2221
The Flood / Re: LC is Lord Commissar?
« on: January 21, 2015, 07:30:18 PM »LC... He's a mod, right?Yes.
Yes
Also you consistently have good avatars.
And by consistently I mean 2/2 have been good.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 2221
The Flood / Re: LC is Lord Commissar?« on: January 21, 2015, 07:30:18 PM »LC... He's a mod, right?Yes. Also you consistently have good avatars. And by consistently I mean 2/2 have been good. 2223
The Flood / Re: Psy for site owner 2015« on: January 21, 2015, 07:23:09 PM »
I totes didn't like this just cuz Verb said no.
2224
The Flood / Re: What do you think, if anything, is wrong with the flood board? [Unofficial]« on: January 21, 2015, 07:17:05 PM »
Let's just try this new system out. I don't think the complainers will stop, but this may work best for now.
I do have one question as to Serious. A while back Nuka made a DA:I thread in Serious since it was about a trans character. Would such a thread be moved to Gaming under the new system? I think it fits better in Gaming, but it may not give Nuka the conversation he was looking for. I think I can get behind the new rules as long as the next step isn't axing shitposts. Though I think topics like math and science should fall under Serious. I realize I'm pretty much doing a 180 in this thread. You guys can't drop stuff on me like this. 2225
The Flood / Re: What do you think, if anything, is wrong with the flood board? [Unofficial]« on: January 21, 2015, 07:07:04 PM »Agreed. I don't think banning shit posting is up for discussion as most of the mods seem to recognize it wouldn't help.Well they'll kill the site with banning shitposting so it has the same effect.If you guys really hate shitposts this much just make private groups a thing.I doubt there's enough people for that yet. It'd just drive conversation away from boards and encourage cliques. 2226
The Flood / Re: What do you think, if anything, is wrong with the flood board? [Unofficial]« on: January 21, 2015, 07:05:48 PM »If you guys really hate shitposts this much just make private groups a thing.I doubt there's enough people for that yet. It'd just drive conversation away from boards and encourage cliques. Its too early yet. 2227
The Flood / Re: What do you think, if anything, is wrong with the flood board? [Unofficial]« on: January 21, 2015, 07:00:05 PM »Yeah, you're probably right. Still the natural progression of this conversation is going to be people complaining about shitposts burying / derailng their threads. And we already voted against strict moderation.Why do people feel the need to have serious topics and censored discussions in the flood?It's a problem because deeming something serious is subjective. There were numerous bait threads and borderline-troll threads in Serious that made me scratch my head. 2228
The Flood / Re: What do you think, if anything, is wrong with the flood board? [Unofficial]« on: January 21, 2015, 06:57:06 PM »Ugh. What's the problem with having them in Flood? Its not like the rules are vastly different from gaming. I don't see them getting buried. If there isn't that many why the push to move them over?<_<I'm curious - would anyone be upset if Gaming were to evolve into an Entertainment board? (TV, Movies, Sports, Games, etc.)It would take more content away from flood (which already lost politics, gaming and religion), and I like having a board solely for gaming (which would probably drown out everything else). Its big enough that it deserves its own place. I just like having a dedicated gaming forum. I don't want to sift through anime and guardians of the galaxy to find bloodborne. 2229
The Flood / Re: What do you think, if anything, is wrong with the flood board? [Unofficial]« on: January 21, 2015, 06:52:10 PM »I'm curious - would anyone be upset if Gaming were to evolve into an Entertainment board? (TV, Movies, Sports, Games, etc.)It would take more content away from flood (which already lost politics, gaming and religion), and I like having a board solely for gaming (which would probably drown out everything else). Its big enough that it deserves its own place. 2230
The Flood / Re: What do you think, if anything, is wrong with the flood board? [Unofficial]« on: January 21, 2015, 06:49:39 PM »How about this guys.Eh. The more I think about this the less I like the lines between boards being blurred. I wouldn't like the idea of not having a dedicated gaming board and taking movies etc out of flood would leave it barren. Hmm need to think more. The one thing I'm certain on is leaving shitposting in flood alone. 2231
The Flood / Re: What do you think, if anything, is wrong with the flood board? [Unofficial]« on: January 21, 2015, 06:30:04 PM »Why do people feel the need to have serious topics and censored discussions in the flood?So, if I want to seriously talk about Anime, it goes in Serious? I don't see why it can't go in serious if its a genuinely serious discussion. (not that I know how you would have a serious discussion about anime.....art style and voice acting maybe?) We can post about politics in a nonserious manner here after all. Of course ignoring the fact that I'd vote for an anime board 2232
The Flood / Re: What do you think, if anything, is wrong with the flood board? [Unofficial]« on: January 21, 2015, 06:26:00 PM »
Why do people feel the need to have serious topics and censored discussions in the flood?
I honestly don't get it. Someone explain it to me. 2233
The Flood / Re: What do you think, if anything, is wrong with the flood board? [Unofficial]« on: January 21, 2015, 06:02:30 PM »Due to the way you've gone about serious criteria, I feel that a lot of people who post something and want a genuine discussion will probably get their stuff buried under shitposts or just get 'K.' for answers or something, if I user my own examples, it's like when I post my writing stuff and it just goes onto the second page in about ten minutes becase of spam. I guess having a semi-serious board would be cool, where proper discussion can go but the flood stays as it's shit[pos]ty self.Or we could just allow all serious discussion in serious regardless of the content. Which would seem like an easier and more logical solution. All this new system will result in is more people complaining about shitposts burrying and derailing their threads in flood. Then the complainers will move on to saying we need to be more strict on shitposting (as they are in this thread). We already have a board for that. Its called Serious. 2234
The Flood / Re: What do you think, if anything, is wrong with the flood board? [Unofficial]« on: January 21, 2015, 05:20:12 PM »The flood is suppose to be garbage despised by the rest of the site. People forget that because for the longest time its been the only sane place on bnet. I'm not for cutting serious apart just to make crappy derailed flood threads. We need to stop trying to social engineer this shit and let it develop naturally. Getting annoying how we seem to be catering to a small group of complainers. 2235
Gaming / Re: TESO drops sub fee« on: January 21, 2015, 04:21:02 PM »Haha, I'd forgotten about that lone wolf thread. Fucking classic.Oh lawd, I remember that. What was the exact text?it's not as good as grey warden"Mission statement: 2236
Gaming / Re: The Order 1886 - Story Trailer« on: January 21, 2015, 03:39:37 PM »Sadly that would get you banned over there. and I wanted to play match maker.This is the only opinion preventing you from being a perfect fit for neogaf.The only issue I have when it comes to frame rate is when it isn't consistent. Duh. I mean, no one likes lag. But to me, that's the only reasonable outlook to have on the matter. 2237
Gaming / Re: The Order 1886 - Story Trailer« on: January 21, 2015, 03:34:40 PM »This is the only opinion preventing you from being a perfect fit for neogaf.Not being a better experience, not a negligible difference. It's not witty if you don't make properly answer it.Well, when you say "not better", that makes me think "worse", meaning it's not negligible. And clearly, it's not negligible to them, if they can even make the distinction. So my point still stands--I can't possibly imagine 24fps being worse than 60fps, let alone 30. I'd settle for 20, for crying out loud. I'm sure the game played just fine. 2238
The Flood / Re: Microsoft HoloLens« on: January 21, 2015, 03:24:38 PM »
bamp ;_;
I guess a mod could move it to gaming if it won't survive in floof. Taking this as a sign VR is going to be a saturated market out the gate, and flop like 3d. 2239
Gaming / Re: The Order 1886 - Story Trailer« on: January 21, 2015, 03:22:55 PM »For those of you who are thinking of getting this at day one I'd recommend you hold off on it. I have a buddy that played it at PAX and he was saying that the game was no where near ready to be shipped. There were bugs galore and the game ended up crashing on him.Or don't preorder any games, and always wait for reviews. This also works. 2240
The Flood / Re: Moot is stepping down from 4chan« on: January 21, 2015, 03:21:08 PM »
I'd like to think of subtly/blatantly derailing threads as an art form. At which I've gotten quite good.
Spoiler 2241
The Flood / Re: Who's going to watch the SuperBowl?« on: January 21, 2015, 03:14:10 PM »
Only watch college ball.
Edit: But fuck the seahawks and Pete Carroll. 2242
The Flood / Microsoft HoloLens« on: January 21, 2015, 02:52:54 PM »YouTube http://www.wired.com/2015/01/microsoft-hands-on/ http://techcrunch.com/2015/01/21/microsoft-hololens/ https://twitter.com/HoloLens More of a tech thread than gaming though I'm sure it'll factor in with Kinect. tl;dr - MS is developing their own VR head set. Slightly different from teh rest. Almost google glass-esque. 2243
Gaming / Re: The Order 1886 - Story Trailer« on: January 21, 2015, 02:38:02 PM »I hate that 'but its more cinematic' logic when it comes to framerate. Its a plague in movies, and just an excuse in gaming to be cheap. Choosing to make the game look and play objectively worse is never a good thing.They wanted to make it 24fps, but it played awfully. Imagine that, a lower framerate not being a better experience.Didnt they say it would be like 25 or 15?Looks like your generic run of the mill 3rd person shooter gameplay wise. Have it at below 30 FPS on top of that, it better have a good story.Below? It's 30fps. 2244
The Flood / Re: Moot is stepping down from 4chan« on: January 21, 2015, 02:20:58 PM »We shall see comrade. So far it keeps growing in size while stealing moots traffic out from under him. Considering the audience that each site is trying to appeal to I'm going to put my money on the one that values freedom of speech over banning topics.>2025Long live teh 8chan. I don't see gg going any where anytime soon. Even though its been declared dead 40 times by know nothings. 2245
Septagon / Re: So why can't we have porn threads in The Flood?« on: January 21, 2015, 02:15:19 PM »
People should stop using tapatalk. The site update makes it unnecessary.
2246
The Flood / Re: Moot is stepping down from 4chan« on: January 21, 2015, 02:12:17 PM »>2025Long live teh 8chan. >being able to even say 4chin without vomiting absolutelydistgusting.jpeg 2247
The Flood / Re: Moot is stepping down from 4chan« on: January 21, 2015, 01:46:37 PM »
Long live teh 8chan.
2248
The Flood / Re: The plague of Manspreading« on: January 21, 2015, 01:10:09 PM »
Third wave feminism ladies and gents.
2249
Gaming / Re: TESO drops sub fee« on: January 21, 2015, 01:05:32 PM »First response in first thread:It was a necro bump too. Double points. 2250
The Flood / Re: Users with animal avatars« on: January 21, 2015, 12:56:39 PM »
I knew I had a penguin avatar for some reason. Damn furry uprisings.
|