Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Nick McIntyre

Pages: 1 ... 636465 6667 ... 105
1921
The Flood / Re: I'm back bitches
« on: February 03, 2015, 02:23:33 AM »
Wait... you went?
stop
That doesn't answer my question.

I'm just going to assume you did some shit and got banned.

Jim played with loli in Anarchy and got leljected :^)

1922
The Flood / Re: Opinions on the Ninjas
« on: February 02, 2015, 09:30:54 PM »
Fire Rocketman.

Haven't really seen Yutaka at all with the modding thing, and I don't have an opinion on TBlocks ' moderating.

To add onto this, I was just shitposting with the Fire Rocketman meme.  May be a bit biased since he's a friend and all, but he wasn't terrible at his job.  He was alright, had a couple of questionable moments but seemed otherwise fine.

1923
The Flood / Re: Welp, anarchy is over.
« on: February 02, 2015, 08:16:32 PM »
Not quite as much drama this time around.  Was fucking hilarious to see Dustin and Jim have their mental meltdowns though
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

I never saw that what the fuck.

Dustin got rekted by Nuka whem Nuka said "a tranny has a manlier voice than you." Dustin then went to the flood and started spamming a lot of porn threads and making very long paragraph posts

1924
The Flood / Re: The SuperBowl broke a record
« on: February 02, 2015, 08:13:04 PM »
I enjoyed the game until the chimpout moment at the end.

1925
The Flood / Re: Opinions on the Ninjas
« on: February 02, 2015, 08:11:26 PM »
Could someone explain to me what this supposed circe jerk is all about? Am I part of it, for example? Because in all my time on the staff, I've seen very few actual cases of modbias, especially now that the rules have been changed to allow for less mod discretion.

Just some members who believe because some users are friendly with a mod on skype, then that person is very invincible and can never get warned. Even though that has been proven otherwise

1926
The Flood / Re: What happened to Jim?
« on: February 02, 2015, 03:30:12 PM »
He's banned for one more day. He posted loli in anarchy and then tried evading the ban with an alt. His ban wears off tomorrow.

What a fucking moron

1927
The Flood / Re: What happened to Jim?
« on: February 02, 2015, 03:10:03 PM »
Fapped himself to death

Fapped to loli

1928
The Flood / Re: Monty Oum has passed away
« on: February 02, 2015, 03:08:51 PM »
How is it possible that he "fought bravely" when he was in a coma?

Well there was a Family Guy episode where a guy was in a coma but was still mentally awake and was alone with his thoughts.

Perhaps Monty had a mental battle with some evil force, who knows.

1930
The Flood / Re: Opinions on the Ninjas
« on: February 02, 2015, 11:44:18 AM »
Fire Rocketman.

Haven't really seen Yutaka at all with the modding thing, and I don't have an opinion on TBlocks ' moderating.

1931
The Flood / Re: Welp, anarchy is over.
« on: February 02, 2015, 11:43:01 AM »
Not quite as much drama this time around.  Was fucking hilarious to see Dustin and Jim have their mental meltdowns though

1932
The Flood / Re: The Seahawks head coach is a fucking retarded piece of shit
« on: February 02, 2015, 12:17:19 AM »
They didn't deserve winning at all after that high school display of getting into a fight with the Patriots offense, on national TV, in front of tens of millions of viewers.

1933
Serious / Re: Perfect example of why I don't like leftists
« on: February 01, 2015, 08:11:31 PM »
>Wants to ban animal testing
>is fine with kosher and halal

What the fuck

1934
Gaming / Re: What do you guys think about Evolve?
« on: February 01, 2015, 03:58:42 PM »
I would consider buying it if it wasn't such as cash-grab.

Those are just rumors.


Still not as bad as the Watch Dogs preorders

1935
Serious / Re: I really don't get how people can be anti-capitalist
« on: February 01, 2015, 01:19:09 PM »
I'm not against capitalism per say, but I am against the vulture capitalism the United States has been showing off lately

1936
(Yes I know the website is called liberalamerica, but this is one of two locations I can find this kind of story right now.  It does, however, link to the bill on Cruz's own website:

http://www.liberalamerica.org/2015/01/26/ted-cruz-proposes-bill-to-strip-5th-and-6th-amendment-out-of-us-constitution/

Quote
Cruz has proposed a new bill, the Expatriate Terrorist Act (Senate Bill 247), which strips away the rights of any American citizen who runs off to join or in support of any terrorist organization. It would immediately strip the citizenship of anyone in support of an organization that the United States deems a “terrorist organization.”

There is a problem here, however…

This is in violation of the US Constitution, which Cruz has often referred to himself as a fan and follower of. His bill, which was originally written by the ineffable jingoistic idiot Michelle Bachmann (who also happens to be a Dominionist) violates these particular Amendments:

Amendment V:

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger;

Amendment VI:

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.

Here's the link to the bill

http://www.cruz.senate.gov/files/documents/Bills/20150123_Expatriate_Terrorist_Act_of_2015.pdf

Even if Ted Cruz believes that this can stop terrorist threats, this bill could be heavily exploited since it appears to be so fucking flawed.  Not to mention, even if you do run off to a terrorist organization you're still a United States citizen and still have access to your rights.

Though I probably would feel differently if you completely 100% renounced your ties to the United States and declared yourself a foreign citizen.  Not totally sure on how I'd feel in those types of situations.

1937
Please take your complaints to the Septagon board.

1938
More like "unfinished demo called a beta to create hype"

Oh shut the fuck up.

The last beta was actually the best Battlefield beta I have ever played, with little to no lag and glitches that plagued the betas for 3 and 4.

1939
Septagon / Re: >BANS PEOPLE FOR STUPID REASONS AND THEN LOGS OFF
« on: January 30, 2015, 11:31:07 PM »
So mad.

1940
The Flood / Re: Fucking mod bias.
« on: January 30, 2015, 05:50:49 PM »
Get REKT Nexus

1941
The Flood / Re: Game of Thrones Season 5 trailer
« on: January 30, 2015, 05:29:33 AM »
I think they should take a break after this season, and allow the author to finish Winds Of Winter (hopefully by the end of this century). AFFC and ADWD are essentially just the same book split into two. They'd be stretching out the source material like hackson did with the Hobbit.

HBO wouldn't allow that at all, unless they did a series set during The Age of Heroes or Robert's Rebellion, leading up to the events of Game of Thrones season 1.
That'd actually be based as fuck.

Henry Cavill or Chris Hemsworth when they aren't filming their respective roles for young Bobby B would be GOAT. Doubt it's gonna happen though.

Warrior Bobby B would be fucking awesome to see.  Watching him crush people and then destroy pansy-ass Rhaeger and his harp-playing pussy fingers with his giant warhammer.

1942
The Flood / Re: Game of Thrones Season 5 trailer
« on: January 30, 2015, 05:25:18 AM »
I think they should take a break after this season, and allow the author to finish Winds Of Winter (hopefully by the end of this century). AFFC and ADWD are essentially just the same book split into two. They'd be stretching out the source material like hackson did with the Hobbit.

HBO wouldn't allow that at all, unless they did a series set during The Age of Heroes or Robert's Rebellion, leading up to the events of Game of Thrones season 1.

1943
The Flood / Re: Game of Thrones Season 5 trailer
« on: January 30, 2015, 05:20:25 AM »


"Who said anything about him?"

mfw

I'm already pissed-right-the-fuck-off enough that they completely cut out Aegon and Jon Connington's stories from the show, and seem to be doing the same with Victarion and Euron Greyjoy.

They only have a certain amount of time to do stuff, there are practical and other reasons, y'know.

Thing is, Aegon VI adds in that very, very fucking juicy drama that could fill the appetites of the show watchers.  Done right, it could come down to Dany choosing to either let her brother's son rule the kingdom, or denounce him as a Blackfyre pretender and kill him.

Victarion's scenes would be cool, but not totally overall special to the plot...unless he's taking Dany to Westeros anyway

1944
The Flood / Re: Game of Thrones Season 5 trailer
« on: January 30, 2015, 04:51:30 AM »


"Who said anything about him?"

mfw

I'm already pissed-right-the-fuck-off enough that they completely cut out Aegon and Jon Connington's stories from the show, and seem to be doing the same with Victarion and Euron Greyjoy.

1945
Someone's rustled.

1946
Gaming / Re: Halo 5 Story Predictions?
« on: January 29, 2015, 06:46:42 PM »

I have a feeling the campaign may go the way of Halo 2 with You playing as not only Master Chief but Locke aswell which we kind off already know know. I have a feeling however they're going to surprise us with a 3rd character who will most likely be Arby H2 style. The Didact might show up. I don't really have anything new lol.
The Didact got Composed.

Spoiler
343 already spoiled in their comic book tie-in series that the Didact is already back.

1947
What if someone is atheist? Or of a religion that is not available?

In the article, it says the couple will just have a "Common-Law Marriage", which isn't observed as a full "legal and official" marriage by the State and Church.

1948
The Flood / Re: Pocket Thread.
« on: January 29, 2015, 01:40:19 AM »
Well since I empty out my pockets when I get home from work, nothing right now.

1949
Yes, even gay ones.

Quote
Oklahoma state representative Todd Russ has filed House Bill 1125, which would require all marriages to have the stamp of approval of a minister, priest, rabbi or other religious official.

    "Put it back to what it was supposed to be and was originally, a holy matrimony and a very solemn and spiritual vow." said Rep. Russ.

Rep. Russ admits he came up with the idea after Oklahoma's same-sex marriage ban was ruled unconstitutional last October. Rep. Russ sees it as a way to keep judges and clerks who are opposed to marriage equality from having to issue marriage licenses or officiate at same-sex weddings.

     "It doesn't put the county officials into the business of condoning it or approving it or licensing it," explained Rep. Russ.

Under House Bill 1125, judges would no longer have the power to officiate at marriages and court clerks would not issue marriage licenses. The clerks' only responsibility would be to file the licenses that couples received through their officiating clergy member. Of course, clergy can grant licenses according to their own religious beliefs, which again leaves a lot of gay couples on the outside looking in.

Representative Russ, (photo right) however, has a solution for those who aren't religious or aren't able to receive religious approval.

    "They don't have a spiritual basis for a marriage and don't want to have a clergy member or a priest or someone involved in the spiritual aspect, then they can file an affidavit of common-law marriage," Rep. Russ told reporters.

So religious people can get married married, and everyone else can claim common law status? I wish someone would ask him how that is not a violation of the establishment clause?

Russ maintains his bill is a way for the State of Oklahoma stick their finger in the eye of the federal government, complaining:

    "Where the federal government does not have a right to come in and force its new definitions of what they believe on independent states. Not just Oklahoma, but any state."

By the way, Oklahoma does not recognize "common law" marriages. It's just another way to separate those "not worthy."

Sooo...take the power of handing out Licenses to religious clergies instead of the fucking people chosen to do this shit...and then anyone who isn't "religiously" married just gets a Common-Law Marriage?

Fuck you Russ.

1950
Gaming / Re: Hyrule Warriors Majora DLC
« on: January 29, 2015, 01:09:25 AM »
I was expecting a video where you could play as Majora <.<

BUT THAT FIERCE DEITY IS FUCKING SICK.

Pages: 1 ... 636465 6667 ... 105