2851
The Flood / Re: 6.5. inch dicks are the perfect size
« on: November 24, 2014, 04:30:19 PM »>.>You're pretty gay, mang.
<.<
I see my notoriously homosexual reputation proceeds me.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 2851
The Flood / Re: 6.5. inch dicks are the perfect size« on: November 24, 2014, 04:30:19 PM »>.>You're pretty gay, mang. 2852
Serious / Re: A decision regarding Darren Wilson/Mike Brown has been reached« on: November 24, 2014, 04:27:10 PM »I'm Spartacus!I'm Ferguson no matter what.No, I'M Ferguson 2853
Serious / Re: A decision regarding Darren Wilson/Mike Brown has been reached« on: November 24, 2014, 04:25:03 PM »
I have a feeling shits about to get real in Ferguson no matter what.
2854
Serious / Re: I think it's time for another "controversial opinions" thread« on: November 24, 2014, 04:22:56 PM »-Humans should be cloned and farmed for organs-not very economical, especially when we can just grow them in vitro or even print them -not sure we'd need that many, but that's the spirit. 2855
The Flood / Re: ITT: The worst kinds of people« on: November 24, 2014, 04:20:18 PM »ftfybut dude, weed makes you feel OK w/ everything. . .unless of course it makes you paranoid. . .or nauseous. . .it's not for everyone.obnoxious straight edge peoplealmost as bad as obnoxious stoners 2856
The Flood / Re: ITT: The worst kinds of people« on: November 24, 2014, 04:18:32 PM »nope, it's OK to smoke just as long you're not completely retarded about it.ill assume that wasnt a personal attack and agree with youobnoxious straight edge peoplealmost as bad as obnoxious stoners 2857
The Flood / Re: ITT: The worst kinds of people« on: November 24, 2014, 04:15:58 PM »obnoxious straight edge peoplealmost as bad as obnoxious stoners 2858
Serious / Re: Anti-GG block list targets neutral David Pakman« on: November 24, 2014, 04:15:20 PM »Can't you keep all this gg shit in one thread like Camnator has to do with his police articles?That's probably a good idea honestly. Like an archive. We can have a group of people contribute shit to it. 2859
The Flood / Re: ITT: The worst kinds of people« on: November 24, 2014, 04:12:04 PM »-Those who constantly borrow your shit with no intention of ever getting their own. You allow them the first time, thinking it'll be only once they'll need it, but then it's constant. Then when you finally say no, they act as if you're the asshole.kill them 2860
Serious / Re: I think it's time for another "controversial opinions" thread« on: November 24, 2014, 04:05:46 PM »You don't think it be like it is, but it do.The Green Energy lobby doesn't have nearly the amount of money that the GMO lobby does.what you mean just like the green energy lobby does for the climate scientists?Who do you think has more money to pay off "researchers": the multi-billion dollar GMO industry, or the small percentage of awake Americans who oppose it? There's a reason GMOs are banned in nearly every first world country.> mfw you never even clicked that link full of studies, all of which were performed by third parties and published in third party genetics, biology and agricultural journalsAre you kidding me? It's not "icky", it's fucking poison. Giving people food that causes cancer, heart failure, and a shitload of other diseases in't a solution to hunger.it's inherently wrong? what the fuck does that even mean? I'm not even going to go into the general shittiness of that kind of assertion.Universal consensus doesn't mean shit. Generically modifying food to be more filling, or resist insects, or whatever, is inherently wrong. Talk to be when you're not brainwashed by the corporate conglomerate anymore.If you support GMOs in any way, you're a fucking confirmed retard.please try again when there isn't a near universal consensus that they are fine. http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2012/07/28/602151/bombshell-koch-funded-study-finds-global-warming-is-real-on-the-high-end-and-essentially-all-due-to-carbon-pollution/ Case in point, this study was funded by the fucking Koch's. If there was ever a scientific study where the person funding it wanted a certain outcome it's this one. Guess what? They confirmed global warming. Here's your problem. You assume researchers go into research to become rich. Lol, no. If a scientifically minded person wants money they go into engineering. The sheer dissonance of your stance is that these studies are not funded by GMO lobby where as your studies are in almost all cases funded directly by anti-GMO conspiracy theorists. 2861
Serious / Re: I think it's time for another "controversial opinions" thread« on: November 24, 2014, 03:45:07 PM »what you mean just like the green energy lobby does for the climate scientists?Who do you think has more money to pay off "researchers": the multi-billion dollar GMO industry, or the small percentage of awake Americans who oppose it? There's a reason GMOs are banned in nearly every first world country.> mfw you never even clicked that link full of studies, all of which were performed by third parties and published in third party genetics, biology and agricultural journalsAre you kidding me? It's not "icky", it's fucking poison. Giving people food that causes cancer, heart failure, and a shitload of other diseases in't a solution to hunger.it's inherently wrong? what the fuck does that even mean? I'm not even going to go into the general shittiness of that kind of assertion.Universal consensus doesn't mean shit. Generically modifying food to be more filling, or resist insects, or whatever, is inherently wrong. Talk to be when you're not brainwashed by the corporate conglomerate anymore.If you support GMOs in any way, you're a fucking confirmed retard.please try again when there isn't a near universal consensus that they are fine. /ohmygodtheamountofsarcasmhere 2862
Serious / Re: I think it's time for another "controversial opinions" thread« on: November 24, 2014, 03:42:59 PM »GMOs cut down on the number of chemicals used on crops because they are made to be naturally resistant to pests and diseases. Less herbicides/pesticides=safer crops, go figure.Selective breeding isn't what I'm talking about. I'm talking about chemicals, spraying, and actually changing the genetic makeup of the food with poisons.Are you kidding me? It's not "icky", it's fucking poison. Giving people food that causes cancer, heart failure, and a shitload of other diseases isn't a solution to hunger.it's inherently wrong? what the fuck does that even mean? I'm not even going to go into the general shittiness of that kind of assertion.Universal consensus doesn't mean shit. Generically modifying food to be more filling, or resist insects, or whatever, is inherently wrong. Talk to be when you're not brainwashed by the corporate conglomerate anymore.If you support GMOs in any way, you're a fucking confirmed retard.please try again when there isn't a near universal consensus that they are fine. 2863
Serious / Re: I think it's time for another "controversial opinions" thread« on: November 24, 2014, 03:40:43 PM »> mfw you never even clicked that link full of studies, all of which were performed by third parties and published in third party genetics, biology and agricultural journalsAre you kidding me? It's not "icky", it's fucking poison. Giving people food that causes cancer, heart failure, and a shitload of other diseases in't a solution to hunger.it's inherently wrong? what the fuck does that even mean? I'm not even going to go into the general shittiness of that kind of assertion.Universal consensus doesn't mean shit. Generically modifying food to be more filling, or resist insects, or whatever, is inherently wrong. Talk to be when you're not brainwashed by the corporate conglomerate anymore.If you support GMOs in any way, you're a fucking confirmed retard.please try again when there isn't a near universal consensus that they are fine. > mfw you have a far lower number of studies to point too, most of which have been shown to suffer from experimental inconsistency and bias http://m.voanews.com/a/in-kenya-calls-grow-to-lift-controversial-gmo-ban/2527833.html Ayyyy 2864
The Flood / Re: ITT: The worst kinds of people« on: November 24, 2014, 03:27:53 PM »
> being in this thread
I'm shitty too. 2865
Serious / Re: I think it's time for another "controversial opinions" thread« on: November 24, 2014, 03:24:37 PM »it's inherently wrong? what the fuck does that even mean? I'm not even going to go into the general shittiness of that kind of assertion.Universal consensus doesn't mean shit. Generically modifying food to be more filling, or resist insects, or whatever, is inherently wrong. Talk to be when you're not brainwashed by the corporate conglomerate anymore.If you support GMOs in any way, you're a fucking confirmed retard.please try again when there isn't a near universal consensus that they are fine. Letting people starve because you think genetically modified food is icky poses a bigger ethical problem. 2866
Serious / Re: I think it's time for another "controversial opinions" thread« on: November 24, 2014, 03:16:31 PM »If you support GMOs in any way, you're a fucking confirmed retard.please try again when there isn't a near universal consensus that they are fine. http://www.geneticliteracyproject.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Ge-crops-safety-pub-list-1.xls scroll to bottom and click that list of almost 2,000 studies If you wanna talk about Monsanto's business model and abuse of policy then yeah. 2867
Serious / Re: I think it's time for another "controversial opinions" thread« on: November 24, 2014, 03:02:42 PM »And because I'm quite obviously the most intelligent person here, if you disagree with me, you're wrong.-Having the attraction isn't, necessarily. acting on it can be. -eh, whatever the case we're never leaving that part of the world -nothing quite as dangerous as a wacko that believes he has a divine duty to kill you -I can maybe agree w/ this, ever read Larry Niven's Known Space? There is a thing that can be abused to cause direct pleasure to the brain, it actually created a Darwinian selection effect in humans for self-control. -if by that you mean there is always a physical affliction? Our minds are a product of a physical system, that's not really controversial, nor should it be. -their both pretty shitty, but yeah collateral damage poses the biggest ethical issue. -eh -eh -at this point it's the only course of action, that and geo-engineering, risky but. . .you know, terraforming. -eh -within reason -exceptionally lucky? -monetary policy is boring -FUCKING THIS -automation is a powerful driver for it 2868
The Flood / Re: 6.5. inch dicks are the perfect size« on: November 24, 2014, 02:29:08 PM »You do realize that that chart was made to sell men w/ penor insecurities a product that probably doesn't work, right? 2869
The Flood / Re: Do you think Bill Cosby is innocent?« on: November 24, 2014, 02:22:31 PM »
It's doesn't matter how many allegations are made, if that's all they have then don't expect it to hold up in court.
Trial by tabloid is one of the more obnoxious aspects of our culture. 2870
Serious / Re: Need a paper topic about control and influence« on: November 24, 2014, 12:58:19 PM »
I didn't mean to sound like I was shoving you off.
Give me a little and I can probably get you a run down along w/ some source material. 2871
Serious / Re: Need a paper topic about control and influence« on: November 24, 2014, 12:03:55 PM »I was joking. Unless of course you'd like to do a paper on control and reaction management through physical feedback.Control theory. 2872
The Flood / Re: Now that Comms Officer is back« on: November 24, 2014, 12:02:21 PM »that's zesty.He is not back.He isn't.He renamed his profile to Leroy Bilbo 2873
Serious / Re: Need a paper topic about control and influence« on: November 24, 2014, 12:01:05 PM »
Control theory.
2875
The Flood / Re: New monitor, AMA« on: November 24, 2014, 11:55:59 AM »I wouldn't know. I've never owned any reptiles much bigger than a gecko. 2876
The Flood / Re: BABIES SCIENCE IN THW EOMB« on: November 24, 2014, 11:52:05 AM »I read somewhere that babies, even after they leave the womb, possess total enlightenment, which they lose as the world imposes on them. This is the face of an enlightened individual. 2877
The Flood / Re: New monitor, AMA« on: November 24, 2014, 11:50:06 AM »> my brain every time I see "monitor" 2878
The Flood / Re: New monitor, AMA« on: November 24, 2014, 11:33:27 AM »How do you feel about your promotion leaving you with the ugliest default colour profile and font? 2879
The Flood / Re: Jurassic World Teaser Trailer« on: November 24, 2014, 11:29:49 AM »I can't take Jurassic park seriously after that video of the harmonica... 2880
The Flood / Re: Jurassic World Teaser Trailer« on: November 24, 2014, 11:28:22 AM »They're back on Nublar, right?I don't see the trouble w/ splicing. It's played a major plot point in the book and first movie, of course they'd take it a step further. Spoiler I heard rumors some visitors were going to stumble on the ruins of the old park and discover wild raptors, sounds like that's probably true. |