This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - RustingFloor
Pages: 1 ... 242526 2728 ... 45
751
« on: October 06, 2014, 07:21:32 PM »
I hate old people
752
« on: October 06, 2014, 02:57:58 PM »
Why is your phone's resolution so small?
I dunno It's a 5S
753
« on: October 06, 2014, 02:55:27 PM »
 Seriously
754
« on: October 06, 2014, 02:00:49 PM »
One google search later...
According to a hadith attributed to Mohammed (Sahih Muslim, Book 41, Number 6985), Judgment Day will see Jews hiding behind stones and trees which will betray them to their Muslim attackers. Only behind the gharqad tree, which we know as the boxthorn, will Jews be safe. (Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu was once photographed planting a boxthorn.) God islam is fucking weird
755
« on: October 06, 2014, 01:59:37 PM »
forbes DROPPED
I'm sorry, is Forbes known for being agenda-driven like Huffpost?
I'd get it if I had posted Breitbart or Fox, but come on. Why are you so butthurt all the time?
So when I do it, I'm butthurt, but when you do it, it's a push for an unbiased source?
You're always butthurt, all the time, it seems like.
You weren't looking for an unbiased source, you were still butthurt that I won't take Huffingpost's twisted narrative.
He's butthurt because he disagrees with you?
Again, the article isn't all that important. It's the links in the article.
His tone makes it pretty clear.
And whether or not most gun crime is gang-related is irrelevant, because the fact still stands that the vast majority of gun crimes are committed with either illegally obtained weapons or ones borrowed from family or friends. Law-abiding gun owners are not the problem here.
>gets proven wrong
>HURR ITS IRRELEVANT
Come on bro. This is the Serious section. Provide a source for your claims. These angelic "law abiding gun owners" are regular people who happen to have a license which allows them to carry a weapon capable of killing several people. A lot of them snap and use their gun to commit crimes, a lot of people accidentally commit suicide, a lot of people accidentally kill family members.
I don't trust people to drive correctly. I'm supposed to feel safe because Johnny Two Guns is on the case? Give me a fućking break. People are dumbasses and you know it.
Not a lot actually. A very small number, honestly. You have a very cynical worldview. We might as well ban cars and alcohol while we're at it, since people can snap and get hurt with those.
756
« on: October 06, 2014, 01:43:02 PM »
This will not apply to the Gharqad, which is a Jewish tree." wut
757
« on: October 06, 2014, 01:39:09 PM »
forbes DROPPED
I'm sorry, is Forbes known for being agenda-driven like Huffpost?
I'd get it if I had posted Breitbart or Fox, but come on. Why are you so butthurt all the time?
So when I do it, I'm butthurt, but when you do it, it's a push for an unbiased source?
You're always butthurt, all the time, it seems like.
You weren't looking for an unbiased source, you were still butthurt that I won't take Huffingpost's twisted narrative.
He's butthurt because he disagrees with you?
Again, the article isn't all that important. It's the links in the article.
His tone makes it pretty clear. And whether or not most gun crime is gang-related is irrelevant, because the fact still stands that the vast majority of gun crimes are committed with either illegally obtained weapons or ones borrowed from family or friends. Law-abiding gun owners are not the problem here.
758
« on: October 06, 2014, 01:29:36 PM »
This will not apply to the Gharqad, which is a Jewish tree." wut
759
« on: October 06, 2014, 01:27:28 PM »
forbes DROPPED
I'm sorry, is Forbes known for being agenda-driven like Huffpost?
I'd get it if I had posted Breitbart or Fox, but come on. Why are you so butthurt all the time?
So when I do it, I'm butthurt, but when you do it, it's a push for an unbiased source?
You're always butthurt, all the time, it seems like. You weren't looking for an unbiased source, you were still butthurt that I won't take Huffingpost's twisted narrative.
760
« on: October 06, 2014, 01:21:33 PM »
Edit: On a second look, it fucking is! Won't be linking them again!
761
« on: October 06, 2014, 01:11:46 PM »
Sorry, accidentally posted garbage
762
« on: October 06, 2014, 12:53:43 PM »
This is from huffpost,
DROPPED
763
« on: October 06, 2014, 12:39:21 PM »
Crime is going to be abundant wherever there is poverty.
If they don't use guns they'll use bombs, or knives, or fists.
In my opinion, gun legality is really about enabling a populace to defend themselves from organized aggression and oppression, not petty criminals. Revolution must always be an option on the table of the people.
764
« on: October 06, 2014, 12:28:13 PM »
Bethesda would have definitely made a better Destiny in terms of dialogue and story. I wouldn't be surprised if the bulk of games are made in the US. However, quality over quantity.
Could you imagine how much better it could have been with Bungie doing the gameplay mechanics and Bethesda doing story.
>bethesda writing >being good AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
765
« on: October 06, 2014, 12:26:49 PM »
Slavs.
766
« on: October 06, 2014, 11:21:00 AM »
Still, you might as well be saying the west has a big problem with Atheistophobia or Not-Christianophobia. There's a certain kind of person this is an issue with, and there is a generally consistent mindset there.
767
« on: October 06, 2014, 11:15:41 AM »
Are you implying there's something wrong with being critical of Islam?
Not at all. People should be critical of all religions - I'm referring to the people who think all Muslims are terrorists, that no Muslim should wear traditional headcoverings or attire in places like America, etc.
Oh, well no shit that happens. But that's to be expected of an uneducated populace regarding any other culture. Especially considering the propaganda role the media played in our last few wars, and Christian preachers and clergy jumping on the bandwagon to demonize the "enemy".
768
« on: October 06, 2014, 11:07:52 AM »
Your title had me a little worried, but after reading the body, yeah, I agree.
769
« on: October 06, 2014, 11:01:34 AM »
Are you implying there's something wrong with being critical of Islam?
Because I think anyone who can seriously defend a philosophy that assigns women the role of property, and promotes violence against nonbelievers who won't pay a tax, has some serious issues.
770
« on: October 05, 2014, 11:30:08 PM »
771
« on: October 05, 2014, 10:45:53 PM »
excuse my unfounded speculation but I wonder if the other guy broke it off because he realised that if she'd cheat on charlie she'd probably cheat on him?
I certainly hope not considering that belief is fracking stupid.
It's stupid to think that all cheaters would, but if you look at what we know about her as an individual, I think it's a safe bet that she's going to be unrepentant.
772
« on: October 05, 2014, 10:32:52 PM »
Marriage should be beyond any government body to regulate and should be accessible to everyone via mutual contract.
> inb4 called a degenerate for allowing polygamy.
I don't disagree.
773
« on: October 05, 2014, 10:16:54 PM »
'Well, I believe marriage is between one man and one woman"
Paul had also said that at the federal level he opposed “efforts to redefine marriage as something other than a union between one man and one woman.” He believes that recognizing or legislating marriages should be left to the states and local communities, and not subjected to "judicial activism."
He has opposed the Federal Marriage Amendment, which would amend the US Constitution to define marriage as the union of one man and one woman, because he worries that with its passage “liberal social engineers who wish to use federal government power to redefine marriage will be able to point to the constitutional marriage amendment as proof that the definition of marriage is indeed a federal matter! I am unwilling either to cede to federal courts the authority to redefine marriage, or to deny a state’s ability to preserve the traditional definition of marriage.”[151]
Paul has been a cosponsor of the Marriage Protection Act in each Congress since the bill's original introduction. It would bar federal judges from hearing cases pertaining to the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act. Speaking in support of the Marriage Protection Act in 2004, he urged those of his fellow congressional representatives who “believe Congress needs to take immediate action to protect marriage” to vote for the bill because its passage, requiring only simple majorities in both Houses of Congress, would be much more readily achieved than the passage of the Federal Marriage Amendment, which, as a Constitutional amendment, would require not only much larger majorities in both Houses but also ratification by the state legislatures.[151]
In February 2011, Attorney General Eric Holder announced that the Obama administration's Justice Department had determined that a key provision of the Defense of Marriage Act was unconstitutional and, as a result, the administration would no longer argue in support of the act's constitutionality in court.[152] Paul issued a statement to Iowa Republicans criticizing the Obama administration's position, saying: "Like the majority of Iowans, I believe that marriage is between one man and one woman and must be protected. I supported the Defense of Marriage Act, which used Congress’ constitutional authority to define what other states have to recognize under the Full Faith and Credit Clause, to ensure that no state would be forced to recognize a same sex marriage license issued in another state."[153][154]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Ron_Paul#Same-sex_marriage
tl;dr the shitbag only wants the feds out of marriage so redneck states can ban gay marriage.
774
« on: October 05, 2014, 09:39:15 PM »
Your wife is a fucking cunt
Hold onto those text messages by the way
Those should be a help in court.
You're a good man, Charlie, and you deserve better than this.
775
« on: October 05, 2014, 09:37:23 PM »
776
« on: October 05, 2014, 07:39:12 PM »
 Anu is gonna be so pissed
777
« on: October 05, 2014, 05:23:25 PM »
>teenager
He knew what he was doing.
778
« on: October 04, 2014, 11:22:29 PM »
/lit/
779
« on: October 04, 2014, 05:12:45 PM »
WBC aren't fundamentalists. Does anyone believe that?(besides WBC themselves)
What else are they?
They're hypocrites and ignorant of their own beliefs. such should never considered fundamentalists.
NO TRUE SCOTSMAN
780
« on: October 04, 2014, 10:37:31 AM »
Pages: 1 ... 242526 2728 ... 45
|
Show Posts
