Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Camnator

Pages: 1 ... 151617 1819 ... 132
481
The Flood / Re: Discussion on Transgenderism
« on: January 19, 2015, 09:27:09 PM »

482
The Flood / Re: Discussion on Transgenderism
« on: January 19, 2015, 09:25:50 PM »
Fuck. Now this shit is in Serious?

God damn it.

Icy pls.

If only you could control which threads you engage in!

483
The Flood / Re: Discussion on Transgenderism
« on: January 19, 2015, 09:25:27 PM »
Why was this handled in such a freaking mess?

484
The Flood / Re: I'm going to be tripping balls here shortly
« on: January 19, 2015, 09:24:04 PM »
So where's the fun in it if you can't even remember anything afterwards?
In the moment it feels amazing.
So how much exactly do you remember then if you're able to remember the feeling?
It's not like total "50 First Dates" style amnesia. It's just all really blurry. The memory loss happens while high too. Like you can't remember what you were doing 5 minutes ago. I can remember just sitting there listening to music, I remember having some freaky hallucinations, I just can't remember what they were.
But you remember just enough to know that it feels amazing. Well that's interesting.
It's a shame that you can't remember the hallucinations. That would've been interesting to hear about.
I remember something to do with the mirror in my room, like someone/something standing there next to me in the reflection but I'd look around me and nothing.

You're obsessed.

485
The Flood / Re: Would you bang a 10/10 trap?
« on: January 19, 2015, 09:21:52 PM »
Fuck you mods!

Do their lobotomies not make for some humorous observations, though?

486
The Flood / Re: Body cam shows events leading up to rookie cop's death
« on: January 19, 2015, 09:19:50 PM »
I did prove it. You claimed cops would not arrest people for drugs, and I showed you they do, a lot. Cannabis is not illegal, the unjust laws are the only thing illegal. It infringes upon our freedoms which they have no authority to do. No one should enforce unjust laws. Are cops just dummies that do whatever they are told no matter how wrong they know it is?
But I never made that claim. Ever. You just threw that accusation into one of your responses to me. Regardless of whether it's unjust, they're not necessarily wrong for doing their jobs unless it strongly violates moral boundaries or their own conscience.

Infringing upon freedoms DOES violate moral boundaries. You just admitted you were wrong. Also, are you really saying I put it into your responses? Let's review...

I began with, "I've had a few offers to be a cop, and there's a reason I never took it. I can deal with pathetic people, I can even deal with having to take on multiple drunks, but I could never sacrifice my principle and infringe upon people like cops do. You spend your day robbing from mostly productive people."

I've had a few offers to be a cop, and there's a reason I never took it. I can deal with pathetic people, I can even deal with having to take on multiple drunks, but I could never sacrifice my principle and infringe upon people like cops do. You spend your day robbing from mostly productive people.
I can't imagine the stress of actually being a cop.

I've had a few offers to be a cop, and there's a reason I never took it. I can deal with pathetic people, I can even deal with having to take on multiple drunks, but I could never sacrifice my principle and infringe upon people like cops do. You spend your day robbing from mostly productive people.
I am 100% certain that is not most cops.

It is the overwhelming majority of them. How many cops would let someone they found with heroin go?
It's overwhelmingly not the majority of them.

You're wrong, again.

487
The Flood / Re: Discussion on Transgenderism
« on: January 19, 2015, 09:11:46 PM »
It's just immoral.
I'm not going to get into a debate with you but you have a strange definition of morality.
I'd consider it pretty immoral to let a sufferer of a disease believe that he's healthy instead of actually trying to help him.
Alright alright fine.
What exactly is unhealthy about it if they're normal functioning people that blend in to normal society and are happy?
They're living a lie. They're pretending to be something they're not. If someone truly believed that they were King Richard III, would you encourage him to live out that life? Or would you recommend him a therapist? Probably the latter.

I have no problem with people being whatever they want, but you're making some excellent points here, actually.

488
The Flood / Re: Discussion on Transgenderism
« on: January 19, 2015, 09:10:31 PM »
delusional

Jaythenerdkid just ejaculated.

489
The Flood / Re: Discussion on Transgenderism
« on: January 19, 2015, 09:09:15 PM »
This thread is an A+ shitfest.
I dropped a match and it turned into a forest fire...

You deserve a medal.

Peace prize*

490
The Flood / Re: Super Bowl ads
« on: January 19, 2015, 09:07:22 PM »
They are sissies for not running NORML's cannabis ad, and also preventing users from using in legal states. Not to mention watching sports is just incredibly lame and boring.

491
The Flood / Re: Body cam shows events leading up to rookie cop's death
« on: January 19, 2015, 09:05:04 PM »
I can't imagine the stress of actually being a cop.

I've had a few offers to be a cop, and there's a reason I never took it. I can deal with pathetic people, I can even deal with having to take on multiple drunks, but I could never sacrifice my principle and infringe upon people like cops do. You spend your day robbing from mostly productive people.
I am 100% certain that is not most cops.

It is the overwhelming majority of them. How many cops would let someone they found with heroin go?
It's overwhelmingly not the majority of them.

So, you're saying most cops won't arrest someone that is in possession of heroin? I request you do an experiment where you purchase some heroin and go around using it near police. See how many ignore you before one finally arrests you and we'll have a solid test.
You're the one claiming they won't. You prove it.

This is easy.

"According to the recent Federal Bureau of Investigation's annual Uniform Crime Report, There have been over twelve million cannabis arrests in the United States since 1996 including 749,825 persons for marijuana violations in 2012. Of those charged with marijuana violations in 2012, 658,231 were charged with possession only. The remaining 91,593 individuals were charged with "sale/manufacture," a category that does not differentiate for cultivation offenses, even those where the marijuana was being grown for personal or medical use. Marijuana arrests comprise almost one-half (48.3 percent) of all drug arrests reported in the United States."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannabis_in_the_United_States#Crime
>asking you to prove a claim about heroin
>you give evidence about cannabis

Wait, what does heroin or cannabis even have to do with anything?

You've gone full incoherent. Never go full incoherent.

The only incoherence is your own. This still proved my point, but if you don't believe people get locked up for heroin and may other drugs all of the time, well, that's something you need to research. I don't need to prove something that is already established as common sense. Prohibition of drugs is completely unjust and criminal. The point is, cops that are not truly corrupt would NEVER arrest someone for possessing, using, selling or producing drugs. Period. Prostitution as well.
Your point is irrelevant to the discussion. You simply pulled it out of your ass because you needed an out from a losing argument.

You're only speaking about yourself, as I just humiliated you and proved you were wrong. My point is entirely relevant and shows all cops have to be corrupt. The fact you don't like addressing reality doesn't make it any less true.
The only one humiliated is yourself. By speaking into the mirror, you have proven that you are incoherent. You are delusional.

You're lucky that is a comment which is fine instead of a thread or I would have you banned.

492
The Flood / Re: Body cam shows events leading up to rookie cop's death
« on: January 19, 2015, 09:04:21 PM »
I can't imagine the stress of actually being a cop.

I've had a few offers to be a cop, and there's a reason I never took it. I can deal with pathetic people, I can even deal with having to take on multiple drunks, but I could never sacrifice my principle and infringe upon people like cops do. You spend your day robbing from mostly productive people.
I am 100% certain that is not most cops.

It is the overwhelming majority of them. How many cops would let someone they found with heroin go?
It's overwhelmingly not the majority of them.

So, you're saying most cops won't arrest someone that is in possession of heroin? I request you do an experiment where you purchase some heroin and go around using it near police. See how many ignore you before one finally arrests you and we'll have a solid test.
You're the one claiming they won't. You prove it.

This is easy.

"According to the recent Federal Bureau of Investigation's annual Uniform Crime Report, There have been over twelve million cannabis arrests in the United States since 1996 including 749,825 persons for marijuana violations in 2012. Of those charged with marijuana violations in 2012, 658,231 were charged with possession only. The remaining 91,593 individuals were charged with "sale/manufacture," a category that does not differentiate for cultivation offenses, even those where the marijuana was being grown for personal or medical use. Marijuana arrests comprise almost one-half (48.3 percent) of all drug arrests reported in the United States."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannabis_in_the_United_States#Crime
>asking you to prove a claim about heroin
>you give evidence about cannabis

Wait, what does heroin or cannabis even have to do with anything?

You've gone full incoherent. Never go full incoherent.

The only incoherence is your own. This still proved my point, but if you don't believe people get locked up for heroin and may other drugs all of the time, well, that's something you need to research. I don't need to prove something that is already established as common sense. Prohibition of drugs is completely unjust and criminal. The point is, cops that are not truly corrupt would NEVER arrest someone for possessing, using, selling or producing drugs. Period. Prostitution as well.
Your point is irrelevant to the discussion. You simply pulled it out of your ass because you needed an out from a losing argument.

You're only speaking about yourself, as I just humiliated you and proved you were wrong. My point is entirely relevant and shows all cops have to be corrupt. The fact you don't like addressing reality doesn't make it any less true.
lol

You didn't prove anything. You can't just declare victory like that. And besides, marijuana is still illegal in most of the country. You make it sound like cops aren't supposed to enforce the law or something.

I did prove it. You claimed cops would not arrest people for drugs, and I showed you they do, a lot. Cannabis is not illegal, the unjust laws are the only thing illegal. It infringes upon our freedoms which they have no authority to do. No one should enforce unjust laws. Are cops just dummies that do whatever they are told no matter how wrong they know it is?

493
The Flood / Re: Hey Slash!
« on: January 19, 2015, 09:02:34 PM »
Enjoy your ban
For what?

Calling out users is against the rules now, unless of course you've participated in some circle jerks here.
Calling out users to insult them is against the rules.

Slash and I are very insulted.


















 





















 












 


 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 








 





















           





























         



























By your FACE!

494
The Flood / Re: Hey Slash!
« on: January 19, 2015, 09:01:19 PM »
is there a joke that im not aware of or something?
No
then what is going on you fat shit?

See? This comment you made is fine, however, if you made that a thread it suddenly becomes a problem.

495
The Flood / Re: Hey Slash!
« on: January 19, 2015, 09:00:23 PM »
Enjoy your ban
For what?

Calling out users is against the rules now, unless of course you've participated in some circle jerks here.

496
The Flood / Re: When anarchy comes around.
« on: January 19, 2015, 08:59:45 PM »
I prefer big female booty.

497
Serious / Re: Was Jesus's Cruxifixction a true sacrifice?
« on: January 19, 2015, 08:59:19 PM »
God doesn't contradict Himself by sacrificing His Son, because Jesus WAS God.
This is something that gets complex: realizing that Jesus "was with God, and WAS God."
And Christ was the "sacrificial lamb, sin offering" that cleanses the world of its sins if it accepts that gift.

And also, why does knowledge of the aftermath of His death keep His death from being a sacrifice?
He still had to go through the suffering. The knowledge of what your actions will bring don't negate what you are doing.

That's like saying: you know that if you hold off a gunman and die, the people you are with will escape and survive. So you dying is no longer a sacrifice. You do the exact same action, the only difference is you have the knowledge of the aftermath.


What determines an act as sacrifice? The lack of knowledge that what you are doing is worth it?
The "book definition" of Sacrifice is: offer or kill as a religious sacrifice.

So yeah, Jesus meets the book definition of Sacrifice.

Why exactly would a deity need to make a son of himself to get himself killed in order to forgive us? If anything, it should piss a deity off.

498
The Flood / Re: Body cam shows events leading up to rookie cop's death
« on: January 19, 2015, 08:57:29 PM »
I can't imagine the stress of actually being a cop.

I've had a few offers to be a cop, and there's a reason I never took it. I can deal with pathetic people, I can even deal with having to take on multiple drunks, but I could never sacrifice my principle and infringe upon people like cops do. You spend your day robbing from mostly productive people.
I am 100% certain that is not most cops.

It is the overwhelming majority of them. How many cops would let someone they found with heroin go?
It's overwhelmingly not the majority of them.

So, you're saying most cops won't arrest someone that is in possession of heroin? I request you do an experiment where you purchase some heroin and go around using it near police. See how many ignore you before one finally arrests you and we'll have a solid test.
You're the one claiming they won't. You prove it.

This is easy.

"According to the recent Federal Bureau of Investigation's annual Uniform Crime Report, There have been over twelve million cannabis arrests in the United States since 1996 including 749,825 persons for marijuana violations in 2012. Of those charged with marijuana violations in 2012, 658,231 were charged with possession only. The remaining 91,593 individuals were charged with "sale/manufacture," a category that does not differentiate for cultivation offenses, even those where the marijuana was being grown for personal or medical use. Marijuana arrests comprise almost one-half (48.3 percent) of all drug arrests reported in the United States."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannabis_in_the_United_States#Crime
>asking you to prove a claim about heroin
>you give evidence about cannabis

Wait, what does heroin or cannabis even have to do with anything?

You've gone full incoherent. Never go full incoherent.

The only incoherence is your own. This still proved my point, but if you don't believe people get locked up for heroin and may other drugs all of the time, well, that's something you need to research. I don't need to prove something that is already established as common sense. Prohibition of drugs is completely unjust and criminal. The point is, cops that are not truly corrupt would NEVER arrest someone for possessing, using, selling or producing drugs. Period. Prostitution as well.
Your point is irrelevant to the discussion. You simply pulled it out of your ass because you needed an out from a losing argument.

You're only speaking about yourself, as I just humiliated you and proved you were wrong. My point is entirely relevant and shows all cops have to be corrupt. The fact you don't like addressing reality doesn't make it any less true.

499
The Flood / Re: Discussion on Transgenderism
« on: January 19, 2015, 08:54:05 PM »
Er...do you know the difference between the two? Just curious.
I've been taught that "transsexual" is basically transgendered + surgery. If you're gonna tell me that what I've been taught is wrong, go ahead, but that's what I've been taught.

They make it up as they go along. Don't try to make sense of it because they'll just keep getting more ridiculous. Some people just have to be different for attention.

500
The Flood / Re: Hey Slash!
« on: January 19, 2015, 08:51:42 PM »
Enjoy your ban

501
The Flood / Re: Body cam shows events leading up to rookie cop's death
« on: January 19, 2015, 08:50:34 PM »
I can't imagine the stress of actually being a cop.

I've had a few offers to be a cop, and there's a reason I never took it. I can deal with pathetic people, I can even deal with having to take on multiple drunks, but I could never sacrifice my principle and infringe upon people like cops do. You spend your day robbing from mostly productive people.
I am 100% certain that is not most cops.

It is the overwhelming majority of them. How many cops would let someone they found with heroin go?
It's overwhelmingly not the majority of them.

So, you're saying most cops won't arrest someone that is in possession of heroin? I request you do an experiment where you purchase some heroin and go around using it near police. See how many ignore you before one finally arrests you and we'll have a solid test.
You're the one claiming they won't. You prove it.

This is easy.

"According to the recent Federal Bureau of Investigation's annual Uniform Crime Report, There have been over twelve million cannabis arrests in the United States since 1996 including 749,825 persons for marijuana violations in 2012. Of those charged with marijuana violations in 2012, 658,231 were charged with possession only. The remaining 91,593 individuals were charged with "sale/manufacture," a category that does not differentiate for cultivation offenses, even those where the marijuana was being grown for personal or medical use. Marijuana arrests comprise almost one-half (48.3 percent) of all drug arrests reported in the United States."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannabis_in_the_United_States#Crime
>asking you to prove a claim about heroin
>you give evidence about cannabis

Wait, what does heroin or cannabis even have to do with anything?

You've gone full incoherent. Never go full incoherent.

The only incoherence is your own. This still proved my point, but if you don't believe people get locked up for heroin and may other drugs all of the time, well, that's something you need to research. I don't need to prove something that is already established as common sense. Prohibition of drugs is completely unjust and criminal. The point is, cops that are not truly corrupt would NEVER arrest someone for possessing, using, selling or producing drugs. Period. Prostitution as well.

502
The Flood / Re: Discussion on Transgenderism
« on: January 19, 2015, 08:46:34 PM »
I'm talking about damage to the individual.
You fucking hypocrite.

You fucking pot-smoking goddamn fucking hypocrite.
If you think that trying to fuck up your body with senseless surgery is as damaging as smoking weed, there's not much left to argue about. You're too far gone.

You make a good point. Senseless surgeries are pretty awful, but I'd still die to defend their freedom to ruin their own lives.

503
The Flood / Re: Discussion on Transgenderism
« on: January 19, 2015, 08:45:03 PM »
I'm talking about damage to the individual.
You fucking hypocrite.

You fucking pot-smoking goddamn fucking hypocrite.

Heal your mind with cannabis.

504
The Flood / Re: ITT: We Shill For Our Favorite YouTube channels.
« on: January 19, 2015, 08:44:27 PM »
Vinesauce, although they stream, people upload stuff

YouTube


Are they the people that used to use soundboards and other things in gaming chats? Haha! I remember this fantastic one when some gamer got excited and made this horrible noise, they had recorded it and put it in the chat a few times and everyone was getting pissed at the guy for being annoying even though he wasn't doing it! Haha!

505
The Flood / Re: Discussion on Transgenderism
« on: January 19, 2015, 08:39:54 PM »
It's just immoral.
I'm not going to get into a debate with you but you have a strange definition of morality.

I find it amusing you of all people are lecturing others on their morality.

506
The Flood / Re: Discussion on Transgenderism
« on: January 19, 2015, 08:38:38 PM »
Just a reminder to play nice in here guys.
If insults are thrown, report and move on. Don't feed the fire.

You are doing good for the most part.

Why are you encouraging people to make false reports? You said yourself insulting others is fine as long as it's not a thread.

508
The Flood / Re: my fetish
« on: January 19, 2015, 08:26:13 PM »
right

That's it. Reported. I'm not putting up with this harassment anymore.

509
The Flood / Re: my fetish
« on: January 19, 2015, 08:25:17 PM »
I'd like to be small and live inside the underwear of a big booty female.

510
Serious / Re: Should a fetus have a right to an attorney?
« on: January 19, 2015, 08:22:52 PM »
A fetus is a living organism, therefore it definitely deserves the right to an attorney.

Does a tree?

A tree is not a human being

You said "living organism"

We don't need to discuss semantics

That is the entire judicial process.

This isn't a judicial process, though

I always think your posts are mine for a second. Dredd is such an amazing movie.

Pages: 1 ... 151617 1819 ... 132