13981
The Flood / Re: Edgiest post wins
« on: August 31, 2014, 01:11:03 PM »
The Catholic Church is institutionally evil.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 13981
The Flood / Re: Edgiest post wins« on: August 31, 2014, 01:11:03 PM »
The Catholic Church is institutionally evil.
13982
Serious / NATO divided over Russian aggression« on: August 31, 2014, 01:01:38 PM »And it's the Iron Chancellor, as usual. Basically, the Polish prime minister asked for 10,000 NATO boots to be put permanently on the ground way back in March. Last week, however, Angela Merkel put down the idea of permanent military placements in Eastern Europe while she was in Latvia. There are hopes that a new action plan, to be revealed at the summit in Wales. Some hawks, however, feel it nothing more than a feat of mental gymnastics that Camnator would be proud of. The problem arises form the Conventional Armed Forces in Europe Treaty, which forbid the establishment of permanent troop deployments, although Russia hasn't been exactly holding up her part of the bargain. Merkel, predictably, thinks we should abide by the treaty. One "senior NATO official" also ruled out permanent deployments, and instead made reference to "appropriate presence", which is a deliberately open-ended use of language. The recent creation of an expeditionary force/"high readiness brigade", led by British officers and capable of being launched in "hours", will be stationed mainly in Poland and have its HQ on the Baltic coast. There are a number of other placements in Eastern Europe, including the U.S.'s EAS in Germany, British paratroopers in Poland, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, and Danish, French and British fighter jets in Poland and Estonia. This might sound substantial, but the biggest NATO Baltic war-game consisted of 6,000 troops. Russia's war-games around the Baltic and Ukrainian borders have involved 150,000. 13983
The Flood / Re: Would you freak out if your GF/BF was reassigned?« on: August 31, 2014, 11:19:33 AM »I wouldn't give a fuck. 13984
Serious / Re: So, I'm talking to a BNP supporter.« on: August 31, 2014, 10:30:33 AM »>mfw I don't really know what a gypsy isThey're like nomads. They don't pay taxes and move from campsite to campsite as the police move them along. 13986
Serious / Re: If you had to pick one label for yourself, what would it be?« on: August 31, 2014, 10:22:08 AM »Constitutionalist/LibertarianIf you had to pick one label. Which overrides which? The constitution, or your sense of liberty? 13987
Serious / Re: Democrat or Republican?« on: August 31, 2014, 10:21:17 AM »Registered Libertarian.>implying Ron Paul wasn't corrupt 13988
Serious / Re: Democrat or Republican?« on: August 31, 2014, 08:28:35 AM »
I really don't know. Depending on the candidate, likely Republican.
When it comes to the Presidentials, though, they always pick fucking loonies. I'd have chosen Obama over both McCain and Romney. 13989
The Flood / HEYYEYAAEYAAAEYAEYAA« on: August 31, 2014, 12:14:58 AM »YouTube I can't believe I've only just watched this properly. 13991
Gaming / Re: Steam game give-away: The Incredible Adventures of Van Helsing« on: August 31, 2014, 12:03:58 AM »I want Van HelsingMOTHERFUCKER 13992
Serious / Re: What's your prediction for the midterms this year?« on: August 30, 2014, 11:37:44 PM »Voting is actually really important. Fine, skip the nation shit, but your state and local ballot issues will more directly effect you.On a completely unrelated note, when's the next giveaway? 13993
Serious / Re: If you had to pick one label for yourself, what would it be?« on: August 30, 2014, 11:35:20 PM »You guys just don't quit do you?Funnily enough, Dustin, I've never allowed the thinly-veiled contempt and arrogance of others to keep me from what it is I desire. 13994
The Flood / Re: Anti-fedora« on: August 30, 2014, 10:57:43 PM »Oh boy let's throw in the word subhuman so we can equate the dirty atheist to a Nazi or other universally hated villain. YouTube 13995
The Flood / Re: When you think something's on you and you have a fit« on: August 30, 2014, 10:32:35 PM »And you freak out and swat at your leg and feel stupid after because you see it's a string?dis nigger 13996
Serious / Re: If you had to pick one label for yourself, what would it be?« on: August 30, 2014, 10:31:32 PM »I skimmed through the link and I noticed one thing: No mention of the 1970 (or 1971) act that fully eliminated the remainder of the gold standard. While it does mention the 1934 act of basically banning gold for civilian ownership, gold was still used as money backing till the 1970s. At that time our national debt numbered like $20B (rough estimate) due to being limited by the reserve of gold. Ever since then the debt has greatly risen to the current $17T because there's no limitation of the amount of money that can be printed. Basically we've been increasing inflation for the past 3+ decades and it'll only get worse, especially due to Iran not selling itself and oil to America. Oil is the only thing giving the dollar any value and we know oil is a non-renewable resource so it greatly explains American hostility and war-like nature in areas rich with oilSome inflation is better than zero inflation because prices (especially wages) can be incredibly sticky and can threaten the flow of nominal income; it's no surprise that countries recovered from the Great Depression in the order that they stopped exchanging currency for gold. Speaking about nominal income, the Fed has actually been quite contractionary with its monetary policy throughout recent history. As for the petrodollar? That's dubious at best, and I have my problems with SCG despite the obvious fearmongering. It's tempting to view U.S. foreign policy through one monolithic lens, and it makes sense. But, as David Hume says, reason is the slave of the passions, and, having an intuition towards patterns, its easy to fall into a system and then reason your way into justifying it. His claim that the U.S. lost revenue by switching the sale of oil into dollars from euros doesn't make much sense, and he essentially boils the entire thing down to mad bankers pushing us towards a global apocalypse in order to prop up the dollar; it's un-falsifiable. Once you create a paradigm where aggressive behaviour supposedly falls under some elaborate, aggregate plan you can then stamp your feet and point to further aggression as vindication when really all you're doing is making a lot of noise about nothing. By the way, American foreign policy is probably driven more by pro-Israeli sentiments than the petrodollar. That'll be tested fairly soon anyway, since the petrodollar just died. 13997
The Flood / Re: When you think something's on you and you have a fit« on: August 30, 2014, 10:15:25 PM »No idea what the hell you're talking about. You know? It's like 2am and you're lying in bed or something, and then you think something is crawling on you or something. 13998
The Flood / When you think something's on you and you have a fit« on: August 30, 2014, 09:36:43 PM »
Dem strings on dose pajama bottoms
dem muddahfuhkas 13999
Serious / Re: If you had to pick one label for yourself, what would it be?« on: August 30, 2014, 08:15:26 PM »the restitution of a gold/silver backed-economy Can't say I'm a fan. Although, under a free-banking regime I suppose consumers could be given the option of holding gold-backed currencies. That being said, George Selgin, a proponent of free banking, is still sceptical of the Gold Standard: Quote The claim that the real price of gold has become too volatile to allow that metal to be relied upon as a standard, for example, overlooks the extent to which gold’s price depends on the demand for private gold hoards, which has become both very great and very volatile precisely because of the uncertainty that fiat money regimes have inspired. The claim also overlooks the tendency for a metal’s price to become more stable as it becomes more widely adopted as a monetary standard. It's worth reading the entire thing. On a social note, I agree that life essentially begins at conception. 14000
Serious / If you had to pick one label for yourself, what would it be?« on: August 30, 2014, 06:37:16 PM »
What would be your overall socio-econo-political label? Also, if you feel like differentiating, what labels would you choose for your social, economical and political labels separately.
Overall - Liberal. Social - Libertarian. Economic - Neo-monetarist. Political - Conservative. Spoiler I know labels can be restrictive and often aren't particularly helpful or illuminating, I'm just interested to see what people choose when put in that situation. 14001
The Flood / Re: Stuff Your S/O Does For You« on: August 30, 2014, 05:43:10 PM »i am become jelYou don't need that. You just need somebody to love you. 14002
The Flood / Re: Stuff Your S/O Does For You« on: August 30, 2014, 05:34:42 PM »you bastardu jel m80 14003
Serious / Re: Ask me anything about politics, economics, philosophy or psychology« on: August 30, 2014, 05:34:13 PM »
I watched it not too long ago.
14004
Serious / So, I'm talking to a BNP supporter.« on: August 30, 2014, 04:40:32 PM »Quote gypsies are the one ethnic gorup i would genuinely like to see genocided That's disgusting Quote gypsies are sub-human People have accused me of intolerance, despite being quite liberal, but I'm an angel compared to you. Quote Seriously though, steralisation for gypsies, that's not even inhumane YES IT IS What the fuck is wrong with you? Well fuck me. Fascism lives. 14005
Serious / Re: Post facts which surprised you« on: August 30, 2014, 04:34:51 PM »Meta thinks he's actually of use in society.I have literally no idea what gave you that impression. 14006
The Flood / Re: Stuff Your S/O Does For You« on: August 30, 2014, 04:24:34 PM »Haha, don't worry. I am sure you will find someone.There's a chick in my class who seems quite into me. Maybe she'll be my next victim. 14007
The Flood / Re: Stuff Your S/O Does For You« on: August 30, 2014, 04:19:31 PM »
They don't hinder me, by virtue of not existing.
14008
Serious / Re: What's your prediction for the midterms this year?« on: August 30, 2014, 04:17:13 PM »When I say rigged I do not mean in the sense that they enter fraudulent votes into the system, but rigged as in the media purposely ignores certain individuals and tries to completely shut them out, as do the political parties. It is what they did with Ron Paul during both the '08 and '12 elections.Yeah, I agree with that. 14009
Serious / Re: What's your prediction for the midterms this year?« on: August 30, 2014, 04:14:37 PM »No idea but either way you'll still have an endless stalemate for a parliament.If the doctor isn't running, which way do you anticipate your constituency to go? 14010
Serious / Re: What's your prediction for the midterms this year?« on: August 30, 2014, 04:14:00 PM »Political parties and major news media outlets are not legitimate sources of information either, and elections are rigged because of false information by the parties I mentioned."Rigged", eh. I wouldn't say rigged. America isn't a democracy, though, I agree there. We choose who to have, they just tend to be equally shit. |