This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - cxfhvxgkcf-56:7
Pages: 1 ... 212223 2425 ... 517
661
« on: November 17, 2015, 11:16:49 AM »
do all the psycho
662
« on: November 17, 2015, 11:13:49 AM »
Natural instinct is all about survival of the individual not the species as a whole. Is this even true?
Examples in nature would point to yes in many cases.
663
« on: November 17, 2015, 11:13:21 AM »
However natural instinct is a conflicting imperative. Elephants for example will, as a collective, herd around all the young, whether it be their own or not, in order to protect them against predators. So I suppose natural insticts may not always be about survival of the individual. I don't know.
664
« on: November 17, 2015, 11:10:22 AM »
i dont see anything wrong with it. its a survival instinct for the most part
It's a survival instinct to be apathetic towards the survival of your species (ie. anyone other than yourself)?
If you put it that way, then yes.
...But that's obviously not going to lead anywhere near survival?
Sure it does, you see it all the time in nature. For example a bear will eat its own cubs to ensure it doesn't starve because the bear can always have more offspring to survive so long as it doesn't die. We share the same survival instincts as most all mammals they're just well hidden beneath our sentience and cushy modern environment. Natural instinct is all about survival of the individual not the species as a whole. Of course your whole worldview revolves around rebutting our natural instincts so I suppose that argument is null in this conversation. I'm just saying that's why a lot of people have the view of "It doesn't affect me, so I don't care."
665
« on: November 17, 2015, 10:53:26 AM »
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/nov/17/how-easy-is-it-to-buy-fake-syrian-passportForgers in the Middle East are offering fake Syrian passports for as little as $250, days after it emerged that one of the Paris bombers may have entered Europe using false Syrian paperwork. The development raises fears over the potential security threat posed by tens of thousands of asylum seekers arriving in Greece every week, and will amplify calls to provide them with secure and legal routes to safety.
As the United Nations warned on Tuesday against scapegoating refugees for Friday’s attacks in Paris, a backlash nevertheless gained momentum with the news that up to eight people allegedly entered Europe using similar passport details as one of the Paris bombers. The EU border agency revealed that it does not have the equipment to assess the authenticity of people’s identification documents in all of the Greek islands.
A Guardian journalist in Iraqi Kurdistan was offered fake Syrian passports by two separate smuggling rings, less than a week after French authorities alleged that a terrorist used a similar forgery to enter the Greek island of Leros, before taking part in an attack on the Stade de France in Paris. For just $250, one smuggler based in Sulaymaniyah promises to deliver a fake Syrian passport, ID card or birth certificate within 10 days. A second forger in Duhok says he can procure a passport, allegedly with the help of a Syrian embassy official, within four days – for a premium price of $2,500.
The family of a Kurdish asylum seeker who died in a truck in Austria in August said Heresh Dindar, had been easily able to buy fake Syrian paperwork in Zakho, an Iraqi city close to the Turkish border. “Obtaining Syrian documents in Zakho is like drinking water,” said Dindar’s brother, Isa. “It is very easy.”
The revelations came as Serbian officials claimed that as many as eight asylum seekers entered Europe this year with similar passport details as ”Ahmad Almohammad”, the suspected pseudonym of one of the Paris suspects, leading to suspicions that all of them might have bought passports from the same forger in the Middle East. Two of them had identical documents, while the other six used similar names, a Serbian police source told the Guardian. But there is not yet any clear proof that any of them were definitely involved in the attack, an Interpol source said.
The revelations have increased scrutiny of the porous Greek maritime border, where over 670,000 asylum-seekers have crossed so far this year in an attempt to reach Europe. Using safety fears as an excuse, Poland’s new conservative government has already backed out of an EU-wide deal to share refugees among member states – while on Tuesday the rightwing Hungarian parliament voted to challenge the legitimacy of the refugee-sharing deal in the European courts.
A spokeswoman for Frontex, the EU border agency, admitted that her colleagues did not have the equipment or specialists necessary to check the authenticity of all ID documents among new arrivals on the Greek islands. A passport assessment team is in place on Lesbos, the main gateway for arrivals to Greece, but Frontex could not confirm whether other document experts are now operating on Leros, the island where the bomber is alleged to have entered Greece. Despite promising to beef up Frontex’s presence on the islands, EU countries have also provided the agency with less than half of the manpower it needs to properly operate. By 4 November, two of the EU’s most isolationist countries – Poland and Slovakia – had not sent a single border guard, while Hungary had sent just four.
“We have people to interview migrants and the purpose of this interview is to establish nationality,” said Ewa Moncure, a Frontex spokeswoman. “They may say no, this person’s accent is not from Syria – and if they have any doubt they will ask follow-up questions”, to test a migrant’s knowledge of life in Syria. But Moncure admitted that not all Greek islands were staffed with specialists who can examine the authenticity of passports. “You can’t say that wherever there is Frontex activity, there is a document expert.”
Formal asylum systems in EU countries have far more rigorous means of checking the backgrounds of asylum seekers. Migration officials in Sweden confirmed that they verify documents as a matter of course, while in Germany, “if there is any doubt, a language and text analysis will be performed”, said a spokeswoman for the Germany migration office.
But at the asylum seekers’ first point of entry to Europe in Greece the system is often not nearly as strict. When the Guardian visited Leros earlier in the year, several of the Syrian refugees on the island noted that some people registering as Syrian were in fact from Iraq, Lebanon or Palestine. Overworked officials who spoke no Arabic could have little idea who they were letting into Europe, they said. A Syrian teenager, who wished to be identified only by her first name, Reem, travelled with her father, mother and sister in a boat of 29 people to Leros from Turkey. Everyone on the boat claimed to be Syrian – according to Reem, only she and her family were.
“They said, ‘I don’t have a passport, I don’t have anything to say who I am, so I am Syrian’,” said Reem. “What can [officials] say? ‘He told me he is Syrian. He talks Arabic.’”
This week, such fears have done nothing to deter locals from bringing food, clothes and support to the hundreds still arriving every day on inflatable boats in increasingly hostile winter conditions. Spyros Daniil, who manages the Leros Solidarity Network with his wife Matina Kastivelli, said: “Today is Sunday but many women arrived this morning, set up a big table and served food to all the refugees. Nothing changes here.”
The UN hopes that the rest of Europe will respond in a similar way. On Tuesday, its refugee agency, the UNHCR, argued against scapegoating hundreds of thousands of refugees for crimes committed by just one of their number.
“The overwhelming majority of those coming to Europe are fleeing persecution or the life-threatening effects of conflict and are unable to reach safety in Europe by alternative avenues,” said UNHCR spokeswoman Melissa Fleming. “Precarious situations in countries of first asylum are also driving many to leave for Europe. Many are fleeing extremism and terrorism – from the very people associated with the Paris attacks.”
Fleming joined Human Rights Watch, an independent pressure group, in calling for the implementation of safe and legal means of mass resettlement for refugees still in the Middle East. Campaigners argue that organised resettlement will both save refugee lives, and give Europe greater control over their borders.
In an online statement, Peter Bouckaert, HRW’s emergency director, said: “The answer to the Paris attacks and the possibility that one of the attackers came by rubber dinghy to Greece, where he was registered on Leros island, is not to shut the door on those desperately fleeing war in Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan – including many fleeing from IS.
“The answer is to put in place a coherent EU asylum policy that provides those fleeing war and repression with safe and legal alternatives to get that asylum, without having to risk their lives. Replacing the chaos with coherent policies would address both the responsibility to give asylum to those in need, and the security concerns raised by chaotic and uncontrolled flows.
“People fleeing war need refuge. And trying to build fences and stopping them at sea only drives them deeper into the hands of criminal gangs, and drives them underground where there is no control over who comes and goes.”
666
« on: November 17, 2015, 10:46:15 AM »
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/he-is-a-barbaric-man--the-belgian-who-may-be-behind-the-paris-attacks/2015/11/16/d0cca29c-8c64-11e5-934c-a369c80822c2_story.htmlPARIS — On the night of Jan. 2, Belgian authorities closing in on a terror cell in the town of Verviers intercepted a telling piece of intelligence. Homegrown terrorists were plotting to gun down police officers, and they discussed their plans by phone with a superior in Athens — a Belgian man whom authorities believed to be a puppet master in the Islamic State’s effort to terrorize Europe.
Acting on a request from Belgian intelligence, Greek officials raided an apartment in the middle-class Pangrati district of Athens, hauling in suspects and bagging the cellular phone used in that Jan. 2 call. But fingerprint analysis soon revealed that the Greeks had the wrong men. Once again, Abdelhamid Abaaoud had slipped through the fingers of European intelligence.
French authorities now believe that Abaaoud, a 28-year-old of Moroccan descent who recruited his 13-year-old brother to fight for the Islamic State, was a “guru” behind the massacre that unfolded at a stadium, concert hall and bars and restaurants in Paris on Friday, killing 129 people and wounding more than 300. Officials are beginning to piece together a network of attackers with ties that radiate back to him.
Two European officials familiar with the case said Abaaoud is thought to have arrived in Syria sometime in 2013 or 2014 and slipped in and out of Europe since. He is believed to be back in Syria now. At least two of the men believed to be directly involved in the Paris attacks had years-long connections to him and came from his same hardscrabble neighborhood in Brussels that has become a breeding ground for European jihadists.
The sinewy, bearded Islamic State operative, officials say, may also have been directly involved in the recruitment of other assailants in Friday’s attacks, and he was actively involved in several other attempts this year to stage terrorism in Europe. In August, a French foreign fighter arrested after his return to France told intelligence officials that Abaaoud had instructed him to strike at densely populated targets, including a “concert hall.”
“He is a barbaric man,” said a French official familiar with the case.
The focus on Abaaoud emerged as a manhunt was underway to find Salah Abdeslam, 26. French authorities believe Abdeslam had a role in the attacks; his older brother, Brahim, 31, blew himself up at a Paris restaurant on Friday.
A third brother, Mohammed Abdeslam, was arrested by Belgian authorities and let go. He painted a picture of a family shocked that one or more of its own could have staged such an attack.
“I had two brothers with absolutely normal conduct,” Mohammed Abdeslam told reporters in Brussels after his release. “People need to know that my brother Salah Abdeslam has not been heard yet. We do not know what really happened. We do not know where he is right now.
“My family and I were deeply hit by what has happened,” Abdeslam said. “We could never have imagined that our brother was linked to a terror attack.”
Authorities have identified five of the seven dead assailants from Friday’s assault, including at least four French nationals, some of whom lived in Belgium, who are believed to have fought in Syria. Samy Amimour, a 28-year-old who lived in a northeastern Paris suburb, was a former bus driver whose Facebook page shows him as an irreverent youth flipping the bird in photos. In June 2014, his father, Azzédine, 67, traveled to Syria to try to persuade his son to come back. He failed.
When the father arrived in the town of Minbej, northeast of Aleppo, he said that his son was injured and that he was impersonal and strident about fighting for the Islamic State.
“When I finally saw my son, he was with another guy who wouldn’t leave us alone,” the father told Le Monde in December 2014. “The reunion was very cold. He did not show me his house. He did not tell me how he got injured or if he was fighting.”
He said he gave his son a letter from his mother and 100 euros in an envelope. “He gave me back the 100 euros, saying that he did not need it.”
Intelligence officials believe Brahim Abdeslam, a French national who spent time in the same Molenbeek neighborhood of Brussels where Abaaoud is said to have conducted Islamic State recruiting, went to Syria via Turkey on Jan. 27, 2015, then returned sometime in February. His brother Salah was stopped in Greece in August on suspicion of attempting to travel to Syria. But one European intelligence official said he may have gone to Greece to meet with an operative from the Islamic State.
Authorities said that two other assailants — Bilal Hadfi, 20, and Ismael Omar Mostefai, a 29-year-old former petty criminal — also spent time fighting in Syria.
But a French official familiar with the case described Abaaoud as the “centerpiece” seeming to unite Friday’s attackers.
Abaaoud has been linked by authorities to several foiled terrorist plots in France and Belgium over the past two years, including the attempted attack in August on a Paris-bound TGV train from Amsterdam that was thwarted with the aid of a group of Americans.
The degree of his participation in each plot has yet to be determined. A European intelligence official familiar with the investigation in Belgium said Abaaoud appeared to be “involved” in the attacks but said it was too early to dub him a “mastermind” who had devised and orchestrated the plot.
A French official familiar with the case, however, said Abaaoud appeared to be a key figure behind the attacks, citing his clear links to the attackers and his role in other, eerily familiar plots. In August, Reda Hame, a French foreign fighter, was arrested in France after returning home from Syria. He told the police that he had met Abaaoud in Syria and that he had been given several targets for attacks in France, including “concert halls” and “food markets.”
“These weren’t specific targets,” the French official said, “rather, ideas of places to strike, so as to spread fear everywhere.”
Abaaoud spent his youth in the Molenbeek neighborhood of Brussels and was arrested for petty crimes — a profile common among young jihadists who were also wayward youths. But he is thought to have later associated with members of Sharia4Belgium, an Islamist activist group that was designated a terrorist organization this year.
Abaaoud is believed to have joined the Islamic State sometime in 2013. He has appeared in a number of its videos, including one from March 2014 in which he drives a pickup truck with a string of dead bodies attached.
“He contributed to sending hundreds of Belgians to Syria, coordinating departures,” said Jean-Charles Brisard, a counterterrorism expert based in Paris. “He has a big role in recruitment of the French-speaking jihadists.”
In an interview with Dabiq, the Islamic State magazine, in February — shortly after the Belgians disrupted the plot in Verviers — Abaaoud boasted of effortlessly slipping back into Syria from Europe.
“I was even stopped by an officer who contemplated me so as to compare me to the picture, but he let me go, as he did not see the resemblance!” he said. “This was nothing but a gift from Allah.”
Elinda Labropoulou in Athens, Cléophée Demoustier and Virgile Demoustier in Paris, and Julie Tate in Washington contributed to this report.
667
« on: November 17, 2015, 10:25:49 AM »
http://m.independent.ie/world-news/indonesian-newlyweds-kill-alleged-rapist-and-eat-his-genitals-34209022.htmlTwo Indonesian newlyweds have been arrested on suspicion of plotting to kill a man the woman said had raped her a week before her marriage.
Rudi Effendi and his wife Nuriah also ate the victim's genitals after the man was killed, police said.
The couple were being held for further investigation after their arrests at their house in Tulang Bawang district in Sumatra's Lampung province on Sunday, a Lampung police spokeswoman said.
Police found the victim's body in a burnt minivan on October 4, the spokeswoman said, adding that a month-long investigation led to the conclusion that the couple had planned to kill the man, who was a driver for a travel agency.
The couple had married in September and the husband found out on the wedding night that his wife was no longer a virgin. She then said she had been raped one week before the marriage.
Police said Mr Effendi, 30, asked his 20-year-old wife to arrange a meeting with the man she accused of raping her. Mr Effendi stabbed the man to death and cut off his genitals before setting the car on fire.
Mr Effendi said he fried the severed genitals and ate them to cure his heartache over the rape.
Police said the couple could be charged with premeditated murder, which carries a maximum death penalty.
668
« on: November 16, 2015, 09:26:08 PM »
Joy Division
S: Closer
A: Unknown Pleasures
Damn that was hard
But you still got it wrong.
MOTHER I'D TRIED PLEASE BELIEVE ME
I'M DOING THE BEST THAT I CAN
I'M ASHAMED OF THE THINGS I'VE BEEN PUT THROUGH
I'M ASHAMED OF THE PERSON I AM
Unknown Pleasures > Closer
669
« on: November 16, 2015, 08:48:00 PM »
After discovering the power fist I have abandoned firearms
I now spend my days running around juiced up on psycho and med-x beating the shit out of people.
670
« on: November 16, 2015, 08:14:16 PM »
I don't even give a shit that Bernie goes against nearly every core of my principles on economics I'd easily vote for him just because he has an ounce of fucking integrity and honesty unlike Shillary.
You'd prefer economic incompetence over dishonesty and flip-flopping?
in this case yes
671
« on: November 16, 2015, 07:28:42 PM »
We don't need to give weapons to anyone. Our soldiers already have them.
672
« on: November 16, 2015, 07:22:44 PM »
2. There's a reason Switzerland has not been involved in any conflicts for the last hundred years. Tactically it would be a terrible decision to invade them; it's why Hitler never did. Armies much larger would easily be decimated trying to invade Switzerland.
I think with time this is much more a political deterrence, not a geographical. Nazis and Allies didn't have much trouble fighting legitimate standing armies in either the Caucasus or Italy, and that was 7 decades ago.
It's not even just the mountains although the country basically has a natural wall around it because of them. Not to mention the Swiss military has tunnels, bunkers, and booby-traps hidden everywhere in those mountains. The biggest reason is that every single citizen in the country is a member of the military and armed. That is such a tactical disadvantage in and of itself, it's one of the reasons the big US got so fucked by the Vietcong. Short of nuking any military would have a really hard time taking down Switzerland.
But Switzerland's value isn't in territory or in natural resources, it's in its capital and interests, which are static targets that you don't have to patrol an entire country to control. An international banking system can't be sustained with guerrilla tactics.
If Switzerland is occupied by a foreign entity those capital resources are no longer there. The capital investments and interests of the foreign nations supplying such will most likely be withdrawn in the event of a foreign power taking over unless I suppose it was a coalition of sorts then yeah I guess it might work in this hypothetical scenario. Invading a country for the interest of taking it's capital doesn't really work last I checked. It's not like strolling into a country to take acreage, oil, or any physical material. You can't really take capital, an economy, and GDP since most of it is superficial and not actually palpable material you can just seize. I mean there are physical aspects of capital such as the money that is physically in banks but I would highly doubt it's enough to justify a costly invasion.
I'm not sure I'm understanding what you're trying to say.
Well the only real reason to invade Switzerland is to dissolve its banking system.
You might not garner the capital, yeah, but they can't continue to do business if they're forced underground.
Ah okay I get what you're saying now
673
« on: November 16, 2015, 07:11:17 PM »
2. There's a reason Switzerland has not been involved in any conflicts for the last hundred years. Tactically it would be a terrible decision to invade them; it's why Hitler never did. Armies much larger would easily be decimated trying to invade Switzerland.
I think with time this is much more a political deterrence, not a geographical. Nazis and Allies didn't have much trouble fighting legitimate standing armies in either the Caucasus or Italy, and that was 7 decades ago.
It's not even just the mountains although the country basically has a natural wall around it because of them. Not to mention the Swiss military has tunnels, bunkers, and booby-traps hidden everywhere in those mountains. The biggest reason is that every single citizen in the country is a member of the military and armed. That is such a tactical disadvantage in and of itself, it's one of the reasons the big US got so fucked by the Vietcong. Short of nuking any military would have a really hard time taking down Switzerland.
But Switzerland's value isn't in territory or in natural resources, it's in its capital and interests, which are static targets that you don't have to patrol an entire country to control. An international banking system can't be sustained with guerrilla tactics.
If Switzerland is occupied by a foreign entity those capital resources are no longer there. The capital investments and interests of the foreign nations supplying such will most likely be withdrawn in the event of a foreign power taking over unless I suppose it was a coalition of sorts then yeah I guess it might work in this hypothetical scenario. Invading a country for the interest of taking it's capital doesn't really work last I checked. It's not like strolling into a country to take acreage, oil, or any physical material. You can't really take capital, an economy, and GDP since most of it is superficial and not actually palpable material you can just seize. I mean there are physical aspects of capital such as the money that is physically in banks but I would highly doubt it's enough to justify a costly invasion. I'm not sure I'm understanding what you're trying to say.
674
« on: November 16, 2015, 06:58:58 PM »
I don't even give a shit that Bernie goes against nearly every core of my principles on economics I'd easily vote for him just because he has an ounce of fucking integrity and honest unlike Shillary.
675
« on: November 16, 2015, 06:57:01 PM »
2. There's a reason Switzerland has not been involved in any conflicts for the last hundred years. Tactically it would be a terrible decision to invade them; it's why Hitler never did. Armies much larger would easily be decimated trying to invade Switzerland.
I think with time this is much more a political deterrence, not a geographical. Nazis and Allies didn't have much trouble fighting legitimate standing armies in either the Caucasus or Italy, and that was 7 decades ago.
It's not even just the mountains although the country basically has a natural wall around it because of them. Not to mention the Swiss military has tunnels, bunkers, and booby-traps hidden everywhere in those mountains. The biggest reason is that every single citizen in the country is a member of the military and armed. That is such a tactical disadvantage in and of itself, it's one of the reasons the big US military got so fucked by the Vietcong. Short of nuking, any military would have a really hard time taking down Switzerland.
676
« on: November 16, 2015, 06:49:31 PM »
If you became successful by means of the US infrastructure then it seems unfair to avoid any and all means of repaying that establishment.
Yeah aren't offshore bank accounts a way that people use to avoid paying taxes? If so, couldn't you just force them to pull their money out of those accounts and bring it all back here by just putting a gun to their head?
That would be immoral
How else are countries supposed to close the tax loophole for the super wealthy?
Abolish taxes on the wealthy
677
« on: November 16, 2015, 06:49:12 PM »
Quite a few reasons.
Swiss banks are super confidential; so much so it could be equatable to a doctor-patient confidentiality agreement. Swiss law forbids bankers to disclose the existence of your account or any other information about it without your consent.
Switzerland is also incredibly stable. The fact that they haven't been involved in any kind of conflict for a few hundred years and have one of the most stable currencies and economies in the world also lends to the appeal of keeping your big bucks in a Swiss bank account.
The biggest appeal though is that your money is virtually untouchable from your home country's government. For example doctors who might be sued for malpractice might have money in a Swiss account to prevent them being totally wiped out in the event of lawsuit.
Really? Why would the Swiss allow for such confidentiality in banking? Especially when rich people from other nations are using it to their advantage by not paying taxes in their home countries? Wouldn't Switzerland be a little nervous about that aggravating bigger, more powerful nations for the allowance of such blatant tax evasion for the wealthy in those other countries?
1. Switzerland get's rich off of it. It's one of the reasons they have such a stable economy and high GDP. 2. There's a reason Switzerland has not been involved in any conflicts for the last hundred years. Tactically it would be a terrible decision to invade them; it's why Hitler never did. Armies much larger would easily be decimated trying to invade Switzerland. 3. The US doesn't really care that rich people are evading taxes using Swiss bank accounts definitely not enough to start a war with Switzerland. That's a ridiculous notion.
678
« on: November 16, 2015, 06:37:21 PM »
If you became successful by means of the US infrastructure then it seems unfair to avoid any and all means of repaying that establishment.
Yeah aren't offshore bank accounts a way that people use to avoid paying taxes? If so, couldn't you just force them to pull their money out of those accounts and bring it all back here by just putting a gun to their head?
That would be immoral
679
« on: November 16, 2015, 06:34:08 PM »
Quite a few reasons.
Swiss banks are super confidential; so much so it could be equatable to a doctor-patient confidentiality agreement. Swiss law forbids bankers to disclose the existence of your account or any other information about it without your consent.
Switzerland is also incredibly stable. The fact that they haven't been involved in any kind of conflict for a few hundred years and have one of the most stable currencies and economies in the world also lends to the appeal of keeping your big bucks in a Swiss bank account.
The biggest appeal though is that your money is virtually untouchable from your home country's government. For example doctors who might be sued for malpractice might have money in a Swiss account to prevent them being totally wiped out in the event of lawsuit.
680
« on: November 16, 2015, 06:21:51 PM »
Hancock just made Nick disappear
'go to X location'
'sure no problem'
LOL like fuck he will
So yeah I'm a little annoyed that nick has vanished, if anyone knows how to find him that'd be nice but until then I'll let the redcoated sociopath help me fuck shit up.
check all your settlements and the detective agency i've heard of this issue happening to quite a few
681
« on: November 16, 2015, 06:14:07 PM »
Hancock is best companion
682
« on: November 16, 2015, 02:38:45 PM »
683
« on: November 16, 2015, 02:35:35 PM »
Realistically speaking
What political experience does he have?
none
684
« on: November 16, 2015, 02:22:00 PM »
▲
▼ ▼
▲ ▲
▼
685
« on: November 16, 2015, 02:17:41 PM »
▲
▲ ▲
▲ ▲
▲ ▲ ▲ ▲
▲ ▲
▲ ▲ ▲ ▲
▲ ▲ ▲ ▲
▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲
▲ ▲
▲ ▲ ▲ ▲
▲ ▲ ▲ ▲
▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲
▲ ▲ ▲ ▲
▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲
▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲
▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲
686
« on: November 16, 2015, 02:13:44 PM »
so when is the trilogy of All Too Easy being adapted to film?
I think Jonah Hill or Seth Rogan can play Roman
687
« on: November 16, 2015, 02:08:26 PM »
ebin xD
688
« on: November 16, 2015, 02:07:19 PM »
▲
▲ ▲
689
« on: November 16, 2015, 02:04:47 PM »
▲
▲ ▲
690
« on: November 16, 2015, 12:33:26 PM »
I'd like to think there would be a collective effort on the party to not allow that to happen
Just like the Democrats collectively will try to not allow Sanders to get the nomination
Though one of these parties is blocking the wrong person for nomination.
Pages: 1 ... 212223 2425 ... 517
|
Show Posts
