

No sleep for two days
Damn, you gonna be okay?

613
Serious / Re: If you had the possibility of creating AI, would you?
« on: May 28, 2016, 05:15:08 AM »
If I had the means, sure.

Concepts and ideas exist. Just because something isn't tangible doesn't mean it's not real.
So, you would help one person if it meant subjecting 1000s of others to suffering?
What? How does the fact that I would help a kid escape from some sweatshop cause more suffering?
the ones who walk away from omelas is a story about a utopian society is only able to keep its utopian state due to one child suffering.
Oh, I didn't know you changed the topic, never heard of that movie. And yes, I would absolutely save that child. A utopia that thrives off of someone eternally suffering isn't a utopia, and has no right to exist, regardless of how good it is.
So you would let thousands of people suffer rather than just one person suffer? Yeah, that sure seems like the more moral option.

614
Serious / Re: If you had the possibility of creating AI, would you?
« on: May 28, 2016, 05:11:53 AM »
If I had the means, sure.

Concepts and ideas exist. Just because something isn't tangible doesn't mean it's not real.
So, you would help one person if it meant subjecting 1000s of others to suffering?
What? How does the fact that I would help a kid escape from some sweatshop cause more suffering?
the ones who walk away from omelas is a story about a utopian society that is only able to keep its utopian state due to one child suffering.

615
Serious / Re: If you had the possibility of creating AI, would you?
« on: May 28, 2016, 04:48:43 AM »
If I had the means, sure.

Concepts and ideas exist. Just because something isn't tangible doesn't mean it's not real.
So, you would help one person if it meant subjecting 1000s of others to suffering?

616
Serious / Re: If you had the possibility of creating AI, would you?
« on: May 28, 2016, 04:42:33 AM »
Utility means NOTHING, in anything but a pragmatic sense. If something morally sound has utility, then great. If something morally wrong has utility, it doesn't matter. If we rounded up every homeless person and forced them into slave labor, quality of life would increase for the rest of us. But again, it would be wrong. That's the more important thing that matters.

And I try to avoid companies that outsource to other countries in general, but I'm not perfect.
Just a side question, but would you help the child in the ones who walk away from omelas?
Also, morality and human rights are a spook, just saying.
You keep using that word and I don't give a shit. I don't even know what it means, but if being concerned with morality and human rights makes me a spook, then that's what I am. I have no problems with that.
They aren't real, they're no more than social constructs. They are literally spooks of the mind.

617
Serious / Re: If you had the possibility of creating AI, would you?
« on: May 28, 2016, 04:34:51 AM »
Also, morality and human rights are a spook, just saying.

618
Serious / Re: If you had the possibility of creating AI, would you?
« on: May 28, 2016, 04:33:49 AM »
And guess what - it's wrong that we turn a blind eye to kids in those sweatshops. Bad comparison.
In yet you still use products whose creation was contingent on the suffering of others.

Quote
And a fucking bum stealing shit and living on the sidewalk is also useless. That doesn't mean he doesn't have human rights.
I know how anti-utilitarianism you are, but considering how much human quality of life could increase through advanced AI being created, I find it funny how adamant you are against it.

619
Serious / Re: If you had the possibility of creating AI, would you?
« on: May 28, 2016, 04:24:07 AM »
LOL Antinatalists

"It's bad to create life even if artificial to advance humanity"

No, no it isn't. Suffering is a part of life, get over it. That's just how the universe is.
I'm not going to sit here and have a big argument about consent with you, but the fact that life necessitates suffering doesn't give a reason for making new life, it gives a reason against it.
Wait, so you antinatalist now too?

620
Serious / Re: If you had the possibility of creating AI, would you?
« on: May 28, 2016, 04:23:17 AM »
We created it, but that doesn't mean a thing. Just because we're intellectually capable of creating new souls doesn't mean we're morally capable of enslaving them.
Ah, arguing from morality, well spooked my property.
Quote
No, I'm talking about sentience. The ability to feel actual pain, emotions, and pleasure. Sapience goes without saying, it's an AI; of course it can think abstractly and make decisions. That's the point of this hypothetical creation, it can learn, think, and use logic like any human. That alone is enough to give it human rights, but when you add on sentience, it's even more deserving of them. Anything that can suffer has a moral consideration to it, let alone something that can think and knows that it exists.
First off, unless we're giving these AI's the works with receptors on their bodies for pain and pleasure, they aren't going to think anything of those feelings. A sexbot AI without that would not feel anything from the person fucking them. Secondly, even if they do feel those emotions, so what? It doesn't change the fact that the AI was created for a specific purpose and if it doesn't fulfill that purpose, it's basically useless. Just saying, neither me nor you are doing anything to stop sweat shops that uses kids as a means of production and willingly use products from it. If AI hit the point of sapience and sentience, we'd turn the same blind eye with no sleep lost on our part. 

621
Serious / Re: If you had the possibility of creating AI, would you?
« on: May 28, 2016, 03:59:44 AM »
People who want sexbots or whatever are even worse than the general advocates of this. It would be literal rape.
Except a AI programed to be a sexbot would be literally coded for the purpose of providing sexual pleasure.
Humans are coded for the exact same thing, fucking and having kids. But since we're a sentient, intelligent species, we have free agency and can break that coding. An AI is no different. If you're talking about a true AI, one that learns and is self aware, then it will start to develop an opinion of whether or not it enjoys being a sex slave to gross, desperate old men.

If you want a sex robot, some human looking thing that's programmed to move in a certain way and say certain things in reaction to an input, then whatever. But this goes far beyond that.
First off, everyone here needs to learn the difference between sentient and sapient. Being able to think abstractly and form opinions about scenarios is sapience. Second, even if it was able to form its own opinions, why should we afford something we created to serve us the same rights as us?

622
Serious / Re: If you had the possibility of creating AI, would you?
« on: May 28, 2016, 03:43:24 AM »
People who want sexbots or whatever are even worse than the general advocates of this. It would be literal rape.
Except a AI programed to be a sexbot would be literally coded for the purpose of providing sexual pleasure.

623
Serious / Re: If you had the possibility of creating AI, would you?
« on: May 28, 2016, 12:34:43 AM »
Nothing morally wrong with manufacturing intelligent life and then telling them their entire existence revolves around serving us.
There isn't.

624
it's ryle's birthday fucking turn up nerds
I was literally the first to say it on discord nigger.

625
Serious / Re: If you had the possibility of creating AI, would you?
« on: May 27, 2016, 07:49:53 PM »
Yeah hell, though I'd place priority on uploading existing consciousness before making new consciousness.

626
The Flood / Re: 1x le means your ironic
« on: May 27, 2016, 05:48:31 PM »
Show us/me your dick
once in vegas i saw a lady put 12 boiled eggs up her cooter and then lay them
So show is your tan cock

cok
Fuckin spineless prude
:(

sorry

627
The Flood / Re: 1x le means your ironic
« on: May 27, 2016, 05:43:25 PM »
Show us/me your dick
once in vegas i saw a lady put 12 boiled eggs up her cooter and then lay them
So show is your tan cock

cok

628
The Flood / Re: 1x le means your ironic
« on: May 27, 2016, 05:38:14 PM »
Show us/me your dick
once in vegas i saw a lady put 12 boiled eggs up her cooter and then lay them

629
The Flood / Re: 1x le means your ironic
« on: May 27, 2016, 05:34:30 PM »

630
The Flood / 1x le means your ironic
« on: May 27, 2016, 05:28:21 PM »
2x le means your ironicly ironic--it negates your irony-therefore not ironic

but what about 3x le?

Pages: 1 ... 192021 2223 ... 261