Our ranks grow!

Given the recent uptick in talk of psychopaths (personality tests and questions between psycho- vs. sociopath), I figured these might interest some people. The first is just a random test I found, and the results kind of correlate between psycho- and sociopathy. The second one is based on the Hare Psychopathy Checklist, and is slightly longer.

Neither of these are diagnostic tools. Internet tests are ridiculously easy to manipulate.

So, do one or the other, or both and post your results.
 

Your score from primary psychopathy has been calculated as 4.4. Primary psychopathy is the affective aspects of psychopathy; a lack of empathy for other people and tolerance for antisocial orientations.

Your score from secondary psychopathy has been calculated as 4.3. Secondary psychopathy is the antisocial aspects of psychopathy; rule breaking and a lack of effort towards socially rewarded behavior.

Spoiler

You score for primary psychopathy was higher than 94.37% of people who have taken this test.

You score for secondary psychopathy was higher than 97.46% of people who have taken this test.

PCL:

You reached 93.75% of Factor 1 which captures the core personality traits of psychopathy that define the interpersonal and affective deficits of this personality disorder (e.g. shallow affect, superficial charm, manipulativeness, lack of empathy) and that are correlated with narcissistic personality disorder, low anxiety, low empathy, low stress reaction and low suicide risk. But Factor 1 is also associated with extraversion and positive affect - affected persons usually score high on scales of achievement and well-being, so some aspects of the personality disorder may even be beneficial for the psychopath (in terms of nondeviant social functioning or if it comes to profit from manipulation or lies).

You reached 61.11% of Factor 2 which captures the traits of antisocial behavior (e.g. criminal versatility, impulsiveness, irresponsibility, poor behaviour controls, juvenile delinquency) and is associated with reactive anger, social deviance, sensation seeking, anxiety, increased risk of suicide, low socio-economic status, criminality, and impulsive violence.

You reached 100.00% in other relevant traits that can indicate this personality disorder.

Fun, fun, fun.

What I'm saying, is that Israel's actions are making the conflict worse by pissing off and stirring up ill sentiment among people who would otherwise just get on with their lives

Hamas airs anti-semitic cartoons in Gaza to indoctrinate Muslim children.

They fire rockets from beside schools and hospitals to force the Israelis to shoot at such places, if they shoot at all.

They use their own people as human shields, to deter the Israeli soldiers from shooting while they freely kill them.

They are explicitly genocidal in their ideology, while Israel is a Jewish state reacting against centuries of national suppression.

They make reference to the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

They've built tunnels for the sake of kidnapping Israelis and supplying other terrorist organisations.

And, on top of this, they're democratically elected.

Is Israel all sunshine and rainbows? No, of course not. But to even equate the two is to fail to compare them properly. You don't fight shit like that with just words, you needs bombs and bayonets too. Hamas would massacre the Israelis and the rest of the Jews given the opportunity. We saw what happened in the 30s and 40s when a worshipful, dogmatic, totalitarian and racist government got a semblance of authority.

You can focus on Israel all you like, that's your prerogative and Israel certainly harbour some skeletons in its closet. But I will not surrender to these theocratic narcissists seeking to establish their beloved caliphate.

And nothing excuses bulldozing houses like that in order to claim lebensraum and no doubt to continue stirring up the conflict.

Come on, man, you aren't seriously equating the two?

Hamas are literally Nazis with a Qur'an.

ALL WILL KNEEL BEFORE ME.

When Israel happily bulldozes their houses to build settlements and they have no political power to stop it, is it really surprising they turn to violence?

I think it's more accurate to say Israel is willing to bulldoze houses in the face of Islamic Nazism.

Nothing excuses genocidal ideations - ever.

too late.

Oh Christ.

"ISIS aren't real Muslims, waaah, waaaah". 

Good for this woman, though, she has a lot of courage. This serves as testimony to the power of rational thought and social empathy.

I think she's more upset because the pics were very unflattering.

yup

my nigguh

So when are the little Metas comming?
Considering we are expecting more.

No more Metas for now.

I don't want to incite pogroms.

Prepare for friction burns.

It's me.

So call me Cognition.

Which, incidentally, is something you should practise doing more.

Oh, I wouldn't argue that. But Israel don't give a frack, which is the problem. Sure, held to higher standard far more than Hamas, but it hasn't exactly stopped them killing civilians in friendly fire (I'm leaving out "accidents" as there's plenty of debate around that...). Hell, I haven't heard from any source saying Israel has apologised for any such cases, they only get angry and justify their actions some more like a broken record.

I'd be pissed too if I were expected to apologise in the course of fighting genocidal theocrats.