Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - TheOneTrueDesticle

Pages: 1 ... 192021 2223 ... 95
601
The Flood / Re: No, McDonald's does NOT have a secret menu
« on: February 18, 2015, 12:35:37 PM »
My local McDonald's has an item called the McBitchin'. This is in Mormonville, USA so it's kinda unexpected.

602
Gaming / Re: If TLOU isn't one of the best games of all time...
« on: February 17, 2015, 07:54:26 PM »
beyond: two souls
That game was garbage dough. kek

603
Gaming / Re: Square Enix Humble Bundle GIveaway!
« on: February 17, 2015, 07:48:57 PM »
I would like one of these games. Preferably Sleeping Dogs. Also Supreme Commander 2 would be great.

604
Gaming / Re: Apparently The Order: 1886 is only 5 hours long
« on: February 17, 2015, 07:46:17 PM »
i liked TLOU (inb4cruifiction), i aint judgin you.
Do people have a problem with TLoU? I really liked it and I hardly ever play stuff on my PS3.
http://sep7agon.net/index.php?topic=26466.0
Follow-up: Everyone in that thread fucking baffles me. TLoU received universal acclaim. I don't understand what the huge issue was.

605
Gaming / Re: Apparently The Order: 1886 is only 5 hours long
« on: February 17, 2015, 07:42:30 PM »
i liked TLOU (inb4cruifiction), i aint judgin you.
Do people have a problem with TLoU? I really liked it and I hardly ever play stuff on my PS3.
http://sep7agon.net/index.php?topic=26466.0
Jesus. Gaming is just as bad as The Flood. I don't know why I still post on this fucking site at all. Most everyone here is an asshole including myself.

606
Gaming / Re: Apparently The Order: 1886 is only 5 hours long
« on: February 17, 2015, 07:38:28 PM »
i liked TLOU (inb4cruifiction), i aint judgin you.
Do people have a problem with TLoU? I really liked it and I hardly ever play stuff on my PS3.

607
Gaming / Re: Apparently The Order: 1886 is only 5 hours long
« on: February 17, 2015, 07:33:03 PM »
Old and disproven. Most are saying 8-10hrs.
A lot of people can speed run games.
Read the OP. Read the thread. Read literally any of the words here and you'll get an idea of what I'm actually talking about.
I read the op, and already looked into it extensively seeing as how its a) old and 2) a game I plan on getting.
Clearly you're invested in it so you have some interest in proving to yourself that your future investment is a waste of money. If you're dead-set on getting it, that's fine but don't try to make false claims to make it look less bad.

You clearly didn't read the OP because I'm not referring to the rumors from several weeks ago. I'm referring to a two-day-old thread on Reddit (which doesn't necessarily count as old unless that's what you're referring to in which case, holy shit it's not that old).
Guess we'll see in a couple days then when the reviews start coming in.
Of course. That isn't going to get you out of how obvious it was that you didn't read the OP or the link I provided. I encourage you to read through the rest of the thread but it's fairly likely that you won't so I'll just say it one more time.

The "old news" from a few weeks ago is referring to the fact that somebody got the trophy for completing the game in five hours. At that stage, the five hours thing was a rumor because they didn't know if that person was speedrunning the game. Now that this Let's Play video from two days ago has surfaced and it's been noted that they weren't trying to speedrun the game, it's pretty clear now that the average playthrough is five hours long and that at least half of it is cutscenes.

My OP was referring to the LP from two days ago, not the several week old trophy kerfuffle (which Comet linked to earlier and you certainly would have known this if you had read this thread in any detail because he linked to it two posts in).

Moral of this story is read fucking OP.

EDIT: Also read thread discussion so you don't say the same thing twice.
Quote
A Let's Play of the entire game was uploaded and subsequently deleted recently. Apparently in addition to running at 30fps and having downgraded graphics from earlier previews, it's also essentially as long as a pretty long movie (with half of that being composed of actual movies). Also, the entire game has black bars on the edges of the screen for that "cinematic" feel when in reality it was just done to reduce the overall resolution in an attempt to make the game not run like a piece of shit.
all of this is even older then the LP, so i have no idea why you keep telling people to read it.
Nobody has even mentioned this game on the Gaming forum for weeks. I'd rather be thorough than have a bunch of people asking shit because I didn't include it in the OP.

EDIT: I should let you know that I don't play games on PS4. I don't keep up on PS4 news so by the time I find out about this stuff, it's guaranteed that a lot of other people know as well. Try to consider that not everyone is omniscient, my friend.

608
Gaming / Re: Apparently The Order: 1886 is only 5 hours long
« on: February 17, 2015, 07:30:42 PM »
Old and disproven. Most are saying 8-10hrs.
A lot of people can speed run games.
Read the OP. Read the thread. Read literally any of the words here and you'll get an idea of what I'm actually talking about.
I read the op, and already looked into it extensively seeing as how its a) old and 2) a game I plan on getting.
Clearly you're invested in it so you have some interest in proving to yourself that your future investment is a waste of money. If you're dead-set on getting it, that's fine but don't try to make false claims to make it look less bad.

You clearly didn't read the OP because I'm not referring to the rumors from several weeks ago. I'm referring to a two-day-old thread on Reddit (which doesn't necessarily count as old unless that's what you're referring to in which case, holy shit it's not that old).
Guess we'll see in a couple days then when the reviews start coming in.
Of course. That isn't going to get you out of how obvious it was that you didn't read the OP or the link I provided. I encourage you to read through the rest of the thread but it's fairly likely that you won't so I'll just say it one more time.

The "old news" from a few weeks ago is referring to the fact that somebody got the trophy for completing the game in five hours. At that stage, the five hours thing was a rumor because they didn't know if that person was speedrunning the game. Now that this Let's Play video from two days ago has surfaced and it's been noted that they weren't trying to speedrun the game, it's pretty clear now that the average playthrough is five hours long and that at least half of it is cutscenes.

My OP was referring to the LP from two days ago, not the several week old trophy kerfuffle (which Comet linked to earlier and you certainly would have known this if you had read this thread in any detail because he linked to it two posts in).

Moral of this story is read fucking OP.
Two days is old. I was aware of the let'splay before clicking your thread. You're not breaking anything new here.

You seem kinda invested in this tho. Like I said all we can do is wait for reviews, but feel free to yell about how right you are.
The only thing that's pissing me off here is how nobody reads the OP ever. These same people also act like they have read it when they haven't and it's frustrating to repeat oneself.

Maybe two days is old for you but it hasn't been covered at all on this forum and not everyone was aware of this. Essentially what I'm saying is stop being an idiot and consider that maybe not everyone knows literally all the things. Hence the informative post, yo.

609
Gaming / Re: Apparently The Order: 1886 is only 5 hours long
« on: February 17, 2015, 07:23:24 PM »
Old and disproven. Most are saying 8-10hrs.
A lot of people can speed run games.
Read the OP. Read the thread. Read literally any of the words here and you'll get an idea of what I'm actually talking about.
I read the op, and already looked into it extensively seeing as how its a) old and 2) a game I plan on getting.
Clearly you're invested in it so you have some interest in proving to yourself that your future investment is a waste of money. If you're dead-set on getting it, that's fine but don't try to make false claims to make it look less bad.

You clearly didn't read the OP because I'm not referring to the rumors from several weeks ago. I'm referring to a two-day-old thread on Reddit (which doesn't necessarily count as old unless that's what you're referring to in which case, holy shit it's not that old).
Guess we'll see in a couple days then when the reviews start coming in.
Of course. That isn't going to get you out of how obvious it was that you didn't read the OP or the link I provided. I encourage you to read through the rest of the thread but it's fairly likely that you won't so I'll just say it one more time.

The "old news" from a few weeks ago is referring to the fact that somebody got the trophy for completing the game in five hours. At that stage, the five hours thing was a rumor because they didn't know if that person was speedrunning the game. Now that this Let's Play video from two days ago has surfaced and it's been noted that they weren't trying to speedrun the game, it's pretty clear now that the average playthrough is five hours long and that at least half of it is cutscenes.

My OP was referring to the LP from two days ago, not the several week old trophy kerfuffle (which Comet linked to earlier and you certainly would have known this if you had read this thread in any detail because he linked to it two posts in).

Moral of this story is read fucking OP.

EDIT: Also read thread discussion so you don't say the same thing twice.

610
Gaming / Re: Apparently The Order: 1886 is only 5 hours long
« on: February 17, 2015, 07:17:42 PM »
Old and disproven. Most are saying 8-10hrs.
A lot of people can speed run games.
Read the OP. Read the thread. Read literally any of the words here and you'll get an idea of what I'm actually talking about.
I read the op, and already looked into it extensively seeing as how its a) old and 2) a game I plan on getting.
Clearly you're invested in it so you have some interest in proving to yourself that your future investment is a waste of money. If you're dead-set on getting it, that's fine but don't try to make false claims to make it look less bad.

You clearly didn't read the OP because I'm not referring to the rumors from several weeks ago. I'm referring to a two-day-old thread on Reddit (which doesn't necessarily count as old unless that's what you're referring to in which case, holy shit it's not that old).

611
Gaming / Re: Apparently The Order: 1886 is only 5 hours long
« on: February 17, 2015, 07:07:34 PM »
Old and disproven. Most are saying 8-10hrs.
A lot of people can speed run games.
Read the OP. Read the thread. Read literally any of the words here and you'll get an idea of what I'm actually talking about.

612
Gaming / Re: Apparently The Order: 1886 is only 5 hours long
« on: February 17, 2015, 06:25:01 PM »
this is kinda old...
If "two days old" means "old" then sure. I just found out about this and nobody else was saying anything about it so

kek
bruh

Comet... Don't tell me you really believe Dualshocker....

It's a shill website.
Hell* no I* don't* believe Dualshocker*.
I'm* saying the 5 hour length was floating around for longer than* 2 days.
I made this post to confirm the five hour length. As opposed to "it's rumored to be five hours long", it's now "it's actually five hours long, guys".

It's important to read and understand the OP before you make a comment.
wow were you seriously so mad you went and corrected my grammar?
Quote
kek
relax bro, i wasnt attacking you when i said this was old.
Look man, I don't know you. I don't know how you meant what you said.

Also, if you grew up in an English-speaking country and regularly attended school, there's no reason you shouldn't type like a non-autist.

I'm just irritated that you clearly didn't read the OP.

613
Gaming / Re: Apparently The Order: 1886 is only 5 hours long
« on: February 17, 2015, 06:20:44 PM »
this is kinda old...
If "two days old" means "old" then sure. I just found out about this and nobody else was saying anything about it so

kek
bruh

Comet... Don't tell me you really believe Dualshocker....

It's a shill website.
Hell* no I* don't* believe Dualshocker*.
I'm* saying the 5 hour length was floating around for longer than* 2 days.
I made this post to confirm the five hour length. As opposed to "it's rumored to be five hours long", it's now "it's actually five hours long, guys".

It's important to read and understand the OP before you make a comment.

I will say that this was also confirmed a couple days ago as well when Playthroughme uploaded his run to youtube. I know I made a thread about it on b.net then and it was a topic of discussion in the skype.
Like I said to you in Skype and earlier in this thread, I know that this YouTube kerfuffle is at least two days old. I realize this. The five hour length wasn't 100% confirmed until that LP was uploaded however.

614
Gaming / Re: Apparently The Order: 1886 is only 5 hours long
« on: February 17, 2015, 06:15:19 PM »
this is kinda old...
If "two days old" means "old" then sure. I just found out about this and nobody else was saying anything about it so

kek
bruh

Comet... Don't tell me you really believe Dualshocker....

It's a shill website.
Hell* no I* don't* believe Dualshocker*.
I'm* saying the 5 hour length was floating around for longer than* 2 days.
I made this post to confirm the five hour length. As opposed to "it's rumored to be five hours long", it's now "it's actually five hours long, guys".

It's important to read and understand the OP before you make a comment.

615
Gaming / Re: Apparently The Order: 1886 is only 5 hours long
« on: February 17, 2015, 06:12:16 PM »
this is kinda old...
If "two days old" means "old" then sure. I just found out about this and nobody else was saying anything about it so

kek
bruh

Comet... Don't tell me you really believe Dualshocker....

It's a shill website.
Oh, and of course. That too. That should have been obvious.

616
Gaming / Re: Apparently The Order: 1886 is only 5 hours long
« on: February 17, 2015, 06:11:50 PM »
this is kinda old...
If "two days old" means "old" then sure. I just found out about this and nobody else was saying anything about it so

kek
bruh
That's based on the time it took for someone to get the trophy for completing the game. The link I provided was based on a YouTube Let's Play which had a length of a little over five hours. Maybe you should try actually reading the shit people put in the OP instead of assuming you already know what it's talking about.

617
Gaming / Re: Apparently The Order: 1886 is only 5 hours long
« on: February 17, 2015, 06:01:40 PM »
this is kinda old...
If "two days old" means "old" then sure. I just found out about this and nobody else was saying anything about it so

kek

618
Gaming / Apparently The Order: 1886 is only 5 hours long
« on: February 17, 2015, 05:55:46 PM »
...and half of that length is composed of cutscenes. You can read more here: http://www.reddit.com/r/Games/comments/2vybg8/order_1886_playtime_details_from_youtubers_play/

A Let's Play of the entire game was uploaded and subsequently deleted recently. Apparently in addition to running at 30fps and having downgraded graphics from earlier previews, it's also essentially as long as a pretty long movie (with half of that being composed of actual movies). Also, the entire game has black bars on the edges of the screen for that "cinematic" feel when in reality it was just done to reduce the overall resolution in an attempt to make the game not run like a piece of shit.

My very first thread on Sep7agon was about this stupid game. I always suspected it would be a piece of shit but now I think it's clear now that it really will be.

619
When do you unlock a custom title?

At Mythdick. Pretty much sucking up to the mods to get there.

Alright well I have no control over anyone's titles. So sucking up to me won't get you to legendary or mythic.
Hey LC, can I have Mythic?

620
The Flood / Re: Book Thread Mk3
« on: February 16, 2015, 01:55:25 PM »
FYI: Ender's Game is great but Orson Scott Card is a fucking psycho. Dem Mormons.

I haven't gotten any books recently. I've been reading The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy again lately though.

622
The Flood / Re: Is there a way to upload a video...
« on: February 15, 2015, 04:06:54 PM »
Don't think so...

Also, this is better suited to the Septagon board.
It's a general question, not a Sep7agon specific question.
Maybe not to you, but a question about the site functionality does sound like it belongs on the board set up for theose questions.
What I mean is that it isn't about site functionality. He's looking for an alternative service, not trying to upload his video to Sep7agon itself.

623
The Flood / Re: Is there a way to upload a video...
« on: February 15, 2015, 04:04:32 PM »
Don't think so...

Also, this is better suited to the Septagon board.
It's a general question, not a Sep7agon specific question.

624
Gaming / Re: XBL/PSN/Steam/Nintendo
« on: February 15, 2015, 02:12:56 PM »
I don't know what people's beef is in the first place. Eh.
Oh hey, I need to add your stuff to the OP.
I think it's all in my profile. My Steam community id is http://steamcommunity.com/id/procreant/

625
The Flood / Re: Which book in the Hitchhiker's Guide trilogy is the worst?
« on: February 15, 2015, 02:09:00 PM »
I always just thought it was one book. I never read any of them.
Well technically there are six but I don't regard the last one as canon as it wasn't written by the original author.

You should have a go at reading the first one. It's good. And then all the others lololol

Is it bad that I haven't read any of the books

Refer to my answer above. lelel

626
Gaming / Re: XBL/PSN/Steam/Nintendo
« on: February 15, 2015, 02:07:13 PM »
no more bad blood then?
I do not know. I just ignore the people who tried to start shit in the first place. If they have not realized their mistakes by now, they are not worth talking to.
I don't know what people's beef is in the first place. Eh.

627
The Flood / Re: Which book in the Hitchhiker's Guide trilogy is the worst?
« on: February 15, 2015, 02:06:17 PM »
five books in the trilogy? what?

>trilogy
>5 options

Mostly Harmless (book five) was described as "Book five in the increasingly inaccurately named HItchhiker's Guide trilogy".

628
With Quick-Reply you can write a post when viewing a topic without loading a new page. You can still use bulletin board code and smileys as you would in a normal post.
Please read the rules before you post!

629
PLEASE DO NOT COPY AND PASTE TH I S COPYP A STA. IT IS M Y ORIGIN A L COPYPASTA AND IS PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT LAW. IF I SEE ANYONE PASTING MY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY WITHOUT PERMISSION, A NAVY SEAL TRAINED IN G ORILLA WARFARE WILL SMITE YOU.
AYY LMAO

630
Have a look at this thread. My quote theme song to be didn't turn any heads. Fun shit.

http://sep7agon.net/index.php?topic=6447.0

Pages: 1 ... 192021 2223 ... 95