This will lead to a long rant of my hardcore Constitutionalism and how it's every citizen's responsibility to vote.

Does it state in the Constitution that citizens must vote?

Do you not watch the BBC... like ever...? ._.

Well no because I'm not a socialist.

That's the mindset that gets us no change and at least if I vote and the wrong person wins I have the right to complain because I actually put forth the effort to make a change.

Can't say I agree there. You don't walk into a store and buy the "least bad" thing when you are presented with terrible options. People have a right to complain if nobody represents them.

That being said, the opportunity cost of not voting is fairly high, so I'll be voting UKIP next general election and probably be a persistent Conservative voter throughout my life - even if I don't agree with much.

I don't watch AF/rugby/football/soccer.

You...didn't know this?

Of course I did. Seeing it graphically was just a surprise.

i didn't mean to be rude btw

it was just so tempting to post

hue its k bby

I'm much more personable irl, believe it or not.

Because the whole series literally is about America and more specifically the perception of the American public back in the 50s and 60s. Everything ranging from music, to the cheesy-style of adverts and consumer products, to the sci-fi of robotics is all American and the basis of Fallout.

Not taking place in America wouldn't be a Fallout game, it would be some spin-off game. It would be like if a Halo game was made all about the Interplanetary War. It wouldn't truly be Halo because Halo is about the story of Chief, the Covenant, and the Forerunners

> implying Halo 3: ODST, Halo: Reach, Halo Wars and the Halo 2 Arbiter missions weren't really Halo.

Can you stop being fucking retards and generalizing people because there are two idiots that run their mouth on Twitter? You're definitely better than this Mr P. Honestly, do you even know what social justice is? Because it doesn't mean 'random bitch on the internet who hates men.' Just because you're on a forum with a sour culture when it comes to issues like these doesn't mean you have to stoop to a low to get on their good side. Fact of the matter is that the majority of feminists and SJWs are glad that this happening so it's truly just not necessary to warp those people into radical idiots just because of a small few who are probably trolls anyway.

> not understanding what the term SJW means.

"Moral argument"

LOL. Not even going to read your shitty post with that title.

I don't blame you. Moral arguments tend to be fucking retarded.

What you mean to say is that it works, but not as well as...

As well as what?
Don't leave me hanging.

Ah right... well summarising it in general wouldn't be particularly easy <.<

When it comes to fields of approach it's a collection of applied suggestions/ideas/sciences. So the biological explanation is rooted in biology (No shit sherlock) with things like Neurotransmitters and brain abnormalities. The cognitive-/-behavioural approach(es) focus on learned behaviours as the explanation for things.

The evolutionary approach tries to explain features of modern day human psychology from an adaptive evolutionary approach. Like muh patriarchy, hunter gatherers, circadian cycles and the like. Some of it has been misappropriated by MRAs but it's still amusing nonetheless >.>

If you don't have any thoughts in particular though, no worries <.<

I can't say I see a problem with it. So long as it's not used prescriptively.

Was Freud wrong about everything?

No.

I certainly want to fuck my mother.

Link is paywalled, can you copypastrami the details?

Nah, whenever you try and copy and paste an FT article they throw a copyright warning at you.

I'll try and pick out some statistics for you, though.

Changed my mind, can't be bothered. We're spending less on food than we were a year ago, thanks to price cuts. That's pretty much it.

And as wages increase, prices of goods and services increase even more.

. . .

No.

ONCE MORE UNTO THE BREACH