This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Word Wizard
Pages: 1 ... 444546 4748 ... 90
1351
« on: February 15, 2015, 01:15:49 AM »
Also, why do people think that waiting until marriage is ridiculous? Don't you want to be able to say that you were the only one who has fucked your spouse and that no else has ever touched them, and vice versa? Isn't that something special? Something to be proud of? And don't give me all that, "Well it's boring. I need some variety." bullshit. If your sex life with your spouse is boring well than that's your fault. Your sex life would be boring because you'd suck due to no experience.
A lot of marriages end because they're either sexually incompatible or just flat out suck dick in bed, y'know.
So yes, reserving yourself until you're married is ridiculous.
Is it impossible to get experienced after you're married?
1352
« on: February 14, 2015, 06:11:15 PM »
How fast are you?
1353
« on: February 14, 2015, 03:52:23 PM »
In GTA online I used to stalk people and kill them repeatedly until they left the server.
I killed a guy 24 times in a row with a tank once. Man that was awesome.
Fother muckin siece of phit
1354
« on: February 14, 2015, 12:25:21 PM »
The vagina of the one in the flower skirt looks like a piece of deli ham between to hamburger buns.
1355
« on: February 13, 2015, 11:10:42 PM »
Trying to play MCC, but it's just being a piss off.
1356
« on: February 13, 2015, 10:42:32 PM »
I heard it means their vagina's loose, astheticallly I'm indifferent.
1357
« on: February 13, 2015, 10:39:55 PM »
He obviously didn't perform any miracles and is no son of god.
This is what puzzles me. How is it 'obvious' that he didn't do any divine shit? What evidence is this conclusion based on? Logically, he probably didn't...but assuming God exists, logic goes right out the window.
>assuming god exists
There's your problem.
Ah, I get it. You're toting your personal belief or lackthereof around and smugly insisting you know better without any real basis. I see.
It's this sort of thinking that leaves me just as disgusted with atheism as I am with any particular religion.
Are you saying rational scepticism is equally as bad as credulous belief?
I'm saying blindly dismissing a distinct possibility as 'illogical' based on the grounds that 'it sounds illogical' is just as bad as blindly believing in a concept just because it's in a book that's supposed to be holy.
Two thousand years ago, not believing in a creator deity was considered laughably illogical. Two thousand years from now, odds are there will be some other belief and our current idea of the Big Bang or Big Crunch or whatever it's called this week will be considered the same. It's why I've never settled on any particular belief. Until I die, I won't know if there is or isn't a creator deity/pantheon, and I'll likely never be given conclusive proof either way. Perhaps the universe was just a happy, astronomically improbable accident...or perhaps it wasn't. Religious neutrality, I call it, because people get anal when I say I'm agnostic and try to insist I'm actually atheist.
As it is, I find anyone touting either theism or atheism as 'correct' and concluding that the other side is 'stupid and illogical' as both arrogant and rather hypocritical. That's why religious neutrality is objectively the best personal ideology and all others are wrong. (See what I did there?)
Logic isn't relative. It was still illogical then for a lot of the reasons it is now.
Illogical based on what? What are you basing this conclusion on? I fail to see how a Higher Power setting Earth up for us is any less logical than a massive release of energy somehow, against all odds, making a perfect planet for millions of different forms of life to prosper on.
There is evidence of a big bang, which we can make accurate predictions with, while there is not of a divine being.
Which does nothing to actively disprove the concept of a creator deity. Perhaps the Big Bang was set off by a specific being, for instance. Or maybe it just happened for reasons we can only speculate. Neither of us know, and we'll probably never know.
It doesn't have to disprove it, it's never been proven. Christians haven't disproven Greek mythology or Islam either. The same logic can be applied to anything. The flying spaghetti monster hasn't been disproven either. There's no knowledge to gain from believing it. Claiming god started the big bang is just reverse engineering after the fact. Again, can be applied to anything. Our planet isn't perfect. Most of it is inhospitable for humans without technology. The poles and Antarctica, deserts, salty oceans, etc. 99% of all known life has gone extinct on this so called "perfect" planet. Okay, perhaps not perfect. But it's at least enough to support millions of forms of life, still against all odds. It's not against all odds, there's hundreds of trillions of stars with several planets existing for billions of years. It was a matter of probability. There's trillions of stars with their own solar systems in trillions of galaxies. It's not impossible for at least one planet to harbor some life.
But still highly improbable that even one planet in the universe would have the right atmosphere, the right distance from a star, the right biospherical conditions for so many forms of life to thrive on. Compare an atomic bomb blowing up a bunch of scrap and forming a house. But not impossible. NASA has observed several planets that are in the goldie locks zone and have similar atmospheres as ours. The analogy of the atom bomb is similar to the watch maker and just as fallacious. You're comparing a non-natural process to a natural one. The big bang is far more complex than a nuke explosion. There's no evidence that the creation of the one planet we're aware of that contains life was deliberately conceived by a divine (or not-so-divine) being, but dismissing the idea entirely is exactly as ignorant as clinging to it.
There's no evidence That's my point. Without substantial evidence, it's pointless to base your life on it.
1358
« on: February 13, 2015, 09:53:57 PM »
He obviously didn't perform any miracles and is no son of god.
This is what puzzles me. How is it 'obvious' that he didn't do any divine shit? What evidence is this conclusion based on? Logically, he probably didn't...but assuming God exists, logic goes right out the window.
>assuming god exists
There's your problem.
Ah, I get it. You're toting your personal belief or lackthereof around and smugly insisting you know better without any real basis. I see.
It's this sort of thinking that leaves me just as disgusted with atheism as I am with any particular religion.
Are you saying rational scepticism is equally as bad as credulous belief?
I'm saying blindly dismissing a distinct possibility as 'illogical' based on the grounds that 'it sounds illogical' is just as bad as blindly believing in a concept just because it's in a book that's supposed to be holy.
Two thousand years ago, not believing in a creator deity was considered laughably illogical. Two thousand years from now, odds are there will be some other belief and our current idea of the Big Bang or Big Crunch or whatever it's called this week will be considered the same. It's why I've never settled on any particular belief. Until I die, I won't know if there is or isn't a creator deity/pantheon, and I'll likely never be given conclusive proof either way. Perhaps the universe was just a happy, astronomically improbable accident...or perhaps it wasn't. Religious neutrality, I call it, because people get anal when I say I'm agnostic and try to insist I'm actually atheist.
As it is, I find anyone touting either theism or atheism as 'correct' and concluding that the other side is 'stupid and illogical' as both arrogant and rather hypocritical. That's why religious neutrality is objectively the best personal ideology and all others are wrong. (See what I did there?)
Logic isn't relative. It was still illogical then for a lot of the reasons it is now.
Illogical based on what? What are you basing this conclusion on? I fail to see how a Higher Power setting Earth up for us is any less logical than a massive release of energy somehow, against all odds, making a perfect planet for millions of different forms of life to prosper on.
There is evidence of a big bang, which we can make accurate predictions with, while there is not of a divine being. Our planet isn't perfect. Most of it is inhospitable for humans without technology. The poles and Antarctica, deserts, salty oceans, etc. 99% of all known life has gone extinct on this so called "perfect" planet. It was a matter of probability. There's trillions of stars with their own solar systems in trillions of galaxies. It's not impossible for at least one planet to harbor some life.
1359
« on: February 13, 2015, 09:18:05 PM »
He obviously didn't perform any miracles and is no son of god.
This is what puzzles me. How is it 'obvious' that he didn't do any divine shit? What evidence is this conclusion based on? Logically, he probably didn't...but assuming God exists, logic goes right out the window.
>assuming god exists
There's your problem.
Ah, I get it. You're toting your personal belief or lackthereof around and smugly insisting you know better without any real basis. I see.
It's this sort of thinking that leaves me just as disgusted with atheism as I am with any particular religion.
Are you saying rational scepticism is equally as bad as credulous belief?
Spoiler I'm saying blindly dismissing a distinct possibility as 'illogical' based on the grounds that 'it sounds illogical' is just as bad as blindly believing in a concept just because it's in a book that's supposed to be holy.
Two thousand years ago, not believing in a creator deity was considered laughably illogical. Two thousand years from now, odds are there will be some other belief and our current idea of the Big Bang or Big Crunch or whatever it's called this week will be considered the same. It's why I've never settled on any particular belief. Until I die, I won't know if there is or isn't a creator deity/pantheon, and I'll likely never be given conclusive proof either way. Perhaps the universe was just a happy, astronomically improbable accident...or perhaps it wasn't. Religious neutrality, I call it, because people get anal when I say I'm agnostic and try to insist I'm actually atheist.
As it is, I find anyone touting either theism or atheism as 'correct' and concluding that the other side is 'stupid and illogical' as both arrogant and rather hypocritical. That's why religious neutrality is objectively the best personal ideology and all others are wrong. (See what I did there?)
Logic isn't relative. It was still illogical then for a lot of the reasons it is now.
1360
« on: February 13, 2015, 08:29:59 PM »
He obviously didn't perform any miracles and is no son of god.
This is what puzzles me. How is it 'obvious' that he didn't do any divine shit? What evidence is this conclusion based on? Logically, he probably didn't...but assuming God exists, logic goes right out the window.
>assuming god exists
There's your problem.
Ah, I get it. You're toting your personal belief or lackthereof around and smugly insisting you know better without any real basis. I see.
It's this sort of thinking that leaves me just as disgusted with atheism as I am with any particular religion.
Are you saying rational scepticism is equally as bad as credulous belief?
1361
« on: February 13, 2015, 07:52:17 PM »
Life's a numbers game. If you interact with enough MILFs one will bang you.
1362
« on: February 13, 2015, 07:49:33 PM »
Give me a reason why you shouldn't kill yourself.
Because you might kill him first, murderer.
Give me a reason why you shouldn't kill yourself.
1363
« on: February 13, 2015, 05:46:34 PM »
Give me a reason why you shouldn't kill yourself.
1364
« on: February 13, 2015, 05:03:33 PM »
I thought cross dressing crack whores made their own hours?
1365
« on: February 13, 2015, 05:02:35 PM »
1366
« on: February 13, 2015, 04:43:44 PM »
I'd just say muslims in general, not just Obocka Jew Wacka
1367
« on: February 13, 2015, 04:40:17 PM »
Does your dog licking peanut butter off your balls count?
That reminds me.
1368
« on: February 13, 2015, 04:21:15 PM »
As you can see, they are on clear left and right sides of the body. Like someone said, it would be like saying since you lose your right arm your left arm is now your middle arm.
that's an uncircumcised penis
Fixed
lol cut fag
Slug dicked butt licker
mutilated dick nigger
Your dick looks like a pin headed retard shoving his head through a long sleeved shirt sleeve every time you get an erection.
mad cus mutilated
My dad used a carrot peeler on my dick when I was 4, no anesthesia He sowed the foreskin to my eyelids and I had a seizure Tried to call my mom but couldn't reach her, reached out to a preacher He took me to the confessional, it wasn't long till it got sexual He stuck it in my butt, then I was gay The fuck in my what, nevermind let's pray
1369
« on: February 13, 2015, 04:02:48 PM »
As you can see, they are on clear left and right sides of the body. Like someone said, it would be like saying since you lose your right arm your left arm is now your middle arm.
that's an uncircumcised penis
Fixed
lol cut fag
Slug dicked butt licker
mutilated dick nigger
Your dick looks like a pin headed retard shoving his head through a long sleeved shirt sleeve every time you get an erection.
1370
« on: February 13, 2015, 03:48:44 PM »
As you can see, they are on clear left and right sides of the body. Like someone said, it would be like saying since you lose your right arm your left arm is now your middle arm.
that's an uncircumcised penis
Fixed
lol cut fag
Slug dicked butt licker
1371
« on: February 13, 2015, 03:39:18 PM »
As you can see, they are on clear left and right sides of the body. Like someone said, it would be like saying since you lose your right arm your left arm is now your middle arm.
that's an uncircumcised penis
Fixed
1372
« on: February 13, 2015, 08:42:15 AM »
Well hopefully opposition to the FCC will be overruled.
It's just a matter of time before companies like Google and Sonic.net put the old cable companies out of business by offering gigabit connections are roughly the same rate that AT&T and Comcast are offering their shitty megabit connections.
There's starting to be a bunch smaller, unheard of providers offering gibabit. My ISP Metalink is offering in Defiance OH, Ting is putting it in 2 places, and dozens of others. Seems they can only focus on cities to make their investment back so it'll prolly be a while before I can get modern internet.
1373
« on: February 13, 2015, 08:18:06 AM »
At least I could connect to friends and not have the game crash or need restarted every other game. 343 says it runs on dedicated servers but if the host quits it ends the game. I hope it was worth being mocked on every halo forum online.
It runs on P2P and Dedicated Servers.
They said most games are on dedis, but I've had it happen twice in a row and multiple times through out the day. Titanfall never had this problem, you'd think Halo, MS's flagship title, would be able to run as smooth if not more. On top of that, they don't have host migration, a game ending earlier results in a messed up party system and having to have everyone restart and reconnect. I give up on the game till I read how well the next patch works, which we're waiting on an ETA for the ETA of when that patch is. A month ago they said the patches sucked because of internal testing so they were going to do a public beta, delayed said beta, then cancelled it just days before sending it out because "internal testing is fine", which completely contradicts their previous statements on why the game launched horribly and why their last patches failed. Their management is a joke.
1374
« on: February 13, 2015, 08:04:23 AM »
At least I could connect to friends and not have the game crash or need restarted every other game. 343 says it runs on dedicated servers but if the host quits it ends the game. I hope it was worth being mocked on every halo forum online.
1375
« on: February 13, 2015, 07:55:33 AM »
Even if they were right, there is no down side to becoming more efficient.
1376
« on: February 13, 2015, 07:53:30 AM »
Thanks for the source. I was just debating an atheist muslim apologist who was blaming poverty for terrorism.
1377
« on: February 12, 2015, 08:41:03 PM »
Pre-order cancelled.
1378
« on: February 12, 2015, 06:36:34 PM »
I can't shove my fist into your college degree
E=MC^Vagina
WHAT
Vagina
GENI-TAIL-YUH
1379
« on: February 12, 2015, 03:30:53 PM »
1380
« on: February 12, 2015, 03:02:26 PM »
Gmail, live.com, and yahoo
Pages: 1 ... 444546 4748 ... 90
|
Show Posts