44101
Serious / Re: Does moral responsibility require free will?
« on: January 15, 2015, 12:08:16 PM »
Would you not lock up natural disasters if you could, or am I missing your point there?
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 44101
Serious / Re: Does moral responsibility require free will?« on: January 15, 2015, 12:08:16 PM »
Would you not lock up natural disasters if you could, or am I missing your point there?
44103
Serious / Re: Does moral responsibility require free will?« on: January 15, 2015, 11:53:24 AM »
Frankly, as a determinist myself (one who is relatively unacquainted with its derivative forms), this mentality--the mentality of, "Well, everything is determined, so I guess I should be a moral nihilist" is toxic, and should be eschewed immediately.
Ultimately, yeah, everything is determined. That may SEEM to make your life futile--but the thing is... no, determinism is not the impetus for moral nihilism--it should be an impediment. The fact is, we don't know what the future is like--we can't predict our fate. We can't even predict the weather. As a determinist, you have to realize that the only reason things are determined is, basically, because of Newton's laws of motion, yes? Taking those into account, that should inspire you to be the force that gets people to act like good, civilized, and productive human beings. You should be an advocate for good behavior. Determinism doesn't make good behavior futile--it makes it necessary. I don't think it's redundant to speak of moralistic "oughts" in a deterministic universe--I think it's all the more reason to do so. Just because everything is "set in stone", as it were, doesn't mean we know the outcome. It doesn't mean that we shouldn't try to change undesirable outcomes. Because that's not determinism, that's defeatism. They keyword is "try". Make an effort. Read your script. Do your duty. 44104
The Flood / Re: where the fuck is anarchy« on: January 15, 2015, 11:31:49 AM »Yo nigga how the fuck do you request the nameplateThere's a drop-down menu under your avatar up there. One of the options is "nameplates". You'll find it. It's the "beyond the sea" nameplate, for whatever reason. I don't think of classic jazz songs when I think of "anarchy," but you know, whatever. 44105
The Flood / Re: People that buy pure breed dogs« on: January 15, 2015, 11:22:11 AM »
Well, that's good to hear. I'm glad that people here (myself included, make no mistake) hold their pets in high regard.
Just, if something ever rubs me the wrong way, especially when it comes to a sanction or social norm, I gotta take a critical glance on it... 44106
The Flood / Re: People that buy pure breed dogs« on: January 15, 2015, 11:15:16 AM »I can't really argue that point considering that I don't know how domestication the dog happened. It could have been a mutual thing, or one-sided. If you know anything about it I'd be interested to read itmIt's a mystery, but people have their theories. 44107
The Flood / Re: People that buy pure breed dogs« on: January 15, 2015, 11:05:35 AM »The only reason animals need to be taken care of is because we fucked them up. A lot of people abuse and neglect animals, which gets them in shelters. A lot of people specially breed them, which has an entire host of health risks. This has drastically reduced their capacity to survive out in the wild (if they had much a capacity to begin with... like Aria, I'm ignorant of how domestication took place, so I might just be talking shit right now).Is it ethical to push someone into a crevice and swiftly pull them back and say, "Saved your life"?...huh? I don't understand this analogy. Again, I just wanna make it clear that these thoughts aren't ironclad right now. I'm simply postulating--hence my first post. 44108
The Flood / Re: People that buy pure breed dogs« on: January 15, 2015, 10:56:41 AM »Maybe my view is just different because I view dogs as companions instead of pets.Well, so do I, though. I'm just conceding that we sort of made them our companions. I don't think it started off as a mutual thing. Well, obviously. But that doesn't mean owning a pet is unethical - it's just some people are shitty people.I don't know. Is it ethical to push someone into a crevice and swiftly pull them back and say, "Saved your life"? Most people are shitty. I wouldn't trust the average person to own a pet. That's just me. 44109
The Flood / Re: People that buy pure breed dogs« on: January 15, 2015, 10:45:13 AM »Pets aren't there for our entertainment. They're part of the family.Well, says you. Not everyone thinks of their pets that way. They're evil, but they're there. 44110
The Flood / Re: People that buy pure breed dogs« on: January 15, 2015, 10:44:38 AM »Nearly every dog we've had beside the Chow was adopted. It's a home with food and affection vs the shelter, so I'd think that the situation is a nonchoice. Turning them loose is what probably had them end up in the pound in the first place, so a domesticated animal being set free is giving it the option between dying or being adopted.Well no, I'm not trying to say we should just let them all loose. That would be retarded. I have two chihuahuas--one of which gets heavy seizures very frequently because of her fucked up physiology. Ain't no way, no how she'd make it out there. I'm just saying, we probably should have never started to own pets. Now we can't stop, because our pets are designed to be pets. It's just a little fucked up to me. All of it. Not just pure-breeding. 44111
The Flood / Re: People that buy pure breed dogs« on: January 15, 2015, 10:33:33 AM »Because I certainly wouldn't want to be "owned" by anyone for their entertainment.I've been questioning the ethics of owning pets at all lately.Really? Why? Thing is, most pets seem to be okay with it... but does that necessarily make it okay?... 44112
The Flood / Re: People that buy pure breed dogs« on: January 15, 2015, 10:28:24 AM »
I've been questioning the ethics of owning pets at all lately.
44113
The Flood / Re: Are the walls of your bedroom painted in your favorite color?« on: January 15, 2015, 10:21:49 AM »
I live up in the attic, so...
44115
The Flood / Re: Best around, or Best in town?« on: January 15, 2015, 09:46:47 AM »The Karate Kid one. 44116
The Flood / Re: So this is Sep7agon, eh?« on: January 15, 2015, 07:15:38 AM »
How did it feel to ban him?
Felt good, didn't it? Felt REAL good. Do that more. 44117
The Flood / Re: What time do you take showers?« on: January 15, 2015, 07:12:21 AM »
Whenever. Usually in the morning, so I'm wide awake.
44118
The Flood / Re: There's a Sep7agon Wiki, apparently« on: January 15, 2015, 07:02:39 AM »
nope
gives a relaxed tone; see no reason to do so unless i wanna give a dry tone, or otherwise 44119
The Flood / Re: There's a Sep7agon Wiki, apparently« on: January 15, 2015, 07:00:25 AM »
that would be because she's a minor
and i'm a poor college student who's not gonna be able to move out of my parents' house for another two to three years 44120
The Flood / Re: You have 10 seconds to prove you're not an americunt« on: January 15, 2015, 06:58:56 AM »
i just get a bunch of people raising their arms
44121
The Flood / Re: There's a Sep7agon Wiki, apparently« on: January 15, 2015, 06:57:09 AM »
aw shit son
bonus points if it used buzzwords like "edgy" and "autistic" or any derivative forms 44122
The Flood / Re: There's a Sep7agon Wiki, apparently« on: January 15, 2015, 06:53:18 AM »
Someone only had one lines worth of shit about me?
Come the fuck on. 44123
The Flood / Re: There's a Sep7agon Wiki, apparently« on: January 15, 2015, 06:46:20 AM »
Who said the article has to be wholly flattering? If you wanted it to be convincing, you'd either pepper insults here and there or write it straight-up like an ED article...
44124
The Flood / Re: There's a Sep7agon Wiki, apparently« on: January 15, 2015, 06:42:09 AM »
Let's play a game called "Who Wrote Their Own Article?"
44125
Serious / Re: Intelligent people, how do you know you're not stupid?« on: January 14, 2015, 01:38:56 PM »it's so funny that you say thatI'm dumb in a lot of areas.Aren't engineers supposed to be like... skilled in everything but English? 44126
The Flood / Re: Years on the Flood?« on: January 14, 2015, 08:47:27 AM »
i began my sixth year in september
44127
The Flood / Re: It's 2015. If You Don't Have Netflix Yet« on: January 14, 2015, 08:45:37 AM »
or because i'm the only person who realizes that we aren't living in a "golden era" of television, and everything on netflix pretty much sucks or is a colossal waste of time
44129
Serious / Re: Intelligent people, how do you know you're not stupid?« on: January 14, 2015, 08:43:40 AM »
I've never met an intelligent person who wasn't smart enough to concede that they're also highly ignorant.
44130
News / Re: Jono's Reviews: Ratchet and Clank« on: January 14, 2015, 05:48:53 AM »
Ratchet & Clank is probably the most nostalgic game series that I've ever played. Definitely one of my favorites.
(and it's infinitely superior to jak and daxter wtf) Going Commando > A Crack in Time > Up Your Arsenal > Tools of Destruction = Quest for Booty > Ratchet & Clank >>> Deadlocked > Size Matters = Secret Agent Clank >>>>> All 4 One I've yet to play Full Frontal Assault and Into the Nexus. And the mobile games, but... fuck. |