Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - cxfhvxgkcf-56:7

Pages: 1 ... 464748 4950 ... 517
1411
The Flood / Re: I don't like music
« on: October 26, 2015, 09:59:16 PM »
mmmmmmm really digging this Black Breath as well

YouTube

1412
The Flood / Re: I don't like music
« on: October 26, 2015, 09:58:28 PM »
YouTube


my album of the year so far

1413
The Flood / Re: I don't like music
« on: October 26, 2015, 09:44:30 PM »
omg you like Fleet Foxes? Did not expect that

1414
The Flood / Re: Question to the people here who hate anime
« on: October 26, 2015, 09:40:10 PM »
i remember watching a couple of the Ghibli films when i was a kid, they were enjoyable

idk its not anime specifically i just don't really like animated stuff period

1415
Serious / Re: Why should transgenderism be something we "accept"?
« on: October 26, 2015, 08:55:07 PM »
LC bout to fuck some shit up

1416
Serious / Re: Why should transgenderism be something we "accept"?
« on: October 26, 2015, 08:20:54 PM »
It will bring out the best results to not have emotion involved. Imagine how much the human race could accomplish if emotion wasn't a factor in decision making.
So if we operated off of Sociopathic principles?

Imagine if the United States still had slavery as a labor force. We'd be able to achieve and thrive economically much more. (just look at China, which is a small gap from slavery)
I can't tell if you're being serious

1417
Serious / Re: Why should transgenderism be something we "accept"?
« on: October 26, 2015, 08:17:31 PM »
It will bring out the best results to not have emotion involved. Imagine how much the human race could accomplish if emotion wasn't a factor in decision making.
So if we operated off of Sociopathic principles?

1418
The Flood / Re: Happy Birthday Luci
« on: October 26, 2015, 07:32:38 PM »
happy birthday

1419
Not really.

Sometimes its nice to have a debate, but online tends to just get to 'Lol fuck you bitch' Well... Here at least.
I mean maybe in the Flood but you'll get banned for that in Serious

1420
two fucking weeks

my dick hard

1421
The Flood / Re: So, uh The Walking Dead (SPOILERS)
« on: October 26, 2015, 07:21:37 PM »
Spoiler
I don't think Glenn actually died
Spoiler
They would have to asspull something of planetary proportions in order for him to get out of a situation like that. If they're going to axe a main character they should at least have the balls to stick to it.
Spoiler
idk the shot was so unclear I'm thinking maybe it was actually Nicholas's body on top of him getting ripped to shreds. It would be inconsistent and kind of shitty I suppose. However I just don't think Glenn's death would be so minute like that. His death scene should have had a little more oomph like Tyrese's. I thought they would surely give him the traumatic death he got in the comics.
Spoiler
If anyone I think either Morgan or Daryl will get Glenn's comic death. Morgan because it feels like they're setting him up to die with one of the season's key plots revolving around the difference between Morgan and Rick. Also Morgan's no-killing attitude would be a good motivator for Rick to spare Negan at the end of All Out War, as it's what Morgan would have wanted. Daryl because him getting the death makes more sense from a TV show perspective than Glenn's.
Spoiler
That makes a lot of sense but I hope you're wrong. Daryl's death would tear me up even more than Glenn's especially if it was in the style of comic book Glenn's

1422
The Flood / Re: So, uh The Walking Dead (SPOILERS)
« on: October 26, 2015, 07:18:14 PM »
Spoiler
I don't think Glenn actually died
From the comics
That chink is most definitely dead.
Spoiler
Yeah but Glenn actually had a dramatic death scene in the comics unlike this piss poor excuse of a death.

1423
The Flood / Re: So, uh The Walking Dead (SPOILERS)
« on: October 26, 2015, 07:13:58 PM »
Spoiler
I don't think Glenn actually died
Spoiler
They would have to asspull something of planetary proportions in order for him to get out of a situation like that. If they're going to axe a main character they should at least have the balls to stick to it.
Spoiler
idk the shot was so unclear I'm thinking maybe it was actually Nicholas's body on top of him getting ripped to shreds. It would be inconsistent and kind of shitty I suppose. However I just don't think Glenn's death would be so minute like that. His death scene should have had a little more oomph like Tyrese's. I thought they would surely give him the traumatic death he got in the comics.

1424
The Flood / Re: So, uh The Walking Dead (SPOILERS)
« on: October 26, 2015, 07:10:39 PM »
People still watch this trainwreck?
Season 2 and 3 (well the first half of 3) were shit, its true but seasons 4 and 5 were amazing and season 6 is shaping up to be as well

1425
The Flood / Re: So, uh The Walking Dead (SPOILERS)
« on: October 26, 2015, 07:09:56 PM »
Spoiler
I don't think Glenn actually died

1426
Serious / Re: Is the Commonwealth about to make a glorious return?
« on: October 26, 2015, 07:03:40 PM »
Ay. This is some pretty big news, although I don't see it change much just yet. Could influence the next European elections, but I don't think we're gonna see drastic changes any time soon.
Do you think they will go as far as to actually exit the EU?

Because I feel like that would be a big deal considering they are the 8th largest economy in Europe and sort of a figurehead for East Europe as a whole.
Not a chance, I'd say. The conservative party really isn't that anti-EU. It still very much supports EU membership (just like the majority of Poles) and strives for the eventual succession to the Euro Zone when its standard of living catches up with the Western EU.

You can't forget that despite its historic aversion to integration after the USSR, the EU demands, its relationship to Russia and the current refugee crisis, the country still owes the Union a lot. The EU provided it with a lot of opportunities and helped it become such a growing industry. It doesn't want to give that up.

As the telegraph put it:

Although the party is not anti-European Union (as some lazy commentators tend to suggest), it is very much sceptical of deeper European integration as a desirable end in of itself, and it also wants Poland to assert its national interest more forcefully in a number of key areas ranging from energy and climate policies to the EU’s stance towards Russia. The key point is that while Poles still overwhelmingly back EU membership, they want a greater degree of control over its development and direction.
Ah thanks for clearing that up. The article I linked, must have been made by one of the aforementioned lazy commentators, seemed like it was trying to paint them as anti-EU. So do you see this as possibly paving the way for the EU as a whole to take a more hard line stance on Russia?
Hard to say. First thing you need to know is that external relations with third countries (= everything outside of the EEA, EU, Eurozone) are still mainly left up to the European member states themselves to conduct inter-governmental relations with other countries for as long as they don't directly interfere with the workings or principles of the Union. The EU's foreign relations are generally limited to matters of trade, energy, economic sanctions, border control and so on. These matters are usually in the hands of the Commission, which is made up out of 28 commissioners (one for each member states) that are all there to present the interests of the EU rather than those of their own member state. Even if Poland would try to push anti-Russian members in this executive branch of the EU, it would still require a lot of other states to agree with it. It could however exert more power in a specific area of external relations, being the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP). This is a very particular area of EU competence that focuses on European defense, security and diplomacy. The main player here is the Council (which is the other half of the bicameral legislative procedure with the Parliament) made up out of national ministers from the member states. As most of the decisions in this area require unanimity of member states, Polish ministers from the conservative party could do a lot more here.

I think it's pretty unlikely that Poland alone could change the EU's actions against Russia unless it provided some very compelling arguments or plans, but it's possible that Poland's national policy towards Russia will affect some parts of the Union and how it treats Russia.
Interesting read. I really need to do some more reading into the inner-workings of the EU.

1427
Gaming / Re: I have Halo 5. Screw this thread :^) | Halo 5 mega thread
« on: October 26, 2015, 06:48:03 PM »
I guess I'm going to buy the game come Wednesday. I need something to hold me over until Fallout 4
Even if you don't like the story, the campaign is still very fun, and the MP is also very fun.
I've yet to play Warzone though.
I do WANT to play the campaign and will probably finish it before touching MP. I rip on 343 purely just to rustle you.

MP was insanely fluid and fun in the beta though and looking forward to Warzone.

1428
Gaming / Re: I have Halo 5. Screw this thread :^) | Halo 5 mega thread
« on: October 26, 2015, 06:43:51 PM »
I guess I'm going to buy the game come Wednesday. I need something to hold me over until Fallout 4

1429
Serious / Re: Why should transgenderism be something we "accept"?
« on: October 26, 2015, 06:34:13 PM »
what are we actually arguing about now? you guys have lost me

1430
Gaming / Re: Concept Art for Cancelled Ensemble Studios Halo Game
« on: October 26, 2015, 06:27:43 PM »
Still think it looks good now, Roman?
Spoiler
How about now?
Spoiler
i threw up in my mouth

1431
Serious / Re: Is the Commonwealth about to make a glorious return?
« on: October 26, 2015, 06:21:51 PM »
Ay. This is some pretty big news, although I don't see it change much just yet. Could influence the next European elections, but I don't think we're gonna see drastic changes any time soon.
Do you think they will go as far as to actually exit the EU?

Because I feel like that would be a big deal considering they are the 8th largest economy in Europe and sort of a figurehead for East Europe as a whole.
Not a chance, I'd say. The conservative party really isn't that anti-EU. It still very much supports EU membership (just like the majority of Poles) and strives for the eventual succession to the Euro Zone when its standard of living catches up with the Western EU.

You can't forget that despite its historic aversion to integration after the USSR, the EU demands, its relationship to Russia and the current refugee crisis, the country still owes the Union a lot. The EU provided it with a lot of opportunities and helped it become such a growing industry. It doesn't want to give that up.

As the telegraph put it:

Although the party is not anti-European Union (as some lazy commentators tend to suggest), it is very much sceptical of deeper European integration as a desirable end in of itself, and it also wants Poland to assert its national interest more forcefully in a number of key areas ranging from energy and climate policies to the EU’s stance towards Russia. The key point is that while Poles still overwhelmingly back EU membership, they want a greater degree of control over its development and direction.
Ah thanks for clearing that up. The article I linked, must have been made by one of the aforementioned lazy commentators, seemed like it was trying to paint them as anti-EU. So do you see this as possibly paving the way for the EU as a whole to take a more hard line stance on Russia?

1432
Gaming / Re: ITT: Devs that are on your shit list.
« on: October 26, 2015, 06:14:03 PM »
I'm surprised I'm the only one to mention Rockstar

1433
If they had any others I would have mentioned them.
Go be a fucking faggot somewhere else.

1434
But I don't..
New Puscifer album, listen to it.

They have one, and only one good song, and that's The Humbling River.

Aside from that I think I'll pass.
Please kill yourself

1435
Serious / Re: Is the Commonwealth about to make a glorious return?
« on: October 26, 2015, 06:00:59 PM »
Ay. This is some pretty big news, although I don't see it change much just yet. Could influence the next European elections, but I don't think we're gonna see drastic changes any time soon.
Do you think they will go as far as to actually exit the EU?

Because I feel like that would be a big deal considering they are the 8th largest economy in Europe and sort of a figurehead for East Europe as a whole.

1436
Septagon / Re: Switch the edit and report buttons on mobile
« on: October 26, 2015, 05:59:36 PM »
Wait what? Somebody give me a screenshot. It may just be a glitch.


it really doesn't make any sense right there. Its like your assuming the most common thing I'm going to do is report my own post. And there is the distinct lack of consistency between looking at my own post and someone else's post


1437
I didn't know the album was out
It isn't, but you can listen to the whole thing on Pandora early.
Thanks babe.
Uh no, I showed him and even messaged you to tell you, but you're never fucking on. Thank me. He would not have even known if not for me.

http://www.pandora.com/station/play/1411412518987239135/43633676259039

here is the link btw bitch.
Oh man what a travesty you not get credit for something so trivial

1439
It follows is shit though

Also why not call them all movies like a normal person
It follows was great though you nigger
literally STD: the ghost
Oh no someone came up with an original concept, how dare they
I think it's a dumb concept imo, but to each their own etc
You're a dumb concept

1440
Gaming / Re: ITT: Devs that are on your shit list.
« on: October 26, 2015, 05:28:43 PM »
Rockstar as a publisher, but they're still shit as a dev too

Pages: 1 ... 464748 4950 ... 517