631
Gaming / Re: dat gtav pc version tho
« on: April 13, 2015, 02:58:57 PM »
THREE HOURS!
MUCH EXCITEMENT.
MUCH EXCITEMENT.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 631
Gaming / Re: dat gtav pc version tho« on: April 13, 2015, 02:58:57 PM »
THREE HOURS!
MUCH EXCITEMENT. 632
Gaming / Re: Which console is better?« on: April 13, 2015, 01:05:46 AM »so you pick the company that thinks 1 comes after 360Well, if we're talking in geometry, 1º comes after 360º. 633
Serious / Re: Hillary Clinton is one of, if not the, worst potential presidents out there« on: April 12, 2015, 07:25:48 PM »
It'd be interesting to see her up against Rand Paul in the general election.
634
The Flood / Re: Well THAT didn't last long. Ama« on: April 11, 2015, 11:27:06 AM »
What exactly were the images in question?
For science. 635
The Flood / Re: when was you when achievement hunter was die?« on: April 11, 2015, 08:39:21 AM »
I got the vibe that Ray wasn't enjoying himself as much in these last few months with AH.
636
The Flood / Re: Syria rebels home made tank. The "Sham II.« on: April 11, 2015, 08:36:54 AM »
Ten bucks says they play Battlefield 2 Terrorist Mod on the TV inside and pretend they're driving a tank.
638
Gaming / tfw smoothskin a long time ago in a galaxy far far away« on: April 09, 2015, 01:08:24 PM »
feels bad man
639
Serious / Re: Let's discuss why Rand Paul is so fucking great« on: April 09, 2015, 01:04:18 PM »Thing is, the only way I can see it really working is if there's a massive overhaul of the welfare system, since the money you receive from the government is supposed to serve as your "welfare".I could get behind that. But the right will demonize such a system as encouraging people to be poor, etc etc etcI tend to favor Milton Friedman's proposal of a regressive tax system where if you make below a certain threshold you receive money from the government, and once you're over that threshold you enter progressive tax brackets that eventually reach a flat tax rate of 20-30%.When everyone is rich no one is rich. Wealth inequality will always exist in a market economy.This is true. But we shouldn't encourage exacerbating the issue by adopting something like a flat tax. We need varying tax rates. "One size fits all" does not work for us. I do imagine that a lot of this would cut what little fraud there is, since welfare would be dealt purely with cash. I also wonder what society would be like if the minimum amount of money any citizen could receive per month was $300-500. 640
The Flood / Re: HOLY FUCKING SHIT FINALLY« on: April 09, 2015, 12:58:35 PM »
I'm pretty sure Noelle doesn't have a dick, guys.
641
Serious / Re: Let's discuss why Rand Paul is so fucking great« on: April 09, 2015, 12:51:58 PM »I tend to favor Milton Friedman's proposal of a regressive tax system where if you make below a certain threshold you receive money from the government, and once you're over that threshold you enter progressive tax brackets that eventually reach a flat tax rate of 20-30%.When everyone is rich no one is rich. Wealth inequality will always exist in a market economy.This is true. But we shouldn't encourage exacerbating the issue by adopting something like a flat tax. We need varying tax rates. "One size fits all" does not work for us. 642
Serious / Re: John Oliver interviews Edward Snowden« on: April 09, 2015, 12:47:58 PM »Civil disobedience is one of the most effective ways to enact change. Prohibition and segregation would still be around if people didn't deliberately disobey those laws to make a point.No, you have the responsibility to change or remove unjust laws. Because disobeying a law will just get you locked up, fined, shot, etc.It's true, though. You can't just ignore a law that you personally object to.Camnator, is that you?Well, I guess this discussion is over, seeing as how you have no intelligent retort. Quote Disobeying a law does not exempt you from its punishment.Never said that. 643
Serious / Re: Let's discuss why Rand Paul is so fucking great« on: April 09, 2015, 12:42:45 PM »When everyone is rich no one is rich. Wealth inequality will always exist in a market economy.It's not even about socialism and marx, really; you can take that out of the quote entirely and it still rings true for so many Americans. They aren't poor and getting fucked, they're just temporarily down on their game and mildly inconvenienced; they'll be rich soon, don't worry. They eat that shit up because it makes the feel less shitty about the situation they're in.“Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires.”And how many workers, do you think, who do think of themselves as exploited proletarians actually end up becoming millionaires? 644
Serious / Re: John Oliver interviews Edward Snowden« on: April 09, 2015, 12:40:28 PM »It's true, though. You can't just ignore a law that you personally object to.Camnator, is that you?Well, I guess this discussion is over, seeing as how you have no intelligent retort. Spoiler 645
Serious / Re: John Oliver interviews Edward Snowden« on: April 09, 2015, 12:38:15 PM »Anyone can follow your car around and see where you go. They can't see what's in your car or what you're doing at the destinations. To do that they need a warrant.Anger, present an argument about why it's wrong. All you're doing is saying "you're wrong, I'm right" over and over. The NSA's methods of data collection are virtually the same in the context of the world-wide web. They follow traffic around and if they find something suspicious they get a warrant. 646
Gaming / Re: Blessed be Steam and Rockstar« on: April 09, 2015, 12:28:52 PM »>Preordering a PC port when there are an unlimited amount of copies to download>PreorderingThe difference here is that we know the game is good because it's already had 2 releases already. 648
Serious / Re: Let's discuss why Rand Paul is so fucking great« on: April 09, 2015, 10:30:34 AM »Has a strong stance against IS but wants to get rid of the Patriot Act?There are better ways of fighting terrorists than basically criminalizing every citizen you're supposed to be protecting. 649
The Flood / Re: let's explore some of the formatting options that never get used« on: April 08, 2015, 10:45:27 PM »650
The Flood / Re: YouTube to launch subscription service for ad-free viewing« on: April 08, 2015, 10:41:41 PM »AdBlock does cause huge problems for content creators. For people whose livelihoods rely on ad revenue (a lot of fucking people) having a huge chunk of that potential revenue washed away because someone doesn't want to watch a 30-second ad probably hurts.People who use Adblock are the very reason why people are doing this. I'm glad you support the channels you watch through donations, but I mean, who the fuck else does that? Adblock is still retarded, and wrong.Or: That said, many channels are now incorporating ads into the videos themselves. Like Roosterteeth's or LinusTechTips' endorsement of products at the beginning of their shows. I think we'll see a transition to that type of advertising exclusively in the coming years. 651
Serious / Re: Let's discuss why Rand Paul is so fucking great« on: April 08, 2015, 10:35:03 PM »still not as good as jeb bushJeb Bush won't get elected simply because of his last name. 652
The Flood / YouTube to launch subscription service for ad-free viewing« on: April 08, 2015, 10:26:19 PM »
Linky
Quote YouTube has confirmed the forthcoming launch of a monthly subscription option that will let users bypass the ads that normally run in front of videos.Personally I support the channels I enjoy via direct donations. With that and the fact that you can just use AdBlock or uBlock to get rid of ads, will anyone here be using this? 653
Serious / Re: Can somebody tell me exactly what's wrong with Ted Cruz?« on: April 08, 2015, 11:05:32 AM »
He's basically Rick Santorum, but worse.
654
Gaming / Re: Suggestions for good games to buy« on: April 06, 2015, 10:44:31 AM »
Cities: Skylines
656
The Flood / Re: Songs/Artists You Liked, and Now Regret« on: April 06, 2015, 01:56:42 AM »STP 657
Serious / Re: So, that Indiana pizzaria that was forced to close?« on: April 06, 2015, 01:52:44 AM »
They see catering as a form of endorsement (i.e. "Wedding of ____ and ____ catered by ____."). They don't want their name associated with a gay wedding in what I gather is an extremely conservative town.
As for the donations: What do you expect when you invoke the wrath of Glenn Beck? 658
The Flood / Re: My five-seven has been seized.« on: April 02, 2015, 04:16:41 PM »Either sit the fuck down and accept that you already spent 1,100 dollars to add to a pile of guns that will otherwise never be used for their intended purpose as a tool except for only 1 of them at a time, or if he's so flustered about it then make a compromise and sell some excess.Only drink water because any other variety is unneeded excess. You can only drink one thing at a time. Only buy one movie because others are excess. You can only watch one movie at a time. Only buy one song because the rest is excess. You can only listen to one song at a time. Do you realize how fucking ignorant you sound? I get that you're a minimalist but Jesus Christ, dude. Edit: Also, it sounds to me that you suck with personal finances. 659
Serious / Re: Any other Bongs watching the leaders debate on ITV?« on: April 02, 2015, 02:28:24 PM »
That Labour guy is so fucking annoying. Holy shit.
|