Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - The Lord Slide Rule

Pages: 1 ... 373839 4041 ... 144
1141
Serious / Re: Hume's Fork is self-refuting
« on: April 28, 2015, 03:49:44 PM »
Though many logical proofs are most readily accomplished by contradiction (not synthetic), they're also accomplished using induction
Induction, however, is imperfect. Always is, and always will be. IIRC, Kant uses the example of the Second Law of Thermodynamics as an example of such a proposition, and yet I think it's unfair to categorise this as a truly a priori proposition. It may well be applicable in all circumstances we ever find, but in line with Hume I think it's really more of an incredibly strong conjecture, warranted by significant empirical evidence.

Although, having actually read GEB, you probably have a better grasp on the idea.

I think there's a strong argument for the entirety of our natural laws to be derived from induction; being able to be proved through analytic means just reinforces their certainty.

I think piranha wanted to talk about the problem of induction, and this seems like a good transition point.
well I wasn't suggesting changing the subject of your thread.

Working on a project now but I'd love to read what both of you have to say about it.

1142
Serious / Re: Hume's Fork is self-refuting
« on: April 28, 2015, 03:04:35 PM »
forgive my dumb but are you saying hume's guillotine should be rejected and hume's fork accepted
Yes.

Quote
as a matter of pragmatics?
That's a rather deep question about the nature of epistemology itself, so I don't really have a well-prepared answer. But, to put it really simply, yes. Epistemology, I think, must be deflationary and pragmatic--and to some degree instrumentalist--in order to make any kind of sense.
well the first quote wasn't required. . .

But I like that second bit. There are certain assumptions which simply must be made we can stand around arguing about them or we can get to the interesting stuff while keeping in mind we may be wrong. Peirce would be proud.

1143
Serious / Re: Hume's Fork is self-refuting
« on: April 28, 2015, 02:48:27 PM »
Synthetic propositions/matters of fact cannot be certain according to Hume.
They aren't and never will be, Hume was right on this.

Quote
As far as I'm aware, he never made an exception for first principles in his schema.
Which is where he was wrong. Whether it was a purposeful omission or he just didn't think of it, his own idea is pretty clearly a presupposition. Philosophy still hadn't figured this out by the 1940s apparently, because the Vienna Circle and the Logical Positivists all maintained ideas of Verificationism while also maintaining Hume's Guillotine.

Which is where the contradiction lies. If you maintain Hume's Guillotine, then Hume's Fork fails dramatically. If you reject Hume's Guillotine, it's quite clear that there is a role for presuppositions in any schema you develop, even if Hume himself never recognised it. And, it seems to me, you must reject Hume's Guillotine. There is a clear role for "oughts" in questions of what "is"; science itself is fundamentally based on Karl Popper's idea of falsificationism, which as you probably know is just a modern re-iteration of certain ideas like fallibilism and empiricism.

You have to pre-suppose things in order to get off the ground; science only ever works when you assume certain values like fallibilism and empiricism and physicalism. The point of epistemology is to make sure your pre-suppositions are actually worth holding.

Hume got one thing right and one thing wrong here, and I think you're essentially looking at the wrong side of the coin.
forgive my dumb but are you saying hume's guillotine should be rejected and hume's fork accepted as a matter of pragmatics?

1144
The Flood / Re: Was the Holocaust justified?
« on: April 28, 2015, 02:04:27 PM »
Yes, entirely

1145
Serious / Re: Hume's Fork is self-refuting
« on: April 28, 2015, 01:47:56 PM »
Gonna do some research. I'd also like to discuss the problem of induction.

1146
The Flood / Re: Power Axe vs Orcrist
« on: April 28, 2015, 01:38:10 PM »
For some reason I thought these were power metal bands.

1147
The Flood / Re: is this not the sexiest case ever?
« on: April 28, 2015, 01:34:59 PM »
That's kinda boring.
But then again, simple things for simple minds... and that's all there are these days.

>not appreciating minimalism

1148
The Flood / Re: Sex dialouge through photos
« on: April 28, 2015, 01:30:08 PM »
Desty what is this?

1149
The Flood / Re: New Dragon Ball anime announced
« on: April 28, 2015, 10:56:29 AM »
>kotaku

Nigger what are you doing

1150
The Flood / Re: I shaved Ushan.
« on: April 28, 2015, 01:26:51 AM »

1151
The Flood / Re: I shaved Ushan.
« on: April 28, 2015, 01:24:52 AM »

1152
The Flood / Re: Pics that sum up your average day
« on: April 28, 2015, 01:15:45 AM »


One eye on the equations the other on the pussy.

1153
The Flood / Re: Becoming offended in the norm
« on: April 28, 2015, 12:16:31 AM »
THEM GOL DERN LIBERALS ER RUINEN DIS 'ERE CUNTREE

I love it when someone takes a radical minority and uses it as a blanket statement across an entire group of people

It's just like conservatives to do such a thing :^)
I hope you realize the amount of irony here
You're not very good at picking up irony so blatantly obvious that it has a face at the end basically synonymous with the word "satire", are you?
I thought that was a passive aggressive smiley not a lololololol smiley

1154
https://youtu.be/WpUKVfU3A2E
ITT pedo songs for das

1155
The Flood / Re: Becoming offended in the norm
« on: April 28, 2015, 12:03:17 AM »
SPEAK ENGLISH OR DIE

1156
The Flood / Re: Becoming offended in the norm
« on: April 28, 2015, 12:01:26 AM »
THEM GOL DERN LIBERALS ER RUINEN DIS 'ERE CUNTREE

I love it when someone takes a radical minority and uses it as a blanket statement across an entire group of people

It's just like conservatives to do such a thing :^)
I hope you realize the amount of irony here

1157
Serious / Re: Baltimore riots continue
« on: April 27, 2015, 11:51:23 PM »

well shit, I concede comms


brb committing sudoku


1158
I wish fgts would keep their politics out of my science.

1159
It's obvious that Global Warming is happening! When the last two years in my area have been cooler than usual all year long

-Dat sarcasm


regional weather patterns=global climate

1160
The Flood / Re: #VOTEVERMIN2016
« on: April 27, 2015, 11:30:32 PM »
You're a filthy fucking Canuck, you don't get an opinion.

1161
Serious / Re: Baltimore riots continue
« on: April 27, 2015, 11:28:10 PM »
>looters are human shit
>well aren't we racist today
>missing the point
>chimp out
>the Internet

1162
Serious / Re: Baltimore riots continue
« on: April 27, 2015, 11:19:34 PM »
>looters are human shit
>well aren't we racist today

1163
The Flood / Re: Band Memes
« on: April 27, 2015, 07:16:33 PM »
So not only is your teacher trying to force memes but he is trying to force the meme life on people.

1164
The Flood / Re: Why are people racist?
« on: April 27, 2015, 06:30:28 PM »

1165
The Flood / Re: What's so entertaining about Nascar?
« on: April 27, 2015, 06:23:01 PM »
I used to think Nascar was boring. Some of my redneck friends invited me. It's one of those things you've gotta be there for.

Like Das said, most passing action of any motorsport, w/ the proximity of the cars like it is in Nascar there's a defensive aspect that's just not there in most high speed motorsports.

Really though I'd rather go to the dragstrip.

1166
The Flood / Re: In 2016, why not vote for...
« on: April 26, 2015, 12:24:48 AM »

1167
We should've dropped more.

1168
The Flood / Re: 2OO1: A Space Odyssey
« on: April 25, 2015, 02:30:22 PM »
Best movie

1170
The Flood / Re: So, what are your excuses?
« on: April 25, 2015, 12:47:02 AM »
kill yourself

Pages: 1 ... 373839 4041 ... 144