Your argument appears to be rather semantic.

I use the word "evil" to describe things that I find severely detrimental, or diametrically opposed, to... not necessarily my ideals, but what I perceive to be of the most virtuous ideals.

I'm talking about the multiplayer, you spongaloid.

And I'm NOT.

Last I checked, Hatred isn't a multiplayer game anyway, so it's fucking moronic to compare it with the multiplayer of another game.

Last I checked, wars don't happen for no reason. We don't have wars just because we like to kill people.

All they needed was a fucking--I mean, anything. They could've gave some shitty excuse, like, "Oh, his daddy beat him up as a kid." And that would've been like, oh, okay. That's a lame-ass fucking excuse, but at least it's something.

And hell, I haven't played the damn game, so I don't even really know anything about the main character's backstory or whatever. If he has any. So I feel bad for censuring this game so harshly with only having seen the trailer for it, but that's just the thing--they ought to have put more in the trailer.

But, as someone mentioned earlier, they did it on purpose. Making the trailer as violent and as edgy as possible generated a lot of buzz, which is exactly what they wanted. Which, to me, is evil in itself. Manipulating people to generate buzz around your game, make it popular, make it known, so they can chicanerously sell more copies. We'll have a bunch of people who will play the game to see how bad it is, or if it's as bad as it looked in the trailer, rather than people who were genuinely interested in the game to begin with. It's bullshit. It's bullshit, and I fucking hate it.

That should be reason enough not to get the game, but people will anyway. Because we suck.

they're playing the Stars at home

I should make one some time.

I'm not sure what's hard for you to understand

Man 1: Hello Man 2, I want you to kill me and eat my body. I am giving you my consent.
Man 2: Okay Man 1, I shall kill you and eat you now.

Is this okay for vegans?

I misinterpreted your post initially due to ambiguous phrasing, but I see what you mean now.
Yes, if both parties are okay with that, then I don't see any problem.

If somebody consented to you killing an eating them (Baking them into cookies), would that be okay? There are actual cases of this

That's not how consent works, shithead.

Unless I'm misreading your poorly-worded-ass post.

Cálmate, por favor.

Either way, GMO or not, I still view it as abuse, so...

I don't drink that shit.

if you can't eat eggs then why can you eat sperm?
species doesn't matter

This is why I used the word "consensually", you dumb cunt. You can't ask an animal for permission to basically take its eggs and milk for your use. If you could, and the cow said, "Yes." then I'd be okay with it. But cows can't do that.

but you can't eat eggs

Nope. Because they're... extracted in a completely different and incomparable way. Unless you're referring to human eggs, in which case... you're a disgusting fuckbag, but if you meet a woman, and she's okay with you... eating her... ova?... Have the fuck at it, buddy.

Cookies are good. Like, in general. I don't know. I'm not particular about cookies. Just as long as they're vegan, I guess.

Which actually makes me very particular... fml
I just realized, I haven't had a cookie since I've become a vegan about a month ago.

Nah, man.

Gotta say. He can't rock the white at all.