This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - w/e
Pages: 1 ... 777879 8081 ... 176
2341
« on: January 25, 2015, 02:25:46 PM »
Parents are people. Some people are shitty.
Being a parent doesn't automatically make you some glorious person.
Don't get me wrong either; she isn't a horrible person. On a fundamental level we just don't 'click' and there are certain things about her I find worthy of criticism. But that's exactly how generations improve upon one another.
They don't always improve.
While true, nobody is going to improve if you don't tell them what they're doing wrong.
What?
2342
« on: January 25, 2015, 02:24:36 PM »
They don't always improve.
I intend to.
That's perfect, but what about your children? What about their children? Eventually, one of your successors will become like your mom.
2343
« on: January 25, 2015, 02:18:58 PM »
Parents are people. Some people are shitty.
Being a parent doesn't automatically make you some glorious person.
Don't get me wrong either; she isn't a horrible person. On a fundamental level we just don't 'click' and there are certain things about her I find worthy of criticism. But that's exactly how generations improve upon one another.
They don't always improve.
2344
« on: January 25, 2015, 02:17:33 PM »
Also, you're a piece of shit.
Trying not to take things for granted is above you. You're not a god, you're not able to use matter as you wish. You are the matter, and you're meant to interact with other matter. There's no reason for a piece to become conscious of the other pieces when they can't move on their own. It's like a chess piece trying to make sense of his battle. Where's the point?
2345
« on: January 25, 2015, 02:14:53 PM »
All I see from your posts on the Flood is an unfunny Loaf.
I place zero stock in entertaining you. What's wrong with being critical of your parents? I would want my children to do exaclty the same for me.
Why the fuck would I come here to post banal platitudes about how my mother's a fucking saint who does a lot for me. It's fairly self-evident she does a lot for me. Discussing it would have literally no utility.
He probs worded his message badly
2346
« on: January 25, 2015, 02:13:28 PM »
Growing up with technology, most people take it all for granted.
Hell, I do too, I'm just a bit more self aware of that.
Do you take the ground into consideration as well? What about chairs? Basically all objects. I used to do that when I was a child, but I grew out of it, and I recommend that you do too. Spoiler I honestly used to try not to hurt the feelings of the things I bumped into, or whatever by apologizing and stuff.
2347
« on: January 25, 2015, 02:08:34 PM »
What made her say that?
2348
« on: January 25, 2015, 02:02:21 PM »
About a year ago I heard this in Swedish by some old man, and I thought "That means that they'll be available when we catch up. Nothing wrong with that."
Now, however, I realize how annoying it can be when technology doesn't work as you want it to. A simple task as to upload an image to your computer for the first time could be done quickly by the experienced person, but I encountered problems, and had to waste effort.
In the end, I spent about 5 minutes trying to upload images to my comp. It should have taken me 0. If I'd been able to transfer it via my mind, or rather, make the connection with my computer to my phone and send those pictures, I'd be done much faster.
So old man, I say, we need computers to be faster than us, and we need them to be up to pace with our semi-conscious minds, because in the end, it's not a race against humans. It's simply a tool for us, and we should develop this tool to help us better.
2349
« on: January 25, 2015, 12:43:17 PM »
2350
« on: January 25, 2015, 12:40:34 PM »
That's like asking why we have feet.
We have feet to stand
Why do we have toes though?
No, our legs are for standing.
Lol try standing without your feet
Lol try standing without your toes
I'm pretty sure I can get use to standing with an inch off my foot
Lol try surviving with only walking like a moron anywhere between 1000 bc-1600 ad
That sentence made no logical sense
Not if you consider that you're trying to compensate for no toes. If you have no toes, you can't walk normally, and thus sprinting would prove even harder.
How would you move around efficiently? How would you hunt, and fight? How would you work without being able to walk normally?
Lol sure I would have trouble for a couple of days but I'm sure I can get use to it
It's just an inch off my feet which really isn't much
Fine, then chop of your toes. Eventually, they should stop existing in your line of predecessors. If not, then the toe will still be there, because they serve a function. There's no reason for it to disappear, so it won't, but if you give it a reason for long enough, then it will.
What the fuck kind of logic is this?
You do know that toes use to be longer and used for climbing when we were apes right?
And the reason we still have them is because evolution hasn't gotten rid of them yet?
Speaking of evolution, do you even know the first thing about it or are you using Lamarck's logic?
Chopping off your toes won't mean that your children are born without toes lol
And you meant successors, not predecessors
Don't try to make me seem retarded when you can't get facts straight yourself
"And the reason we still have them is because evolution hasn't gotten rid of them yet?"
please stop repeating my words, jackass.
So you're telling me that your successors won't be influenced by anything that their predecessors did, and went through?
Then tell me, why are some more hairy than others? Our bodies adapt, and our brains are adjusted ever so slightly. Exercising alters the DNA, so I imagine exercising different parts of your body for millions of years would have an effect, which would make the toes useless. Your dna would be altered for less space taken up by the toes, and eventually they'd disappear.
The only thing I got wrong was the predecessor part.
Are you retarded?
No
Children are not affected by what their parents went through
They receive a "base model" blueprint of a human from their parents
You are using Lamarck's logic right now
Even worse, you're trying to play off your retarded logic as truth
Read this
http://necsi.edu/projects/evolution/lamarck/intro./lamarck_intro.html
The last three sections
I know how evolution works.
Scientists know that certain genes become active or quieter as a result of exercise.
Not exercising certain parts for millions of years will most definitely have an effect, don't you think?
This is my argument; it is not complex, so please realize that. If you can't understand it, then I end this discussion now, because there'd be no point to it.
Not exercising certain parts for millions of years will most definitely have an effect, don't you think?
So why did you say that my children won't have any toes if I chop off my own?
And this directly contradicts your earlier point of saying that the children will be affected by what the parents go through
When did I say that? Might have done it without realizing, but it was a small mistake, and you should ignore it, because I've repeated my points enough times for you to understand it.
They will be affected.
It's not like they'll lose their toes, or that there will be any changes, but they will be affected on a microscopical level. It might be that a small adenine strand will be 1 mm to the left, if the size of the strand was 10 km wide, and 20 km long.
Still, it is a change none the less.
Ok so?
How does that prove your point?
Or was your point only to make me look idiotic?
My point is to come in with an idea, and then back it up by eradicating all doubts. If the doubt is not eradicated within myself, then I will accept it as a loss until proven otherwise. Until then however, I will take any point that anyone throws at me and reciprocate.
That's great
Now how does it prove your point?
So you're gonna ignore my reply, and ask for me to retype it?
2351
« on: January 25, 2015, 12:39:14 PM »
That's like asking why do we have heads
Are you aware of your stupidity?
How do the two even connect?
Try connecting what you said. If you don't have a head, then you don't have a brain = question unsolved
You're just furthering this, for no reason other than that you're trying to imitate my response. You fail however.
...
Are you retarded?
Can you not tell that I'm just copying what you said in my thread instead of actually trying to be serious?
Or do you always try to twist my words for no other reason than to hate me?
Are you retarded?
Can you not read that I included that you're trying to copy what I said in your thread?
Or are you just always trying to enjoy life so much that you don't think? Perhaps you're only capable of rudimentary thinking.
Lol wtf
You can't think of shit
The only thinking that happens when you respond to me is "how can I post something to make him seem stupid?" and they come off as very poor replies
The only thinking that relates to stupidity is happening when I'm reading your replies.
Such a good counter argument
Good job OP you win
It's only reasonable to give up when you've lost.
Good for you.
>taking me seriously
I have never in my life taken a clown seriously.
Well you seem to be taking yourself pretty seriously
Care to give an example of me taking myself seriously?
You're full of shit, and nothing to back it up.
Uh
Every time I post something, you always feel compelled to try and tear it apart
And as for nothing to back it up, lol
You're the one who always replies with an insult instead of actually countering my point
That doesn't mean I think of myself as good.
How would I make a good insult without considering your point?
now you're leaking
Uh no
You reply to me with no other intention than hating on me instead of actually responding to what I said
You've caught my interest. What is it that I din't respond to? I'll do it now if I have indeed ignored it.
2352
« on: January 25, 2015, 12:37:29 PM »
That's like asking why we have feet.
We have feet to stand
Why do we have toes though?
No, our legs are for standing.
Lol try standing without your feet
Lol try standing without your toes
I'm pretty sure I can get use to standing with an inch off my foot
Lol try surviving with only walking like a moron anywhere between 1000 bc-1600 ad
That sentence made no logical sense
Not if you consider that you're trying to compensate for no toes. If you have no toes, you can't walk normally, and thus sprinting would prove even harder.
How would you move around efficiently? How would you hunt, and fight? How would you work without being able to walk normally?
Lol sure I would have trouble for a couple of days but I'm sure I can get use to it
It's just an inch off my feet which really isn't much
Fine, then chop of your toes. Eventually, they should stop existing in your line of predecessors. If not, then the toe will still be there, because they serve a function. There's no reason for it to disappear, so it won't, but if you give it a reason for long enough, then it will.
What the fuck kind of logic is this?
You do know that toes use to be longer and used for climbing when we were apes right?
And the reason we still have them is because evolution hasn't gotten rid of them yet?
Speaking of evolution, do you even know the first thing about it or are you using Lamarck's logic?
Chopping off your toes won't mean that your children are born without toes lol
And you meant successors, not predecessors
Don't try to make me seem retarded when you can't get facts straight yourself
"And the reason we still have them is because evolution hasn't gotten rid of them yet?"
please stop repeating my words, jackass.
So you're telling me that your successors won't be influenced by anything that their predecessors did, and went through?
Then tell me, why are some more hairy than others? Our bodies adapt, and our brains are adjusted ever so slightly. Exercising alters the DNA, so I imagine exercising different parts of your body for millions of years would have an effect, which would make the toes useless. Your dna would be altered for less space taken up by the toes, and eventually they'd disappear.
The only thing I got wrong was the predecessor part.
Are you retarded?
No
Children are not affected by what their parents went through
They receive a "base model" blueprint of a human from their parents
You are using Lamarck's logic right now
Even worse, you're trying to play off your retarded logic as truth
Read this
http://necsi.edu/projects/evolution/lamarck/intro./lamarck_intro.html
The last three sections
I know how evolution works.
Scientists know that certain genes become active or quieter as a result of exercise.
Not exercising certain parts for millions of years will most definitely have an effect, don't you think?
This is my argument; it is not complex, so please realize that. If you can't understand it, then I end this discussion now, because there'd be no point to it.
Not exercising certain parts for millions of years will most definitely have an effect, don't you think?
So why did you say that my children won't have any toes if I chop off my own?
And this directly contradicts your earlier point of saying that the children will be affected by what the parents go through
When did I say that? Might have done it without realizing, but it was a small mistake, and you should ignore it, because I've repeated my points enough times for you to understand it.
They will be affected.
It's not like they'll lose their toes, or that there will be any changes, but they will be affected on a microscopical level. It might be that a small adenine strand will be 1 mm to the left, if the size of the strand was 10 km wide, and 20 km long.
Still, it is a change none the less.
Ok so?
How does that prove your point?
Or was your point only to make me look idiotic?
My point is to come in with an idea, and then back it up by eradicating all doubts. If the doubt is not eradicated within myself, then I will accept it as a loss until proven otherwise. Until then however, I will take any point that anyone throws at me and reciprocate.
2353
« on: January 25, 2015, 12:33:35 PM »
That's like asking why we have feet.
We have feet to stand
Why do we have toes though?
No, our legs are for standing.
Lol try standing without your feet
Lol try standing without your toes
I'm pretty sure I can get use to standing with an inch off my foot
Lol try surviving with only walking like a moron anywhere between 1000 bc-1600 ad
That sentence made no logical sense
Not if you consider that you're trying to compensate for no toes. If you have no toes, you can't walk normally, and thus sprinting would prove even harder.
How would you move around efficiently? How would you hunt, and fight? How would you work without being able to walk normally?
Lol sure I would have trouble for a couple of days but I'm sure I can get use to it
It's just an inch off my feet which really isn't much
Fine, then chop of your toes. Eventually, they should stop existing in your line of predecessors. If not, then the toe will still be there, because they serve a function. There's no reason for it to disappear, so it won't, but if you give it a reason for long enough, then it will.
What the fuck kind of logic is this?
You do know that toes use to be longer and used for climbing when we were apes right?
And the reason we still have them is because evolution hasn't gotten rid of them yet?
Speaking of evolution, do you even know the first thing about it or are you using Lamarck's logic?
Chopping off your toes won't mean that your children are born without toes lol
And you meant successors, not predecessors
Don't try to make me seem retarded when you can't get facts straight yourself
"And the reason we still have them is because evolution hasn't gotten rid of them yet?"
please stop repeating my words, jackass.
So you're telling me that your successors won't be influenced by anything that their predecessors did, and went through?
Then tell me, why are some more hairy than others? Our bodies adapt, and our brains are adjusted ever so slightly. Exercising alters the DNA, so I imagine exercising different parts of your body for millions of years would have an effect, which would make the toes useless. Your dna would be altered for less space taken up by the toes, and eventually they'd disappear.
The only thing I got wrong was the predecessor part.
Are you retarded?
No
Children are not affected by what their parents went through
They receive a "base model" blueprint of a human from their parents
You are using Lamarck's logic right now
Even worse, you're trying to play off your retarded logic as truth
Read this
http://necsi.edu/projects/evolution/lamarck/intro./lamarck_intro.html
The last three sections
I know how evolution works.
Scientists know that certain genes become active or quieter as a result of exercise.
Not exercising certain parts for millions of years will most definitely have an effect, don't you think?
This is my argument; it is not complex, so please realize that. If you can't understand it, then I end this discussion now, because there'd be no point to it.
Not exercising certain parts for millions of years will most definitely have an effect, don't you think?
So why did you say that my children won't have any toes if I chop off my own?
And this directly contradicts your earlier point of saying that the children will be affected by what the parents go through
When did I say that? Might have done it without realizing, but it was a small mistake, and you should ignore it, because I've repeated my points enough times for you to understand it. They will be affected. It's not like they'll lose their toes, or that there will be any changes, but they will be affected on a microscopical level. It might be that a small adenine strand will be 1 mm to the left, if the size of the strand was 10 km wide, and 20 km long. Still, it is a change none the less.
2354
« on: January 25, 2015, 12:29:12 PM »
That's like asking why do we have heads
Are you aware of your stupidity?
How do the two even connect?
Try connecting what you said. If you don't have a head, then you don't have a brain = question unsolved
You're just furthering this, for no reason other than that you're trying to imitate my response. You fail however.
...
Are you retarded?
Can you not tell that I'm just copying what you said in my thread instead of actually trying to be serious?
Or do you always try to twist my words for no other reason than to hate me?
Are you retarded?
Can you not read that I included that you're trying to copy what I said in your thread?
Or are you just always trying to enjoy life so much that you don't think? Perhaps you're only capable of rudimentary thinking.
Lol wtf
You can't think of shit
The only thinking that happens when you respond to me is "how can I post something to make him seem stupid?" and they come off as very poor replies
The only thinking that relates to stupidity is happening when I'm reading your replies.
Such a good counter argument
Good job OP you win
It's only reasonable to give up when you've lost.
Good for you.
>taking me seriously
I have never in my life taken a clown seriously.
Well you seem to be taking yourself pretty seriously
Care to give an example of me taking myself seriously?
You're full of shit, and nothing to back it up.
Uh
Every time I post something, you always feel compelled to try and tear it apart
And as for nothing to back it up, lol
You're the one who always replies with an insult instead of actually countering my point
That doesn't mean I think of myself as good. How would I make a good insult without considering your point? now you're leaking
2355
« on: January 25, 2015, 12:21:58 PM »
That's like asking why we have feet.
We have feet to stand
Why do we have toes though?
No, our legs are for standing.
Lol try standing without your feet
Lol try standing without your toes
I'm pretty sure I can get use to standing with an inch off my foot
Lol try surviving with only walking like a moron anywhere between 1000 bc-1600 ad
That sentence made no logical sense
Not if you consider that you're trying to compensate for no toes. If you have no toes, you can't walk normally, and thus sprinting would prove even harder.
How would you move around efficiently? How would you hunt, and fight? How would you work without being able to walk normally?
Lol sure I would have trouble for a couple of days but I'm sure I can get use to it
It's just an inch off my feet which really isn't much
Fine, then chop of your toes. Eventually, they should stop existing in your line of predecessors. If not, then the toe will still be there, because they serve a function. There's no reason for it to disappear, so it won't, but if you give it a reason for long enough, then it will.
What the fuck kind of logic is this?
You do know that toes use to be longer and used for climbing when we were apes right?
And the reason we still have them is because evolution hasn't gotten rid of them yet?
Speaking of evolution, do you even know the first thing about it or are you using Lamarck's logic?
Chopping off your toes won't mean that your children are born without toes lol
And you meant successors, not predecessors
Don't try to make me seem retarded when you can't get facts straight yourself
"And the reason we still have them is because evolution hasn't gotten rid of them yet?"
please stop repeating my words, jackass.
So you're telling me that your successors won't be influenced by anything that their predecessors did, and went through?
Then tell me, why are some more hairy than others? Our bodies adapt, and our brains are adjusted ever so slightly. Exercising alters the DNA, so I imagine exercising different parts of your body for millions of years would have an effect, which would make the toes useless. Your dna would be altered for less space taken up by the toes, and eventually they'd disappear.
The only thing I got wrong was the predecessor part.
Are you retarded?
No
Children are not affected by what their parents went through
They receive a "base model" blueprint of a human from their parents
You are using Lamarck's logic right now
Even worse, you're trying to play off your retarded logic as truth
Read this
http://necsi.edu/projects/evolution/lamarck/intro./lamarck_intro.html
The last three sections
I know how evolution works. Scientists know that certain genes become active or quieter as a result of exercise. Not exercising certain parts for millions of years will most definitely have an effect, don't you think? This is my argument; it is not complex, so please realize that. If you can't understand it, then I end this discussion now, because there'd be no point to it. Edit: relevant http://www.theguardian.com/science/2011/jul/27/higher-latitudes-bigger-eyes-brains
2356
« on: January 25, 2015, 12:18:40 PM »
That's like asking why do we have heads
Are you aware of your stupidity?
How do the two even connect?
Try connecting what you said. If you don't have a head, then you don't have a brain = question unsolved
You're just furthering this, for no reason other than that you're trying to imitate my response. You fail however.
...
Are you retarded?
Can you not tell that I'm just copying what you said in my thread instead of actually trying to be serious?
Or do you always try to twist my words for no other reason than to hate me?
Are you retarded?
Can you not read that I included that you're trying to copy what I said in your thread?
Or are you just always trying to enjoy life so much that you don't think? Perhaps you're only capable of rudimentary thinking.
Lol wtf
You can't think of shit
The only thinking that happens when you respond to me is "how can I post something to make him seem stupid?" and they come off as very poor replies
The only thinking that relates to stupidity is happening when I'm reading your replies.
Such a good counter argument
Good job OP you win
It's only reasonable to give up when you've lost.
Good for you.
>taking me seriously
I have never in my life taken a clown seriously.
Well you seem to be taking yourself pretty seriously
Care to give an example of me taking myself seriously? You're full of shit, and nothing to back it up.
2357
« on: January 25, 2015, 12:11:09 PM »
That's like asking why do we have heads
Are you aware of your stupidity?
How do the two even connect?
Try connecting what you said. If you don't have a head, then you don't have a brain = question unsolved
You're just furthering this, for no reason other than that you're trying to imitate my response. You fail however.
...
Are you retarded?
Can you not tell that I'm just copying what you said in my thread instead of actually trying to be serious?
Or do you always try to twist my words for no other reason than to hate me?
Are you retarded?
Can you not read that I included that you're trying to copy what I said in your thread?
Or are you just always trying to enjoy life so much that you don't think? Perhaps you're only capable of rudimentary thinking.
Lol wtf
You can't think of shit
The only thinking that happens when you respond to me is "how can I post something to make him seem stupid?" and they come off as very poor replies
The only thinking that relates to stupidity is happening when I'm reading your replies.
Such a good counter argument
Good job OP you win
It's only reasonable to give up when you've lost.
Good for you.
>taking me seriously
I have never in my life taken a clown seriously.
2358
« on: January 25, 2015, 12:09:33 PM »
That's like asking why we have feet.
We have feet to stand
Why do we have toes though?
No, our legs are for standing.
Lol try standing without your feet
Lol try standing without your toes
I'm pretty sure I can get use to standing with an inch off my foot
Lol try surviving with only walking like a moron anywhere between 1000 bc-1600 ad
That sentence made no logical sense
Not if you consider that you're trying to compensate for no toes. If you have no toes, you can't walk normally, and thus sprinting would prove even harder.
How would you move around efficiently? How would you hunt, and fight? How would you work without being able to walk normally?
Lol sure I would have trouble for a couple of days but I'm sure I can get use to it
It's just an inch off my feet which really isn't much
Fine, then chop of your toes. Eventually, they should stop existing in your line of predecessors. If not, then the toe will still be there, because they serve a function. There's no reason for it to disappear, so it won't, but if you give it a reason for long enough, then it will.
What the fuck kind of logic is this?
You do know that toes use to be longer and used for climbing when we were apes right?
And the reason we still have them is because evolution hasn't gotten rid of them yet?
Speaking of evolution, do you even know the first thing about it or are you using Lamarck's logic?
Chopping off your toes won't mean that your children are born without toes lol
And you meant successors, not predecessors
Don't try to make me seem retarded when you can't get facts straight yourself
"And the reason we still have them is because evolution hasn't gotten rid of them yet?" please stop repeating my words, jackass. So you're telling me that your successors won't be influenced by anything that their predecessors did, and went through? Then tell me, why are some more hairy than others? Our bodies adapt, and our brains are adjusted ever so slightly. Exercising alters the DNA, so I imagine exercising different parts of your body for millions of years would have an effect, which would make the toes useless. Your dna would be altered for less space taken up by the toes, and eventually they'd disappear. The only thing I got wrong was the predecessor part.
2359
« on: January 25, 2015, 12:04:36 PM »
That's like asking why do we have heads
Are you aware of your stupidity?
How do the two even connect?
Try connecting what you said. If you don't have a head, then you don't have a brain = question unsolved
You're just furthering this, for no reason other than that you're trying to imitate my response. You fail however.
...
Are you retarded?
Can you not tell that I'm just copying what you said in my thread instead of actually trying to be serious?
Or do you always try to twist my words for no other reason than to hate me?
Are you retarded?
Can you not read that I included that you're trying to copy what I said in your thread?
Or are you just always trying to enjoy life so much that you don't think? Perhaps you're only capable of rudimentary thinking.
Lol wtf
You can't think of shit
The only thinking that happens when you respond to me is "how can I post something to make him seem stupid?" and they come off as very poor replies
The only thinking that relates to stupidity is happening when I'm reading your replies.
Such a good counter argument
Good job OP you win
It's only reasonable to give up when you've lost. Good for you.
2360
« on: January 25, 2015, 12:03:25 PM »
Stopped reading after "poo"
2361
« on: January 25, 2015, 12:01:34 PM »
That's like asking why do we have heads
Are you aware of your stupidity?
How do the two even connect?
Try connecting what you said. If you don't have a head, then you don't have a brain = question unsolved
You're just furthering this, for no reason other than that you're trying to imitate my response. You fail however.
...
Are you retarded?
Can you not tell that I'm just copying what you said in my thread instead of actually trying to be serious?
Or do you always try to twist my words for no other reason than to hate me?
Are you retarded?
Can you not read that I included that you're trying to copy what I said in your thread?
Or are you just always trying to enjoy life so much that you don't think? Perhaps you're only capable of rudimentary thinking.
Lol wtf
You can't think of shit
The only thinking that happens when you respond to me is "how can I post something to make him seem stupid?" and they come off as very poor replies
The only thinking that relates to stupidity is happening when I'm reading your replies.
2362
« on: January 25, 2015, 11:57:56 AM »
That's like asking why we have feet.
We have feet to stand
Why do we have toes though?
No, our legs are for standing.
Lol try standing without your feet
Lol try standing without your toes
I'm pretty sure I can get use to standing with an inch off my foot
Lol try surviving with only walking like a moron anywhere between 1000 bc-1600 ad
That sentence made no logical sense
Not if you consider that you're trying to compensate for no toes. If you have no toes, you can't walk normally, and thus sprinting would prove even harder.
How would you move around efficiently? How would you hunt, and fight? How would you work without being able to walk normally?
Lol sure I would have trouble for a couple of days but I'm sure I can get use to it
It's just an inch off my feet which really isn't much
Fine, then chop of your toes. Eventually, they should stop existing in your line of predecessors. If not, then the toe will still be there, because they serve a function. There's no reason for it to disappear, so it won't, but if you give it a reason for long enough, then it will.
2363
« on: January 25, 2015, 11:53:38 AM »
That's like asking why do we have heads
Are you aware of your stupidity?
How do the two even connect?
Try connecting what you said. If you don't have a head, then you don't have a brain = question unsolved
You're just furthering this, for no reason other than that you're trying to imitate my response. You fail however.
...
Are you retarded?
Can you not tell that I'm just copying what you said in my thread instead of actually trying to be serious?
Or do you always try to twist my words for no other reason than to hate me?
Are you retarded? Can you not read that I included that you're trying to copy what I said in your thread? Or are you just always trying to enjoy life so much that you don't think? Perhaps you're only capable of rudimentary thinking.
2364
« on: January 25, 2015, 11:48:44 AM »
That's like asking why we have feet.
We have feet to stand
Why do we have toes though?
No, our legs are for standing.
Lol try standing without your feet
Lol try standing without your toes
I'm pretty sure I can get use to standing with an inch off my foot
Lol try surviving with only walking like a moron anywhere between 1000 bc-1600 ad
That sentence made no logical sense
Not if you consider that you're trying to compensate for no toes. If you have no toes, you can't walk normally, and thus sprinting would prove even harder. How would you move around efficiently? How would you hunt, and fight? How would you work without being able to walk normally?
2365
« on: January 25, 2015, 11:46:55 AM »
That's like asking why do we have heads
Are you aware of your stupidity? How do the two even connect? Try connecting what you said. If you don't have a head, then you don't have a brain = question unsolved You're just furthering this, for no reason other than that you're trying to imitate my response. You fail however.
2366
« on: January 25, 2015, 11:42:35 AM »
That's like asking why we have feet.
We have feet to stand
Why do we have toes though?
No, our legs are for standing.
Lol try standing without your feet
Lol try standing without your toes
I'm pretty sure I can get use to standing with an inch off my foot
Lol try surviving with only walking like a moron anywhere between 1000 bc-1600 ad
2367
« on: January 25, 2015, 11:40:34 AM »
T4R
inb4 joke on my expense
2368
« on: January 25, 2015, 11:39:20 AM »
That's like asking why we have feet.
We have feet to stand
Why do we have toes though?
No, our legs are for standing.
Lol try standing without your feet
Lol try standing without your toes
2369
« on: January 25, 2015, 11:36:30 AM »
That's like asking why we have feet.
We have feet to stand
Why do we have toes though?
No, our legs are for standing.
2370
« on: January 25, 2015, 11:36:11 AM »
Balance.
I agree, his stupidity does outweigh his reason, and balance is needed.
Pages: 1 ... 777879 8081 ... 176
|
Show Posts
