This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - cxfhvxgkcf-56:7
Pages: 1 ... 128129130 131132 ... 517
3871
« on: August 25, 2015, 05:27:19 PM »
cheat you never addressed how much it costs
3872
« on: August 25, 2015, 05:27:03 PM »
this wouldn't be a problem if we could block individual avatars, tbh
what do you guys think of that
i'd be in goddamn full acceptance of that
everyone wins
That's just silly and you know it.
How? We already have a similar option with Anarchy
You mean the anonymous posting image, right? I've only attended 3 anarchy weekends.
There's currently a script with Anarchy that allows users to have a separate avatar for that forum, and it can be anything within Anarchy's rules (No loli, etc). If someone in anarchy doesn't want to see those Anarchy avatars, they can turn the option off and will only see the global one.
I thought cheat never got that working...
well he didn't but it will work he's just lazy
3873
« on: August 25, 2015, 05:24:41 PM »
this wouldn't be a problem if we could block individual avatars, tbh
what do you guys think of that
i'd be in goddamn full acceptance of that
everyone wins
That's just silly and you know it.
How? We already have a similar option with Anarchy
You mean the anonymous posting image, right? I've only attended 3 anarchy weekends.
No, there's an option to have an avatar that's unique to Anarchy for people that want a dick avatar or something. There's also an option to block said custom avatars if you don't want to see dicks.
3874
« on: August 25, 2015, 05:21:27 PM »
this wouldn't be a problem if we could block individual avatars, tbh
what do you guys think of that
i'd be in goddamn full acceptance of that
everyone wins
That's just silly and you know it.
what the gosh-darn heck exactly is wrong with that you varmint?
3875
« on: August 25, 2015, 05:16:47 PM »
this wouldn't be a problem if we could block individual avatars, tbh
what do you guys think of that
i'd be in goddamn full acceptance of that everyone wins
3876
« on: August 25, 2015, 05:14:21 PM »
There are? Who?
Bro, a shit ton of our idiots are all HS freshies and the like.
I know it seems like we're all 19 or 20-somethings, but that's hardly it.
if they're 13 they can see a PG13 movie and if they've seen a PG13 movie then these avatars are nothing new.
3877
« on: August 25, 2015, 05:09:16 PM »
then they're too young to be here anyway.
I don't remember having to input my age to access the website.
p sure that was changed later on. You now have to agree that you're at least 13 to join the site I'm p sure
3878
« on: August 25, 2015, 05:08:46 PM »
NSFW in itself is a very subjective term and you can't really apply objectivity to it.
indeed
you contradicted yourself, by the way
cheat considers it NSFW
Yes. Unfortunately the practice of judging images is subjective. Sorry if that rustles your jimmies, but the avatar and nameplate images are going to need to remain on the safer side, since they're not able to be spoilered to guests and potential members.
you don't have any potential members outside of people coming from b.net and most of them are completely used and have no problem to stuff like this. I think you have this idea that you have this wildly expanding community of people that are completely new to the internet, well you fucking don't.
You have to also remember that there are minors that frequent Sep7agon, and I'm pretty sure it's illegal in most of the United States to show minors any form of pornography. Although, as suggestive as that gif is it is not pornographic, but Cheat has the final say on anything that goes on on his forum.
At the same time, this is the only facet where we try to make thing appropriate for minors. We don't forbid swearing, there are plenty of "racist" jokes, half of the images outside of avatars aren't appropriate for minors.
It isn't, or shouldn't be, our place to ensure that everything is sterile and family-friendly.
but at least keep the avatars and nameplates PG13
when's the last time you saw a PG13 movie? Most of the avatars removed have been at a PG13 level.
3879
« on: August 25, 2015, 04:59:05 PM »
>tfw your country isn't being cucked by Muslims
feels good man
911
and in return we killed a hundred thousand or so of them meanwhile Europe just sits idly by while they're citizens are getting beheaded
3880
« on: August 25, 2015, 04:55:23 PM »
cheat you never addressed how much it costs
3881
« on: August 25, 2015, 04:51:33 PM »
NSFW in itself is a very subjective term and you can't really apply objectivity to it.
indeed
you contradicted yourself, by the way
cheat considers it NSFW
Yes. Unfortunately the practice of judging images is subjective. Sorry if that rustles your jimmies, but the avatar and nameplate images are going to need to remain on the safer side, since they're not able to be spoilered to guests and potential members.
you don't have any potential members outside of people coming from b.net and most of them are completely used and have no problem to stuff like this. I think you have this idea that you have this wildly expanding community of people that are completely new to the internet, well you fucking don't.
3882
« on: August 25, 2015, 04:48:48 PM »
you're going to be reprimanded for browsing a forum at work anyways. depends on the job
point is, common decency when it comes to avatars isn't really asking for much
this isn't a fucking hentai board or a porn board or a whatever board
it also isn't asking much to have a little bit of freedom of expression
3883
« on: August 25, 2015, 04:45:07 PM »
what's NSFW about that image? she is jiggling her ass in a very suggestive way
HOTDAMN
Like, this is you just being nitpicky now.
I would love for you to post a picture of that image where you work and see if you don't get reprimanded for it
you're going to be reprimanded for browsing a forum at work anyways. So in and of itself the forum is NSFW with the logic you're using
3884
« on: August 25, 2015, 04:43:15 PM »
To be clear: the rule is that avatars and nameplates must be safe for work.
and many of the ones you've had removed have been entirely SFW
3885
« on: August 25, 2015, 04:42:49 PM »
what's NSFW about that image? she is jiggling her ass in a very suggestive way
suggestiveness doesn't constitute for being NSFW NSFW in itself is a very subjective term and you can't really apply objectivity to it.
3886
« on: August 25, 2015, 04:36:46 PM »
the avatar thing is far from lenient
there is no legitimate reason this shouldn't be allowed as an avatar other than keeping the site SFW?
which it should be?
what's NSFW about that image?
3887
« on: August 25, 2015, 04:33:37 PM »
Profile image cannot be anything illegal (No loli/graphic gore/etc) and no porn.
Otherwise, we're fairly lenient
you might want to review your own rules on that because avatars that aren't porn have been removed
"Fairly lenient"
There are always exceptions. Play nice. Blah blah blah.
the avatar thing is far from lenient
there is no legitimate reason this shouldn't be allowed as an avatar
I don't disagree
glad to know there are some sane people left in the staff
3888
« on: August 25, 2015, 04:32:44 PM »
signed, if you're going to be a nazi at least be a consistent nazi
3889
« on: August 25, 2015, 04:29:47 PM »
Profile image cannot be anything illegal (No loli/graphic gore/etc) and no porn.
Otherwise, we're fairly lenient
you might want to review your own rules on that because avatars that aren't porn have been removed
"Fairly lenient"
There are always exceptions. Play nice. Blah blah blah.
the avatar thing is far from lenient there is no legitimate reason this shouldn't be allowed as an avatar
3890
« on: August 25, 2015, 04:25:30 PM »
Profile image cannot be anything illegal (No loli/graphic gore/etc) and no porn.
Otherwise, we're fairly lenient
you might want to review your own rules on that because avatars that aren't porn have been removed
3891
« on: August 25, 2015, 04:20:36 PM »
So what can't you put in your profile picture?
anything that's remotely sexual or even sexually suggestive. Cheat like DeeJ wants to protect his non existent influx of new users from the atrocities of the internet.
3892
« on: August 25, 2015, 04:17:42 PM »
there's already a hairstyle called the beehive
well I'm sorry I'm not a ghetto haircut savant
Um if white women from the 50s are ghetto then sure
that doesn't really look like a beehive when you compare it to hairstyle in OP
but it does
Not really....it's just big. It's poofy. It doesn't have the texture of a beehive.
mesh defines something much more than texture you retard
does this shitty unheard of niche haircut have rungs?
seems like you're the only person who hasn't heard of it
3893
« on: August 25, 2015, 04:13:23 PM »
>tfw your country isn't being cucked by Muslims
feels good man
3894
« on: August 25, 2015, 04:11:59 PM »
there's already a hairstyle called the beehive
well I'm sorry I'm not a ghetto haircut savant
Um if white women from the 50s are ghetto then sure
that doesn't really look like a beehive when you compare it to hairstyle in OP
but it does
Not really....it's just big. It's poofy. It doesn't have the texture of a beehive.
mesh defines something much more than texture you retard
3895
« on: August 25, 2015, 03:58:14 PM »
there's already a hairstyle called the beehive
well I'm sorry I'm not a ghetto haircut savant
Um if white women from the 50s are ghetto then sure
that doesn't really look like a beehive when you compare it to hairstyle in OP
but it does
3896
« on: August 25, 2015, 03:46:55 PM »
there's already a hairstyle called the beehive
well I'm sorry I'm not a ghetto haircut savant
Um if white women from the 50s are ghetto then sure
3897
« on: August 25, 2015, 03:42:03 PM »
there's already a hairstyle called the beehive
3898
« on: August 25, 2015, 03:38:50 PM »
What's NSFW about tentacles? They weren't penetrating any kind of orifice or doing anything explicitly sexual that could be visualized from the cropped versions which were in the GIF. maybe if you're blind
That could be any sort of fluid. It's not NSFW until you use your own inference and representation based on background context to subconsciously connect the dots and then visualize the full image rather than the cropped version which is presented. To any other number of people that could be just a miscellaneous anime drawing, completely non sexual in nature.
3899
« on: August 25, 2015, 03:31:27 PM »
also I don't really see what was wrong with Gasai's GIF. The dicks in question were tentacles I'm pretty sure
because that's so much better?
What's NSFW about tentacles? They weren't penetrating any kind of orifice or doing anything explicitly sexual that could be visualized from the cropped versions which were in the GIF.
3900
« on: August 25, 2015, 03:17:17 PM »
Old and gay
Pages: 1 ... 128129130 131132 ... 517
|
Show Posts
