This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Alternative Facts
Pages: 1 ... 232233234 235236 ... 306
6991
« on: December 04, 2014, 10:19:28 AM »
I'm not american, so if I wasn't a vegetarian I'd probably dip them in something that didn't give me fat-brain-cancer. Like a sauce not made in america. And minus the wings.
I forget, we have people from Britbongistan here.
6992
« on: December 04, 2014, 10:14:59 AM »
You are giving a choice to dip your wings and/or boneless wings in.
Which do you choose?
6993
« on: December 04, 2014, 10:12:58 AM »
< Avatar for reference.
6994
« on: December 04, 2014, 10:12:01 AM »
Should it be criminalized, in the sense that the mother go to jail? No (Unless the baby dies from directly related conditions).
I do agree, there are genuinely ignorant people that don't understand the consequences of alcohol on children (Especially in some places here in the US with absolutely appalling health courses in school) - more attention should be given from OBGYN's to explain to the mother's the effects of too much alcohol on newborn infants prior to birth, the various health risks, etc.
At the same time, if the mother chooses to ignore the risks and drink like an Irishman anyway, then yes. She should face some penalty.
Hmm yeah, perhaps not to jail <.<
I think to dismiss the compensation claim though, that's just wrong. It's clearly her fault the kid is fubar, so why the hell shouldn't she have to pay towards it's care .___________.
Because Britbongistan. Couldn't really tell you.
6995
« on: December 04, 2014, 10:11:11 AM »
Bolded and underlined one part.
Yes, the protests center on the Michael Brown case - but these protests are not just about a lack of indictment (You may think of it as such), but it is also about a blatant lack of trust between minority communities across the country, and the police officers that are supposed to be protecting them.
Hell, you're seeing it in New York City now with that lack of indictment.
Watch the ABC interview with Wilson and you can tell through his sppech and appearance that he wasn''t out to do anything wrong. He has been patrolling the worst part of Ferguson and has had no issues with the public
Uhh.... but these protests are not just about a lack of indictment (You may think of it as such), but it is also about a blatant lack of trust between minority communities across the country, and the police officers that are supposed to be protecting them. Where did I mention Wilson at all? It's not just about him - it's about a lack of trust in the system in general revolving minority communities versus police.
6996
« on: December 04, 2014, 10:08:52 AM »
Should it be criminalized, in the sense that the mother go to jail? No (Unless the baby dies from directly related conditions).
I do agree, there are genuinely ignorant people that don't understand the consequences of alcohol on children (Especially in some places here in the US with absolutely appalling health courses in school) - more attention should be given from OBGYN's to explain to the mother's the effects of too much alcohol on newborn infants prior to birth, the various health risks, etc.
At the same time, if the mother chooses to ignore the risks and drink like an Irishman anyway, then yes. She should face some penalty.
6997
« on: December 04, 2014, 10:04:38 AM »
>Land of the free
Top kek
Yeah, because you'rd free to rob and destroy property. If these protests were peaceful then it would have a very different response
Let me ask - what were your thoughts on the Ukrainian protests?
You know - pre-Civil War.
However, these are seperate; in Ukraine we saw obvious government corruption so there was a basis for protesting. Ferguson is a pathetic excuse just to steal and destroy property as the grand jury fkund Wilson to be not guilty and this no basis for a criminal action. Notice how his record was never brought up, because he never had a problem which shows no racial bbaud. He also never used his weapon before
Bolded and underlined one part. Yes, the protests center on the Michael Brown case - but these protests are not just about a lack of indictment (You may think of it as such), but it is also about a blatant lack of trust between minority communities across the country, and the police officers that are supposed to be protecting them. Hell, you're seeing it in New York City now with that lack of indictment. If you think this issue is as thin and dry as you say it is, with "Oh they want to loot and steal, they don't care about anything", you're in the wrong.
6998
« on: December 04, 2014, 09:55:11 AM »
>Land of the free
Top kek
Yeah, because you'rd free to rob and destroy property. If these protests were peaceful then it would have a very different response
Let me ask - what were your thoughts on the Ukrainian protests? You know - pre-Civil War.
6999
« on: December 04, 2014, 09:52:17 AM »
>Land of the free
Top kek
Please don't try and start a flame war in here.
With the volatility of the topic, I think that's going to be inevitable. But yeah. >.>
7000
« on: December 04, 2014, 09:49:43 AM »
That said, their militarisation is worrisome - I just don't blame the officers.
Agreed. This entire movement to turn the police into, what is essentially a mini-military, is counterproductive to work on the problems in that field.
7001
« on: December 04, 2014, 09:47:54 AM »
 Am I doing it right?
7002
« on: December 03, 2014, 11:01:28 PM »
Are i cool emo kid now?
10/10 would bang.
k Cheat.
7003
« on: December 03, 2014, 08:54:40 PM »
> was gonna post a shirtless pic
7004
« on: December 03, 2014, 08:16:14 PM »
inb4 gorilla
inb4 lock
7005
« on: December 03, 2014, 07:54:33 PM »
I know this may be too much to ask, but could we keep this thread on discussing the rules...on track?
Thanks.
7006
« on: December 03, 2014, 07:29:38 PM »
Posting this here because I'm buttmad the thread got locked.
I'm going to put this in simple terms.
You feel less. You lose 70,000 nerve endings. You last longer because your penis is less sensitive thus you feel far less pleasure.
Rub your finger slowly across your palm. That's what a normal penis feels. Now do the same to the top of your hand. That's what you feel. There is no need for circumcision. We have clean water.
Understand yet?
Are you purposely ignoring me or are you legitimately this disengaged in the argument that you think repeating the same false statistic over and over again is going to be any more convincing than the last time? And yes I mean what I say when I say false statistic. An uncircumcised penis has at most 20,000 nerve endings. How are you supposed to lose 70,000 of them by cutting off the foreskin? Please cite your sources because none of what you're saying seems to hold true.
Scroll down to the bottom of page 866 (http://www.nocirc.org/touch-test/bju_6685.pdf). That is the difference between the feeling of a circumcised penis and an uncircumcised penis. Not only is the difference small and negligible, but because psychology is relative and not numerical, the difference is yet even less than that (and feel free to argue with me on that instead of just repeating the same defeated argument for the fourth time now).
No.
Take this elsewhere, or don't discuss it at all.
This is the Flood, it doesn't matter as long as it's not spam or rule breaking. I mean it's less spammy than the OP for crying out loud.
I just wanted to post it rather than having it go to waste.
Then make another thread in Serious if you want to discuss (This shouldn't be discussed in The Flood because of how the last thread turned out), or PM Challenger.
But you are not derailing.
I sent a PM to Mr P if he could make a new thread since people will actually listen to him if he says no spamming or shitposting. I've literally done this same thing in the past and I'll still have losers like Max and challenger who'll end up shitposting anyway. But yeah, Mr P is taking too long to reply, he probably got off or something, so I just put it here.
That's fine - I'm simply letting you know not to continue the discussion here.
7007
« on: December 03, 2014, 07:24:19 PM »
Posting this here because I'm buttmad the thread got locked.
I'm going to put this in simple terms.
You feel less. You lose 70,000 nerve endings. You last longer because your penis is less sensitive thus you feel far less pleasure.
Rub your finger slowly across your palm. That's what a normal penis feels. Now do the same to the top of your hand. That's what you feel. There is no need for circumcision. We have clean water.
Understand yet?
Are you purposely ignoring me or are you legitimately this disengaged in the argument that you think repeating the same false statistic over and over again is going to be any more convincing than the last time? And yes I mean what I say when I say false statistic. An uncircumcised penis has at most 20,000 nerve endings. How are you supposed to lose 70,000 of them by cutting off the foreskin? Please cite your sources because none of what you're saying seems to hold true.
Scroll down to the bottom of page 866 (http://www.nocirc.org/touch-test/bju_6685.pdf). That is the difference between the feeling of a circumcised penis and an uncircumcised penis. Not only is the difference small and negligible, but because psychology is relative and not numerical, the difference is yet even less than that (and feel free to argue with me on that instead of just repeating the same defeated argument for the fourth time now).
No.
Take this elsewhere, or don't discuss it at all.
This is the Flood, it doesn't matter as long as it's not spam or rule breaking. I mean it's less spammy than the OP for crying out loud.
I just wanted to post it rather than having it go to waste.
Then make another thread in Serious if you want to discuss (This shouldn't be discussed in The Flood because of how the last thread turned out), or PM Challenger. But you are not derailing.
7008
« on: December 03, 2014, 07:20:38 PM »
Posting this here because I'm buttmad the thread got locked.
I'm going to put this in simple terms.
You feel less. You lose 70,000 nerve endings. You last longer because your penis is less sensitive thus you feel far less pleasure.
Rub your finger slowly across your palm. That's what a normal penis feels. Now do the same to the top of your hand. That's what you feel. There is no need for circumcision. We have clean water.
Understand yet?
Are you purposely ignoring me or are you legitimately this disengaged in the argument that you think repeating the same false statistic over and over again is going to be any more convincing than the last time? And yes I mean what I say when I say false statistic. An uncircumcised penis has at most 20,000 nerve endings. How are you supposed to lose 70,000 of them by cutting off the foreskin? Please cite your sources because none of what you're saying seems to hold true.
Scroll down to the bottom of page 866 (http://www.nocirc.org/touch-test/bju_6685.pdf). That is the difference between the feeling of a circumcised penis and an uncircumcised penis. Not only is the difference small and negligible, but because psychology is relative and not numerical, the difference is yet even less than that (and feel free to argue with me on that instead of just repeating the same defeated argument for the fourth time now).
No. Take this elsewhere, or don't discuss it at all.
7009
« on: December 03, 2014, 07:02:34 PM »
 Nahh, not about that life.
7010
« on: December 03, 2014, 06:52:32 PM »
It's Cheat.
7011
« on: December 03, 2014, 06:45:30 PM »
See, theres more than one user here that simply wont understand this. Im glad its made clear.
I was starting to get fed up with the recent accusations against somebody.
Expression of ideas through images or other media as long it is relevant, even though it might happen often from identical users is not spam as long it adheres to being consistent within the given context. We know. Just remember to be considerate of what you are posting, in what threads. Derailing threads, from anyone, will still lead to locking.
7012
« on: December 03, 2014, 06:39:31 PM »
If you've reached the bottom of the barrel with the "why should we let people give birth without consent" in a circumcision debate, you know you're on the wrong side. Why? Because you... can't argue against the logic?...
Because there is no goddamn logic to argue with. Comparing giving birth to circumcision is like comparing getting a heart transplant to getting a nose job. The underlined are actual medical procedures. The one's who are not are simply cosmetic changes. Tell me, are we going to give babies nose jobs now because a Mom wants it? No, the Doctor is going to laugh in the Mom's face and say she's an idiot for considering it. Circumcision is unnecessary, there are ZERO benefits in the western world unless you are a lazy person who cannot take five seconds to clean his penis properly. If you are that lazy, you deserve the infection you'll get.
7013
« on: December 03, 2014, 06:33:19 PM »
Unless a medical procedure is absolutely necessary, parents should not be making the decision (When they just had a newborn) to go through with what amounts to plastic surgery - you are changing a part of the body for nothing more than cosmetic purposes. So why's it okay to give birth to a kid without it's consent? I mean, you're giving it the capacity to feel pain and suffering and shit. Life kinda sucks when you get down to it, and you're gonna impose it on someone else?
If you've reached the bottom of the barrel with the "why should we let people give birth without consent" in a circumcision debate, you know you're on the wrong side. I've got more important crap to deal with right now than bashing my head against the brick wall that is you, so kindly have a good night.
7014
« on: December 03, 2014, 06:28:44 PM »
I literally did in my post, which you kindly cut out. It had very little to do with anything.Poor comparison.
At this point, in the Western World, male circumcision is pointless. Our medicine, clean water supply, and all that has advanced to a point that the only benefit to being circumcised is you can be lazy in the shower.
Why we continue advocating for pointless medical procedures is beyond me. I don't know what this has to do with consent. That was the crux of my post. You evaded my point, so I ignored your non-sequitur response.
You don't know what this has to do with consent? Unless a medical procedure is absolutely necessary, parents should not be making the decision (When they just had a newborn) to go through with what amounts to plastic surgery - you are changing a part of the body for nothing more than cosmetic purposes.
7015
« on: December 03, 2014, 06:24:11 PM »
That's preposterous. Poor comparison. Okay, kids, here's the thing.
You have to actually explain why. That's the whole idea of arguments.
I literally did in my post, which you kindly cut out.
7016
« on: December 03, 2014, 06:14:49 PM »
The consent argument is absolutely bogus. I can make the same exact argument that my parents didn't ask me if I wanted to get born in the first place. If you're gonna make any consent argument and you're not an anti-natalist, you're a hypocrite.
Poor comparison. At this point, in the Western World, male circumcision is pointless. Our medicine, clean water supply, and all that has advanced to a point that the only benefit to being circumcised is you can be lazy in the shower. Why we continue advocating for pointless medical procedures is beyond me.
7017
« on: December 03, 2014, 06:08:17 PM »
Everything breath you take
Every move you make
Every bond you break
Every step you take....
I'll be watching you
pls no
those lyrics aren't therapeutic
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Watching you.
7018
« on: December 03, 2014, 06:06:48 PM »
Everything breath you take
Every move you make
Every bond you break
Every step you take....
I'll be watching you
7019
« on: December 03, 2014, 06:00:53 PM »
I wasn't joking.
I don't think circumcision is a problem, based on the fact that, well, it worked out okay for me.
Dat anectodal evidence.
7020
« on: December 03, 2014, 05:59:53 PM »
Get some good shit in here.
Pages: 1 ... 232233234 235236 ... 306
|
Show Posts