151
Serious / Re: Considering a religious conversion
« on: July 20, 2016, 07:19:49 AM »Too late, OP already said he only cares about happiness and not being logical.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 151
Serious / Re: Considering a religious conversion« on: July 20, 2016, 07:19:49 AM »Too late, OP already said he only cares about happiness and not being logical. 152
The Flood / Re: If I was looking to develop a drinking problem« on: July 19, 2016, 09:36:43 PM »
Boiling water
You'll have even more problems if you stick your face in it, which I recommend for maximum difficulty. 153
Serious / Re: Let's talk about the Sep7 Presidential Poll« on: July 17, 2016, 03:55:15 PM »
-He thinks climate change is a Chinese hoax to steal manufacturing jobs
-Wants to create a huge Gestapo force to round up illegal immigrants, which is a huge ethical dilemma. 1) law enforcement is already understaffed 2) Most of these people are peaceful and offer a net benefit. 3) He's says he won't raise taxes but will build internment camps, militarize the police force, and deportation staff, etc. 4) Families who resist open the door for lethal force for nonviolent crimes. -Fails to understand trade deficits and thinks it's with Mexico rather than businesses -Generally uninformed, spreading blatant lies and misinformation (his study on immigrant crime had a 20% margin of error, small sample size, double countings, and the author even said he misused the data). -He has the most blatantly false statements of any candidate -His use of repetition isn't normal. No one intelligent thinks like he speaks. Imagine thinking to yourself "I'm really smart. In fact, I'm very very smart. If I was Democrat, they'd think I'm a genius. No one would disagree". There's obviously an ulterior motive to speaking this way. 154
The Flood / Re: Audio of Timothy Treadwell's death at the hands of a grizzly bear« on: July 16, 2016, 08:36:23 AM »
That seemed really mild for being eaten alive.
155
The Flood / Re: "Religion is the opium of the people"« on: July 15, 2016, 04:31:18 PM »
I believe this quote was taken out of context.
156
Serious / Re: French government suppressed the fact that hostages at Bataclan were tortured« on: July 15, 2016, 04:30:11 PM »
How does an explosion blow someone's testicles into their own mouth? Fuck those prosecutors.
158
Serious / Re: Black cop tears BLM a new one« on: July 11, 2016, 06:09:12 PM »That's cool and all, but I'm more concerned with bathroom privileges. 159
Serious / Re: A message to those of you who work.« on: July 10, 2016, 05:45:15 PM »It's kind of funny to watch both the Right and the Left sort into their usual narrativesI'm glad you found a way to feel superior to both. 160
The Flood / Re: I've been pretending to be someone I'm not this entire time« on: July 09, 2016, 07:22:30 PM »
But I'm not a rapper
161
The Flood / Re: Describe another user, without being obvious« on: July 09, 2016, 12:22:42 PM »
Wrapped in tin foil and covered in sun screen in his grandmother's organic garden.
162
The Flood / Re: Since this site has officially died« on: July 09, 2016, 12:19:51 PM »
Verbatim, ChallengerX, Meta, Turkey, Flee
164
The Flood / Re: Explain this liberals« on: July 05, 2016, 11:03:11 PM »He didn't say unAmerican religion.>honor what they fought forOh God, this can't be real. Chally, please tell me this isn't real.It is 165
The Flood / Re: Do you ever just imagine yourself stomping on a baby?« on: July 04, 2016, 10:00:08 PM »
Everytime you post, I think, "Man, a time machine would be great right now - so I could go stomp baby Loaf and stop his shitposting from ever happening".
166
Serious / Re: Medical ethicists at Oxford argue killing newborns is no different to abortion« on: July 03, 2016, 11:09:53 PM »
This could be averted by arguing abortion strictly from a female bodily autonomy perspective.
167
The Flood / Re: This video made me deny atheism.« on: June 28, 2016, 04:48:58 PM »
Now let's anal eyes a pineapple
169
Serious / Re: I can't even... KINDERGARTENERS DID THIS!« on: June 21, 2016, 10:07:08 PM »
OT: Indoctrination works best when you start young.
170
Serious / Re: I can't even... KINDERGARTENERS DID THIS!« on: June 21, 2016, 10:05:01 PM »
Why are the reporters slurring their words? That shit doesn't even sound English.
171
Serious / Re: Opposition to Islam for the wrong reasons. (A pet peeve)« on: June 19, 2016, 10:28:50 PM »
Arguing within a religions framework is too large a concession imo.
172
The Flood / Re: Anonymous hacks ISIS's twitter, makes it fabulous« on: June 17, 2016, 09:43:56 PM »Not in the true Quran. You obviously have never read the Quran and you only read from hate sites.You quote from a hate site. The true Korra only preach love and trust in Muhammad (pbuh)Nothing in Islam opposes gayness though, where do you get hate 😯? 173
The Flood / Re: Anonymous hacks ISIS's twitter, makes it fabulous« on: June 17, 2016, 05:07:42 PM »You quote from a hate site. The true Korra only preach love and trust in Muhammad (pbuh)Nothing in Islam opposes gayness though, where do you get hate 😯? 174
The Flood / Re: Do you care about clothes / fashion?« on: June 17, 2016, 01:21:07 PM »
I just updated my wardrobe. I care to an extent. People judge pretty quickly so I tend to dress well everytime I go anywhere. Get way more compliments now. It's also feels nice to look sharp.
175
The Flood / Re: Anonymous hacks ISIS's twitter, makes it fabulous« on: June 17, 2016, 01:19:12 PM »
Nothing in Islam opposes gayness though, where do you get hate 😯?
176
The Flood / Re: pseudo science test« on: June 17, 2016, 12:17:25 PM »
Crush
Fool Leave Bout to crush Class then leave ;( 177
The Flood / Re: Just finished my final exam... Ever*« on: June 16, 2016, 09:38:25 PM »
That's good to hear. Why type of law were you studying again?
178
Gaming / Re: Insomniac's Spider-man for PS4 Thread« on: June 15, 2016, 08:05:32 AM »Pretty sick combination. We all liked Spider-Man 2--what went wrong with the other games? Apparently, the guy who engineered the web swinging in 2 patented the physics algorithm and that is one of the reasons why swinging has sucked. He used it for a small game he made called Energy Hook, which did horrible. The number of features were also heavily gimped. No -Hold to press jump/lunge -No sprint/fast crawl -Wall running has just now made a return -Spider-sense dodging hasnt been the same -non existent humor -No fun side missions (my balloon!) -No gymnastics -No fun grapples/pile driving criminals off the empire state building -etc etc. 179
Serious / Re: Corruption out the fucking wazzoo« on: June 14, 2016, 04:20:29 PM »As to your claim that Sanders being labelled a socialist would harm his chances, I highly doubt that, given that a majority of both self-identified Democrats and liberals have a favourable view of socialism. That was just an example, an exaggeration so to speak. I was moreso trying to find a way to illustrate clearly that not all negatives are equal. Socialism stuck out as an extreme to me because my family is pro-Trump and toss it around as bringer of destruction. I guess a better analogy would be the different ways we perceive crimes. Someone who jay walks or goes 5mph over the speed limit a hundred times is probably going to be viewed less offensively than someone who murders or rapes once. So back to where we were, Hillary seems to have a lot of negative press, but a lot seems to be minor things people don't really care about. Like Benghazi. How many negative articles have been made about Benghazi when there is still yet to be any incriminating evidence of wrong doing? Aside from a few right leaning groups, everyone seems to have moved on from it and ignores it. Quote wouldn't you say the degree to which it's negative should also be considered? Quote How would you quantify that? I'm not sure. I am not in statistics. But I do think that the variation in "ethical perception" (what I'll call it) plays a role. 180
Serious / Re: Corruption out the fucking wazzoo« on: June 14, 2016, 07:53:32 AM »
Skimming through (I might have missed the explanation), but it didn't seem like they accounted for the type/range of like/dislike.
For example, Bernie Sanders being labeled a socialist would seem more (negatively) impactful than say a negative article on Clinton's handling of Benghazi. So while Clinton might have received more "negative" press than anyone else, wouldn't you say the degree to which it's negative should also be considered? |