Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - cxfhvxgkcf-56:7

Pages: 1 ... 636465 6667 ... 517
1922
The Flood / Re: Halloween plans
« on: October 20, 2015, 02:49:46 PM »
Pass out some candy laced with PCP and possibly bath salts to the local children

1923
The Flood / Re: Check out this cool meme
« on: October 20, 2015, 02:45:42 PM »
Dude what the hell don't lie to me like that
#Invalid Witty Reply#

1924
The Flood / Check out this cool meme
« on: October 20, 2015, 02:44:39 PM »
#Invalid Meme#

1925
Gaming / Re: "bethesda fucking sucks" | 21 Days - Fallout 4
« on: October 20, 2015, 02:24:42 PM »
Seems they've released an edition between standard and pip boy. Probably going to trade my preorder for the standard edition for this

http://www.gamestop.com/product/strategy-guides/fallout-4-ultimate-vault-dwellers-guide-bundle/126341

1926
Serious / Re: Hillary's emails reveal: Bush committed treason
« on: October 20, 2015, 01:29:24 PM »
You mean they planned a 2003 invasion in 2002? Oh the horror. This is unbelievable. We can't stand for this! BUSH MUST HANG!

It means he was planning on waging an aggressive war before he had approval to do so.

Would you expect the president to ask for a declaration of war without having a plan to carry out that war?


This whole thing is nonsense.

He wasn't just making the plans, though. He was forming alliances when he was still making his case to congress.
Making alliances isn't part of planning? This is news to me.

While, yes, alliances are a part of planning, they are beyond what he had authority to do. They show he was committing the USA to an aggressive war well before he had the authority to do so. It's where it goes from drawing up the plans on paper to where war is an inevitability
Show me where making alliances is outside the authority of the president.

By your reasoning every wartime president would be guilty of treason.
Bush planned and started to prepare for war without approval
Once again this isn't illegal.

Except when it is
Charlie tell me, do you like FDR?

He did get a DoW. Bush did not
But are you aware of the things that he did prior to getting a DoW? Because by your logic he would be just as guilty if not more of the things you're accusing Bush of.

Also once again Bush did get a DoW when he actually went to war. Once again planning is not illegal, I don't see how you're failing to see this. You just need to admit you're making baseless accusations in the interest of attacking Bush because he's a Republican. You're making a fool of yourself.

Umm... Bush didn't get a DoW. He had congressional approval, but not a declaration of war.
He was within his right to do so according to the War Powers Resolution.

1927
Serious / Re: Hillary's emails reveal: Bush committed treason
« on: October 20, 2015, 01:08:32 PM »
You mean they planned a 2003 invasion in 2002? Oh the horror. This is unbelievable. We can't stand for this! BUSH MUST HANG!

It means he was planning on waging an aggressive war before he had approval to do so.

Would you expect the president to ask for a declaration of war without having a plan to carry out that war?


This whole thing is nonsense.

He wasn't just making the plans, though. He was forming alliances when he was still making his case to congress.
Making alliances isn't part of planning? This is news to me.

While, yes, alliances are a part of planning, they are beyond what he had authority to do. They show he was committing the USA to an aggressive war well before he had the authority to do so. It's where it goes from drawing up the plans on paper to where war is an inevitability
Show me where making alliances is outside the authority of the president.

By your reasoning every wartime president would be guilty of treason.
Bush planned and started to prepare for war without approval
Once again this isn't illegal.

Except when it is
Charlie tell me, do you like FDR?

He did get a DoW. Bush did not
But are you aware of the things that he did prior to getting a DoW? Because by your logic he would be just as guilty if not more of the things you're accusing Bush of.

Also once again Bush did get a DoW when he actually went to war. Once again planning is not illegal, I don't see how you're failing to see this. You just need to admit you're making baseless accusations in the interest of attacking Bush because he's a Republican. You're making a fool of yourself.

1928
Serious / Re: Hillary's emails reveal: Bush committed treason
« on: October 20, 2015, 12:57:40 PM »
You mean they planned a 2003 invasion in 2002? Oh the horror. This is unbelievable. We can't stand for this! BUSH MUST HANG!

It means he was planning on waging an aggressive war before he had approval to do so.

Would you expect the president to ask for a declaration of war without having a plan to carry out that war?


This whole thing is nonsense.

He wasn't just making the plans, though. He was forming alliances when he was still making his case to congress.
Making alliances isn't part of planning? This is news to me.

While, yes, alliances are a part of planning, they are beyond what he had authority to do. They show he was committing the USA to an aggressive war well before he had the authority to do so. It's where it goes from drawing up the plans on paper to where war is an inevitability
Show me where making alliances is outside the authority of the president.

By your reasoning every wartime president would be guilty of treason.
Bush planned and started to prepare for war without approval
Once again this isn't illegal.

Except when it is
Charlie tell me, do you like FDR?

1929
Serious / Re: Hillary's emails reveal: Bush committed treason
« on: October 20, 2015, 12:48:53 PM »
You mean they planned a 2003 invasion in 2002? Oh the horror. This is unbelievable. We can't stand for this! BUSH MUST HANG!

It means he was planning on waging an aggressive war before he had approval to do so.

Would you expect the president to ask for a declaration of war without having a plan to carry out that war?


This whole thing is nonsense.

He wasn't just making the plans, though. He was forming alliances when he was still making his case to congress.
Making alliances isn't part of planning? This is news to me.

While, yes, alliances are a part of planning, they are beyond what he had authority to do. They show he was committing the USA to an aggressive war well before he had the authority to do so. It's where it goes from drawing up the plans on paper to where war is an inevitability
Show me where making alliances is outside the authority of the president.

By your reasoning every wartime president would be guilty of treason.
Bush planned and started to prepare for war without approval
Once again this isn't illegal.

1930
The Flood / Re: pink floyd is shit
« on: October 20, 2015, 12:45:05 PM »
Opiate was also metal

1931
Serious / Re: Hillary's emails reveal: Bush committed treason
« on: October 20, 2015, 12:38:49 PM »
You mean they planned a 2003 invasion in 2002? Oh the horror. This is unbelievable. We can't stand for this! BUSH MUST HANG!

It means he was planning on waging an aggressive war before he had approval to do so.

Would you expect the president to ask for a declaration of war without having a plan to carry out that war?


This whole thing is nonsense.

He wasn't just making the plans, though. He was forming alliances when he was still making his case to congress.
Making alliances isn't part of planning? This is news to me.

While, yes, alliances are a part of planning, they are beyond what he had authority to do. They show he was committing the USA to an aggressive war well before he had the authority to do so. It's where it goes from drawing up the plans on paper to where war is an inevitability
Show me where making alliances is outside the authority of the president.

By your reasoning every wartime president would be guilty of treason.

1932
anyone who supports AA should be shot.

1933
The Flood / Re: pink floyd is shit
« on: October 20, 2015, 12:36:36 PM »
King Crimson

that's the only counter argument i need

stay mad fgts

1934
The Flood / Re: What was your first R-rated movie?
« on: October 20, 2015, 12:34:46 PM »

1935
Serious / Re: Hillary's emails reveal: Bush committed treason
« on: October 20, 2015, 12:34:01 PM »
You mean they planned a 2003 invasion in 2002? Oh the horror. This is unbelievable. We can't stand for this! BUSH MUST HANG!

It means he was planning on waging an aggressive war before he had approval to do so.

Would you expect the president to ask for a declaration of war without having a plan to carry out that war?


This whole thing is nonsense.

He wasn't just making the plans, though. He was forming alliances when he was still making his case to congress.
Making alliances isn't part of planning? This is news to me.

1936
The Flood / pink floyd is shit
« on: October 20, 2015, 12:32:11 PM »
prove me wrong

pro tip: you can't

1937
Serious / Re: Hillary's emails reveal: Bush committed treason
« on: October 20, 2015, 12:27:17 PM »
You mean they planned a 2003 invasion in 2002? Oh the horror. This is unbelievable. We can't stand for this! BUSH MUST HANG!

It means he was planning on waging an aggressive war before he had approval to do so.
There's nothing illegal about that.....

1938
Serious / Re: Hillary's emails reveal: Bush committed treason
« on: October 20, 2015, 11:27:18 AM »
this is news?

1939
The Flood / Re: When did you watch your first porn?
« on: October 20, 2015, 11:04:32 AM »
are people that watched porn at a super early age more apt to have some fucked up fetishes?

1940
The Flood / Re: Favorite depiction of a post-apocalyptic setting?
« on: October 20, 2015, 10:29:24 AM »
I would have to agree on Oblivion

Or Metro

1941
The Flood / When did you watch your first porn?
« on: October 20, 2015, 10:26:41 AM »
Inspired by verb's thread

I watched my first one when I was about 5 or 6. My parents had HBO and didn't really regulate it at all.

1942
The Flood / Re: The celebrity you are ashamed you would bang
« on: October 20, 2015, 10:19:35 AM »
Amanda Bynes
She crazy as fuck now but I'd still rail the shit out of her with another dude in a lobster costume.
Can I be that other guy in the lobster costume?

1943
Jef fuel can't melt steel beams

1944
The Flood / Re: What was your first R-rated movie?
« on: October 20, 2015, 10:12:48 AM »
Uh I think it was Spawn actually lol

1945
Serious / Re: Why do we allow a two party system in the US?
« on: October 20, 2015, 10:07:45 AM »
Well most people are center left or center right or just plain center so there's not a sizeable portion that would vote for parties that lie on the extreme right or extreme left like the libertarian or socialist party respectively.

Or there's the parties that exist for solely one purpose like the green party for example and have completely retarded ideas outside of the one their platform is built upon.

1946
The Flood / Re: Should I go to Big Sandy this weekend?
« on: October 20, 2015, 12:30:20 AM »
I want to see some pics if you go

1947
Serious / Re: WaPO: NRA Will Decline in the Future
« on: October 19, 2015, 10:55:14 PM »
Expected

1948
The Flood / Re: haha
« on: October 19, 2015, 10:27:54 PM »
Why is this not locked yet?
we're discussing things

1949
Should be tortured. No quick and easy death for murders and rapists.
can't rape your wife

1950
Serious / Re: Never give up your guns.
« on: October 19, 2015, 10:16:35 PM »
Hmm, we're doing pretty good down here in Aus with minimal guns. I think the last shooting "massacre" we had was in 2002 that resulted in 2 deaths. The last before that was in 1996 I'm pretty sure.
When was your last shooting massacre, 'Merica?
port aurthur was a hoax

What do you mean?



35 people were shot dead. Sounds like a massacre to me. Regardless of who did it.
its a hoax in regard to who the shooter was and it wasn't Bryant.

Pages: 1 ... 636465 6667 ... 517