This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - The Waifu Master
Pages: 1 ... 109110111 112113 ... 234
3301
« on: February 04, 2015, 05:51:28 PM »
haha just kidding
3302
« on: February 04, 2015, 05:50:53 PM »
3303
« on: February 04, 2015, 05:50:01 PM »
No reason needed
can't even see that.
3304
« on: February 04, 2015, 05:49:42 PM »
son and mum
you'd know
rekt him
3305
« on: February 04, 2015, 05:48:53 PM »
Younger bro x big sis
Wrong
no you are
3306
« on: February 04, 2015, 05:48:07 PM »
Younger bro x big sis
Because it's hawt.
3307
« on: February 04, 2015, 05:47:20 PM »
Hey Flee, can you get super cheap East German surplus uniforms in French-fry-mayonaise land?
HEY FUCK YOU FRENCH FRIES AND MAYO GO GREAT TOGETHER
Good lord, you Michigan lot are even more weird than I thought.
FUCK YOU NIGGUH I FROM THE REAL HOOD 50 MILES OUT OF DETROIT I'M STRAIGHT UP GANGSTA MAN
3308
« on: February 04, 2015, 05:45:53 PM »
Does anyone really care that much about the art of an album?
Have you ever gotten in Gorillaz before?
I've been a fan since 2005.
Then you should know that the artwork and story is a major part of them
Well I didn't. And I still don't care about it.
3309
« on: February 04, 2015, 05:45:24 PM »
Hey Flee, can you get super cheap East German surplus uniforms in French-fry-mayonaise land?
HEY FUCK YOU FRENCH FRIES AND MAYO GO GREAT TOGETHER
3310
« on: February 04, 2015, 05:43:40 PM »
Does anyone really care that much about the art of an album?
Have you ever gotten in Gorillaz before?
I've been a fan since 2005.
3311
« on: February 04, 2015, 05:42:47 PM »
I always tip my waiter 50%. Because all I ever order is water.  )))))))))))))))))))))))
3312
« on: February 04, 2015, 05:40:46 PM »
Does anyone really care that much about the art of an album?
3313
« on: February 04, 2015, 05:39:35 PM »
youre shit
Talk dirty to me.
http://i.imgur.com/qb0wGcx.webm
Awwww yissssss
This is not okay
That's what makes it so dirty
Dammit
That's right. Damn me like the dirty whore I am. OH MY WHAT AN ORIGINAL THREAD 100/100
THANKS BB 10/10 LOVE YOU TOO
3314
« on: February 04, 2015, 05:38:27 PM »
youre shit
Talk dirty to me.
http://i.imgur.com/qb0wGcx.webm
Awwww yissssss
This is not okay
That's what makes it so dirty
3315
« on: February 04, 2015, 05:38:11 PM »
i agree unironically
You are correct!
3317
« on: February 04, 2015, 05:36:08 PM »
3318
« on: February 04, 2015, 05:35:32 PM »
youre shit
Talk dirty to me.
3319
« on: February 04, 2015, 05:33:50 PM »
I am objectively correct
3320
« on: February 04, 2015, 05:26:08 PM »
For you
3321
« on: February 04, 2015, 05:20:03 PM »
3322
« on: February 04, 2015, 05:14:05 PM »
People still can't grasp the idea that others have different taste in games.
Opinions don't exist. Otherwise I would have them and I do not. Everything I believe is fact.
3323
« on: February 04, 2015, 05:12:24 PM »
Everything looks great except for that big daddy.
3324
« on: February 04, 2015, 04:37:23 PM »
3325
« on: February 04, 2015, 04:35:22 PM »
Prolly just going to get the mods in to lock this thread.
This forum is literally cancer. Don't know why I bother spending time here.
>Lose an argument >Gets mods to lock the thread The butthurt is real.
3326
« on: February 04, 2015, 04:30:36 PM »
mordo, since you keep repeating the same thing over and over, i thought id take the liberty to repost something i said earlier in the thread that you might have missed.
here, let me clue you in on some #relevanthistoricalinformation
the confucians have long believed in a concept called "the rectification of names," which encourages proper nomenclature of things so as to catalyze social harmony. so, when you take words like "realism," dilute the meaning and apply it to define something that... isnt realistic at all... that's a breach of proper confucian conduct, and you are fostering social enmity instead of harmony
I'm not sure why you're bringing out ancient Chinese philosophy to debate microbiology, but eh. Whatever. I'm done with this inflammatory thread.
inflammatory? oh, friend, you have it all wrong... you pulled out the autist card, i simply played the game you started.
le funy reaction face ex dee dee
Really though, what are you guys even arguing at this point? I asked a question then I get a torrent of sperglords trying to debate semantics and contest basic biology.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/realistic
You're changing the meaning of realistic to possible.
Possible != realistic.
Which is why Azu said:
here, let me clue you in on some #relevanthistoricalinformation
the confucians have long believed in a concept called "the rectification of names," which encourages proper nomenclature of things so as to catalyze social harmony. so, when you take words like "realism," dilute the meaning and apply it to define something that... isnt realistic at all... that's a breach of proper confucian conduct, and you are fostering social enmity instead of harmony
https://www.google.co.uk/?gws_rd=ssl#q=realistic
having or showing a sensible and practical idea of what can be achieved or expected. https://www.google.co.uk/?gws_rd=ssl#q=possible
that may exist or happen, but that is not certain or probable. ya dun goof'd m9
We done with this semantics war, or are you going to continue to debate definitions and scientific fact?
you're very stubborn.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/realistic
realism:
concern for fact or reality and rejection of the impractical and visionary;
the theory or practice of fidelity in art and literature to nature or to real life and to accurate representation without idealization
from Merriam-Webster. do you have a more credible dictionary source than that? i doubt it. please stop. you're embarrassing yourself.
"This online source isn't credible because it's online, but this OTHER online source is!"
Holy fuck lol, the logic.
It's a credible source because it's a dictionary. Google is not a dictionary, genius.
3327
« on: February 04, 2015, 04:29:20 PM »
mordo, since you keep repeating the same thing over and over, i thought id take the liberty to repost something i said earlier in the thread that you might have missed.
here, let me clue you in on some #relevanthistoricalinformation
the confucians have long believed in a concept called "the rectification of names," which encourages proper nomenclature of things so as to catalyze social harmony. so, when you take words like "realism," dilute the meaning and apply it to define something that... isnt realistic at all... that's a breach of proper confucian conduct, and you are fostering social enmity instead of harmony
I'm not sure why you're bringing out ancient Chinese philosophy to debate microbiology, but eh. Whatever. I'm done with this inflammatory thread.
inflammatory? oh, friend, you have it all wrong... you pulled out the autist card, i simply played the game you started.
le funy reaction face ex dee dee
Really though, what are you guys even arguing at this point? I asked a question then I get a torrent of sperglords trying to debate semantics and contest basic biology.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/realistic
You're changing the meaning of realistic to possible.
Possible != realistic.
Which is why Azu said:
here, let me clue you in on some #relevanthistoricalinformation
the confucians have long believed in a concept called "the rectification of names," which encourages proper nomenclature of things so as to catalyze social harmony. so, when you take words like "realism," dilute the meaning and apply it to define something that... isnt realistic at all... that's a breach of proper confucian conduct, and you are fostering social enmity instead of harmony
https://www.google.co.uk/?gws_rd=ssl#q=realistic
having or showing a sensible and practical idea of what can be achieved or expected. https://www.google.co.uk/?gws_rd=ssl#q=possible
that may exist or happen, but that is not certain or probable. ya dun goof'd m9
We done with this semantics war, or are you going to continue to debate definitions and scientific fact?
>Using google to define words instead of a dictionary
Yes, we are done.
By all means, refer to a paper dictionary.
I'm sure you'll find the same definition.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/realistichttp://dictionary.reference.com/browse/realistichttp://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/realisticShit, you're wrong!
3328
« on: February 04, 2015, 04:23:56 PM »
mordo, since you keep repeating the same thing over and over, i thought id take the liberty to repost something i said earlier in the thread that you might have missed.
here, let me clue you in on some #relevanthistoricalinformation
the confucians have long believed in a concept called "the rectification of names," which encourages proper nomenclature of things so as to catalyze social harmony. so, when you take words like "realism," dilute the meaning and apply it to define something that... isnt realistic at all... that's a breach of proper confucian conduct, and you are fostering social enmity instead of harmony
I'm not sure why you're bringing out ancient Chinese philosophy to debate microbiology, but eh. Whatever. I'm done with this inflammatory thread.
inflammatory? oh, friend, you have it all wrong... you pulled out the autist card, i simply played the game you started.
le funy reaction face ex dee dee
Really though, what are you guys even arguing at this point? I asked a question then I get a torrent of sperglords trying to debate semantics and contest basic biology.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/realistic
You're changing the meaning of realistic to possible.
Possible != realistic.
Which is why Azu said:
here, let me clue you in on some #relevanthistoricalinformation
the confucians have long believed in a concept called "the rectification of names," which encourages proper nomenclature of things so as to catalyze social harmony. so, when you take words like "realism," dilute the meaning and apply it to define something that... isnt realistic at all... that's a breach of proper confucian conduct, and you are fostering social enmity instead of harmony
https://www.google.co.uk/?gws_rd=ssl#q=realistic
having or showing a sensible and practical idea of what can be achieved or expected. https://www.google.co.uk/?gws_rd=ssl#q=possible
that may exist or happen, but that is not certain or probable. ya dun goof'd m9
We done with this semantics war, or are you going to continue to debate definitions and scientific fact?
>Using google to define words instead of a dictionary Yes, we are done.
3329
« on: February 04, 2015, 04:19:00 PM »
I have half as many posts as he does and I'm still managing Heroic. How does he do it?
Your downvotes at work!
I thought downvotes a shit though
He has an incredible amount of them.
We can see the amount of upvotes or downvotes we have?
3330
« on: February 04, 2015, 04:15:27 PM »
mordo, since you keep repeating the same thing over and over, i thought id take the liberty to repost something i said earlier in the thread that you might have missed.
here, let me clue you in on some #relevanthistoricalinformation
the confucians have long believed in a concept called "the rectification of names," which encourages proper nomenclature of things so as to catalyze social harmony. so, when you take words like "realism," dilute the meaning and apply it to define something that... isnt realistic at all... that's a breach of proper confucian conduct, and you are fostering social enmity instead of harmony
I'm not sure why you're bringing out ancient Chinese philosophy to debate microbiology, but eh. Whatever. I'm done with this inflammatory thread.
inflammatory? oh, friend, you have it all wrong... you pulled out the autist card, i simply played the game you started.
le funy reaction face ex dee dee
Really though, what are you guys even arguing at this point? I asked a question then I get a torrent of sperglords trying to debate semantics and contest basic biology.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/realisticYou're changing the meaning of realistic to possible. Possible != realistic. Which is why Azu said: here, let me clue you in on some #relevanthistoricalinformation
the confucians have long believed in a concept called "the rectification of names," which encourages proper nomenclature of things so as to catalyze social harmony. so, when you take words like "realism," dilute the meaning and apply it to define something that... isnt realistic at all... that's a breach of proper confucian conduct, and you are fostering social enmity instead of harmony
Pages: 1 ... 109110111 112113 ... 234
|
Show Posts
