This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Topics - Turkey
421
« on: February 27, 2015, 05:28:47 PM »
Setup:
-Windows 8.1 -No external HDD -Tried Hiren's but my keyboard and mouse don't work in the virtual XP, so I can't continue -Want to avoid having to re-download programs
Hook a turkey up. This has been a pain in the ass so far and I'm not sure what to do.
422
« on: February 26, 2015, 11:30:24 PM »
Clearly her genes are inferior. Her squinty Asian eyes have failed her not only in field of view, but in a simple color test.
I think it's best to ensure my lineage isn't tainted with her faulty chromosomes.
423
« on: February 26, 2015, 11:07:01 PM »
I'm interested to see what you guys think actually happened today. Without searching for news articles or clicking on someone else's responses, post a couple sentences *in spoilers* of what the decision entails, how it affects the market, and what it means for you, the consumer.
Remember, type your answers in spoilers to prevent bias.
424
« on: February 26, 2015, 02:42:44 PM »
http://on.wsj.com/17AXrwdLONDON—The masked Islamic State militant known as Jihadi John, who has appeared in several videos showing the beheading of Western hostages, has been identified as British citizen Mohammed Emwazi, Western officials said.
Mr. Emwazi, who is in his 20s and was born in Kuwait, grew up in London and attended university here, according to officials and a person familiar with the situation. He appears to have been on the radar of British officials since at least 2009, when they believed he was trying to travel to Somalia for training with Islamist extremists—which he denied—according to correspondence between Mr. Emwazi and a civil-rights group he interacted with.
Western officials said Mr. Emwazi traveled to Syria in 2012, later joining Islamic State, and is believed to be moving around the region. -Born in 1988 -Went to University of Westminster It's amazing that someone growing up in Western education can believe this is okay.
425
« on: February 25, 2015, 04:10:29 PM »
http://www.wsj.com/articles/three-brooklyn-men-accused-of-plot-to-join-islamic-state-1424888001?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTTopStoriesIf that link is behind a paywall, let me know. Three Brooklyn men who authorities said planned to travel to Syria to join the militant group known as Islamic State and wage jihad against the U.S. were arrested on Wednesday as part of a joint investigation by local and federal investigators.
One of the men was arrested at John F. Kennedy Airport, as he was about to board a flight bound for Istanbul, Turkey. Another was arrested in a raid in Brooklyn, and the third man was arrested in Florida, authorities said.
A criminal complaint unsealed on Wednesday named the three men as Abdurasul Hasanovich Juraboev, Akhror Saidakhmetov and Abror Habibov.
[...]
They’re drawn, he said, by a message propagated on social media by Islamic State in particular that goes like this: “Troubled soul come, to the caliphate. You will live a life of glory. These are the apocalyptic end times. You will find a life of meaning here fighting for our so-called caliphate. And if you can’t come, kill somebody where you are.”
According to the complaint and affidavit unsealed Wednesday, Mr. Juraboev’s first post was under an alias: “Greetings! We too wanted to pledge our allegiance and commit ourselves while not present there. I am in U.S.A. now but we don’t have any arms. But is it possible to commit ourselves as dedicated martyrs anywhere while here? What I’m saying is, to shoot Obama and then get shot ourselves, will it do? That will strike fear in the hearts of infidels.” What's more worrying is the number of people that (1) aren't caught and (2) don't feel the need to travel outside of the country to do this.
426
« on: February 25, 2015, 03:33:24 PM »
Was thinking about picking it up for Xbox One because the product key is like $18 and I'm a shill for Ubisoft.
t4r
427
« on: February 24, 2015, 05:16:07 PM »
428
« on: February 23, 2015, 05:57:26 PM »
"Start related topic"
I think the notification for quotes is genius, but this seemed like a pretty useful function back on B.net that I'm surprised hasn't made its way here.
429
« on: February 23, 2015, 02:18:23 PM »
All I've got is Destiny and MCC, and I don't play either anymore. I missed out on Fall releases because of graduating and stuff, so give me some opinions of what was worth getting, for the console at least.
To start, Lords of the Fallen looks pretty fun.
430
« on: February 21, 2015, 12:41:37 AM »
This arguably biased source states that there were 8,961 vaccine preventable deaths from 2007-2015. We'll call that about 1,125 deaths per year, on average. We're going to fudge numbers in this thread a bit, but it all benefits the anti-vax side, so it's okay. Now let's talk nuclear power. Surely, nuclear power is incredibly dangerous and must be approached cautiously. Just look at the Fukushima disaster, where a whopping...uh, 1 person died. From stress-related heart problems. And no significant increase in cancer rates. Despite being one of the worst imaginable scenarios for a nuclear disaster, we saw no nuclear-related deaths. It's hard to determine an average number of nuclear-related deaths each year, because it's so low. Forbes estimated around 90 per year. A NASA study predicted that if nuclear power had been adopted in the early 70s, we would have seen about 5,000 nuclear-related deaths since then. That fits the Forbes number pretty well. This NASA study also estimates that had nuclear power not been adopted, and we had simply used coal and natural gas during those 40 years, we would have seen an additional 1.8 million deaths, and another 64 gigatons of carbon in the atmosphere. None of this includes the long-term health effects of coal mining or environmental harm. That gives us about 45,000 deaths per year on average for not using nuclear power. They also calculate that if we stopped using nuclear power, we'd see another 7 million coal-related deaths, not to mention hundreds more gigatons of carbon released into the atmosphere. Let's summarize: Avg. deaths per yearAnti-vax: 1,125 Anti-nuclear: 45,000/yr in the past, 175,000/yr through the next 40 years The long and short of it is that if you're against nuclear energy, you're an order of magnitude more harmful to the rest of humanity than anti-vaxxers.
431
« on: February 20, 2015, 02:24:21 PM »
Just wondering why this is still an acceptable response. Nearly any thread that isn't a lazy copy and paste news article gets this response from one or more of a few specific members. I didn't know if there was an actual reason why this is never addressed by moderation, or if they just get a pass for being old members.
432
« on: February 20, 2015, 06:45:30 AM »
Still miss Jason Momoa as Ronan Dex.
433
« on: February 18, 2015, 07:12:52 PM »
I'm going to the store to get stuff for dinner. Post recipes and I'll make the one that sounds the least terrible. Preferably something with chicken.
434
« on: February 18, 2015, 06:11:38 PM »
*Israel is innocent, Palestine is evil*
435
« on: February 18, 2015, 11:33:46 AM »
Just curious. I'd like to gauge interest in how proud you are of the forum, and how much respect you have for the users here. Here's a cool gif for your time:
436
« on: February 15, 2015, 01:47:16 PM »
I've been reading Douglas Hofstadter's book, I Am a Strange Loop, lately, and wanted to take an idea of his off on a tangent. Dr. Hoftsadter is a Professor of Cognitive Science and writes about complex ideas in ways that laymen can understand, or at least get the gist of, by using analogies and contrived narratives. His books are great, and if I was stranded on a deserted island, given one book, I'd probably request his most famous work, Gödel, Escher, Bach.
And if you happen to be Meta, Goji, SexyPiranha, or anyone else that likes stuff they post about, please do yourself a favor and purchase I Am a Strange Loop or GEB right now.
So anyways, Hofstadter cites a music critic that describes a piece of music as so complex that some people are just incapable of performing it, regardless of practice, because they lack a "large enough" soul. This guy's from the early 1900s so just play along. Hofstadter rolls with this idea, and expounds on it by describing people as having varying levels of "souledness", on some sort of scale, maybe from 0-100%, or maybe on a scale like an IQ. And by the way, we're not talking about the flimsy religious concept of the soul, we're talking about a legitimate aspect of humans that is often conflated with consciousness, personhood, humanity, etc. He is, after all, a cognitive scientist attempting to root out the workings of the human mind.
He talks about how at conception a human embryo has effective zero soul, and a grown, learned adult would have a level of souledness approaching the high end of averages for humans. But then you can lose souledness as you change, and goes on to say that the elderly or infirm, near the end of their life in a largely vegetative or dying state could be effectively at zero, too. Someone in the late stages of Alzheimer's would fall into this category. Once someone reaches a peak, around the end of their development (the human brain stops developing around age 28), it's not likely for their souledness to go much higher.
This might imply that he sees a person of high 'souledness' as being of a higher utility than a lower one, but he discusses the potential for a person of lower souledness to develop a high level than that other person. To clear it up, we'll use a two-year-old and a 22 year-old. The 22-year-old clearly has more of a soul than the two-year-old, but if I forced you to choose one to kill, you wouldn't immediately choose the two-year-old, or choose it at all. You may recognize the ability of a two-year-old to grow into a much better person than the 22-year-old, and that may give it a higher level of utility than the 22-year-old. We tend to think of utility as existing only in the present, when it should be viewed like a financial investment which fluctuates over time.
This thread isn't meant to ask a question (and frankly, I don't know what to ask). Just respond to what the previous paragraph gets you thinking about. If this sounds like a load of garbage, that's fine. This isn't a veiled discussion of abortion, though you can bring it up.
437
« on: February 14, 2015, 10:17:43 PM »
I'm a pet guy, and I want to get a cat and dog(s) sometime down the road, but my wife is very allergic to them (not to any major health issue, but lots of minor reaction type stuff, enough to preclude her from getting pets. I want her to get the shots, but she's hesitant because of how long it takes and whether it's effective.
So, if you've gotten them or have a friend that has, let me know how they've worked. I'll let her know the flood gave the greenlight, and she'll go along with it.
438
« on: February 14, 2015, 12:25:11 PM »
This show is 90% slow-motion sex and gratuitous blood effects. 8/10
439
« on: February 08, 2015, 01:42:17 PM »
So I've been researching evidence of the gospels because Meta's been on an epistemological soul search lately, and I came across this awesome little story of an alternative Jesus figure named Yoheshua, or Yeshu for short. It was written by medieval Jews as a parody of the Christian gospels. tl;dr Joseph was a stud and hooked up with a girl named Miriam, who gave birth to Yeshu, he went to Egypt and learned their magic, came back to Jerusalem, broke into the temple and stole the name of God, giving him unlimited power, then went around proclaiming his power, seducing women, and doing miracles and fulfilling the prophecies of Isaiah. Spoiler “In the year 3671 (in Jewish reckonging, it being ca 90 B.C.) in the days of King Jannaeus, a great misfortune befell Israel, when there arose a certain disreputable man of the tribe of Judah, whose name was Joseph Pandera. He lived at Bethlehem, in Judah. Near his house dwelt a widow and her lovely and chaste daughter named Miriam. Miriam was betrothed to Yohanan, of the royal house of David, a man learned in the Torah and God-fearing. At the close of a certain Sabbath, Joseph Pandera, attractive and like a warrior in appearance, having gazed lustfully upon Miriam, knocked upon the door of her room and betrayed her by pretending that he was her betrothed husband, Yohanan. Even so, she was amazed at this improper conduct and submitted only against her will. Thereafter, when Yohanan came to her, Miriam expressed astonishment at behavior so foreign to his character. It was thus that they both came to know the crime of Joseph Pandera and the terrible mistake on the part of Miriam… Miriam gave birth to a son and named him Yehoshua, after her brother. This name later deteriorated to Yeshu (“Yeshu” is the Jewish “name” for Jesus. It means “May His Name Be Blotted Out”). On the eighth day he was circumcised. When he was old enough the lad was taken by Miriam to the house of study to be instructed in the Jewish tradition. One day Yeshu walked in front of the Sages with his head uncovered, showing shameful disrespect. At this, the discussion arose as to whether this behavior did not truly indicate that Yeshu was an illegitimate child and the son of a niddah. Moreover, the story tells that while the rabbis were discussing the Tractate Nezikin, he gave his own impudent interpretation of the law and in an ensuing debate he held that Moses could not be the greatest of the prophets if he had to receive counsel from Jethro. This led to further inquiry as to the antecedents of Yeshu, and it was discovered through Rabban Shimeon ben Shetah that he was the illegitimate son of Joseph Pandera. Miriam admitted it. After this became known, it was necessary for Yeshu to flee to Upper Galilee. After King Jannaeus, his wife Helene ruled over all Israel. In the Temple was to be found the Foundation Stone on which were engraven the letters of God’s Ineffable Name. Whoever learned the secret of the Name and its use would be able to do whatever he wished. Therefore, the Sages took measures so that no one should gain this knowledge. Lions of brass were bound to two iron pillars at the gate of the place of burnt offerings. Should anyone enter and learn the Name, when he left the lions would roar at him and immediately the valuable secret would be forgotten. Yeshu came and learned the letters of the Name; he wrote them upon the parchment which he placed in an open cut on his thigh and then drew the flesh over the parchment. As he left, the lions roared and he forgot the secret. But when he came to his house he reopened the cut in his flesh with a knife an lifted out the writing. Then he remembered and obtained the use of the letters. He gathered about himself three hundred and ten young men of Israel and accused those who spoke ill of his birth of being people who desired greatness and power for themselves. Yeshu proclaimed, “I am the Messiah; and concerning me Isaiah prophesied and said, ‘Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.’” He quoted other messianic texts, insisting, “David my ancestor prophesied concerning me: ‘The Lord said to me, thou art my son, this day have I begotten thee.’” The insurgents with him replied that if Yeshu was the Messiah he should give them a convincing sign. They therefore, brought to him a lame man, who had never walked. Yeshu spoke over the man the letters of the Ineffable Name, and the leper was healed. Thereupon, they worshipped him as the Messiah, Son of the Highest. When word of these happenings came to Jerusalem, the Sanhedrin decided to bring about the capture of Yeshu. They sent messengers, Annanui and Ahaziah, who, pretending to be his disciples, said that they brought him an invitation from the leaders of Jerusalem to visit them. Yeshu consented on condition the members of the Sanhedrin receive him as a lord. He started out toward Jerusalem and, arriving at Knob, acquired an ass on which he rode into Jerusalem, as a fulfillment of the prophecy of Zechariah. The Sages bound him and led him before Queen Helene, with the accusation: “This man is a sorcerer and entices everyone.” Yeshu replied, “The prophets long ago prophesied my coming: ‘And there shall come forth a rod out of the stem of Jesse,’ and I am he; but as for them, Scripture says ‘Blessed is the man that walketh not in the counsel of the ungodly.’” Queen Helene asked the Sages: “What he says, is it in your Torah?” They replied: “It is in our Torah, but it is not applicable to him, for it is in Scripture: ‘And that prophet which shall presume to speak a word in my name, which I have not commanded him to speak or that shall speak in the name of other gods, even that prophet shall die.’ He has not fulfilled the signs and conditions of the Messiah.” Yeshu spoke up: “Madam, I am the Messiah and I revive the dead.” A dead body was brought in; he pronounced the letters of the Ineffable Name and the corpse came to life. The Queen was greatly moved and said: “This is a true sign.” She reprimanded the Sages and sent them humiliated from her presence. Yeshu’s dissident followers increased and there was controversy in Israel. Yeshu went to Upper Galilee. the Sages came before the Queen, complaining that Yeshu practiced sorcery and was leading everyone astray. Therefore she sent Annanui and Ahaziah to fetch him. The found him in Upper Galilee, proclaiming himself the Son of God. When they tried to take him there was a struggle, but Yeshu said to the men of Upper Galilee: “Wage no battle.” He would prove himself by the power which came to him from his Father in heaven. He spoke the Ineffable Name over the birds of clay and they flew into the air. He spoke the same letters over a millstone that had been placed upon the waters. He sat in it and it floated like a boat. When they saw this the people marveled. At the behest of Yeshu, the emissaries departed and reported these wonders to the Queen. She trembled with astonishment. Then the Sages selected a man named Judah Iskarioto and brought him to the Sanctuary where he learned the letters of the Ineffable Name as Yeshu had done. When Yeshu was summoned before the queen, this time there were present also the Sages and Judah Iskarioto. Yeshu said: “It is spoken of me, ‘I will ascend into heaven.’” He lifted his arms like the wings of an eagle and he flew between heaven and earth, to the amazement of everyone…Yeshu was seized. His head was covered with a garment and he was smitten with pomegranate staves; but he could do nothing, for he no longer had the Ineffable Name. Yeshu was taken prisoner to the synagogue of Tiberias, and they bound him to a pillar. To allay his thirst they gave him vinegar to drink. On his head they set a crown of thorns. There was strife and wrangling between the elders and the unrestrained followers of Yeshu, as a result of which the followers escaped with Yeshu to the region of Antioch; there Yeshu remained until the eve of the Passover. Yeshu then resolved to go the Temple to acquire again the secret of the Name. That year the Passover came on a Sabbath day. On the eve of the Passover, Yeshu, accompanied by his disciples, came to Jerusalem riding upon an ass. Many bowed down before him. He entered the Temple with his three hundred and ten followers. One of them, Judah Iskarioto apprised the Sages that Yeshu was to be found in the Temple, that the disciples had taken a vow by the Ten Commandments not to reveal his identity but that he would point him out by bowing to him. So it was done and Yeshu was seized. Asked his name, he replied to the question by several times giving the names Mattai, Nakki, Buni, Netzer, each time with a verse quoted by him and a counter-verse by the Sages. Yeshu was put to death on the sixth hour on the eve of the Passover and of the Sabbath. When they tried to hang him on a tree it broke, for when he had possessed the power he had pronounced by the Ineffable Name that no tree should hold him. He had failed to pronounce the prohibition over the carob-stalk, for it was a plant more than a tree, and on it he was hanged until the hour for afternoon prayer, for it is written in Scripture, “His body shall not remain all night upon the tree.” They buried him outside the city. On the first day of the week his bold followers came to Queen Helene with the report that he who was slain was truly the Messiah and that he was not in his grave; he had ascended to heaven as he prophesied. Diligent search was made and he was not found in the grave where he had been buried. A gardener had taken him from the grave and had brought him into his garden and buried him in the sand over which the waters flowed into the garden. Queen Helene demanded, on threat of a severe penalty, that the body of Yeshu be shown to her within a period of three days. There was a great distress. When the keeper of the garden saw Rabbi Tanhuma walking in the field and lamenting over the ultimatum of the Queen, the gardener related what he had done, in order that Yeshu’s followers should not steal the body and then claim that he had ascended into heaven. The Sages removed the body, tied it to the tail of a horse and transported it to the Queen, with the words, “This is Yeshu who is said to have ascended to heaven.” Realizing that Yeshu was a false prophet who enticed the people and led them astray, she mocked the followers but praised the Sages. Now obviously this is taken seriously by nobody, but it's still an interesting read. Hell, I'd see the movie.
440
« on: January 31, 2015, 06:45:36 PM »
http://www.amazon.com/The-Name-Wind-Kingkiller-Chronicle/dp/0756404746Ignore that stupid cover art. Ignore the cliche 'Kingkiller Chronicles' title. Ignore the fact that for all intents and purposes, this looks like the most generic fantasy crap that you've ever passed by at a bookstore. Because it is easily some of the best-written fiction I've ever read, nevermind the fantasy genre alone. Patrick Rothfuss writes like sex feels. Prologue: Spoiler A Silence of Three Parts
IT WAS NIGHT AGAIN. The Waystone Inn lay in silence, and it was a silence of three parts.
The most obvious part was a hollow, echoing quiet, made by things that were lacking. If there had been a wind it would have sighed through the trees, set the inn’s sign creaking on its hooks, and brushed the silence down the road like trailing autumn leaves. If there had been a crowd, even a handful of men inside the inn, they would have filled the silence with conversation and laughter, the clatter and clamor one expects from a drinking house during the dark hours of night. If there had been music…but no, of course there was no music. In fact there were none of these things, and so the silence remained.
Inside the Waystone a pair of men huddled at one corner of the bar. They drank with quiet determination, avoiding serious discussions of troubling news. In doing this they added a small, sullen silence to the larger, hollow one. It made an alloy of sorts, a counterpoint.
The third silence was not an easy thing to notice. If you listened for an hour, you might begin to feel it in the wooden floor underfoot and in the rough, splintering barrels behind the bar. It was in the weight of the black stone hearth that held the heat of a long dead fire. It was in the slow back and forth of a white linen cloth rubbing along the grain of the bar. And it was in the hands of the man who stood there, polishing a stretch of mahogany that already gleamed in the lamplight.
The man had true-red hair, red as flame. His eyes were dark and distant, and he moved with the subtle certainty that comes from knowing many things.
The Waystone was his, just as the third silence was his. This was appropriate, as it was the greatest silence of the three, wrapping the others inside itself. It was deep and wide as autumn’s ending. It was heavy as a great river-smooth stone. It was the patient, cut-flower sound of a man who is waiting to die. If you want an accessible (read: not highbrow) series to interest you for a while, check it out.
441
« on: January 25, 2015, 09:26:08 PM »
I was watching Dateline because I'm a fucking loser, and there was a report about a man who pretended to be a British spy and generally lied about his entire life, including the multiple past wives he had as well as 11 children, all to his current wife (who aborted her pregnancy when she found out about his life).
Long story short she brought him up on several charges, including 'rape by deception, because she consented to a persona that was essentially a complete fabrication. The court did not convict him of anything but theft by deception with 3 years in prison and $4,000 in damages to the wife.
What are your thoughts on this? Should rape by deception a crime? Should it be a sex offense but not rape? Should it even warrant itself as a crime at all?
442
« on: January 22, 2015, 01:22:25 PM »
I'm narrowing in on a car and I'm pretty interested in the Subaru Impreza WRX hatchback. Unfortunately, they're almost all stick shifts and the car itself is rare enough, so I'm not hunting all over the country for an automatic. The problem is that I never learned how to drive stick, so I've never experienced it except when driving with others.
My parents both drove stick in hilly Iowa and are avowed against it, saying the hassle of hills, weather, and traffic make it more of an inconvenience than the benefits. I'm also not swayed by the appeal of 'more control'; you can engine brake and control gear shifts in an automatic without using an extra hand and foot, and CVT gets as good or better mileage than manual, not to mention that the WRX gets significantly less mileage than something like the Impreza, due to the power of the WRX.
Convince me to buy a manual (or not).
443
« on: January 21, 2015, 09:46:20 PM »
t4r Had a discussion with the wife, a nursing student, about a baby with severe defects likely caused by the parents' being blood relatives. I say likely because it's considered unprofessional to legitimately attribute incest to birth defects, apparently. But the discussion moved to whether it's abusive to drink alcohol/do drugs/any other harmful activity while pregnant, or does the mother have a right to do whatever she wants? Spoiler I don't mean legally, I mean ethically.
444
« on: January 21, 2015, 12:21:50 PM »
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/21/nyregion/MTA-targets-manspreading-on-new-york-city-subways.html?_r=0It is the bane of many female subway riders. It is a scourge tracked on blogs and on Twitter.
And it has a name almost as distasteful as the practice itself.
It is manspreading, the lay-it-all-out sitting style that more than a few men see as their inalienable underground right. I thought this was a joke when I first heard about it. As I'm sure you've heard, manspreading is a tumblr/SJW idiom to describe men spreading their legs on public transit to oppress women and spread patriarchy. So here's a totally serious video from the New York Times in which a reporter interviews a famous puppet about how to respond to manspreading (such responses include punching them in the face). The video is coupled with damning evidence in the form of pictures of men on public transit with their legs spread open a bit. The reality, of course, is that pretty much everyone on public transit does this and it's very unusual for someone to continue taking up space if someone asks to sit there. It's synonymous with women or students storing bags on the seat next to them when space is available. I dunno, something about this just kind of pisses me off. 'Manspreading' is such an inexplicably annoying word, and it pains me to see real news videos about this.
445
« on: January 18, 2015, 09:02:07 PM »
446
« on: January 17, 2015, 11:55:39 AM »
Over the years I've swapped out parts in my computer to stay current, but I've never changed my monitors. They both run in 1080p, and I frankly don't know anything more than that.
So how often are you supposed to buy new monitors, and does anyone have recommendations for mid-20" monitors on the market?
447
« on: January 15, 2015, 11:34:36 PM »
So sayeth Al Jazeera. http://m.nationalreview.com/corner/396131/i-am-not-charlie-leaked-newsroom-e-mails-reveal-al-jazeera-fury-over-global-support“Defending freedom of expression in the face of oppression is one thing; insisting on the right to be obnoxious and offensive just because you can is infantile,” Khadr wrote. “Baiting extremists isn’t bravely defiant when your manner of doing so is more significant in offending millions of moderate people as well. And within a climate where violent response — however illegitimate — is a real risk, taking a goading stand on a principle virtually no one contests is worse than pointless: it’s pointlessly all about you.” You don’t actually stick it to the terrorists by insulting the majority of Muslims by reproducing more cartoons – you actually entrench the very animosity and divisions these guys seek to sow. Let the rustling commence.
448
« on: January 12, 2015, 06:35:05 PM »
http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/valleyfever/2015/01/barrett_the_honors_college_at_asu_is_a_close-knit_community_some_say_too_cl.phpThat's a big article. Feel free to read through all of it, but I'm going to pull some stuff out that I think deserves discussion. Obviously professors dating their students is inappropriate, and if that needs to be explained then feel free to post, but I don't think you really belong in this particular thread. tl;dr of the article: profs banged students, then got fired and/or committed suicide. "One thing my professor said to me when he ended this affair still sticks out to me," Jane wrote in the closing of her Title IX complaint testimony. "He had no idea that what he was doing was wrong or even against the rules, because it was so common for Barrett Honors College professors to be involved with students that all of the honors faculty saw it as normal." Jane was devastated when Hunter broke off their relationship. She continued to see him on campus, and she says she became depressed to the point of attempting suicide. As time passed -- and after she learned of Lester's work on campus -- Jane says her view of the relationship changed.
"He took advantage of his power over me to coerce me," Jane says in an e-mail. "This wasn't a consensual relationship. It was sexual abuse and it was rape."
In the testimony she provided for Lester's complaint, Jane says she felt trapped by the need to maintain Hunter as a reference, as well as fear that coming forward would mar her reputation, make her feel unsafe, and harm her relationships with other faculty. So she didn't say anything. A Barrett professor brought this up in the comments, and I wanted you folks to have a crack at it.
449
« on: January 11, 2015, 01:09:51 AM »
http://www.fox10phoenix.com/clip/11014328/activist-critical-of-police-undergoes-use-of-force-scenariosWe've seen protests all across the country after police officers have been accused of shooting people who aren't armed. But what happens when an activist gets put into a scenario that officers face daily? The encounter is eye-opening for a Phoenix activist. tl;dr a local activist that led marches against cops shooting unarmed suspects took a shoot/don't-shoot course in Phoenix and changed his opinion on whether cops are justified in some cases.
450
« on: January 10, 2015, 04:41:27 PM »
Having a hard time deciding what route to go. I have a job that pays decently but I also have some loans to pay off.
I know a lot of you are young, but you also know more about cars than I do. Just looking for some advice from personal experience.
|