Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - The Lord Slide Rule

Pages: 1 ... 363738 3940 ... 144
1111
Serious / Re: Nuclear Weaponry: Effective deterrent or not?
« on: April 29, 2015, 07:11:54 PM »
Mutually assured destruction only works as long as everyone is playing the game. You get one entity that doesn't give a fuck and then the nukes start flying.
this a legitimate concern

religious zealots w/ no regard for life for example

Are they really going to have access to any significant nuclear weapon? They still know we'd immediately wipe them out.
see here's the thing a terrorist cell can,  if it gets hold of a nuclear device, even a small one like a suitcase nuke, use it and not have that use attributed to another state. Responding in kind would be diplomatically troublesome and we'd probably end in another extended, difficult conflict like Afghanistan.

They probably also don't care they just want infidels to die.

1112
Serious / Re: Nuclear Weaponry: Effective deterrent or not?
« on: April 29, 2015, 06:57:05 PM »
Mutually assured destruction only works as long as everyone is playing the game. You get one entity that doesn't give a fuck and then the nukes start flying.
this a legitimate concern

religious zealots w/ no regard for life for example

1113
The Flood / Re: I Love You So Much
« on: April 29, 2015, 06:47:55 PM »

With Quick-Reply you can write a post when viewing a topic without loading a new page. You can still use bulletin board code and smileys as you would in a normal post.

Leave

I don't understand the purpose of posting that... I've seen it in a couple other threads... Why?
another in joke kind of like reported

1114
The Flood / Re: I'm gonna vote for Hillary Clinton...
« on: April 29, 2015, 06:46:02 PM »
Ew dude

1115
They shouldn't be legal just for medical treatment, they should be legal in general. No government has an ethical right to dictate what people can and can't do to their own body.

Agreed. Though, I only recommend the use of cannabis and alcohol in moderation.
The prodigal son has returned!

1116
Am I doin it rite

1117
The Flood / Re: guys im posting on here from school
« on: April 29, 2015, 06:26:31 PM »
Why would you do that?

Your irl friends might see you.

1118
The Flood / Re: Neon Genesis Evangelion
« on: April 29, 2015, 06:19:54 PM »
What is this weeb speak?

1119
She caught you browsing Sep7agon?

1120
The Flood / Re: being perma'd on b.old
« on: April 29, 2015, 05:58:14 PM »
>embeds image of Satan rimming Jesus while delicately cupping his balls


1 month ban

1121
The Flood / Re: The cost of raising a child.
« on: April 29, 2015, 05:36:21 PM »
Oh hi max.

1122
The Flood / Re: personality disorder quiz
« on: April 29, 2015, 04:32:47 PM »
Yes, I'm letting an Internet site judge my personality over the three psychologists I've encountered.
it's for fun, you weeny. No one in their right mind is taking these seriously.

1123
Serious / Re: Sam Harris podcast
« on: April 29, 2015, 04:31:24 PM »
He's got some pretty interesting views but his soft spot for Buddhism is a bit strange. Wonder what his views on scientific research into meditation has shown that it doesn't always promote well being and can even worsen clinical depression, which is unsurprising to me.

I'm also entirely unsure about his views about morality. . .as in I'm not sure exactly what they are and how he reaches the conclusion that metaethical judgements can be reached objectively.

1124
The Flood / Re: personality disorder quiz
« on: April 29, 2015, 04:15:51 PM »
Spoiler
Paranoid            35%
Schizoid.            42%
Schizotypal.      63%
Antisocial.         49%
Borderline.         40%
Histrionic.          26%
Narcissistic.      47%
Avoidant.           30%
Dependent.        31%
Borderline.         42%
k I'm skeptical

1125
Serious / Re: Nuclear Weaponry: Effective deterrent or not?
« on: April 29, 2015, 03:56:14 PM »
It's effectively a gridlock. Even if, there's a war going on somewhere, they won't fire the nukes. Because if they did, everybody would. The country being hit, if capable, would send them back.

Mistakes and jumping the gun with other countries could easily be made when a projectile is spotted travelling through airspace. Russia, for instance.

In order for any country to fire their nukes, it would have to inform all others first. Which would, essentially sink the firing under lines of red tape and arguing.

So, no.

Nuclear devices don't stop wars. They stop themselves. They only stop other people from firing theirs. Conventional war can still easily occur because nobody in their right mind would ever fire because of the return volley. But there's too many ties and interconnected supply lines nowadays for conventional war to be considered.
that was the point of the proliferation.

We thought the Germans were building them so we built them hoping to keep them from firing them at us. When we found out we were the only ones that had them we figured why not use them to avoid a messy invasion. Russia built them to keep us from firing them and so on and so on.

However I do think they played a part in avoiding major conflicts between superpowers in the following decades, hence proxy wars during the cold war.

Fact remains though that mistakes can be made and both parties came close several times just from near accidents.

1126
The Flood / Re: Only two more years until capeshit is finished
« on: April 29, 2015, 03:25:47 PM »
You guys have never seen True Lies?

1127
The Flood / Re: who killed jfk
« on: April 29, 2015, 06:28:57 AM »

1128
Serious / Re: So, today I was called a discriminator
« on: April 29, 2015, 12:03:39 AM »
You should have called her a bitch and tipped her little accidents wheelchair over.

1129
The Flood / Re: Who is the most patriotic American in this forum?
« on: April 28, 2015, 11:53:52 PM »
I'm transmartian. I identify as a human male from mars.

1130
The Flood / Re: who killed jfk
« on: April 28, 2015, 11:51:44 PM »
You and me


Spoiler
guess my name

1131
The Flood / Re: So.... Bored... Join me?
« on: April 28, 2015, 11:45:20 PM »
Today hasn't been that great

I messed my wrist up
that's why they tell you not to jerk off in the shower

1132
The Flood / Re: So.... Bored... Join me?
« on: April 28, 2015, 11:42:50 PM »

Getting more sleep than I usually do, the last few days have been lacking in sleep.
Yu tell her about the tits or gtfo policy
There's an Isara joke in there somewhere.
she has yet to pay up

Fine here:


kek

1133
The Flood / Re: Baltimore did nothing wrong
« on: April 28, 2015, 10:51:57 PM »
He was a good city!

1134
The Flood / Re: So.... Bored... Join me?
« on: April 28, 2015, 10:49:08 PM »
Getting more sleep than I usually do, the last few days have been lacking in sleep.
Yu tell her about the tits or gtfo policy
There's an Isara joke in there somewhere.
she has yet to pay up

1135
The Flood / Re: So.... Bored... Join me?
« on: April 28, 2015, 10:47:35 PM »
Quote
The forum was shit.
No real content just a bunch of whiny brats.
I went on a quest for a better forum and poof here I was.
I found it on the tapatalk app

To be totally honest you're in no better a place than when you started. :/
I am not whiny
ily jim

1136
The Flood / Re: So.... Bored... Join me?
« on: April 28, 2015, 10:45:17 PM »
Quote
The forum was shit. 
No real content just a bunch of whiny brats.
I went on a quest for a better forum and poof here I was. 
I found it on the tapatalk app

To be totally honest you're in no better a place than when you started. :/

1137
The Flood / Re: So.... Bored... Join me?
« on: April 28, 2015, 10:41:16 PM »
The forum was shit.
No real content just a bunch of whiny brats.
I went on a quest for a better forum and poof here I was.
I found it on the tapatalk app
Are you aware of our tits or gtfo policy?
they have to be pm'd directly to me for verification

1138
Serious / Re: Hume's Fork is self-refuting
« on: April 28, 2015, 04:32:07 PM »
I guess I'm having difficulty distinguishing between what is meant by induction in epistemology, versus that of mathematical induction, which Gödel has demonstrated to show completeness and consistency (as in the proof works for all inputs of whatever function it's addressing).

Here:
Quote
Although its name may suggest otherwise, mathematical induction should not be misconstrued as a form of inductive reasoning (also see Problem of induction). Mathematical induction is an inference rule used in proofs. In mathematics, proofs including those using mathematical induction are examples of deductive reasoning, and inductive reasoning is excluded from proofs.

Things like this aren't an issue for Popperians; many critical rationalists have come to identify mathematical operations like Bayesian inference as valuable ways of testing the mettle of propositions. (At least, objective Bayesianism is, not so much subjective Bayesianism. Although I must admit I don't quite understand the distinction).
Bayesian reasoning has become indispensible in some circles.

1139
I'm glad those sorts of people tend to inhabit the social science and art departments of my school.
>implying you're stem master race

LOL GET REKD FAGGOT
EXTRA SALT  ON MY FRIES PLEASE

1140
I'm glad those sorts of people tend to inhabit the social science and art departments of my school.

Pages: 1 ... 363738 3940 ... 144