This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - w/e
Pages: 1 ... 646566 6768 ... 176
1951
« on: February 15, 2015, 04:00:15 AM »
 I'm global
1952
« on: February 15, 2015, 03:41:55 AM »
>killing the joke
1953
« on: February 14, 2015, 05:17:59 PM »
Not gonna deal with your shit right now
1954
« on: February 14, 2015, 05:05:42 PM »
in my mind lolololol
is that you people hate me because I'm incoherent at times where the majority is offline.
1955
« on: February 14, 2015, 05:03:11 PM »
Besides basics
1956
« on: February 14, 2015, 05:02:47 PM »
Why don't you post any information about you IRL?
1957
« on: February 14, 2015, 05:01:37 PM »
ok good
1958
« on: February 14, 2015, 04:58:58 PM »
I tried cooking once.
It cost me money, and the result? The sauce had too much sugar, making the whol- oh right, the rice was also really mooshy and undry, but it was among the best dish I've ever eaten... if one could ignore the incredible sweetness where it reached a point where your head started to hurt.
Chicken and rice with some red sauce.
1959
« on: February 14, 2015, 04:55:07 PM »
1960
« on: February 14, 2015, 04:43:19 PM »
No, that side is a side I've always stood on.
It's highly narcissistical, and boring.
1961
« on: February 14, 2015, 04:39:25 PM »
>start typing 9ga
>blow air out of my nose as a sign of laughter
>close the window
I'm starting to lose it
1962
« on: February 14, 2015, 04:31:28 PM »
I'm not in a minority that's thought about "S'all good, man", right?
1963
« on: February 14, 2015, 04:23:25 PM »
Man that sure is interesting thank you forsharing man thank you
1964
« on: February 14, 2015, 04:19:27 PM »
Wait, wouldn't St. Valentine be equivalent of this holiday in comparison of Santa to Christmas?
Or in modern times...
Chocolate? But that's stealing Easter (and we all know who the mascot for Easter is).
I'm not talking about St. V, but rather V's day and what it stands for.
Geez, am I really that unclear?
It can be analyzed in many ways and different conclusions will be arrived upon, but you obviously don't want to discuss it that much, and are more likely just talking to yourself while still wanting to influence surroundings.
I bet you'd hate to discuss the comparisons.
Not necessarily.
On consumerism and it's effect on interpersonal relationships I'd be alright talking about it, it's just that I didn't want to open up many wounds last night >.>
On a romantic basis and why I think personal affection is doomed we could have a more expansive conversation (because it wouldn't mostly be conjecture on my end).
I think you could easily identify with the statement,
"Language is a somewhat inefficient means of communication"
I thought that since you made the note about Santa and Christmas and reflecting the experience to Easter that you meant the figure representing the holiday. I usually have to get beyond the immediate meaning of your posts to try and understand you better. It's like reading Hemmingway, actually.
I am alien with that statement, so to speak.
I was trying to be specific as to say that the day has the same meaning of Santa on Christmas; for kids and not really anything that exists outside of kids' minds.
With Hemmingway he utilizes the Iceberg technique, where most of the content in a piece is implicit as opposed to explicitly stated.
I wasn't including his style of "athletic prose" in this comparison, though >.>
When most people don't really consider a perspective of reality not native to their own, I'd extend that to adults additionally.
You do realize that to view a different reality you'll have to change yours, right?
The implication from your post above is that I haven't.
Which isn't true. The early stages of my life reversed many notions a majority of the populace holds.
No implication other than ignorance, or just wanting to remind you
1965
« on: February 14, 2015, 04:15:48 PM »
Wait, wouldn't St. Valentine be equivalent of this holiday in comparison of Santa to Christmas?
Or in modern times...
Chocolate? But that's stealing Easter (and we all know who the mascot for Easter is).
I'm not talking about St. V, but rather V's day and what it stands for.
Geez, am I really that unclear?
It can be analyzed in many ways and different conclusions will be arrived upon, but you obviously don't want to discuss it that much, and are more likely just talking to yourself while still wanting to influence surroundings.
I bet you'd hate to discuss the comparisons.
Not necessarily.
On consumerism and it's effect on interpersonal relationships I'd be alright talking about it, it's just that I didn't want to open up many wounds last night >.>
On a romantic basis and why I think personal affection is doomed we could have a more expansive conversation (because it wouldn't mostly be conjecture on my end).
I think you could easily identify with the statement,
"Language is a somewhat inefficient means of communication"
I thought that since you made the note about Santa and Christmas and reflecting the experience to Easter that you meant the figure representing the holiday. I usually have to get beyond the immediate meaning of your posts to try and understand you better. It's like reading Hemmingway, actually.
I am alien with that statement, so to speak.
I was trying to be specific as to say that the day has the same meaning of Santa on Christmas; for kids and not really anything that exists outside of kids' minds.
With Hemmingway he utilizes the Iceberg technique, where most of the content in a piece is implicit as opposed to explicitly stated.
I wasn't including his style of "athletic prose" in this comparison, though >.>
When most people don't really consider a perspective of reality not native to their own, I'd extend that to adults additionally.
You do realize that to view a different reality you'll have to change yours, right? Edit: I get what you meant, but I also responded to it Maybe I just think that I understand what you think I don't understand Oh wait, my reply was in the other thread
1966
« on: February 14, 2015, 04:13:51 PM »
At the current age I'm already having too many doubts about what I've done.
"Oh no, I shouldn't have written that thing that Iw as thinking about when I was writing the sentence. I should have used the other thing which I came to conclude would be the better thing to use"
At bathroom
Then I realize that I did in fact use that word
1967
« on: February 14, 2015, 04:10:03 PM »
Actually, OP, I get those rushes to similar stimuli.
I've been thinking more about directing them into emotional drive for thought expansion by chaining them together continuously.
addictions can be dangerous, so do it moderately
But I've also got a lot of other things on my mind relating to stuff like this, and this site doesn't help me in getting around to them >.>
I could abandon this place altogether and none of my ambitions would be any closer to fulfillment.
Oh, I thought of that sentence in the sense that the site was to help with getting through those ideas.
Language is an inefficient means of communication in some ways.
It could be interpreted both ways.
Language is objective, whereas the mind is not. Are you implying that we should find subjective ways of communicating? Sure, we'd be able to understand each other more, but at the same time we'd know too much, and there'd be those who we wouldn't be able to communicate with as standards don't collide. Language is fine enough for me, but it is my mind that is not suitable for what you seek. If one can understand the different versions, and apply each and one of them to the character's profile one could guess which- actually, sometimes it comes to you at an instant once you've thought of one option. I didn't consider another possibility. I am content with language - that statement tells a lot about me if you can get into my way of thinking, which would be difficult as you'd have to experience a lot of what I have. Edit: Great minds think alike, which means that great minds understand each other, but for the common folk the ideas are nonsensical. It is not that great minds think alike, but that some minds think alike, whereas some don't.
1968
« on: February 14, 2015, 04:04:31 PM »
Wait, wouldn't St. Valentine be equivalent of this holiday in comparison of Santa to Christmas?
Or in modern times...
Chocolate? But that's stealing Easter (and we all know who the mascot for Easter is).
I'm not talking about St. V, but rather V's day and what it stands for.
Geez, am I really that unclear?
It can be analyzed in many ways and different conclusions will be arrived upon, but you obviously don't want to discuss it that much, and are more likely just talking to yourself while still wanting to influence surroundings.
I bet you'd hate to discuss the comparisons.
Not necessarily.
On consumerism and it's effect on interpersonal relationships I'd be alright talking about it, it's just that I didn't want to open up many wounds last night >.>
On a romantic basis and why I think personal affection is doomed we could have a more expansive conversation (because it wouldn't mostly be conjecture on my end).
I think you could easily identify with the statement,
"Language is a somewhat inefficient means of communication"
I thought that since you made the note about Santa and Christmas and reflecting the experience to Easter that you meant the figure representing the holiday. I usually have to get beyond the immediate meaning of your posts to try and understand you better. It's like reading Hemmingway, actually.
I am alien with that statement, so to speak. I was trying to be specific as to say that the day has the same meaning of Santa on Christmas; for kids and not really anything that exists outside of kids' minds.
1969
« on: February 14, 2015, 04:00:15 PM »
Actually, OP, I get those rushes to similar stimuli.
I've been thinking more about directing them into emotional drive for thought expansion by chaining them together continuously.
addictions can be dangerous, so do it moderately
But I've also got a lot of other things on my mind relating to stuff like this, and this site doesn't help me in getting around to them >.>
I could abandon this place altogether and none of my ambitions would be any closer to fulfillment.
Oh, I thought of that sentence in the sense that the site was to help with getting through those ideas.
1970
« on: February 14, 2015, 03:54:19 PM »
Actually, OP, I get those rushes to similar stimuli.
I've been thinking more about directing them into emotional drive for thought expansion by chaining them together continuously.
addictions can be dangerous, so do it moderately
If I could get addicted to learning with ideal motivation I'd never stop.
Why would it be a bad thing?
Oh. I'm trying to find out if it can exist, somewhat. But I've also got a lot of other things on my mind relating to stuff like this, and this site doesn't help me in getting around to them >.>
If such a thing were possible I'd probably abandon my health- and social life (if you can call it that). Yeah, the site really sucks at that kind of stuff, which is annoying.
1971
« on: February 14, 2015, 03:49:26 PM »
Actually, OP, I get those rushes to similar stimuli.
I've been thinking more about directing them into emotional drive for thought expansion by chaining them together continuously.
addictions can be dangerous, so do it moderately Edit: But I doubt a perfect such state can exist
1972
« on: February 14, 2015, 03:48:20 PM »
Wait, wouldn't St. Valentine be equivalent of this holiday in comparison of Santa to Christmas?
Or in modern times...
Chocolate? But that's stealing Easter (and we all know who the mascot for Easter is).
I'm not talking about St. V, but rather V's day and what it stands for. Geez, am I really that unclear? It can be analyzed in many ways and different conclusions will be arrived upon, but you obviously don't want to discuss it that much, and are more likely just talking to yourself while still wanting to influence surroundings. I bet you'd hate to discuss the comparisons.
1973
« on: February 14, 2015, 03:45:25 PM »
I'd say mine is learning stuff that I care about when I feel like it.
inb4 literally anything. comeon you know what I'm talking about
1974
« on: February 14, 2015, 03:41:15 PM »
I didn't even know it was Valentine's day today until some hour ago or so, but either way it doesn't matter.
Valentine's day is the equivalence to Santa on Christmas.
1975
« on: February 14, 2015, 03:08:46 PM »
Maybe.
Are you addicted to making posts?
Gotta keep up that 81 per day count somehow.
Min fråga var fullt-ut seriös.
1976
« on: February 14, 2015, 03:03:46 PM »
Maybe part of the issue is inhabiting multiple personalities.
What does that statement imply?
Potential to have dull and interesting personalities respectively.
Interest is personally assigned, it hinges on perspective, so I might find one of my personas interesting from an internal view while no external parties notice them.
So basically letting some show more? I can't make much sense of how the two replies are connected. Did you mean part of the solution?
1977
« on: February 14, 2015, 03:01:57 PM »
Maybe.
Are you addicted to making posts?
1978
« on: February 14, 2015, 02:59:07 PM »
Maybe part of the issue is inhabiting multiple personalities.
What does that statement imply?
1979
« on: February 14, 2015, 02:46:13 PM »
and you're probably really dull to be around.
1980
« on: February 14, 2015, 01:41:23 PM »
No
Pages: 1 ... 646566 6768 ... 176
|
Show Posts
