This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Camnator
Pages: 1 ... 252627 2829 ... 132
781
« on: January 17, 2015, 09:17:22 PM »
The only way to fix things is to get rid of all rules and let people moderate with the mute function. The rules will never be enforced properly here, not to mention they change constantly.
782
« on: January 17, 2015, 09:15:54 PM »
Nasty cellulite
Please drop that mirror.
783
« on: January 17, 2015, 09:14:07 PM »
I miss when you were banned.
It's a shame you let strangers on the internet bother you. That's pretty pathetic.
At least I don't spill personal secrets.
Neither would I. What I said wasn't a secret, otherwise I and many others wouldn't have been aware, nor is it something one should feel the need to keep a secret. Besides, exposing a "secret" isn't a big deal, especially when the person is a piece of filth and insulted you for no reason many times. He also spread several lies about me, but go ahead and pretend you know what you're talking about you obsessed squirt.
784
« on: January 17, 2015, 09:11:45 PM »
It has every right to life, no one has the right to an attorney.
785
« on: January 17, 2015, 09:11:11 PM »
786
« on: January 17, 2015, 09:10:45 PM »
787
« on: January 17, 2015, 08:43:57 PM »
I miss when you were banned.
It's a shame you let strangers on the internet bother you. That's pretty pathetic.
788
« on: January 17, 2015, 08:30:11 PM »
Small, but I could get lost in that booty. 
789
« on: January 17, 2015, 08:28:24 PM »
790
« on: January 17, 2015, 08:24:06 PM »
Jesse we need to cook
for fuck's sake marie
they're minerals
791
« on: January 17, 2015, 08:15:32 PM »
Fucking thread is still going...
time for bed
Buuuuuuuuut....
Big female butts
792
« on: January 17, 2015, 08:14:31 PM »
My mother has a service dog and an Africa Grey. I love them both. Both girls, the one is a Labradoodle.
793
« on: January 17, 2015, 08:11:46 PM »
. . .
You keep espousing this idea that your arguments are based on history and experience, and are appreciative of facts, but I'm yet to lay witness to this awe-inspiring rationality. I'm still waiting for you to say some even remotely meaningful when it comes to what we know about the economy. Now, the fact that you want to claim some sort of epistemic authority while making cryptic statements about picking up a 'bigger stick' and robbing from the entire world, then all it does is demonstrate your sheer lack of understanding.
Inflation was stable during Clinton's tenure, and the economy did grow. If you had the appreciation of facts you claim to have, you'd know this and understand that everything I'm telling you is based in evidence and looking at prior monetary policy to see what works, and what economic indicators actually tell us what is working.
So far, however, nobody has been fortunate enough to lay witness to your clear superiority on this issue. So--much like God--you must forgive us when we question its existence.
All you have to do is look at the world around you and do a little research. Follow the money. I've said many meaningful things, you just can't grasp the concept. I recommend you read this entire thread three or four times, it may help you. The only one lacking understanding is you. Look at all of the recent wars we've been in. You want me to give you a history lesson because you're slow? Sorry, not going to happen. I've said what needs to be said. If you think what we currently have is working, there is no helping you.
"My only argument here is to say that I'm right, you're wrong. I don't need any basis or statistics to back it up, I'm just out here for a sTROLL."
I have backed up my argument, which you'd realize if you actually read the thread.
No, you really haven't. Meta has been providing graphs, charts and links. You've only provided the US Debt Clock website and nothing else outside of "Oh you don't understand this hurdurr"
His graphs were irrelevant or only proved him wrong. The debt has been my main point all along, it's the very fabric of my argument. If you have been reading this thread you'd know this. It's why any other point here is moot, as the entire monetary system is already worthless. You and Meta are so far behind in the argument, which is what I've been trying to explain.
All I've seen is you being completely wrong and performing mental gymnastics to somehow turn it in your favor.
Except I'm not at all wrong, or someone could explain how I am. The fact you are obsessed and sore because you're not intelligent enough to make an argument is irrelevant to that fact. Keep living that dream, though, I'm glad I no longer allow myself to be robbed from. I won't be anyone's slave.
794
« on: January 17, 2015, 08:06:53 PM »
You should have left the names in so we could email them.
795
« on: January 17, 2015, 08:05:42 PM »
Big female booties.
796
« on: January 17, 2015, 08:02:49 PM »
. . .
You keep espousing this idea that your arguments are based on history and experience, and are appreciative of facts, but I'm yet to lay witness to this awe-inspiring rationality. I'm still waiting for you to say some even remotely meaningful when it comes to what we know about the economy. Now, the fact that you want to claim some sort of epistemic authority while making cryptic statements about picking up a 'bigger stick' and robbing from the entire world, then all it does is demonstrate your sheer lack of understanding.
Inflation was stable during Clinton's tenure, and the economy did grow. If you had the appreciation of facts you claim to have, you'd know this and understand that everything I'm telling you is based in evidence and looking at prior monetary policy to see what works, and what economic indicators actually tell us what is working.
So far, however, nobody has been fortunate enough to lay witness to your clear superiority on this issue. So--much like God--you must forgive us when we question its existence.
All you have to do is look at the world around you and do a little research. Follow the money. I've said many meaningful things, you just can't grasp the concept. I recommend you read this entire thread three or four times, it may help you. The only one lacking understanding is you. Look at all of the recent wars we've been in. You want me to give you a history lesson because you're slow? Sorry, not going to happen. I've said what needs to be said. If you think what we currently have is working, there is no helping you.
"My only argument here is to say that I'm right, you're wrong. I don't need any basis or statistics to back it up, I'm just out here for a sTROLL."
I have backed up my argument, which you'd realize if you actually read the thread.
No, you really haven't. Meta has been providing graphs, charts and links. You've only provided the US Debt Clock website and nothing else outside of "Oh you don't understand this hurdurr"
His graphs were irrelevant or only proved him wrong. The debt has been my main point all along, it's the very fabric of my argument. If you have been reading this thread you'd know this. It's why any other point here is moot, as the entire monetary system is already worthless. You and Meta are so far behind in the argument, which is what I've been trying to explain.
797
« on: January 17, 2015, 07:57:55 PM »
798
« on: January 17, 2015, 07:55:19 PM »
I'll be using some cannabis.
799
« on: January 17, 2015, 07:54:54 PM »
. . .
You keep espousing this idea that your arguments are based on history and experience, and are appreciative of facts, but I'm yet to lay witness to this awe-inspiring rationality. I'm still waiting for you to say some even remotely meaningful when it comes to what we know about the economy. Now, the fact that you want to claim some sort of epistemic authority while making cryptic statements about picking up a 'bigger stick' and robbing from the entire world, then all it does is demonstrate your sheer lack of understanding.
Inflation was stable during Clinton's tenure, and the economy did grow. If you had the appreciation of facts you claim to have, you'd know this and understand that everything I'm telling you is based in evidence and looking at prior monetary policy to see what works, and what economic indicators actually tell us what is working.
So far, however, nobody has been fortunate enough to lay witness to your clear superiority on this issue. So--much like God--you must forgive us when we question its existence.
All you have to do is look at the world around you and do a little research. Follow the money. I've said many meaningful things, you just can't grasp the concept. I recommend you read this entire thread three or four times, it may help you. The only one lacking understanding is you. Look at all of the recent wars we've been in. You want me to give you a history lesson because you're slow? Sorry, not going to happen. I've said what needs to be said. If you think what we currently have is working, there is no helping you.
"My only argument here is to say that I'm right, you're wrong. I don't need any basis or statistics to back it up, I'm just out here for a sTROLL."
I have backed up my argument, which you'd realize if you actually read the thread.
800
« on: January 17, 2015, 07:49:42 PM »
Ranch dressing, guacamole, humus
I'm so doing Olive Garden Italian Dressing now! Thanks!
801
« on: January 17, 2015, 07:48:56 PM »
>playing halo 4
What's wrong with playing a fantastic game? It's not like he was playing the awful Reach abomination.
I actually...agree with Camnator? What?
But yeah, Mantis or bust, mate.
Your obsession is pathetic.
Keep sweet talking me, sweetheart, and this can go a whole new direction.
You already owe me $500. I have some serious booty time at my disposal.
802
« on: January 17, 2015, 07:47:54 PM »
. . .
You keep espousing this idea that your arguments are based on history and experience, and are appreciative of facts, but I'm yet to lay witness to this awe-inspiring rationality. I'm still waiting for you to say some even remotely meaningful when it comes to what we know about the economy. Now, the fact that you want to claim some sort of epistemic authority while making cryptic statements about picking up a 'bigger stick' and robbing from the entire world, then all it does is demonstrate your sheer lack of understanding.
Inflation was stable during Clinton's tenure, and the economy did grow. If you had the appreciation of facts you claim to have, you'd know this and understand that everything I'm telling you is based in evidence and looking at prior monetary policy to see what works, and what economic indicators actually tell us what is working.
So far, however, nobody has been fortunate enough to lay witness to your clear superiority on this issue. So--much like God--you must forgive us when we question its existence.
All you have to do is look at the world around you and do a little research. Follow the money. I've said many meaningful things, you just can't grasp the concept. I recommend you read this entire thread three or four times, it may help you. The only one lacking understanding is you. Look at all of the recent wars we've been in. You want me to give you a history lesson because you're slow? Sorry, not going to happen. I've said what needs to be said. If you think what we currently have is working, there is no helping you.
803
« on: January 17, 2015, 07:45:11 PM »
Of course you are biased against me because I've destroyed your position in a few different firearm threads.
Posting such nonsensical and outlandish things that literally everyone in the thread stops taking you seriously and ignores your posts completely isn't generally considered "destroying someone's opinion".
And if you really have such a problem with the users here, you're welcome to leave at any time, you know. Sticking around like this and coming back to the people that you consider moronic losers on a retarded site as soon as your ban wears off is kind of sending a strange signal here.
The only nonsense is your own, which is of course why you choose not to listen to reason. Go ahead and continue to live in your fantasy world, though. I hardly ever take any of you seriously, because most of you are insane. Only horrible users. A lot of people here are cool. I'll stay and try to make the site better, but you can ignore me if you wish.
804
« on: January 17, 2015, 04:56:25 PM »
Of course you want to think that because you realize you're wrong. No. . . There's a reason the graph represents the debt-to-GDP ratio in the first place: because that's what matters.
The economy didn't "grow" under Clinton, we simply lived a bigger lie as our money became even more worthless.
Again, no. The economy grew at an average of just over 3pc per year. And inflation was stable under Clinton.
You still don't understand how inflation works. The economy didn't grow, we just simply picked up a bigger stick as we robbed from the entire world.
805
« on: January 17, 2015, 04:55:32 PM »
After he baselessly questioned my intelligence after I was correcting him and explaining why he was wrong
I didn't baselessly question your intelligence. You're just spouting ideological rhetoric without appreciation of economic facts, which isn't surprising when you quite clearly stated you don't even care about money demand. And all your "correction" amounts to is:
I care about problems and desire actual solutions to them that won't make things worse. It's blatantly obviously you have no grasp of economics which is why you're not even beginning to see reality here. Nothing rational, statistical or empirical. . . Just a lot of emotional, 'you can't even begin to understand my superiority'-esque narcissistic nonsense.
You did multiple times. I'm spouting common sense based off of history and experience. I appreciate facts all too well, which is why I'm the correct one here. I stated I don't care about money demand when the money is already useless, so you can stop with the false assumptions. You're still not even close to being in the same argument here. You're stuck in neutral and I'm already in fourth gear. The only narcissism is your own. I've already explained why you're wrong. Just because you don't listen or understand is irrelevant.
806
« on: January 17, 2015, 04:50:42 PM »
Your own concentrated ignorance.
There would be nothing for me to lick. Perhaps I could concentrate your obsession.
My obsession with not being ignorant?
Yes, you're right. There would be a lot to lick then.
Except the fact you are often ignorant due to your obsession.
807
« on: January 17, 2015, 04:48:40 PM »
That is different then increasing the overall debt.
Thinking about the debt in absolute, numerical terms is pointless. . .
A $3bn debt is a lot worse if its 80pc of your economy instead of just 5pc. The fact that the economy grew during Clinton's tenure matters. The debt shrank in relation to the size of the economy--which is the only proper measure of the situation of the national debt.
Of course you want to think that because you realize you're wrong. The economy didn't "grow" under Clinton, we simply lived a bigger lie as our money became even more worthless.
808
« on: January 17, 2015, 04:47:17 PM »
No need to target me, especially when I wasn't the one that started it. You can get over your bias. I have no problem keeping my posts clean as long as everyone else does.
It went from Meta telling you that you "probably don't understand economics" and explaining you monetary functions to you responding by calling him pathetic and someone who wants to be special on an internet forum because his life is that miserable.
There is no bias here. Serious forum is for serious discussions. While questioning another user's understanding of a certain topic is perfectly acceptable, the things you said are definitely crossing the line.
After he baselessly questioned my intelligence after I was correcting him and explaining why he was wrong, exactly. After that I simply evaluated his pathetic life. There's no difference between the two, and he acted first. Nothing I said crosses a line anymore than what he said. Stop taking the internet so seriously. If I don't make a big deal about getting a month ban for literally nothing, you can live with me putting a few squirts in their place. Of course you are biased against me because I've destroyed your position in a few different firearm threads. Do what you guys have to do, but I'm not going to try and work with this retarded site anymore. I've been treated unfairly too many times already. I'm going to post how I like until the losers finally get rid of me for good so I won't have to see anymore stupidity here.
809
« on: January 17, 2015, 04:44:57 PM »
Exactly, he still increased the debt.
. . . What?
Clinton's administration is in purple--the part which curves down. The debt-to-GDP ratio shrunk.
Debt to GDP, meaning he didn't spend as much as he could have. That is different then increasing the overall debt.
810
« on: January 17, 2015, 04:37:08 PM »
>playing halo 4
What's wrong with playing a fantastic game? It's not like he was playing the awful Reach abomination.
I actually...agree with Camnator? What?
But yeah, Mantis or bust, mate.
Your obsession is pathetic.
Pages: 1 ... 252627 2829 ... 132
|
Show Posts
