This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - The Waifu Master
Pages: 1 ... 125126127 128129 ... 234
3781
« on: January 09, 2015, 11:34:47 PM »
OP playing shitrim 
3782
« on: January 09, 2015, 11:32:37 PM »
#MODBAIS2015
#MODBAIS2015
#MODBAIS2015
#MODBAIS2015
3783
« on: January 09, 2015, 11:31:39 PM »
Legend has it that the Weebs with their waifu pillows would fight agains the gays and their dildos and with its beggining comes our end Armageddon is coming!
3784
« on: January 09, 2015, 11:30:33 PM »
If the being is incapable of consenting and doesn't even understand the proposition of being eaten after death, it is moral.
No it isn't, and I seriously hope you're just trolling if you think that.
If it is immoral to eat a being that doesn't understand the concept of their body continuing on after death, it is equally immoral to do literally anything else with their body and I don't think even you believe that.
Lives = lives, no matter their intelligence. Eating something that lived, whether it had the ability to know it would continuing existing after death or not, is immoral.
Please explain to me why eating them is less moral than doing literally anything else, given the premise that they did not understand the concept of their body lingering after death and left you no articulation of their desires for what to do with it after death.
The cow did not consent to you burying it's body after it died, therefore immoral.
The cow did not consent to you leaving it's body to rot in the field after it died, therefore immoral.
The cow did not consent to you holding a tasteful funeral service in its honor after it died, therefore immoral.
Let's bring our human back into it. They did not say what you should do with their body. Is it okay to eat them then? No, they should still be buried. A life is a life, whether or not it can communicate what it wants to happen after death doesn't matter. All deaths should be treated equally. In this case, our culture buries out dead. So we bury it.
3785
« on: January 09, 2015, 11:18:53 PM »
If the being is incapable of consenting and doesn't even understand the proposition of being eaten after death, it is moral.
No it isn't, and I seriously hope you're just trolling if you think that. If it is immoral to eat a being that doesn't understand the concept of their body continuing on after death, it is equally immoral to do literally anything else with their body and I don't think even you believe that.
Lives = lives, no matter their intelligence. Eating something that lived, whether it had the ability to know it would continuing existing after death or not, is immoral.
3786
« on: January 09, 2015, 11:10:04 PM »
3787
« on: January 09, 2015, 11:07:01 PM »
Is it okay to kill someone and eat them if they don't know they're going to die?
Is it only okay to eat animals who die of natural causes?
Any time you say anything about the morality of killing someone or something in this thread you are speaking in non sequitur.
You're right.
Killing people is wrong.
I hope you understand that.
Killing people is wrong.
This was never up for debate and is not at all what I'm arguing about.
Then elaborate.
I think you need to reread this thread and the original article. Everything in this thread is predicated on the being in question being already dead.
Good. The human is dead. You're eating it. It is wrong to eat something that used to be living and did not consent, or have the ability to, consent. /thread
3788
« on: January 09, 2015, 11:05:54 PM »
Or the 3 or so actual gays and the users that act like it?
DAS
Tru
Oss
Eyyyyyy
The difference is....
I'm the virgin.
The virgin gay one.
Excellent.
The Virgin asexual one.
im dsexual
Dumbass Sexual?
EYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
3789
« on: January 09, 2015, 11:04:26 PM »
Is it okay to kill someone and eat them if they don't know they're going to die?
Is it only okay to eat animals who die of natural causes?
Any time you say anything about the morality of killing someone or something in this thread you are speaking in non sequitur.
You're right.
Killing people is wrong.
I hope you understand that.
Killing people is wrong.
This was never up for debate and is not at all what I'm arguing about.
Then elaborate.
3790
« on: January 09, 2015, 11:04:06 PM »
Or the 3 or so actual gays and the users that act like it?
DAS
Tru
Oss
Eyyyyyy
The difference is....
I'm the virgin.
The virgin gay one.
Excellent.
The Virgin asexual one.
Don't be silly.
3791
« on: January 09, 2015, 11:02:49 PM »
Is it okay to kill someone and eat them if they don't know they're going to die?
Is it only okay to eat animals who die of natural causes?
Any time you say anything about the morality of killing someone or something in this thread you are speaking in non sequitur.
You're right. Killing people is wrong. I hope you understand that.
3792
« on: January 09, 2015, 11:01:58 PM »
Or the 3 or so actual gays and the users that act like it?
DAS
Tru
Oss
Eyyyyyy
The difference is....
I'm the virgin.
The virgin gay one. Excellent.
3793
« on: January 09, 2015, 11:00:15 PM »
I had to think about this, but under certain conditions (if the deceased consented to their body being used this way that would qualify), I would say the ethical thing to do would be to eat them. Revulsion at eating a human being is evolutionary baggage (given they consented and they're already dead) and your analogy claimed no negative health consequences.
I have to qualify that because the analogy still isn't really accurate. Human rights surrounding death are vastly different from animal rights surrounding death, mainly because humans understand death and can articulate how they wish to be treated after death.
Odd, most animals don't consent to being killed for food. :/
I never anywhere in this thread made any argument that it was moral to kill them.
Animals are incapable of articulating what should be done with their bodies after they're dead. It's questionable whether many animals even understand that they will die.
So? Is it okay to kill someone and eat them if they don't know they're going to die? Is it only okay to eat animals who die of natural causes?
3794
« on: January 09, 2015, 10:57:49 PM »
Bullshit, where's the white flag?
3795
« on: January 09, 2015, 10:55:50 PM »
Or the 3 or so actual gays and the users that act like it?
DAS Tru Oss Eyyyyyy
3796
« on: January 09, 2015, 10:51:38 PM »
I had to think about this, but under certain conditions (if the deceased consented to their body being used this way that would qualify), I would say the ethical thing to do would be to eat them. Revulsion at eating a human being is evolutionary baggage (given they consented and they're already dead) and your analogy claimed no negative health consequences.
I have to qualify that because the analogy still isn't really accurate. Human rights surrounding death are vastly different from animal rights surrounding death, mainly because humans understand death and can articulate how they wish to be treated after death.
Odd, most animals don't consent to being killed for food. :/
3797
« on: January 09, 2015, 10:37:44 PM »
3798
« on: January 09, 2015, 10:30:16 PM »
This is true in every conceivable way
And then you realize San Francisco ruins everything good about your state.
I wouldn't know enough about San Fran, only been there once
It's basically the headquarters of anti-speech feminism.
3799
« on: January 09, 2015, 10:27:48 PM »
3800
« on: January 09, 2015, 10:24:48 PM »
This is true in every conceivable way
And then you realize San Francisco ruins everything good about your state.
3801
« on: January 09, 2015, 10:23:48 PM »
However it is still illegal this is where your analogy broke down
elaborate.
Why are you using something illegal as an analogy for something legal? When you use something illegal and have to mention calling the cops and shit in your alternatives you're making it really easy to tell you your analogy is false
Sorry. It's not illegal. Do you eat the fucking human, or do you not eat the fucking human? Sorry, my analogy is still accurate.
3802
« on: January 09, 2015, 10:22:49 PM »
I fucking knew it would be about Tornadoes
Aye. Lived in Tulsa for 3 years. The only thing more irritating than the tornadoes was the bass of all the mexican music.
3803
« on: January 09, 2015, 10:21:37 PM »
Autism I choose you!
3804
« on: January 09, 2015, 10:18:31 PM »
 Add something about road construction and it's 100% accurate.
3805
« on: January 09, 2015, 10:09:20 PM »
PETANKO
3806
« on: January 09, 2015, 10:08:03 PM »
The human cattle was treated exactly as regular cattle would have been treated. but it's still a human
so it's way different
are you dumb, or
I think you're dumb. The only difference between people and any other animals is, well, nothing relevant. However it is still illegal this is where your analogy broke down
elaborate.
3807
« on: January 09, 2015, 10:07:00 PM »
I may never understand the appeal of cutesy anime.
It's not a conscious decision to become a cancer loving moefag, but rather the culmination of several poor lifestyle choices.
It's a nice cancer too
3808
« on: January 09, 2015, 10:04:44 PM »
cannibalism isn't wrong if it's consensual, and
i would never order a steak even if i wasn't vegan Irrelevant. that situation is a lot different anyway, because when it comes to cannibalism, that's a little more complex morally speaking than just eating an animal, in my opinion
Your opinion is also irrelevant. Lives are lives. The human cattle was treated exactly as regular cattle would have been treated.
3809
« on: January 09, 2015, 10:00:10 PM »
3810
« on: January 09, 2015, 09:58:42 PM »
But it would be against my ethics to eat it.
Dipshit. no, it wouldn't
wasting food should be against all vegetarian's ethics
otherwise, you're a moron
it's not about not eating meat for the sake of not eating meat
if you're that kind of vegetarian, you're a vegetarian for the wrong reason
I'm not a vegetarian at all. Here, let's put it this way. In an alternate reality cannibalism has no ill side effects. However it is still illegal because it's fucking wrong. You go to a restaurant and order a steak. However upon receiving the steak you find out it's actually long pork. Do you, A, not eat it, leave and call the cops B, eat it, and call the cops If you choose A, by your logic, you're wasting people's lives. If you choose B, you're eating someone.
Pages: 1 ... 125126127 128129 ... 234
|
Show Posts
