This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - The Waifu Master
Pages: 1 ... 969798 99100 ... 234
2911
« on: February 07, 2015, 08:30:45 PM »
lmao you're either trolling or hopelessly disillusioned.
Looks like your attempt at trolling failed and now you gotta resort to calling me being a troll. Better luck next time Skippy, and check your sources :^)
>Being this butthurt because I realized you were trolling lmao
>He doesn't check his sources
>He's butthurt and posting 3DPD
2912
« on: February 07, 2015, 08:29:30 PM »
I got rekt, SO I'm resorting to calling people names because that totally proves I'm smarter. Even though my argument has been split in two and my point is pretty much invalid, I still think I won the argument.
FTFY
Also butthurt.
2913
« on: February 07, 2015, 08:25:32 PM »
lmao you're either trolling or hopelessly disillusioned.
Looks like your attempt at trolling failed and now you gotta resort to calling me being a troll. Better luck next time Skippy, and check your sources :^)
>Being this butthurt because I realized you were trolling lmao
2914
« on: February 07, 2015, 08:24:31 PM »
kill her
I am going to kill you
Probably not.
2915
« on: February 07, 2015, 08:23:09 PM »
lmao you're either trolling or hopelessly disillusioned.
2916
« on: February 07, 2015, 08:21:43 PM »
kill her
2917
« on: February 07, 2015, 08:21:08 PM »
Starwars is mediocre.
2918
« on: February 07, 2015, 08:05:51 PM »
inb4lock
2919
« on: February 07, 2015, 07:46:42 PM »
But drama wil cause people to leave. If the members leave, it'll cause inactivity.
Don't click dustin posts Don't respond to dustin posts Don't dustin
2920
« on: February 07, 2015, 07:36:24 PM »
No
I'd totally fuck you
Not kidding
<3
2921
« on: February 07, 2015, 07:25:15 PM »
>tfw 12 yeses
2922
« on: February 07, 2015, 07:22:36 PM »
*cuts arms off*
How do you cut your other arm off after the first
cuz
2923
« on: February 07, 2015, 07:13:14 PM »
luv u
2924
« on: February 07, 2015, 07:12:57 PM »
*cuts arms off*
2925
« on: February 07, 2015, 06:54:58 PM »
You didn't explicitly use the word sustainable, but your whole argument revolves around on the possibility the person will be put in situation they starve to lose muscle, which is unreasonable.
Everything you do in life has a risk. With proper nutrient intake and exercise there is little to no risk. Pretty sure body builders are far more likely to survive than you. They are stronger, have higher endurance, and higher sex appeal than you. Body building is more than physical too. They are mentally stronger as well.
lmao Everything you just said is wrong and ignores everything I've said. Hold on, editing to break this down You didn't explicitly use the word sustainable, but your whole argument revolves around on the possibility the person will be put in situation they starve to lose muscle, which is unreasonable.
How is that unreasonable? Literally the reason anyone with a brain wants to gain muscle in the first place is to perform in difficult situations. Most of these situations require you to expend energy, energy comes from body mass. When the majority of your expendable body mass is muscle you're going to lose muscle. If you're just getting muscles to show you have them, you're an idiot. Full stop. With proper nutrient intake and exercise there is little to no risk. Pretty sure body builders are far more likely to survive than you. They are stronger, have higher endurance, and higher sex appeal than you. Body building is more than physical too. They are mentally stronger as well. But when the nutrients go away you're risking everything. >Higher endurance http://www.lifefitness.com/blog/posts/muscle-strength-vs-muscle-endurance.html>Higher sex appeal http://www.askmen.com/dating/heidi_600/617_what-women-think-about-bodybuilders.html>Mentally stronger Not even close. Put a body builder into ranger training. They'll want out so fucking fast you wouldn't even believe. Also, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/defence/10404822/Is-body-building-bad-for-soldiers-health.htmlBody building is bad for anyone who actually needs to survive.
2926
« on: February 07, 2015, 06:47:58 PM »
stop oppressing me
2927
« on: February 07, 2015, 06:45:46 PM »
School Idol Project is literally cancer.
2928
« on: February 07, 2015, 06:25:57 PM »
Damn...
It's funny to hear about, but it can't be a good experience.
Aye. I'm seriously wondering what people are saying when they call the police. Because you almost always need a warrant to break into someone's home.
Terrorism or gang related stuff I'd imagine. If they're just busting in on short notice like that.
It's crazy.
Looked it up. It's usually someone claiming to have already killed someone and kill someone else or that they're about to.
2929
« on: February 07, 2015, 06:22:05 PM »
My brothers gf is yelling so loud I can hear her from my apartment
"I feel sorry for the girl that falls in love with your brother"
dudewhat
I sorry bae. I'll love you.
queer
<3
2930
« on: February 07, 2015, 06:21:24 PM »
My brothers gf is yelling so loud I can hear her from my apartment
"I feel sorry for the girl that falls in love with your brother"
dudewhat
I sorry bae. I'll love you.
2931
« on: February 07, 2015, 06:20:48 PM »
Damn...
It's funny to hear about, but it can't be a good experience.
Aye. I'm seriously wondering what people are saying when they call the police. Because you almost always need a warrant to break into someone's home.
2932
« on: February 07, 2015, 06:17:59 PM »
Christ the guy is white ffs. ayy lmao
2933
« on: February 07, 2015, 06:10:38 PM »
You said it was unsustainable, which I asked for a source. You still refuse and you're trying say you only thought it was stupid.
You only think it's a risk because of some random ass chance the person will be throw into some survival mode scenario. How many people in America randomly getting abducted and throw in the wilderness or in-prisoned without food? Most don't. Do you live in some state of perpetuating fear?
Quote me. Do you live in some state of mind where you think that doing something for no good reason, and only adding risk to yourself is okay? The reason most people actually want muscle and work out is for it's original purpose in evolution, to help keep you alive. The moment you take it too far and actually hurt your chances for survival is when you're officially an idiot.
2934
« on: February 07, 2015, 06:04:44 PM »
On Bnet someone once argued with me that there could be life on the sun only we just don't have he right equitment to find it.
For Destiny some retard wanted the sun to be a explorable location. I know this is a Sci-Fi game and all but come on.
I sometimes wonder if you guys are the ones getting trolled.
2935
« on: February 07, 2015, 06:03:44 PM »
check the easy access to sloot poosay when under 12%
even though jeff and crew act like full on homos
What the fuck is with the guy on the right's waist?
No bodyfat.
That just looks horrible.
Exactly.
2936
« on: February 07, 2015, 06:01:23 PM »
check the easy access to sloot poosay when under 12%
even though jeff and crew act like full on homos
What the fuck is with the guy on the right's waist?
No bodyfat.
2937
« on: February 07, 2015, 05:53:41 PM »
No one is healthy starving you fucking dolt. Health isn't measured on how long you can starve. Health is defined as being free from illness or injury. Doctors don't do check ups to see how long you can survive without eating. I do not know why you are basing health on the potential of losing muscle in a random scenario.
You said it was unhealthy to maintain a low bf%. I said with proper nutrients and exercise, it was. I was never debating whether starving someone was healthy or not.
Now, do you or do you not have any studies or backed up evidence that with proper nutrients (not starving) and exercise, 6-9% bf is unsustainable?
There is no purpose to have anything lower than 12% bf in any situation, you're only adding extra risk to yourself. Making it an unhealthy choice.
Quit changing the subject. We're not arguing purpose, we're discussing sustainability in a controlled enviroment. Still waiting for one credibile study.
You don't need a credible study to realize that you're a fucking idiot to have less than 12% body fat.
How's it stupid, because you don't want it or can't get it? You haven't been able to prove it's unhealthy besides pointlessly repeating yourself, so it just sounds like you're trying to rationalize your inability/inferiority.
It's amazing how butthurt you are at the fact that I'm pointing out that having extremely low bf% is vain and dangerous is many situations.
Not butthurt, simply pointing out you still haven't been able to provide one source supporting the claim 6-9%bf is unsustainable. Not extremely low like below 5%, but 6-9%.
Because I don't need to. It's simple logic.
Because you can't.
Sorry, let me use logic again. >less than 10% bf >Does nothing for you >In a survival situation, your body will eat almost exclusively you muscle >Losing muscle in a survival situation is damning >Thus we can conclude that low bf% does not help in any way and can actually hurt you
There you go changing the subject again. You still haven't been able to provide one source supporting the claim 6-9%bf is unsustainable.
I never changed the subject you ponce. This has been my argument from the fucking beginning. It's retarded to have single digit bf because you're only adding risk to yourself. I'm sorry you're too dense to understand that.
2938
« on: February 07, 2015, 05:49:40 PM »
...How old are you?
48. Where have you been?
Too old for me.
How old are you?
24
2939
« on: February 07, 2015, 05:42:22 PM »
No one is healthy starving you fucking dolt. Health isn't measured on how long you can starve. Health is defined as being free from illness or injury. Doctors don't do check ups to see how long you can survive without eating. I do not know why you are basing health on the potential of losing muscle in a random scenario.
You said it was unhealthy to maintain a low bf%. I said with proper nutrients and exercise, it was. I was never debating whether starving someone was healthy or not.
Now, do you or do you not have any studies or backed up evidence that with proper nutrients (not starving) and exercise, 6-9% bf is unsustainable?
There is no purpose to have anything lower than 12% bf in any situation, you're only adding extra risk to yourself. Making it an unhealthy choice.
Quit changing the subject. We're not arguing purpose, we're discussing sustainability in a controlled enviroment. Still waiting for one credibile study.
You don't need a credible study to realize that you're a fucking idiot to have less than 12% body fat.
How's it stupid, because you don't want it or can't get it? You haven't been able to prove it's unhealthy besides pointlessly repeating yourself, so it just sounds like you're trying to rationalize your inability/inferiority.
It's amazing how butthurt you are at the fact that I'm pointing out that having extremely low bf% is vain and dangerous is many situations.
Not butthurt, simply pointing out you still haven't been able to provide one source supporting the claim 6-9%bf is unsustainable. Not extremely low like below 5%, but 6-9%.
Because I don't need to. It's simple logic.
Because you can't.
Sorry, let me use logic again. >less than 10% bf >Does nothing for you >In a survival situation, your body will eat almost exclusively you muscle >Losing muscle in a survival situation is damning >Thus we can conclude that low bf% does not help in any way and can actually hurt you
2940
« on: February 07, 2015, 05:35:18 PM »
No one is healthy starving you fucking dolt. Health isn't measured on how long you can starve. Health is defined as being free from illness or injury. Doctors don't do check ups to see how long you can survive without eating. I do not know why you are basing health on the potential of losing muscle in a random scenario.
You said it was unhealthy to maintain a low bf%. I said with proper nutrients and exercise, it was. I was never debating whether starving someone was healthy or not.
Now, do you or do you not have any studies or backed up evidence that with proper nutrients (not starving) and exercise, 6-9% bf is unsustainable?
There is no purpose to have anything lower than 12% bf in any situation, you're only adding extra risk to yourself. Making it an unhealthy choice.
Quit changing the subject. We're not arguing purpose, we're discussing sustainability in a controlled enviroment. Still waiting for one credibile study.
You don't need a credible study to realize that you're a fucking idiot to have less than 12% body fat.
How's it stupid, because you don't want it or can't get it? You haven't been able to prove it's unhealthy besides pointlessly repeating yourself, so it just sounds like you're trying to rationalize your inability/inferiority.
It's amazing how butthurt you are at the fact that I'm pointing out that having extremely low bf% is vain and dangerous is many situations.
Not butthurt, simply pointing out you still haven't been able to provide one source supporting the claim 6-9%bf is unsustainable. Not extremely low like below 5%, but 6-9%.
Because I don't need to. It's simple logic.
Pages: 1 ... 969798 99100 ... 234
|