This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Camnator
Pages: 1 ... 303132 3334 ... 132
931
« on: January 15, 2015, 11:11:56 PM »
Yummy
932
« on: January 15, 2015, 11:09:12 PM »
The standard for being "BTFOd" sure has dropped. I don't care how much experience you have with guns, fully automatic assault rifles simply have no place in a civilian's hands. End of story.
That's literally as pointless as saying, handguns, shotguns, rifles, bows, knives, automobiles, bats, tire irons and countless other objects have no place in civilian hands. The point is, we have every right to have them in our hands so long as we are responsible.
933
« on: January 15, 2015, 11:07:59 PM »
The only point of a gun that large is to kill a lot of people in a small amount of time.
>we need vidya for fun but you can't kill paper or beer cans for entertainment
>hunting isn't a thing
>target shooting isn't fun
>sporting clays isn't an age old pastime
Class pls, I thought you were better than Max.
If you really need a gun like this for shooting beer cans, deer, or any other target, you need to rethink your life.
>not wanting a glorious Stoner master LMG to enshrine and go dakadakadaka at the ranges with.
It's really no different than people owning 200+hp cars. You don't need to go 0 to 60 in four seconds flat, and you may lose control and kill someone doing it.
But fast cars aren't made to do damage, they're made to go fast. Machine guns are actually designed for the purpose of killing people efficiently and quickly.
And sometimes that is necessary.
No Cam, it's not. If you ever do need a full auto weapon to shoot from the elevated windows of your house, chances are, there's a fucking tank approximately three miles out and closing.
You defense nuts make all of us recreational gun lovers look like paranoid tin-foil "the gubment gonna come and take muh rifle" nutjobs.
That just makes you sound paranoid, ironically. Sometimes it absolutely IS necessary, in cases of riots, for example. Dealing with a tank is an entirely separate issue.
Nah, riots? against the government? Sounds like something we'd be involved in rather than fighting off.
Government is often the primary cause of riots. I'd not be involved in any way.
934
« on: January 15, 2015, 10:07:36 PM »
The only point of a gun that large is to kill a lot of people in a small amount of time.
>we need vidya for fun but you can't kill paper or beer cans for entertainment
>hunting isn't a thing
>target shooting isn't fun
>sporting clays isn't an age old pastime
Class pls, I thought you were better than Max.
If you really need a gun like this for shooting beer cans, deer, or any other target, you need to rethink your life.
>not wanting a glorious Stoner master LMG to enshrine and go dakadakadaka at the ranges with.
It's really no different than people owning 200+hp cars. You don't need to go 0 to 60 in four seconds flat, and you may lose control and kill someone doing it.
But fast cars aren't made to do damage, they're made to go fast. Machine guns are actually designed for the purpose of killing people efficiently and quickly.
And sometimes that is necessary.
No Cam, it's not. If you ever do need a full auto weapon to shoot from the elevated windows of your house, chances are, there's a fucking tank approximately three miles out and closing.
You defense nuts make all of us recreational gun lovers look like paranoid tin-foil "the gubment gonna come and take muh rifle" nutjobs.
That just makes you sound paranoid, ironically. Sometimes it absolutely IS necessary, in cases of riots, for example. Dealing with a tank is an entirely separate issue.
935
« on: January 15, 2015, 10:05:41 PM »
It's designed to put a shitload of rounds downrange to make the enemy stay in cover so that your men can move forward and then kill the enemy with their semi-auto AR's.
Man, now I'm convinced that it's logical to sell them to ordinary civilians.
Brotip: your typical sandy hook dude is gonna do more damage with a semi-auto weapon than a full auto any day.
No. If you're in a crowd of people, and you want to kill as many as possible, you're going to do a lot more damage with a gun that shoots hundreds of rounds per minute for you. If you can only shoot as fast as you can pull the trigger, you're not going to do nearly the same level of damage as an LMG would.
I'm nearly as good with my assigned M16.
That doesn't matter. As fast as you can pull the trigger, an automatic gun will always be faster.
And less accurate.
And waste more ammo
And miss more targets.
If you're in a huge crowd, missing targets isn't a problem.
But putting 10 rounds into a target that only needs two or three definitely is.
That's why you actually move the gun around. You don't just hold it in one place. Duh.
You clearly have no experience with fully automatic firearms.
You're either slowly moving the gun around in a suppressive manner or you're wildly jerking around, missing fucking everything because the timing of the bullet going off and your swinging isn't in synch.
It's blatantly obvious when you're talking to someone that has never actually fired these weapons and only envisions them as the way Hollywood portrays.
936
« on: January 15, 2015, 10:04:43 PM »
The only point of a gun that large is to kill a lot of people in a small amount of time.
>we need vidya for fun but you can't kill paper or beer cans for entertainment
>hunting isn't a thing
>target shooting isn't fun
>sporting clays isn't an age old pastime
Class pls, I thought you were better than Max.
If you really need a gun like this for shooting beer cans, deer, or any other target, you need to rethink your life.
Is there something wrong with enjoying the opportunity, though? Should someone be prevented from doing what they want?
Yes. If anyone could just buy a machine gun, the majority of purchases wouldn't be for shooting fucking beer cans, it would be for shooting humans.
That is insanely false and a baseless assumption proven wrong with history and experience. The overwhelming majority of firearm owners have killed NO ONE. People that want to kill are going to try, hindering responsible people will do nothing to help that, but just make things worse.
You don't need a fucking Scarface gun to protect your home. Buy a goddamn pistol.
I'll own as many as I like. Don't tell me what to purchase.
937
« on: January 15, 2015, 09:07:29 PM »
The only point of a gun that large is to kill a lot of people in a small amount of time.
>we need vidya for fun but you can't kill paper or beer cans for entertainment
>hunting isn't a thing
>target shooting isn't fun
>sporting clays isn't an age old pastime
Class pls, I thought you were better than Max.
If you really need a gun like this for shooting beer cans, deer, or any other target, you need to rethink your life.
>not wanting a glorious Stoner master LMG to enshrine and go dakadakadaka at the ranges with.
It's really no different than people owning 200+hp cars. You don't need to go 0 to 60 in four seconds flat, and you may lose control and kill someone doing it.
But fast cars aren't made to do damage, they're made to go fast. Machine guns are actually designed for the purpose of killing people efficiently and quickly.
And sometimes that is necessary.
938
« on: January 15, 2015, 09:06:18 PM »
The only point of a gun that large is to kill a lot of people in a small amount of time.
>we need vidya for fun but you can't kill paper or beer cans for entertainment
>hunting isn't a thing
>target shooting isn't fun
>sporting clays isn't an age old pastime
Class pls, I thought you were better than Max.
If you really need a gun like this for shooting beer cans, deer, or any other target, you need to rethink your life.
Is there something wrong with enjoying the opportunity, though? Should someone be prevented from doing what they want?
Yes. If anyone could just buy a machine gun, the majority of purchases wouldn't be for shooting fucking beer cans, it would be for shooting humans.
That is insanely false and a baseless assumption proven wrong with history and experience. The overwhelming majority of firearm owners have killed NO ONE. People that want to kill are going to try, hindering responsible people will do nothing to help that, but just make things worse.
939
« on: January 15, 2015, 08:51:04 PM »
The only point of a gun that large is to kill a lot of people in a small amount of time.
>we need vidya for fun but you can't kill paper or beer cans for entertainment
>hunting isn't a thing
>target shooting isn't fun
>sporting clays isn't an age old pastime
Class pls, I thought you were better than Max.
If you really need a gun like this for shooting beer cans, deer, or any other target, you need to rethink your life.
Is there something wrong with enjoying the opportunity, though? Should someone be prevented from doing what they want?
940
« on: January 15, 2015, 08:47:45 PM »
Any weapon can be very dangerous dependent on the user. That doesn't mean you go around banning bats, knives, automobiles and nearly every other object in existence just because some people happen to be irresponsible.
Can you kill thirty people in sixty seconds with a baseball bat or a knife? I'm all for protected ownership of a concealed handgun, but there's no reason whatsoever that an ordinary citizen would need a fully automatic assault rifle.
I could kill a lot of people with a bat and knife, yes. Hell, I can take out more than that with a solid vehicle or explosive. There's no reason why an ordinary citizen needs a house or most things they own, but it makes life more pleasant. Some happen to enjoy owning these types of weapons. Not only for protection, but simply recreation. Not to mention, it has its uses in the real world over other types of weapons.
Are you kidding me? An ordinary citizen needs a house as shelter. We need video games for fun, phones for communication, etc. The only point of a gun that large is to kill a lot of people in a small amount of time. And please. You couldn't kill a quarter of the people in sixty seconds with a knife that you could with a machine gun. I thought we were having a serious discussion.
You don't need a house, games or communication at all, actually. You should need a viable means of protecting yourself and other loved ones. You could kill a lot MORE people with a knife than a fully automatic weapon, as you get at most two seconds of firing before running out of ammunition, and switching magazines gives people the opportunity to bring you down. There is no reloading with a knife.
941
« on: January 15, 2015, 08:43:35 PM »
The police can be a lot more corrupt than that here.
942
« on: January 15, 2015, 08:39:26 PM »
Any weapon can be very dangerous dependent on the user. That doesn't mean you go around banning bats, knives, automobiles and nearly every other object in existence just because some people happen to be irresponsible.
Can you kill thirty people in sixty seconds with a baseball bat or a knife? I'm all for protected ownership of a concealed handgun, but there's no reason whatsoever that an ordinary citizen would need a fully automatic assault rifle.
I could kill a lot of people with a bat and knife, yes. Hell, I can take out more than that with a solid vehicle or explosive. There's no reason why an ordinary citizen needs a house or most things they own, but it makes life more pleasant. Some happen to enjoy owning these types of weapons. Not only for protection, but simply recreation. Not to mention, it has its uses in the real world over other types of weapons.
943
« on: January 15, 2015, 08:34:09 PM »
Any weapon can be very dangerous dependent on the user. That doesn't mean you go around banning bats, knives, automobiles and nearly every other object in existence just because some people happen to be irresponsible.
944
« on: January 15, 2015, 08:19:02 PM »
Depends on the mod. Some of them here were just as bad.
945
« on: January 15, 2015, 08:15:47 PM »
Honest question though how many of those booty could be fake?
And honestly do they not sag faster?
Not sure about others, but I never post fakes. I always check them first.
946
« on: January 15, 2015, 06:29:09 PM »
Booty
947
« on: January 15, 2015, 06:24:31 PM »
Hey cam I know this is off-topic but have you ever eaten a pot brownie before? My friends tricked me into eating three of them and I wanna make sure that I won't die
You'll be alright, just drink plenty of water and try to take a nap. I've only made brownies once, I'm not a big fan of brownies. I've made other edibles before, even a cheesecake once.
948
« on: January 15, 2015, 06:15:16 PM »
If you truly didn't care you wouldn't feel compelled to post in the first place. caring to let people know that you don't care
and caring about the topic at hand
are two different things
That doesn't make them irrelevant to each other.
949
« on: January 15, 2015, 06:11:59 PM »
If you truly didn't care you wouldn't feel compelled to post in the first place.
950
« on: January 15, 2015, 06:07:24 PM »
951
« on: January 15, 2015, 06:03:24 PM »
Small booty
952
« on: January 15, 2015, 05:43:29 PM »
I'm not smart enough to debate this
If there is an infinite amount of time prior to us being here, there's no way for us to be here because that infinite amount of time, by definition, couldn't have passed.
Why do you assume we couldn't be here?
I'm not assuming. If there is an infinite amount of time before the occurrence of something, that something cannot occur because the time logically couldn't have passed yet--and it never would pass.
That is an assumption, though. What makes you think this just isn't our time to be here? We're pretty close to killing ourselves off and them we will be just another blip in the universe.
Time changes on perception, so if there was an infinite amount of time before us, we wouldn't exist right now because that infinite amount of time could not have passed (bear with me, time is an incredibly complex thing).
For example, heat death is the demise the universe will most likely meet predicting the current shape of the universe (flat). Before this final energy state is reached, the only things left (as everything else will have decayed or have been destroyed by quantum tunneling) in the universe will be supermassive black holes. These eventually evaporate, as they emit Hawking radiation. The deaths of these black holes will take an immense amount of time, but because they are the only objects left in the universe, this immense amount of time will happen instantaneously.
If time is infinite, though, that doesn't negate the opportunity for us to be apart of it. Time is definitely a complex subject, and many don't even believe it exists at all. It's definitely not linear as we perceive it.
953
« on: January 15, 2015, 05:38:41 PM »
Forcing others to take care of you is not progress, it actually just hurts everyone. Nearly everyone could afford it if the government didn't make it so expensive in the first place.
I'm sure you long for the days where we were hunter-gatherers and lived in mud huts
I'm vagetarian, and I don't live in a mud hut. It's called actually providing for yourself and not being dependent.
954
« on: January 15, 2015, 04:53:14 PM »
I'm not smart enough to debate this
If there is an infinite amount of time prior to us being here, there's no way for us to be here because that infinite amount of time, by definition, couldn't have passed.
Why do you assume we couldn't be here?
I'm not assuming. If there is an infinite amount of time before the occurrence of something, that something cannot occur because the time logically couldn't have passed yet--and it never would pass.
That is an assumption, though. What makes you think this just isn't our time to be here? We're pretty close to killing ourselves off and them we will be just another blip in the universe.
955
« on: January 15, 2015, 04:51:35 PM »
Sounds like any time Mad Max makes a thread.
Sounds like anytime you post...
I actually have character.
Lolno
Except I do. You can get over your obsession now.
956
« on: January 15, 2015, 04:49:36 PM »
Forcing others to take care of you is not progress, it actually just hurts everyone. Nearly everyone could afford it if the government didn't make it so expensive in the first place.
957
« on: January 15, 2015, 07:00:08 AM »
Sounds like any time Mad Max makes a thread.
Sounds like anytime you post...
The difference is I don't take the internet seriously and I actually have character. Hopefully you're not becoming obsessed with me already.
958
« on: January 15, 2015, 05:41:11 AM »
I would never waste my time voting.
959
« on: January 15, 2015, 05:35:29 AM »
I'm not smart enough to debate this
If there is an infinite amount of time prior to us being here, there's no way for us to be here because that infinite amount of time, by definition, couldn't have passed.
Why do you assume we couldn't be here?
960
« on: January 15, 2015, 05:28:34 AM »
Sounds like any time Mad Max makes a thread.
Pages: 1 ... 303132 3334 ... 132
|
Show Posts