Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Tackel

Pages: 12 34 ... 87
31
The Flood / Re: Do you use sunglasses?
« on: July 08, 2016, 12:43:44 AM »
Yes. I drive east in the morning and west home to and from work. Sun is always in my eyes when driving.

32
The Flood / Re: recent changes in your philosophical outlooks?
« on: July 08, 2016, 12:42:01 AM »
Actually I'm in the process of adjusting my stance on marriage, romance and sex.
hopefully shedding your antiquated and dogmatic views

>Believes his own opinion to be absolutely correct an irrefutable
>Calls someone else dogmatic

WEWLAD
E
W
L
A
D

33
The Flood / Re: recent changes in your philosophical outlooks?
« on: July 08, 2016, 12:39:56 AM »

if I ever wanted to change my life and become a good person, stopping eating meat would be pretty much mandatory

Lol wut.

What does eating meat have to do with being a good person? Go work at the soup kitchen or something to be a good person. Not eating meat won't suddenly rid the world of niggers, nor feed the needy.

34
The Flood / Are the Niggers still chimping?
« on: July 08, 2016, 12:36:45 AM »
Are the niggers still on chimp-out mode? I can't access good internet to stream right now.

35
"This is leftism?"

Shut the fuck up.

No, seriously, shut up.

This is a fucked up situation made worse by people like you drawing arbitrary lines.

At least they can sexually reproduce.

36
The Flood / Jesus Christ, what the fuck...
« on: July 07, 2016, 02:57:54 PM »
So I typed in SFM animation to youtube to see what people have created since it's release, and its completely filled with Five Nights at Freddy's animations with huge tits.




This is what Hitler was trying to prevent.

37
Gaming / Re: RDR coming to XB1 on friday
« on: July 07, 2016, 03:12:43 AM »
So? The game is less than 6 years old. Not like it's been gone for a while...

38
The Flood / Re: So they've added all of Star Trek to Netflix UK
« on: July 07, 2016, 03:09:43 AM »


Star Trek is shit. This is now a prequel shill thread.

39
Gaming / Re: Halo Wars 2 Complaints
« on: June 14, 2016, 12:08:43 PM »
This game is boring :/ and in 2016 why is the unit cap fucking minuscule

I think it's because of the gamemode. We're getting regular skirmish on the 16th. If  its still 60 in skirmish, then fuck this shit. Especially because units now take up an upsured amount of unit slots. A marine group is now 3 instead of 1. If it's like that in the real game, then that means a SEQUEL on a NEXT GEN system will have 30 less units on screen than it's previous game.

41
Gaming / Halo Wars 2 Complaints
« on: June 13, 2016, 07:53:11 PM »
Making a different thread, because fuck this shit.

This game is NOT Halo Wars. It feels like a completely different game. This game ffels like Microsoft's version to ripoff other RTSs and slap a Halo skin onto it.

1) Generator income/Base upgrades replacing Reactors. This feels clunky and inconvenient. Not to mention time consuming. Halo Wars does not need another resource. Do not turn this game into another Starcraft ripoff, please allow it to keep its unique feel.

2) Vehicles and Air units only have one upgrade. I could be wrong since the user interface is slightly overbearing, but I don't see power turrets/chaff pods or their equivalent tier upgrades. Are they gone? If so, why? What kind of pacing are you trying to introduce, and why are you removing upgrades from that equation?

3) Control changes. OK, this one is simply because of how much time I've spent on the original Halo Wars. I'm having a difficult time adjusting to the bumper and d-pad changes, when there were other buttons that were never used. Why change already allocated buttons?

4) The beta itself. What the fuck is this? This game looks, feels, and plays like a game in it's pre-alpha stage. Did Microsoft rush this out for E3 and call it a "beta" because it sounds nicer? Keep in min,d we're getting another Beta this fall for the game. 

Also, using a gamemode where no one can actually build units and test them for your introduction to the game? These are the people that will be in charge of managing the game after release? Christ, you might as well have had this game developed in-house by 343i.

42
How is sexualized characters negative again?
Because sex is disgusting, loathsome, and vile. Biologically, its only function is to produce children,

You're being more edgy than usual. You okay?

43
You could just like, not buy the game if you don't like whats in it bro.

I don't come to your house and take the dildo out of your hand.

44
Gaming / Re: Let us calmly and politely discuss this topic.
« on: June 07, 2016, 04:35:56 PM »
>PS2 for $20 at a flea market

Find me a more cost efficient PC that can run any game at optimal settings.

A Playstation 2 can only run Playstation 2 games.

45
"These narrative explanations don't make it okay."

So we should destroy artistic integrity because "muh feelings"? Dumb cunt.
When your "narrative explanation" is just a half assed workaround to have skimpy outfits, that's literally the opposite of artistic integrity.
"Wahhh, I don't like women with their skin exposed :("

Go to Saudia Rabia you spear chucking sand monkey.

46
"These narrative explanations don't make it okay."

So we should destroy artistic integrity because "muh feelings"? Dumb cunt.

47
Gaming / Re: Civ 6 gameplay
« on: May 31, 2016, 07:09:35 PM »
I love the fog of war mechanic. I always hated the stereotypical faded out blackness.

48
Gaming / Re: R9 390 or GTX 970
« on: May 21, 2016, 01:33:35 PM »
GTX 970. Less likely to run into compatibility problems.

49
I enjoyed, the game, but I know people hate it.

YouTube

I mean as far as movie tie ins go, that one was pretty good

I enjoyed the game. Though this is going back a few years so I have no idea if I still would. It's sitting on my shelf, I should play it.

I played it again a couple months ago. Still pretty fun in my opinion.

50
I enjoyed, the game, but I know people hate it.

YouTube

51
Gaming / Re: CIV VI ANNOUNCED
« on: May 12, 2016, 09:44:28 PM »
I hate the art style to it. It looks ugly.



I like it. Looks like Civ Rev. I hated those "realistic" ground textures in Civ 5 tbh. Would much prefer a stylized look like this.

52
Gaming / Re: New Star Wars Battlefront game next year
« on: May 12, 2016, 09:41:58 PM »
It'll probably be episode VII/VIII. I'm pretty sure EA/ Disney are just trying to pretend the prequels and everything associated with them never happened.

I just want my goddamn clone wars already.

Nah, they've stopped that now. It was just like that for TFA. Now we're getting lots of prequel comics, clone wars references, and new Ahsoka book out in October.

Especially with the high likelihood of Hayden being in VIII as a spooky dooky ghost, they don't need to pretend anymore that they don't exist.

53
Gaming / Re: New Star Wars Battlefront game next year
« on: May 12, 2016, 09:39:24 PM »
Battlefront is on a 3 year cycle faggot. EA has Battlefield, Titanfall, and Battlefront. We won't get a new Battlefront until 2018.

That being said, this is most likely for the unannounced 4th DLC pack. They'll launch Battlefront again with all the DLC, similar to how Battlefield has a "Premium" version of their titles 6-9 months after launch.

54
Gaming / Both Force Unleashed games are now backwards compatible
« on: May 09, 2016, 08:56:40 PM »
For any of you fags that care.

55
Gaming / Re: Halo 5 mega thread
« on: May 07, 2016, 11:58:21 AM »
I have now reinforced my belief that Spartan Ops is the worst designed gameplay experience ever created.

It could've been great. have 10 weeks of a new campaign after launch. Each mission was the same environment from multiplayer maps/campaign areas for the first 5 episodes. Then they made new content for the last 5, and made them feel like actual missions at first, but then had us go back to the same area over and over again.


56
Gaming / Re: Halo 5: The Memories of Reach update
« on: May 07, 2016, 10:47:52 AM »
I don't see a release date at all.

57
Gaming / Re: Lets guess those 10 maps for the CoD 4 remaster
« on: May 06, 2016, 06:45:20 AM »
These guys actually think that Paradiso is a good map

Cease these jests before I burst asunder my side plates

How is Paradiso bad? Because it's not and MLG competitive map for Big Team Battle?

58
Gaming / Re: Call of Copypasta: Infinite Warfare trailer
« on: May 06, 2016, 06:35:56 AM »
based battlefield devs

Graphics =/= quality.

If only DICE understood that when developing Battlefront.
Graphics can factor into quality for sure. BattleFIELD for example has both graphics, animation, and sounds (balance too?) over Call of Duty.

The new Call of Duty looks interesting and might actually have a story worth a damn for the first time in 6 years. But no, devs need to bantz with each other over "muh graphics!!!11" Just comes off as unprofessional.

>This one might be good, guys! They might actually get it right this time!

LOL don't be so naive. How many times have we gone through this shit parade with CoD? I mean, fuck, they're still using the same animations from ten fucking years ago. CoD is a joke.

>Implying that I ever though previous Call of Duty games to be good before release.

This is the only time a Call of Duty trailer has interested me since Modern Warfare 2.

59
The Flood / Re: I have a confession to make, Flood...
« on: May 05, 2016, 05:44:49 PM »
Gas the kikes. Race war now.

60
Gaming / Re: Call of Copypasta: Infinite Warfare trailer
« on: May 05, 2016, 01:50:43 PM »
based battlefield devs

Graphics =/= quality.

If only DICE understood that when developing Battlefront.
Graphics can factor into quality for sure. BattleFIELD for example has both graphics, animation, and sounds (balance too?) over Call of Duty.

The new Call of Duty looks interesting and might actually have a story worth a damn for the first time in 6 years. But no, devs need to bantz with each other over "muh graphics!!!11" Just comes off as unprofessional.

Pages: 12 34 ... 87