I control the forum

Ha.

Haha.

No.

I'm reporting this website to the FBI.

Quote from: Icy on January 29, 2015, 10:54:01 PM

approve no accounts

icy no

I got my black woman weave out for this shit.

After the cheese pizza incident, staff doesn't approve new accounts without first checking IP's, making sure they aren't Tor users, etc.

Since none of the IP checking mods are on, it'll be a bit.

That chat image is giving me cancer.

Quote from: Yu on January 29, 2015, 10:40:57 PM

You could wait for Anarchy for this stuff.

I felt like treating my niggas to an early present

Half a boob is not an early present.

Half of a penis is.

Look...either way, they're going to be using a stall.

The girls room only has stalls, so a MTF will have to use them anyway.
For the boys room, a FTM will (likely) have to use a stall as they most likely have not had any surgical work yet.

It's not that big a deal.

Eh. It's not as bad as I would have expected.

Like it's a surprise what this is about.

Quote from: Icy on January 29, 2015, 08:17:14 PM

Quote from: Officer Nasty on January 29, 2015, 08:09:12 PM

While Dustin is just attempting to ruse he manages to bring up a valid point.

Anybody who has a view that is remotely different than the status quo, which is obviously socially liberal, will instantly get shit on and not taken seriously. Freedom of speech, y'all. Everyone should have the right to voice their opinion in a serious matter.

His freedom of speech has not been violated 

No one's arguing against that (extremely overused) comic. It's more about the fact that any viewpoint that doesn't conform to a socially liberal standard is immediately discredited by the community.

Present in a serious way with credible sources then.

Quote from: Icy on January 29, 2015, 07:50:22 PM

Quote from: PSU on January 29, 2015, 07:49:23 PM

Dustin actually has a good point.

They can't be taking those medication while in the military. Thats just dangerous.

And if they haven't started taking medication?

Dressing up as a female and going against army regulation is clearly going to get you kicked out.

Lol

Thanks Psy :^)

Quote from: Icy on January 29, 2015, 07:37:44 PM

Quote from: Dustin' on January 29, 2015, 07:33:24 PM

I'm just curious, is there even one law or legal matter in which transexuals are treated unfairly?

Ban on military service, as one.

I'm too lazy to search for more.

Taking hormone pills and becoming moody doesn't help the military function.

They said letting gays serve openly would disrupt military function as well.

I've yet to see an impact.

Story

Federal regulators have set a new definition for broadband that establishes 25 megabits per second as the baseline for high-speed downloads, up from 4 Mbps previously.

With this standard, the Federal Communications Commission will be able to argue for much stronger action on Internet providers — a point that's rankling Republicans on the commission as the agency moves to promote the adoption of fast, cheap and reliable Internet in America.

It's a simple accounting change that will have major ramifications. As a result of the decision — which also sets the minimum speed for uploads at 3 Mbps — millions of people who subscribe to slower plans will effectively lose their broadband status. Combine those with the substantial share of Americans who have never had broadband, and as many as 17 percent of America, or 55 million people, will lack access to high-speed broadband under the new measure, according to the FCC.

Conservatives are decrying the move as a case of government overreach, calling the 25/3 Mbps standard an "arbitrary" threshold and arguing that most consumers seem to think the old one — 10 Mbps down, 1 Mbps up — works just fine.

"Seventy-one percent of consumers who can purchase fixed 25 Mbps service — over 70 million households — choose not to," said Republican FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai.

For an agency whose mission is to remove barriers to broadband, the FCC is its own worst enemy, Pai added, saying the FCC is intentionally finding that the industry has failed just so that it can "regulate it back to health."

But Democrats on the commission say the new standard establishes a forward-looking, aspirational target. Those who lack access to speeds that are "table stakes" for the rest of the country don't deserve to be left behind, they argue. FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler pointed out that subscriptions to 25/3 service have quadrupled in the last three years. And Wheeler said that Internet providers' claims that there isn't enough demand for 25 Mbps broadband isn't borne out by their marketing campaigns, which treat customers like voracious data consumers.

"Someone is telling us one thing and telling consumers another," Wheeler said. "Our challenge is not to hide behind self-serving lobbying statements, but to recognize reality. And our challenge is to help make that reality available to all."

As the FCC prepares to intervene next month against state laws that make it harder for cities to build their own, public alternatives to traditional Internet providers — and as it plans to release its latest draft rules to prevent discrimination against Internet traffic — the standard for broadband will become a key political tool in defending the FCC's actions. So will the underlying law that recognizes the FCC's authority to promote broadband, Section 706 of the Communications Act. A Republican-backed bill in Congress is already seeking to strip the FCC of that power.