This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - cxfhvxgkcf-56:7
Pages: 1 ... 127128129 130131 ... 517
3841
« on: August 25, 2015, 09:27:20 PM »
you could also die from the common cold so yeah what a wonderful time it was amirite?
And what's stopping me from getting killed from the common cold today?
this magical thing called universal access to medicine
3842
« on: August 25, 2015, 09:26:16 PM »
I swear I remember you from b.net but i just can't place it
3843
« on: August 25, 2015, 09:23:46 PM »
you could also die from the common cold so yeah what a wonderful time it was amirite?
3844
« on: August 25, 2015, 09:22:22 PM »
lol you might as well give your personal info to the NSA
3845
« on: August 25, 2015, 09:21:12 PM »
ah i remember when everyone believed that
probably his only good ruse
3846
« on: August 25, 2015, 09:11:19 PM »
NOBODY CARES ABOUT YOUR SOCIAL LIFE YOU FUCKING NORMIE REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
3847
« on: August 25, 2015, 08:01:30 PM »
i don't really give a fuck?
3848
« on: August 25, 2015, 07:52:49 PM »
who cares
3849
« on: August 25, 2015, 07:40:11 PM »
i'm not autistic
LOL
you're a nigger so it's not like your opinion is very valuable
3850
« on: August 25, 2015, 07:34:38 PM »
i'm not autistic so i don't join clubs.
3851
« on: August 25, 2015, 07:32:57 PM »
ecks dee
3852
« on: August 25, 2015, 07:05:31 PM »
i don't know how to count tbh fam
3853
« on: August 25, 2015, 07:02:30 PM »
oh hahahahaha so le tricky trickster man
3854
« on: August 25, 2015, 07:01:09 PM »
it seems like it's only used for gore and other fucked up shit
not lewd imagery
well people that are sensitive to such things like yourself it would be applicable to
3855
« on: August 25, 2015, 06:58:54 PM »
that's what NSFL is for lol
how long did it take you to find that
because I've never heard or seen that in my life
its a pretty common term
3856
« on: August 25, 2015, 06:56:47 PM »
Apples and oranges how
they're both acronyms
the point is, people don't always mean the exact literal thing when it's spelled out
NSFW doesn't just mean "not safe for work"
it can also mean "not safe for" fucking anything
not safe for public use
not safe for when you're at home and you have little fucking children around
not safe for school
anything
any atmosphere or setting where the content may get you into some deep shit--NSFW
it's just the catch-all term people use to describe all that shit, because that's how we work
that's what NSFL is for
3857
« on: August 25, 2015, 06:25:03 PM »
so you're saying in that hypothetical you would be fired for looking at pictures of your friend on Facebook where they happened to be at the beach?
fired? no
questioned? absolutely
see this is another regard where you are just basing everything off of pure assumption and speculation. You've never had a job so I don't think you really have any real idea about how bosses and workplaces react to these types of things other than what you've read or heard. As a person that's worked at quite a few places I would not be fired for these things you're saying I would be.
3858
« on: August 25, 2015, 06:12:39 PM »
say you're at work browsing facebook and one of your female friends posted pictures of them at the beach. is the exposure of the ass cheeks that modern swimsuits present considered NSFW?
yes
so you're saying in that hypothetical you would be fired for looking at pictures of your friend on Facebook where they happened to be at the beach?
3859
« on: August 25, 2015, 06:10:49 PM »
"i can't be happy unless I'm allowed to use this image of some whore jiggling her ass cheeks as my avatar  "
fuck me running
its an overall principle of unfair censorship. Generally the censorship of one form of expression leads another until you have a really unenjoyable website.
Can you please explain how violating set forum rules is unfair censorship?
its blocking things for being NSFW when they're not necessarily NSFW
that's unfair censorship
If you're talking about the booty jiggling as much as I do enjoy a nice booty bounce it is not safe for work since her ass is exposed.
an exposed ass (cheeks) isn't necessarily NSFW let me present a hypothetical for you say you're at work browsing facebook and one of your female friends posted pictures of them at the beach. is the exposure of the ass cheeks that modern swimsuits present considered NSFW? and there were ones that had even less warrant for removal, Zen's avatar for instant.
3860
« on: August 25, 2015, 06:06:45 PM »
Ran the numbers just now. It's an additional $107.76 per year for an SSL certificate (which we'd need if we go with https). Something to think about; I might end up opening up donations to cover that cost if it's something a lot of people want.
at least make a survey thread asking would you be willing to donate to the cause and if a reasonable number of people say they would then do it. If a reasonable number of people don't then i guess we're just fucked.
3861
« on: August 25, 2015, 06:02:19 PM »
Reminder to drop the insults, its not hard to argue for or against without them.
fuck off weeb
3862
« on: August 25, 2015, 06:01:41 PM »
"i can't be happy unless I'm allowed to use this image of some whore jiggling her ass cheeks as my avatar "
fuck me running
its an overall principle of unfair censorship. Generally the censorship of one form of expression leads another until you have a really unenjoyable website.
Can you please explain how violating set forum rules is unfair censorship?
its blocking things for being NSFW when they're not necessarily NSFW that's unfair censorship
3863
« on: August 25, 2015, 05:55:33 PM »
this wouldn't be a problem if we could block individual avatars, tbh
what do you guys think of that
i'd be in goddamn full acceptance of that
everyone wins
That's just silly and you know it.
How? We already have a similar option with Anarchy
I'm not opposed to allowing them if they're hidden to guests by default and can be enabled
then just do that ffs
It requires a different script, and there are other priorities first.
i would call this a top priority
It's definitely not a top priority, mate. There are a handful of UI improvements and fixes that need to be addressed (for mobile mostly) first. I'm already running behind on groups. 
the approval and overall happiness of a sizable portion of your user base isn't important?
Shut up slash.
Nyet.
3864
« on: August 25, 2015, 05:54:58 PM »
"i can't be happy unless I'm allowed to use this image of some whore jiggling her ass cheeks as my avatar "
fuck me running
its an overall principle of unfair censorship. Generally the censorship of one form of expression leads another until you have a really unenjoyable website.
3865
« on: August 25, 2015, 05:44:39 PM »
this wouldn't be a problem if we could block individual avatars, tbh
what do you guys think of that
i'd be in goddamn full acceptance of that
everyone wins
That's just silly and you know it.
How? We already have a similar option with Anarchy
I'm not opposed to allowing them if they're hidden to guests by default and can be enabled
then just do that ffs
It requires a different script, and there are other priorities first.
i would call this a top priority
It's definitely not a top priority, mate. There are a handful of UI improvements and fixes that need to be addressed (for mobile mostly) first. I'm already running behind on groups.
the approval and overall happiness of a sizable portion of your user base isn't important?
3866
« on: August 25, 2015, 05:43:30 PM »
cheat you never addressed how much it costs
I'll ask the host. I don't recall the exact amount off hand.
if its $20 or less and you're being that much of a jew, seriously kill yourself.
3867
« on: August 25, 2015, 05:41:12 PM »
this wouldn't be a problem if we could block individual avatars, tbh
what do you guys think of that
i'd be in goddamn full acceptance of that
everyone wins
That's just silly and you know it.
How? We already have a similar option with Anarchy
I'm not opposed to allowing them if they're hidden to guests by default and can be enabled
then just do that ffs
It requires a different script, and there are other priorities first.
i would call this a top priority
3868
« on: August 25, 2015, 05:39:23 PM »
this wouldn't be a problem if we could block individual avatars, tbh
what do you guys think of that
i'd be in goddamn full acceptance of that
everyone wins
That's just silly and you know it.
How? We already have a similar option with Anarchy
I'm not opposed to allowing them if they're hidden to guests by default and can be enabled
then just do that ffs
3869
« on: August 25, 2015, 05:36:38 PM »
why the fucking fuck did you bring my post from the other thread into this thread you little shit?
I DON'T WANT THESE FUCKING NOTIFICATIONS
3870
« on: August 25, 2015, 05:31:57 PM »
this wouldn't be a problem if we could block individual avatars, tbh
what do you guys think of that
i'd be in goddamn full acceptance of that
everyone wins
That's just silly and you know it.
How? We already have a similar option with Anarchy
You mean the anonymous posting image, right? I've only attended 3 anarchy weekends.
There's currently a script with Anarchy that allows users to have a separate avatar for that forum, and it can be anything within Anarchy's rules (No loli, etc). If someone in anarchy doesn't want to see those Anarchy avatars, they can turn the option off and will only see the global one.
I thought cheat never got that working...
well he didn't but it will work he's just lazy
I wouldn't say lazy since Isara is mia
this was back when Isara was still around
Pages: 1 ... 127128129 130131 ... 517
|
Show Posts