1981
The Flood / Re: reddit's only problem
« on: December 04, 2018, 06:50:36 PM »jannieswhat are these
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 1981
The Flood / Re: reddit's only problem« on: December 04, 2018, 06:50:36 PM »jannieswhat are these 1982
Gaming / Re: Super Smash Brothers« on: December 04, 2018, 06:38:02 PM »whos the negan of smashbayonetta probably 1983
The Flood / Re: reddit's only problem« on: December 04, 2018, 02:57:25 PM »the only bad thing about reddit is the very core of iti don't mind the karma system on its face, i think upvoting quality posts is a fine idea i just don't think people with negative karma should be punished in the way that they are burying unpopular opinion is more than enough 1984
The Flood / Re: reddit's only problem« on: December 04, 2018, 02:27:33 PM »*goes to Ask Reddit*super general subs are obviously turbo cancer, but niche interest subs are pretty all right 1985
The Flood / Re: reddit's only problem« on: December 04, 2018, 02:14:25 PM »LOL How's negative Karma even real?well, doesn't reddit split karma between threads and comments anyway so you could have high thread karma but low comment karma 1986
The Flood / reddit's only problem« on: December 04, 2018, 01:53:09 PM »
if you're like me and you disagree with the human race on everything (but you choose to be honest anyway), you're getting downvoted to fuck hell
and yeah yeah, karma is just meaningless internet points, so who cares right well guess what, if you have lots of negative karma (which is inescapable if you're someone who tends to go against the grain), the website punishes you by making it so you can only post every ten fucking minutes sure, you won't get banned, but if you have like twenty different people replying to some controversial or unpopular comment you made, you have no choice but to wait ten minutes to respond to each and every one of those messages, unless you're just a mindless drone who agrees with everybody on everything or is too afraid to actually say something that people will disagree with this is the only reason the website is kinda shitty and it has nothing to do with whatever reason you think the website is bad 1987
Gaming / Re: The problem with roleplaying games like fallout« on: December 04, 2018, 11:46:25 AM »uhh, pretty sure you can get like 1,2, and shit like fallout tactics in a bundle for 2 dollars when it's on sale. I'm probably wrong on the number, but y'know, it's super cheap when that bundle is on saleguess i can wait then as much as the internet wants me to, i still can't bring myself to hate fallout 3, but perhaps playing the first two will allow me to join the circlejerk of hate 1988
Gaming / Re: The problem with roleplaying games like fallout« on: December 04, 2018, 11:36:09 AM »
$10 on steam for fallout 1 and 2, huh
i might as well just get them 1989
The Flood / Re: Tumblr Destroying All Porn« on: December 04, 2018, 02:01:58 AM »Why would they suddenly decide to sanitize their platform of something that isn't inherently wrong when they never had an issue with it before?because they're now being pulled from the app store for it 1990
Gaming / Re: Super Smash Brothers« on: December 04, 2018, 01:44:03 AM »In terms of my five Squad Strike characters, I think I pretty much have Simon/Lucario/Sheik/Jigglypuff on lock, based on my interests and all the footage I've seen so far. For 3v3s this can be narrowed down to Simon/Lucario/Sheik. Still trying to decide on a fifth character, though, and I'm thinking it's gonna be either Link, Roy, Ganondorf, or Mii Swordfighter. Link is looking fantastic with his new remote bombs. I was scared that he might be shitty on account of his lack of a tether, but recent footage has shown me that this isn't a crippling weakness. He has the best chance at the moment. Roy looks great, perhaps best he's ever looked. But part of my thing is that I'd like all the characters in my squad to be part of franchises that I actually enjoy and care about, and the thing about Fire Emblem is that I loathe what it's become. The only reason I consider him at all is because he was the first character I ever mained in a Smash game, so there's an emotional connection there. I'll pocket him either way, but I'm still not sure if I want him to be in the five. Ganondorf would be an easy choice if only his moveset hadn't changed at all. I guess it's neat that he actually uses his sword now, but at the same time, his old moveset, regardless of how unfaithful it was, was still really fucking fun. Now that it's different, I'm not sure if I'll necessarily find it as fun. Not to mention, ganoncide can be mashed out of now, so I won't be able to troll with him online as hard. He's looking like a pocket at the moment. Mii Swordfighter is on option. You'll notice that the four characters I have on lock represent 64, Melee, Brawl, and Ultimate. Since I don't have a Smash 4 character represented, it would be neat to fill the gap with my favorite newcomer from that game. Problem is, I didn't really like any of Smash 4's newcomers (with a few exceptions, like Little Mac, who aren't really my style). Turns out, in the end, the newcomers I was most hyped for in that game were the goddamn Mii Fighters, simply because getting to self-insert in a game like this is a fun gimmick. Of the three classes, Swordfighter is the one I enjoy playing the most, which is unfortunate, considering he's one of the weakest characters. Unless he gets buffs, I'll probably dispense on having any Smash 4 representation whatsoever in my squad, unless Ryu turns out to be super fun to play with his new mechanics. I haven't even begun to think about strategy, but I do like how all my chosen characters so far seem to fit a consistent mold. Best when played patient, lame, and defensive (esp. Simon and Puff), but whose offensive prowess cannot be counted out (esp. Sheik and Lucario). Pretty balanced. If I choose Link, this theme can be taken further, since he has mad projectile game while being able to hit pretty hard when he needs to. 1991
Gaming / Re: Super Smash Brothers« on: December 03, 2018, 09:26:30 PM »
there are dedicated discord servers for labbing specific characters which is a great idea
but some of them gate you and require you to write a fucking application before you're even allowed to post lmao 1992
Gaming / Re: Super Smash Brothers« on: December 03, 2018, 07:51:14 PM »Please tell me that I can have the Brinstar Theme from Melee play 24/7 throughout my time playing Ultimatei suppose if you only ever play on metroid stages (which isn't entirely unreasonable because of omega and BF forms) 1993
The Flood / Re: Rip george bush« on: December 02, 2018, 12:18:29 AM »Hilarious!whoMore commonly known as George W Kush 1994
Gaming / Re: Super Smash Brothers« on: December 01, 2018, 12:43:26 PM »Fighting games are for people that can’t fight in real life. YouTube 1995
Gaming / Re: Super Smash Brothers« on: December 01, 2018, 08:29:11 AM »be my guestDon’t make me buy one of those Nintendo doohickeys and whoop that assI see Chally maining Kirby tbhhe's the guy that just keeps jumping all the way up and dropping with down+b the whole game i'll even let you pick my character 😂 1996
Gaming / Re: Super Smash Brothers« on: November 30, 2018, 10:37:25 PM »I see Chally maining Kirby tbhhe's the guy that just keeps jumping all the way up and dropping with down+b the whole game 1997
Gaming / Re: Super Smash Brothers« on: November 30, 2018, 10:23:56 PM »
fortunately, my squad is pretty well-rounded
one top tier, a couple high tiers, a few mid tiers, a couple low tiers, and one bottom tier all theoretical of course, but i wouldn't have it any other way 1998
Gaming / Re: Super Smash Brothers« on: November 30, 2018, 07:30:32 PM »you seem more like a Dr. Mario kind of guy to meMarioJUSTwho is going to be your main in Super Smash Bros. Ultimate for Nintendo Switch 1999
Gaming / Re: Super Smash Brothers« on: November 30, 2018, 07:26:44 PM »JUSTwho is going to be your main in Super Smash Bros. Ultimate for Nintendo Switch 2000
Gaming / Re: Super Smash Brothers« on: November 30, 2018, 04:50:18 PM »
i need to hire someone to stab me every time i use the word "just"
2001
Gaming / Re: Super Smash Brothers« on: November 30, 2018, 04:48:00 PM »What's the deal with him?dude is just really opinionated, and has a reputation for not holding back his thoughts on twitter, so he's a polarizing guy he's either the hero the community needs who tells it like it is, or just a whiny bitch who needs to cool his jets openly hates hungrybox (best player in the world) on a personal level, on top of hating the character he plays to the point where he genuinely believes that he's killing the game, and as a result, tries to take away from his achievements every time he wins anything major, instead of just getting good enough to beat the fucking guy (scrub mentality manifest) every time he loses to hbox he cries on twitter, whinging about how busted jigglypuff is even though he's a fox player (fox is hardline the best character in the game) (lately he's taking to whining about marth, too, when in reality, marth/fox is probably dead even, it's just marth players have been leveling up recently and he can't take a loss for shit) normally i wouldn't care so much, but he has legions of followers who believe everything he says just because he's leffen, and i think it's a toxic reflection of the community to have so many people demonize a player like hbox the way they do he's a fucking fantastic player who's fun to watch, and i don't even have anything big against him, but he's still very immature, and i've kinda just been fed up with his shit lately 2002
Gaming / Re: Super Smash Brothers« on: November 30, 2018, 04:26:20 PM »Looks like I'm probably meeting Leffen tomorrow then.make sure to tell him at least one of these things - hbox is the savior of melee - puff is honest/hype - fox is cancer - fox beats marth - that he is living proof that you can be a top player and a fucking scrub simultaneously 2003
Gaming / Re: Super Smash Brothers« on: November 30, 2018, 11:56:05 AM »YouTube this is peak video game 2004
The Flood / Re: Verbatim sucks and smells like an old man's penis« on: November 29, 2018, 12:12:43 AM »
reported!
have fun getting BANnED ahahahahahaa 2005
Gaming / Re: Nintendo Switch Online thread« on: November 28, 2018, 02:47:29 PM »
Oh shit, I forgot to talk about the "special edition" games.
I mentioned this before, but it seems that, on top of the three NES games that NSO members receive every month (which is still a laughably piddly amount that is borderline insulting), we actually do receive a fourth game as a little bonus of sorts. For October, the fourth game was a "special edition" of The Legend of Zelda. For November, the fourth game was a special edition of Gradius. I wasn't sure at first, but the trend seems to be that we'll be receiving a "special" edition (abbreviated "SP") of a select game that had already been available to play on the service, which is why it's just a bonus. Thankfully, however, the games chosen seem to be the best ones available (I've given both of those titles a 5/5, should that mean anything). What's different about them? Well, not a whole lot, to be blunt. The SP version of Zelda is advertised as a "souped up" version of the classic and subtitled with the phrase, "Living the life of luxury!" It starts you out smack on the first screen of the game—there's not even a title screen—with maximum Rupees, Keys, and Bombs. The Blue Ring is also visibly equipped, as well as the Power Bracelet, Blue Candle, Arrows, Bait, and a Red Potion. Essentially, half of the game's exploration has been done for you in this version. To me, this is kinda fucking stupid, and pretty much defeats the whole point of playing the original Zelda game, but I guess I can kinda see this being cool if you just hate exploration and want to feel powerful without having to earn it—which is pretty counter to everything that makes the game great, in my opinion. As a result, I have no use for this edition whatsoever, and I wouldn't recommend wasting your time with it. Just play the original. There's nothing "special" about this special edition. The way the edition is presented is pretty amateurish and ghetto, too. I already mentioned how the game doesn't even give you a title screen to admire, but that's not the only strange thing going on here. When you start up the game, if you pay attention to the bottom of the screen and perk up your ears a little bit, you can see—and hear—the particle effect of Link's sword beam. Do you know what that means? They didn't even upload a unique application for the game. What they've essentially done is give us is some random person's suspend point of his or her own pre-made file, and then call it a "special edition." You can make of that what you will, but I'm sorry—to me, that is the laziest and most ghetto bum-ass shit I've ever seen. The Gradius SP isn't a whole lot better. It's subtitled with "Stage 5 and maxed out!" and that pretty much tells you the whole story. It brings you to one of the latter stages (there's only seven in the game) and grants you every upgrade, shy a few Speed Ups, and preferring Laser over Double. Again, no title screen. Same situation as before. In essence, you're skipping over half the game (and therefore, half the challenge and the fun) to have a quick and easy little power trip mode type of thing. Once again, I find this fucking stupid and pointless. Gradius it a tough game, sure, but who's gonna get any satisfaction out of having the first four levels (which is already over half) beaten for them? I just don't get it. Even if you suck complete ass at the game, it's not like the Konami Code doesn't already grant you most of the power-ups anyway—but even that code gives you the courtesy of getting to play through the other stages. These so-called "special editions" were probably just tacked on as a means of taking the heat off of their service. They know that no one is happy with the service, so, I guess, in order to make things just a little less shitty, they give us one extra thing for the NES library, advertising it as this cool new SPECIAL thing—but, of course, putting no actual effort into making it truly special, because it doesn't cost them anything to have some random fuck play a game up to a certain point, save the file, and pack it in while pretending it's some sparkly new edition, or something that is worthy of being piled up with the rest of the service's (gradually) growing library. It's kind of a joke—and it's sad, because I think this idea actually has some potential to be at least somewhat cool. If they were to actually alter aspects of these classic games by making them more challenging, or find some way to make them feel like a brand new experience for their loving veterans, it could've been super cool, or at least... interesting. Providing Nintendo vets—who are, being perfectly honest, the only people who are still playing these NES games in 2018—with a fucking EASY MODE for games that they've already played to death is just about the lamest possible thing they could've done, and until they start getting more creative with how they do these things, I will continue to be disappointed with them. lame/5 (I don't do meme scores like this very often, but I honestly cannot dignify these SP editions with a serious rating.) That being said, please play The Legend of Zelda or Gradius if you haven't before and are interested in trying out some ancient-ass games. My poor reception of the so-called "special" versions notwithstanding, the original games still play very well to this day, and are easily two of the better games available on the service. I mean, if you're an NSO member, you're paying for it anyway, so you might as well just give them a shot. Just avoid these lame-ass SP editions like the plague, and you will be just fine. 2006
Gaming / Re: Nintendo Switch Online thread« on: November 27, 2018, 06:12:58 PM »Seriously? NARPASSWORD Too?OKAY, never mind, they all work fine, i'm just a fucking moron when i did justin bailey, i thought i had to put in 0s, not dashes (that means narpas sword works too, on top of everything else) MY BAD, i'll just strike out that paragraph or something 2007
The Flood / Re: Fuck you mint« on: November 27, 2018, 03:37:17 PM »
mint and chocolate go perfect together unless you were born with three legs, two of them on your forehead
2008
Gaming / Re: Nintendo Switch Online thread« on: November 27, 2018, 03:23:08 PM »Seriously? NARPASSWORD Too?i'll have to try that one later, but apparently, ENGAGE RIDLEY MOTHER FUCKER still crashes the game 2010
Gaming / Re: Nintendo Switch Online thread« on: November 27, 2018, 01:43:25 AM »
By the time I got around to writing up the October games, the November games snuck behind me.
Originally released in 1991, this is just one entry in a surprisingly large library of golf games for the NES. It all started in 1984 with a game simply titled Golf—notable for being one of the earliest games ever programmed by Satoru Iwata, as well as for being an insanely detailed and robust electronic golf game for its time. No, seriously. You would think a thirty year old golf game for the NES would be almost mind-numbingly basic, but you'd be surprised to discover how nuanced it actually is. Not only are there loads of different clubs to choose from, terrains to watch out for, and unique courses to play on, you also have to account for all these weird little variables like the wind to play the game well—which I think deserves a lot of credit. Apparently, someone at Nintendo did, too. There was a short period of time when Switch users could actually download a free ROM onto their system when certain conditions were met, presumably as a tribute to the late Iwata. One of the requirements had to do with performing one of Iwata's iconic hand gestures with the Joycons, or something. It was a nice little tribute, and a cute Easter egg, but sadly, as of the latest firmware patch, it doesn't seem to work at all anymore. This could be because the second requirement involved setting the game's internal clock to the date of the man's death, which could be seen as... a little morbid, if not outright disrespectful, even if the intentions were good. Unfortunately for me, by the time I even learned of this secret, it had already been patched out. Shame. Anyway, that was quite the diversion. Back to NES Open Tournament Golf, I suppose. I believe this was Nintendo's second golf game for the system, with Iwata at the programming helm once again—but this time, with over five years of game development experience and knowledge of just how far the NES can be pushed. Gameplay-wise, I mean, it's fucking golf. What do you want? If you don't care about golf at all, then this isn't the game for you. I certainly don't give a shit about golf, but I do have a general appreciation for well-crafted games no matter what genre they happen to be in, and this is definitely what I would consider a well-crafted game. Remember how I was saying the original Golf for NES was surprisingly nuanced and robust? Well, this game is basically the same in every way, just better. Prettier visuals, an actual soundtrack, seemingly better physics, more course variety, more satisfying gameplay, and more modes to choose from. Also, Mario actually looks like himself this time around. The number of variables you have to account for when making the perfect shot has only increased—this time, not only are you accounting for wind, terrain, and club type, but even the speed at which you hit the ball, how high or low you hit it, and even the exact point on the ball that you stroke it so you can account for how much it spins when it actually lands. If you suck and don't always have your ball on the fairway, you'll have to watch out for trees—if a tree is in your way, you're basically fucked, because your ball is going to bounce right off it. Just like before, when aiming your shot, you get a nice bird's eye view of the entire course, which shifts to an over-the-shoulder perspective when stroking. The way all the elements on the map get displayed during these segments is pretty cool—if you're stroking just near a lake, for example, you'll be able to see just a part of it off in the distance while making your shot. I wonder how difficult that was to program at the time, considering that we're not dealing with 3D models or anything. Naturally, the overhead view of the course zooms in when the ball reaches the green, but the coolest part comes around during the putting process. When putting, you get a nice shot of the ball rolling up into the hole, but from the hole's perspective, so you get to see a sprite of the ball getting closer and closer as it succeeds—or fails—to sink. It'll bounce off if it was struck too hard, or careen to the side if the contours of the hill weren't properly accounted for. In terms of modes, there's actually quite a few things to choose from—single player stroke play, a standard solo golf game where you're just hitting bills into holes on your own in as few shots as possible. Single player match play is when you face off against an AI (either Luigi or a bunch of no-name generic losers) to see who can sink balls faster. Two human players can face off, as well, but there's also a tournament mode. You have to register for it, and it's essentially you versus every increasingly-difficult CPU opponent in the game. You only get to select between a limited number of clubs, so you'll have to master each one to suit your purposes, which is actually pretty interesting. You could even save your progress—which isn't a big deal, considering that we have suspend points now—but for the time, having a save feature was a big deal. Not many games had it, and the ones that did were a blessing. All in all, I'm not terribly into golf, but I definitely respect all the care and effort that went into this one. My score might seem surprising, but I'm just trying to be fair. I know it's not the sexiest game they could've added to the service, but I don't think that means it lacks any merit whatsoever. Overall rating: 4/5 Originally released for arcades in 1986, Solomon's Key was developed by Tecmo and ported over to the NES in 1987. This is honestly such an underrated little puzzle-platformer. It received little fanfare back in the day, even though I think it has a lot of clever ideas going for it. You play as a wizard called Dana who has the ability to conjure or destroy a block, with which he can use for a variety of purposes. The object of the game is to clear all the levels by finding the key that unlocks the door to the next screen, making your way through fifty of them. Each room is a puzzle, most of which contain infinitely-spawning monsters that you have little in the way of fighting power against—certain pick-ups, such as blue potions, give you access to a fireball spell that will ricochet across the room and kill everything it touches, but these are a limited and precious resource that should only be used when absolutely necessary. Extreme caution and ingenuity should be used to avoid the enemies instead, as taking a single hit will result in loss of life (and you only get three to start with). Every screen is, indeed, just one screen in size—so you'll always be able to see everything that's happening at all times. You can't idle for long, though, because you do have a limited time to make your way through each door. And if you're not careful, enemies can drop from below if there's a window above your head. Pressing "A" will conjure up a block in front of you, but by stepping at the very edge of the tile you're standing on, you can create a block up to two spaces in front of you. Crouching and pressing "A" will conjure a block below you, assuming there's any room, and the same edge-of-the-tile trick can be performed this way as well. Pressing "A" near a block will dissipate it. If you have any fire spells, you can press "B" to activate them after aiming, but it's unlikely to bounce where you want it to without a little bit of practice. It's actually kinda hard to explain the rules behind how it works, but it's intuitive enough. In general, just face the thing you want to kill and press "B." The ricochet effect is important, but only for players of the highest IQ. The block creation is the coolest thing about the game, really. There's no limit to how many blocks you can conjure up, and they can be used for lots of different things, like creating platforms, walkways, staircases, barricades, or even to trick certain enemies from walking on top of them—only for you to dissipate them from under their feet, causing them to fall to their deaths. Creative use of this tool is what gives the game its life, really. Oh, and certain enemies are strong enough to break the blocks you create, too, so it pays to be mindful of that. Since this is a platformer, you can obviously jump. But since the game already assigned uses for both "A" and "B," that means this is one of those weird games that has you press UP on the d-pad to jump instead. Some may find this very awkward, but I'm fairly used to it. It's a wimpy little jump, too—enough to just barely go over a standard enemy and cross little gaps, but nothing too far. Fortunately, you are able to angle your trajectory to an extent, and it can even be used to break blocks up above you, like Mario (though, he needs to do it twice—the first time will just crumble them). There are hidden secrets in each room—most of which are fairies, or hard-to-reach special tiles that will send you to a bonus stage if you manage to collect them. Fairies are often trapped in different ways and require you to try many different things in order to rescue them, like dissipating naturally-occurring blocks or killing certain enemies. Once at least ten fairies are rescued, you'll get an extra life, so they actually become pretty important for you to look for. The music is pretty cool, and the animations are relatively fluid, making it overall the "smoothest" in terms of overall game feel out of the three October games, and definitely my favorite of those three. Oh, and I have to talk about the game's scoring system. For a little while, when game developers thought people still cared about getting a "high score," Tecmo actually tried to be "different" with some of its games, implementing their own unique system for evaluating a player's aptitude for a select few of its earliest games. They called it "GDV" (Game Deviation Value), and to be honest with you, I don't have any fucking idea how it works. I read the game's original manual and everything—it doesn't explain shit. Just that it's a special system patented specifically to be unique and confusing. For Solomon's Key, I've never gotten a GDV higher than 56, so I guess that's pretty bad or something. I don't know, because there's no way to tell how it works. What an ingenious system. Anyway, I just thought that was pretty funny. The game is still pretty good. Of the 26 games currently available for the service, I'd rank it in the top 10 for sure. The biggest problem, especially when compared to the best puzzle game available at the moment, Dr. Mario, is that the game's difficulty is too punishing for you not to have access to some kind of level selection. Dr. Mario lets you do that, as well as Ice Climber. In my opinion, this would've been the perfect game to have that feature, because there's fifty levels. Just about nobody is gonna want to play through fifty levels in one sitting, but because they don't have that contingency in place, you basically have to start all over from the first level if you restart the game or lose all your lives. That kinda sucks. Oh well, I guess that's what suspend points are for. Overall rating: 4/5 Originally released for the arcade in 1987, Super Dodge Ball is actually the second installment in the long-standing Kunio-kun franchise, following the beat-'em-up forerunner Renegade and preceding the previously-reviewed River City Ransom. However, despite being caught between two entries in a very particular genre, this is not a beat-'em-up game at all—it's a sports game, albeit one that flirts with a few beat-em-'up elements. Just like other games in the franchise, the NES version of Super Dodge Ball was vastly altered during the localization process in order for it to suit its Western audience better. Just like in River City Ransom, you play as Sam—or at least, Sam's dodge ball team—and play against a number of international teams in a sequence to eventually become world champions. Now, when I played dodge ball in middle school, the rules we went by were extremely different from the ones used in this game. For one thing, if you get hit by a ball just once, then that means you're out. If you manage to catch the ball before it hits you, then the person who threw it is out. These are the standard rules that I'm used to. In this game, however, each of the three players in the inner court has a life bar, which varies from player to player. When a player gets hit, they lose a number of hit points depending on how hard the ball was thrown, or something—there's normal tosses, running tosses, jumping tosses, and running+jumping tosses. There's also special tosses, where the ball does crazy shit in midair depending on your timing, and these balls are not only hard to avoid, but do crazy amounts of damage. It's very cartoony, but even so, it may take a number of hits before all players on a team are down. There are six players to a team—three of them in the inner court, three of them in the outer court. Only the players in the inner court have life bars, so those are the players that need to be knocked out. The outer court players are only there for support and putting extra pressure on your opponent, should you choose to pass the ball over to them (which is risky, of course, as this can invite your opponent to go for a pick). Catching a ball that was thrown to you doesn't result in an out; it just gives you the ball, and you're given a very generous frame window to catch each and every ball that is thrown to you. It's so easy, it practically makes dodging pointless, because dodging a ball basically just gives your opponent's outer court players to get their hands on it. It's smarter to just catch it every time. This has a tendency to make each game pretty damn repetitive, making them feel like a somewhat more intense game of catch. Fortunately, the AI is too shitty to catch the ball every time you throw it at them, so beating the campaign on normal is a cinch if you know what you're doing. An actual game against a human player might be pretty miserable if you're both competent, however. The graphics and overall pace of the game are somewhat shoddy. Because there's always at least six different characters moving on screen at once, this will often result in graphical flickering in the most irritating way, and there's not a whole lot you can do about it. The game struggles to process its own shit, which is never a great sign. I think the game has a lot of personality and charm to it, though. The fact that the individual players on each team all use different names, faces, and even have unique stats to set them apart is definitely really cool, and landing special shots is extremely satisfying, even if the AI sucks. It's not like the game has nothing going for it. It's just a little too rough around the edges for me to consider it one of the greater games for the service. Overall rating: 3/5 Originally released in 1986, Mighty Bomb Jack is a Tecmo platformer, and sequel to a 1984 arcade game I've never played, simply called Bomb Jack. You play as the eponymous Jack and make your way through 16 levels inside of a giant treasure-filled pyramid with randomly spawning enemies inside of it. Far from being Tecmo's best, this is genuinely one of the most bland and milquetoast platformers I've ever played in my life. There's really not a whole lot else to it beyond what I described. Mechanically, besides simple running and jumping, you can rapidly press the "A" button while in midair to float around and slow your descent, which makes it an invaluable maneuver to avoid enemies with. Holding up while jumping lets you do a super jump, while holding down results in a lower jump. Oftentimes, Jack's high-ass jump will get him killed, since it's so fast and difficult to control while ascending, so the low jump comes in handy quite often. It's not quite low enough to always be useful, however. Each shoddy and haphazardly-designed level will contain randomly spawning enemies without rhyme or reason. Sometimes, you'll be in the middle of a jump, only for an enemy to spawn right above you. And yes, this will result in a death, because in classic Nintendo fashion, there are punishing one-hit deaths in this game with—you guessed it—just three lives to work with. The game is called Mighty Bomb Jack, but the bombs you find in each level don't seem to play a huge role in the gameplay. You'd think he'd have bomb-based attacks, or something—but no, you just collect them. As far as I know, they don't even explode. They're just there for you to collect, and once you've collected them all, you can proceed to the next level. The only way you can fight enemies, then, is by opening chests—most of which are opened by jumping after standing on top of them, which is weird enough, but some of them are locked. A key won't open them. Instead, you need to find a certain item that will cause Jack to change color, and if Jack's color corresponds to the chest, he'll be able to open it. Some of these chests will contain a power-up that changes all the enemies in the room into coins, which is Jack's only means of defense, as far as I've been able to figure out. It's all just a bunch of stupid nonsense, really, and overall, it kinda sucks. The ONLY reason I don't give the game a negative score is because of one reason: the Torture Rooms. This is actually a really stupid mechanic, but I personally find it hilarious. For all its flaws and eccentricities, the game manages to have a bit of a sense of humor that I appreciate. Most of the chests, when opened, will simply contain items and things that get you points. Most players shouldn't care about points unless they're used for accruing extra lives, but I'm one of those players that likes to impulsively collect everything in a room. To my surprise, however, the game actually punishes you for doing this. If you collect too many coins, the game will stop to call you "greedy" and force and trap you into the Torture Room. This is basically an insane hell zone that forces you to avoid three slowly-moving enemies as a mysterious timer in the background counts down. The only way out is to avoid the enemies until the counter reaches 0, or die. At first, I thought it was a decelerated clock, but I recently discovered that it's actually counting jumps. So, you have to jump fifty straight times without dying in order to get out of this room. Once you do, you get to survive, but you lose all your coins. So, uh, don't be greedy, kids? It's the stupidest thing in the world, but like I said, I find it incredibly amusing, which is enough for me to give it a middle-of-the-road score. Otherwise, this would've been an easy 2/10. Overall rating: 3/5 Originally released for arcades in 1985, TwinBee is a vertically-scrolling Konami shmup that was ported to the Famicom in 1986. Curiously, the game was never actually ported to the NES, making the Nintendo Switch version the first time it's ever been officially playable outside of Japan. You may have been able to play a modern version of it on the 3DS, or something, but this is the first time the 8-bit Famicom game has been playable over here. Unfortunately, that's the most interesting thing about it. In terms of gameplay, it's pretty basic and self-explanatory as far as shoot-'em-ups go. It just has a cutesy cartoon theme, whereas the vastly superior Gradius has a cool sci-fi theme and horizontal flying, which I've always preferred. It's decent, but it's not really doing too much for me. The most exciting thing about having this game available on the service, however, is that it opens the door for other unreleased Famicom games to finally get their due localizations, each one about 30 years behind schedule. I wanna see the original Fire Emblem game, Shadow Dragon and the Blade of Light, to get a translation after all these years. That would be amazing. Overall rating: 3/5 This is one of those games that should've been available on the service from day fucking one. It's a bit late, but it's very nice to finally have it now. To this day, it's still one of the premiere titles for the NES, and everyone knows it. With immersive and satisfying gameplay and an incredible soundtrack, which takes full advantage of the system's limitations to create a deeply sinister and atmospheric sound that's unlike anything I've ever heard before. It seriously might just be the coolest and most unique soundtrack out of all NES games. The Alien-inspired story and darker tone helped make this game feel special when compared to other Nintendo flagships, and to this day, it's considered one of Nintendo's creepier and more mature franchises. Oh, yeah, and the whole woah-Samus-is-a-girl thing was pretty groundbreaking at the time, too. We take it for granted today, but it's important to remember that female heroes weren't so common in games, and though Samus may not have been the first, she was definitely one of the earliest to star in a big epic game like this, even if her gender was kept a secret until you finally beat the game. I don't know if people at the time would've scoffed at the idea had they known Samus was female from the start, but the fact that it's treated as a "plot twist" of sorts brings home the idea that it doesn't actually matter what Samus is. Guy or girl, she still kicks ass, and that's what makes her so cool. The game is pretty far from perfect, though. Playing it back once more has shown me its age in some dishearteningly unpleasant ways. For one thing, my favorite game of all time, Super Metroid, eclipses this game in absolutely every single way. That game has spoiled me to the point where my enjoyment of the original title is somewhat limited. For one thing, there is no quick and easy way to refill your energy tanks—they all have to be refilled manually by grinding enemies, and once you've collected more than two tanks, it can be a real pain trying to get them all filled back up again. That's my biggest issue by far. The other is having to learn important techniques, such as bomb jumping, but then making it extremely fucking difficult to do. It's been years and years, and I still have no fucking idea how to consistently bomb jump in this game. The rhythm is extremely erratic and makes no sense, making it rather tedious to perform. NEVER MIND, THEY STILL WORK FINE, I'M JUST STUPID Most people only know this outfit from the password, but it can also be obtained legitimately by beating the game in less than two hours (or something like that). Beyond these hang-ups, though, I wouldn't stop you at all from trying this one out. By all means, please check it out, it's an all-time classic—just know that Super Metroid is, more or less, everything this game is... but so, so much more. At the very least, play the original title out of respect. It's a pretty good time. Overall rating: 5/5 |