661
Serious / Re: Still down/exhausted about the election?
« on: November 10, 2016, 12:00:28 PM »Stephen Colbert presents: Binding the Wounds.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 661
Serious / Re: Still down/exhausted about the election?« on: November 10, 2016, 12:00:28 PM »Stephen Colbert presents: Binding the Wounds. 662
Serious / Livestream: Trump meets Obama at the White House« on: November 10, 2016, 11:53:10 AM »YouTube 663
Serious / Re: Still down/exhausted about the election?« on: November 10, 2016, 08:47:02 AM »We're arguably more divided than ever before in history.I second this. It's not like America has had a revolution and a civil war in its short history. 664
Serious / Re: This is pretty tempting« on: November 10, 2016, 07:06:57 AM »The idea of creating a world with non-coercive, non-hierarchical institutions is singularly attractive.Anarchists.why 665
Serious / Michael Moore: the one lefty who actually got it« on: November 09, 2016, 10:38:09 PM »YouTube 667
Serious / Re: Now for the $20,000,000 question:« on: November 09, 2016, 08:08:17 PM »The electoral college obviously failed in preventing an unfit person from becoming president.By whose judgement? There's certainly nothing in the constitution defining Trump as unfit. But, of course, you don't mean he's technically ineligible, you just mean you consider him to be unfit. The institutions of your republic were not built with your preferences in mind. 668
Serious / Re: So I was wrong« on: November 09, 2016, 07:28:05 PM »
Why do pollsters keep underestimating the level of white working-class disenchantment and anger with the system?
669
Serious / Re: Now for the $20,000,000 question:« on: November 09, 2016, 06:56:00 PM »
Under-polling of working-class disaffected whites, shy Trump voters and an over-reliance of the Democrats on the Hispanic vote and states like Wisconsin.
670
Serious / Re: President Elect Donald J Trump (Official)« on: November 09, 2016, 05:47:53 AM »The people lob a hand grenade at the establishment for sneering at them, and your solution is to sneer more?What a stain on this great nation.I'm just gonna go ahead and say that this gives me the right to criticize and mock this idiocy without it being (apparently) stereotypical anti-American banter. This display of stupidity is a perfectly valid reason to tank the faith I had left in the general American people even further. 671
Serious / Re: Regrexit reaches all time high - Brexit gone awry« on: November 07, 2016, 07:08:08 AM »
you sneaky belgian fuck
672
Serious / Re: So I went to the Anonymous march in London« on: November 07, 2016, 06:25:17 AM »Extremism Disruption Orders.EDOs 673
Serious / Re: So what's going on with Brexit?« on: November 07, 2016, 06:24:29 AM »
Why is everybody convinced that transparency with respect to the governments negotiating strategy is a good thing? It will weaken the British position horribly.
674
Serious / Re: So I went to the Anonymous march in London« on: November 06, 2016, 07:38:39 PM »I was there for the typical reasons I guess: some affinity for the rights to free expression and assembly, dissatisfaction with the curbing of civil liberties through things like EDOs, dislike for the government's cyber-security policy etc.Both, unless they're the same.What were you protesting?Me personally? Or the march in general? It was a very broad march, as is usually the case with anything Anonymous. Some were there out of frustration, others because they are anarchists. 675
Serious / Re: So I went to the Anonymous march in London« on: November 06, 2016, 07:31:23 PM »What were you protesting?Me personally? Or the march in general? 676
The Flood / Re: Where's Meta? Correctly spot me in this picture and you can choose my username« on: November 06, 2016, 07:19:48 PM »Nope.You're fuckin' with me, right?The dude with the sunglasses and the mask.Well done. Aviators and grey beanie. That's me. 677
The Flood / Re: Where's Meta? Correctly spot me in this picture and you can choose my username« on: November 06, 2016, 06:28:03 PM »The dude with the sunglasses and the mask.Well done. You get to choose my username. 678
Serious / Re: So I went to the Anonymous march in London« on: November 06, 2016, 06:24:47 PM »I wouldnt have guessed you'd ever go to an anonymous marchYou wouldn't have guessed I'd march in the name of stuff like freedom of speech and assembly? 679
Serious / Re: So I went to the Anonymous march in London« on: November 06, 2016, 06:23:52 PM »come on meta you'll post like 20 volumes about shit no one cares about and 1 sentence about stuff we're interested inThere were a lot of people in Trafalgar Square. We all marched down the street--apparently with coppers at the front guiding us--and headed to some area I can't even remember the name of (first time in Central London (maybe near Westminster Cathedral)). They had "Failure to comply may result in arrest" beamed in green lettering on one of the buildings. Then we went to Buckingham Palace; couldn't even get close to it, they had metal fencing set up and riot police with dogs. I think they sort of freaked because the Palace was outside the 'designated route' for the protest; loads of police vans turn up, I see a couple people get arrested, there's chanting etc. Anyway there's this wall just across from the Palace with a gap leading into some grassy area, and we were both in front and behind the wall. So the coppers push their way through and set themselves up in a line in the gap in the wall, splitting us up. Some of us tried to break the police line, but more of them rushed over and pushed us away--I managed to fuck up my ankle when I was being shoved. Then I had a copper tell me I could be arrested if I didn't remove my mask. It kind of died off. They pushed us down the road, away from Buckingham Palace and Trafalgar Sqaure. We heard we were supposed to regroup at Big Ben, but we checked it out and it was dead. Yeah, that was my day. EDIT: The police were expecting it to get ugly. They cracked down hard. 680
The Flood / Where's Meta? Correctly spot me in this picture and you can choose my username« on: November 06, 2016, 06:17:39 PM »681
Serious / So I went to the Anonymous march in London« on: November 05, 2016, 06:02:28 PM »
The police were on job. Set up cordons and lines of vans when we got to Buckingham Palace, and then started separating us and pushing us apart and trying to get us to move on for being outside the designated protest area. Had a copper tell me that if I continued wearing a Guy Fawkes mask I would be arrested, which I thought was pretty fucked up.
Take note, world, if you want to shut down a peaceful protest then look no further than the Met on Nov 5 2016. 682
The Flood / Re: You're so vain« on: November 04, 2016, 09:35:07 PM »
Unsurprisingly, much like everything else you post on this site, this thread is all about you Charlie.
683
The Flood / Re: Michael van Gerwen vs. Mensur Suljovic | European 2016 Championship« on: November 04, 2016, 09:33:06 PM »Very British thread.you mayo eating eurocrat fuck GIVE US BACK OUR DARTS CHAMPIONSHIPS 685
The Flood / Michael van Gerwen vs. Mensur Suljovic | European 2016 Championship« on: November 03, 2016, 06:42:36 PM »YouTube Banging match. 686
The Flood / Re: Subjects you know more about than any other person on the site« on: October 28, 2016, 05:29:58 PM »
Economics.
687
Serious / Re: I actually really like the idea of a safe space« on: October 28, 2016, 05:28:23 PM »Conservatives have a habit of demonizing every nice thing they come across.Leftists have a habit of generalisation. Quote microaggressionsMicroaggressions are good things? Thank God. For a moment I was afraid I wouldn't be able to express my underlying prejudices. 688
Serious / Re: AMA about British politics« on: October 28, 2016, 05:24:29 PM »None of them.Which has been a net benefit overall throughout the years for the British people?Which has been the historically best party throughout the years?Define "best". 689
Serious / Re: AMA about British politics« on: October 28, 2016, 02:41:16 PM »Why is Corbyn best friends with Hezbollah and Hamas?muh ebil jews 690
Serious / Re: AMA about British politics« on: October 28, 2016, 02:40:23 PM »Does labour have any chance of winning an election while corbyn is head honcho?I can't say from the textbooks, but the polls would suggest they cannot. Quote Can the libdems be saved from this nothing they've become?Personally I'm doubtful. The late 1990s to 2010 were characterised by a decline in the classic majoritarian system of government; the rise of third parties like the Liberal Democrats was a part of this. Since 2010, though, there's been kind of a return to the norm, with two-partism coming back in force across England and Wales. I wouldn't expect any coalitions any time soon. |