This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - The Lord Slide Rule
Pages: 1 ... 666768 6970 ... 144
2011
« on: January 26, 2015, 04:09:59 PM »
Sorry, I'm never giving CFA another penny.
you're not making the cathys any less rich and bigoted by not enjoying their delicious, gay-hating chicken
op: the spicy sandwich is better imo
That's true, but I cannot, in good faith, give money to a company that uses it in such a fashion.
Sure you can, just remember the money you're giving them has probably been in the ass crack of a stripper. . .maybe even a gay stripper.
2012
« on: January 26, 2015, 04:07:49 PM »
ITT: Why reading URLs before clicking them is an essential life skill
truly, a lesson worth learning
2013
« on: January 26, 2015, 03:57:35 PM »
Zen gon git catfished.
edit: looks at tru's post. . .wait a minute. . .
2014
« on: January 26, 2015, 03:15:01 PM »
This would be an actual example of rape by deception:
In California, on February 20, 2009, Julio Morales snuck into a sleeping 18-year-old woman’s darkened bedroom after he saw her boyfriend leave. The woman said she awoke to the sensation of someone having sex with her and assumed it was her boyfriend. When a ray of light hit Morales’s face, and the woman saw he was not her boyfriend, she fought back and Morales fled. The woman called her boyfriend, who then called the police. Julio Morales was convicted of rape under two concepts. He was guilty of rape because he began having sex with the woman while she was still asleep and, therefore, unable to consent. He was also guilty of rape-by-fraud because he had impersonated the woman’s boyfriend in order to gain her consent pretty sure that's just rape.
2015
« on: January 25, 2015, 07:27:14 PM »
YOU STUPID FAGOTS GOD DOES NOT EVEN REEL
2016
« on: January 25, 2015, 07:23:10 PM »
dewitfgt
2017
« on: January 25, 2015, 01:37:15 PM »
No interstellar 0/10
Implying Interstellar deserves a spot on this list...
Better than 2001: A Snorefest
If you think it's better than 2001 I'll have to check it out.
don't listen to that fgt. It's pretty good but it'll never be better than 2001.
Take off your nostalgia glasses ffs, Interstellar was amazing
interstellar was great. 2001 was just better, especially in its vision of what's it's like to travel through outer space. Also, fucking Kubrick mane.
2018
« on: January 24, 2015, 08:13:09 PM »
<- mfw MATLAB can't run on any of my computers
hm, I guess I ought to read moral naturalist literature. . .
watch somw sam harris lectures
One day I'll have to sit you down and explain why Sam Harris isn't taken seriously on philosophy forums
Is-ought problem
You and meta
Go.
One day when I'm not doing Lin Alg
One day
>tfw doing my Lin alg and statics and charter shits the bed
that's a bitch, are you dealing w/ big systems?
2019
« on: January 24, 2015, 07:58:09 PM »
hm, I guess I ought to read moral naturalist literature. . .
watch somw sam harris lectures
One day I'll have to sit you down and explain why Sam Harris isn't taken seriously on philosophy forums
Is-ought problem
You and meta
Go.
One day when I'm not doing Lin Alg
One day
>tfw doing my Lin alg and statics and charter shits the bed
2020
« on: January 24, 2015, 07:51:20 PM »
hm, I guess I ought to read moral naturalist literature. . .
watch somw sam harris lectures
One day I'll have to sit you down and explain why Sam Harris isn't taken seriously on philosophy forums
Is-ought problem You and meta Go.
2021
« on: January 24, 2015, 06:32:18 PM »
Statics homework, whoo!
2022
« on: January 24, 2015, 06:13:53 PM »
2023
« on: January 24, 2015, 06:07:20 PM »
Something along the lines of: I don't want to die, so I assume you also don't want to die. So then we shouldn't kill each other.
I guess. 
I'll lay my position out in a set of premises, if you like:
- Moral sentences express propositions, are are thus truth-apt
- These propositions relate to objective facts about the world
- These objective facts (moral features) are reducible to non-moral facts.
In this way, we can determine exactly what is (im)moral within a situation, in principle.
But how do you go about deriving moral statements from non-moral facts of reality? How does it not fall afoul of the is-ought problem?
1. some objective fact
2. 
3. what ought to be done
From my understanding a value judgement of some type must always come in at 2 and only from there can an ought be derived. Aren't value judgments almost always subjective?
is ought problem is a joke
all forms of inquire necessarily presuppose some sort of value, like the worth of empiricism and naturalism
hm, I guess I ought to read moral naturalist literature. . .
2024
« on: January 24, 2015, 05:37:47 PM »
Something along the lines of: I don't want to die, so I assume you also don't want to die. So then we shouldn't kill each other.
I guess.
I'll lay my position out in a set of premises, if you like:
- Moral sentences express propositions, are are thus truth-apt
- These propositions relate to objective facts about the world
- These objective facts (moral features) are reducible to non-moral facts.
In this way, we can determine exactly what is (im)moral within a situation, in principle.
But how do you go about deriving moral statements from non-moral facts of reality? How does it not fall afoul of the is-ought problem? 1. some objective fact 2. 3. what ought to be done From my understanding a value judgement of some type must always come in at 2 and only from there can an ought be derived. Aren't value judgments almost always subjective?
2025
« on: January 24, 2015, 02:06:42 PM »
No The Thing 0/10
IMO Raiders will always be the best adventure movie. John Williams+Spielberg+Harrison Ford=Magic
Raiders will always be a classic.
What is the best Spielberg movie?
that's tough. I'm pretty partial to jp though.
2026
« on: January 24, 2015, 02:05:39 PM »
Ban jews.
Canadians are snow jews.
2027
« on: January 24, 2015, 02:00:42 PM »
Why do you antagonize Canadians so Mr. Doorsy
find me one canadian other than you who isn't a shitposter
Find me one American who isn't a shitposter.
literally all of them
http://vocaroo.com/i/s1PclZF1AXFT
who even are you?
I am the thing that keeps you up at night. The evil that haunts every dark corner of your mind. I will never rest... and neither will you.
OK So who are you?
2028
« on: January 24, 2015, 01:59:04 PM »
Why do you antagonize Canadians so Mr. Doorsy
find me one canadian other than you who isn't a shitposter
Find me one American who isn't a shitposter.
literally all of them
http://vocaroo.com/i/s1PclZF1AXFT
who even are you?
that vocaroo is audio of me laughing
oh, question still remains. I have no idea who they are. Also, is your avatar who I think it is?
2029
« on: January 24, 2015, 01:56:41 PM »
Why do you antagonize Canadians so Mr. Doorsy
find me one canadian other than you who isn't a shitposter
Find me one American who isn't a shitposter.
literally all of them
http://vocaroo.com/i/s1PclZF1AXFT
who even are you?
2030
« on: January 24, 2015, 01:52:47 PM »
fukenlol
2031
« on: January 24, 2015, 01:28:16 PM »
No The Thing 0/10
IMO Raiders will always be the best adventure movie. John Williams+Spielberg+Harrison Ford=Magic
Raiders will always be a classic.
2032
« on: January 24, 2015, 01:25:23 PM »
Because you touch yourself at night.
2033
« on: January 24, 2015, 01:20:57 PM »
No interstellar 0/10
Implying Interstellar deserves a spot on this list...
Better than 2001: A Snorefest
If you think it's better than 2001 I'll have to check it out.
don't listen to that fgt. It's pretty good but it'll never be better than 2001.
2034
« on: January 24, 2015, 01:20:11 PM »
No The Thing 0/10
2035
« on: January 24, 2015, 12:57:34 PM »
Right and wrong isn't subjective; morality is based on factual propositions. People can clearly be wrong about right and wrong, and you should tell them as such.
Allow me to derail this thread. In saying that moral statements can be right or wrong are you merely saying they are propositional statements with a true or false value or are you saying that can be derived non-subjectively? I would argue that while moral statements can be true or false, they are ultimately based on assignment of value which, in my understanding, is pretty much always subjective. There for the truth value would only be with respect to how well they reflect that individuals or communities values. I'm sure I'm mistaken. If you're saying moral statements can be derived from non-moral aspects of reality, I'm really unsure as to how that works, an explanation would be nice.
2036
« on: January 23, 2015, 07:47:59 PM »
2037
« on: January 23, 2015, 07:44:07 PM »
King Crimson?
2038
« on: January 23, 2015, 10:55:41 AM »
Meta-memeing. . .dear god what have we done?
2039
« on: January 23, 2015, 10:53:06 AM »
I sharted, thanks Obama.
2040
« on: January 23, 2015, 10:51:48 AM »
uh...we have some of the same DNA as bananas >.>
50% actually
Doesn't that make us 50% cannibals if we eat bananas?
Yes
cannibalism is tasty
Pages: 1 ... 666768 6970 ... 144
|
Show Posts
