Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Alpha

Pages: 1 ... 456 78 ... 15
151
Serious / Re: Debate Number 2
« on: October 09, 2016, 10:04:59 PM »
Did you not see how American jets killed over 100 Syrian soldiers that are on the front line against ISIS? Right before the bombings, there was a large buildup of ISIS soldiers.
So they're bombing a military target made up of enemy personnel to clear the way for rebels they publicly support? OH WOW WTF THATS WEIRD

Quote
And there are unconfirmed reports of contacts between ISIS and the US. That is too great of a coincidence to ignore.
I blame the Jews tbh

Quote
Also, US reports stated that they had been mistaken and had been watching the Syrian forces for several days or a week. How do you somehow mistake the Syrian forces for ISIS? That means they would have to miss any Syrian flags that were being flown, or somehow believe they were seeing an ISIS flag. The two flags look nothing alike.
Where are you getting all this from?
It's simple logic.

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2016/09/17/us-halts-air-raid-after-learning-syrian-forces-may-have-been-hit.html
"It marked the first known direct American strike on President Bashar Assad's forces."

Read between the lines. Even Fox News knows what's going on. I already said in my previous post that of course America is attacking Assad. Why do you think the CIA indirectly armed and funded the rebels 5 years ago?
I know America is fighting Assad. The point I'm trying to make is how that attack clearly benefitted ISIS the most.
If your implication here is that America supports ISIS because of one attack in a 5 year long civil war which has become regional with multiple countries and forces involved, then you understand nothing about this conflict.
First direct attack.

152
Serious / Re: Debate Number 2
« on: October 09, 2016, 09:38:21 PM »
Wow. The moderator knows how to say Nevada right. Unlike Trump. 

153
Serious / Re: Debate Number 2
« on: October 09, 2016, 09:35:11 PM »
Did you not see how American jets killed over 100 Syrian soldiers that are on the front line against ISIS? Right before the bombings, there was a large buildup of ISIS soldiers.
So they're bombing a military target made up of enemy personnel to clear the way for rebels they publicly support? OH WOW WTF THATS WEIRD

Quote
And there are unconfirmed reports of contacts between ISIS and the US. That is too great of a coincidence to ignore.
I blame the Jews tbh

Quote
Also, US reports stated that they had been mistaken and had been watching the Syrian forces for several days or a week. How do you somehow mistake the Syrian forces for ISIS? That means they would have to miss any Syrian flags that were being flown, or somehow believe they were seeing an ISIS flag. The two flags look nothing alike.
Where are you getting all this from?
It's simple logic.

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2016/09/17/us-halts-air-raid-after-learning-syrian-forces-may-have-been-hit.html
"It marked the first known direct American strike on President Bashar Assad's forces."

Read between the lines. Even Fox News knows what's going on. I already said in my previous post that of course America is attacking Assad. Why do you think the CIA indirectly armed and funded the rebels 5 years ago?
I know America is fighting Assad. The point I'm trying to make is how that attack clearly benefitted ISIS the most. 

154
Serious / Re: Debate Number 2
« on: October 09, 2016, 09:29:01 PM »
Did you not see how American jets killed over 100 Syrian soldiers that are on the front line against ISIS? Right before the bombings, there was a large buildup of ISIS soldiers.
So they're bombing a military target made up of enemy personnel to clear the way for rebels they publicly support? OH WOW WTF THATS WEIRD

Quote
And there are unconfirmed reports of contacts between ISIS and the US. That is too great of a coincidence to ignore.
I blame the Jews tbh

Quote
Also, US reports stated that they had been mistaken and had been watching the Syrian forces for several days or a week. How do you somehow mistake the Syrian forces for ISIS? That means they would have to miss any Syrian flags that were being flown, or somehow believe they were seeing an ISIS flag. The two flags look nothing alike.
Where are you getting all this from?
It's simple logic.

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2016/09/17/us-halts-air-raid-after-learning-syrian-forces-may-have-been-hit.html

155
Serious / Re: Debate Number 2
« on: October 09, 2016, 09:26:58 PM »
How the fuck does she think Russia is paying no attention to ISIS? Russia had bombed ISIS 10x more than the US

[citation here]
I don't remember the articles I saw, but here is one similar. 300 attacks in 3 days. The US has had less than 20 per day.

www.express.co.uk/news/world/625318/Russia-ISIS-Islamic-State-Daesh-Vladimir-Putin-Tu-22-Bomber-Syria/amp
You realize they're bombing indiscriminately right?
At least they aren't fighting for ISIS

That isn't an answer.

You do realize they are bombing with zero cares of innocent women, children, civilians in general are killed, right?
I don't think you realize the situation in Syria.
but a 16 year old kid in vegas does

do you know what "indiscriminately" means
And you are an expert on Syria?

I trust him more than the guy with the Star Wars avatar.
Oh that's nice. Liking Star Wars somehow makes me uninformed on politics.

156
Serious / Re: Debate Number 2
« on: October 09, 2016, 09:25:48 PM »
How the fuck does she think Russia is paying no attention to ISIS? Russia had bombed ISIS 10x more than the US

[citation here]
I don't remember the articles I saw, but here is one similar. 300 attacks in 3 days. The US has had less than 20 per day.

www.express.co.uk/news/world/625318/Russia-ISIS-Islamic-State-Daesh-Vladimir-Putin-Tu-22-Bomber-Syria/amp
You realize they're bombing indiscriminately right?
At least they aren't fighting for ISIS

That isn't an answer.

You do realize they are bombing with zero cares of innocent women, children, civilians in general are killed, right?
I don't think you realize the situation in Syria.
but a 16 year old kid in vegas does

do you know what "indiscriminately" means
And you are an expert on Syria?

157
Serious / Re: Debate Number 2
« on: October 09, 2016, 09:23:01 PM »
How the fuck does she think Russia is paying no attention to ISIS? Russia had bombed ISIS 10x more than the US

[citation here]
I don't remember the articles I saw, but here is one similar. 300 attacks in 3 days. The US has had less than 20 per day.

www.express.co.uk/news/world/625318/Russia-ISIS-Islamic-State-Daesh-Vladimir-Putin-Tu-22-Bomber-Syria/amp
You realize they're bombing indiscriminately right?
At least they aren't fighting for ISIS
And America is? Can you stop posting this retarded bullshit? Thanks.

There's nothing good about Russia's child killing campaign.
Did you not see how American jets killed over 100 Syrian soldiers that are on the front line against ISIS? Right before the bombings, there was a large buildup of ISIS soldiers. And there are unconfirmed reports of contacts between ISIS and the US. That is too great of a coincidence to ignore.
Also, US reports stated that they had been mistaken and had been watching the Syrian forces for several days or a week. How do you somehow mistake the Syrian forces for ISIS? That means they would have to miss any Syrian flags that were being flown, or somehow believe they were seeing an ISIS flag. The two flags look nothing alike.

158
Serious / Re: Debate Number 2
« on: October 09, 2016, 09:17:53 PM »
How the fuck does she think Russia is paying no attention to ISIS? Russia had bombed ISIS 10x more than the US

[citation here]
I don't remember the articles I saw, but here is one similar. 300 attacks in 3 days. The US has had less than 20 per day.

www.express.co.uk/news/world/625318/Russia-ISIS-Islamic-State-Daesh-Vladimir-Putin-Tu-22-Bomber-Syria/amp
You realize they're bombing indiscriminately right?
At least they aren't fighting for ISIS

That isn't an answer.

You do realize they are bombing with zero cares of innocent women, children, civilians in general are killed, right?
I don't think you realize the situation in Syria. There are civilians that are remaining in their homes, near the front lines. There is a war going on. In Aleppo, there are no areas that are strictly military targets.

159
Serious / Re: Debate Number 2
« on: October 09, 2016, 09:14:44 PM »
How the fuck does she think Russia is paying no attention to ISIS? Russia had bombed ISIS 10x more than the US

[citation here]
I don't remember the articles I saw, but here is one similar. 300 attacks in 3 days. The US has had less than 20 per day.

www.express.co.uk/news/world/625318/Russia-ISIS-Islamic-State-Daesh-Vladimir-Putin-Tu-22-Bomber-Syria/amp
You realize they're bombing indiscriminately right?
At least they aren't fighting for ISIS

160
Serious / Re: Debate Number 2
« on: October 09, 2016, 09:12:32 PM »
How the fuck does she think Russia is paying no attention to ISIS? Russia had bombed ISIS 10x more than the US

[citation here]
I don't remember the articles I saw, but here is one similar. 300 attacks in 3 days. The US has had less than 20 per day.

www.express.co.uk/news/world/625318/Russia-ISIS-Islamic-State-Daesh-Vladimir-Putin-Tu-22-Bomber-Syria/amp

161
Serious / Re: Debate Number 2
« on: October 09, 2016, 09:05:30 PM »
How the fuck does she think Russia is paying no attention to ISIS? Russia had bombed ISIS 10x more than the US

162
Serious / Re: Debate Number 2
« on: October 09, 2016, 08:56:20 PM »
Did Hillary forget that she used the same exact loophole as Trump?

163
Serious / Re: Debate Number 2
« on: October 09, 2016, 08:52:56 PM »
I'm hearing a lot of sniffling. Again.
It's cold season. At least he isn't collapsing, and having seizures and coughing fits.

164
Serious / Re: Debate Number 2
« on: October 09, 2016, 08:50:49 PM »
Yet she has no evidence against Russia

165
Serious / Re: Debate Number 2
« on: October 09, 2016, 08:11:52 PM »
Trump sounds VERY subdued tonight.  Did he not get his coke?
Yeah. I noticed that too. He seems depressed.

166
Serious / Re: Trump being a strong, powerful, male businessman
« on: October 09, 2016, 12:20:12 PM »
Donald trying to have consenting sex with other women.
Quote
grab their pussy
"they let you do it."

167
Serious / Re: Trump being a strong, powerful, male businessman
« on: October 09, 2016, 03:55:11 AM »
"BILL CLINTON CHEATED ON HILLARY IT IS HER DUTY TO DIVORCE HIM IMMEDIATELY! IN FACT, IT IS HER FAULT TOO FOR TOO!"

'Trump is a known adulterer and all around terrible person. So?'

What will the Trumpets say to make this one sound like it's all in the right? They have a way of bending reality to the point it makes me jealous.
There is a difference between Bill raping women, and Donald trying to have consenting sex with other women. Both are bad, one is a lot worse.

168
Serious / Re: Putin Banner on the Manhattan Bridge
« on: October 07, 2016, 05:43:38 PM »
Putin is a peacemaker to naive idiots who don't follow up on the Syrian conflict
He's a warmonger to those who only listen to the Western media

169
The Flood / Re: Your preferred black tea.
« on: October 06, 2016, 10:23:53 PM »
Green tea>black tea

170
Chinese, Spanish, or Russian. French, German, and Japanese aren't very widely spoken.

171
Serious / Putin Banner on the Manhattan Bridge
« on: October 06, 2016, 06:37:50 PM »


The flag shows a picture of President Putin in front of a Russian and Syrian flag, with the words peacemaker under it.

From all the articles I've read about it, it's laughable how so many people have no idea what the message is. Some Twitter posts even show people being afraid. It shows how deep the Western media's propaganda has been engrained in people's minds.

Many people jumped to the conclusion that the banned was paid for by Trump or his family, or put up by Russians themselves.

It's obvious to what the true meaning of the banner is. It is making a statement to how Putin is dedicated to achieving peace in Syria, different from what Western media portrays him as. It is declaring the US and its coalition, are causing more war and chaos by supporting terrorists, and attempting to take down the democratically elected leadership of Assad, the only ones capable of defeating ISIS and the rest of the terrorists in Syria. (also known as moderate rebels to Obama)

172
Serious / Re: Pence VS Kaine, round two of presidential debates LET'S GO.
« on: October 04, 2016, 09:16:14 PM »
So according to Kaine, it's bad to have only 15,000 troops in the Middle East

173
Serious / Re: Pence VS Kaine, round two of presidential debates LET'S GO.
« on: October 04, 2016, 08:30:25 PM »
Free tuition for "families earning less than 125k." That seems like a horrible idea.....

174
Serious / Re: NYTimes Releases Report on Trump's Tax Records
« on: October 03, 2016, 01:37:59 AM »
So... He gamed the tax code... hasn't paid a dime to tax in 18 years... so.... He's the only one who can fix it??

What kind of shit tier writing is this?
Trumpets like to live in some alternate reality where they think that even a person incompetent and corrupt at his job, would somehow be a moral crusader and fix everything in the White House.
"Incompetent and corrupt at his job"

It's not like Hillary has caused more chaos as Secretary of State, putting more lives at risk, and being the most corrupt person in Washington.....

175
Gaming / Re: Too many people of colour in Battlefield 1
« on: October 01, 2016, 06:08:54 PM »
I know this is a joke thread but fuck historical accuracy

idc if the world was shitty in WWI and there were no black or female soldiers, it's 2016 and current games depicting that time period shouldn't be that way
Some people actually play WW1 and WW2 games for the recreation of historical battles. If you think a game needs to have black people or females so as to not be misogynist or sexist, you need to get your priorities straight.

To be fair, they could have the British Commonwealth soldiers (Sikhs, Indians, and Pakistanis), the French-Algerians, etc fighting in the Mediterranean and the Eastern battlefields.

Whether they choose to include them and put the extra work in involved is an entirely different matter.
True

176
Gaming / Re: Too many people of colour in Battlefield 1
« on: October 01, 2016, 04:42:54 PM »
I know this is a joke thread but fuck historical accuracy

idc if the world was shitty in WWI and there were no black or female soldiers, it's 2016 and current games depicting that time period shouldn't be that way
Some people actually play WW1 and WW2 games for the recreation of historical battles. If you think a game needs to have black people or females so as to not be misogynist or sexist, you need to get your priorities straight. 

177
The Flood / Re: Star Wars Rebels season 3
« on: September 27, 2016, 07:43:42 AM »
Did you even watch the episode? Are you even a Star Wars fan? It was amazing.

Boring action with zero consequences or tension
Convenient grey force master-ex machina right next to their new base
Emo Ezra
Chopper still exists
Just awful dialog

Yeah Thrawn is in it, but he does nothing a generic Rebels villain wouldn't do.
Did you miss the the entire battle with the empire and the station falling into the storm? Why does it matter if Bendu is right next to their base? It may not even have a physical body and that was just its apparition.
Apparently now being on the brink of turning to the dark side makes you emo.

178
The Flood / Re: Does anybody take anything seriously in Australia?
« on: September 26, 2016, 09:53:20 PM »
That interviewer is fucking retarded.

179
The Flood / Re: Star Wars Rebels season 3
« on: September 26, 2016, 09:51:20 PM »
Did you even watch the episode? Are you even a Star Wars fan? It was amazing.

180
Serious / Re: Trump vs Hillary, Presidential Debate 2016. HERE WE GO LADS.
« on: September 26, 2016, 09:13:20 PM »
I knew it. Hillary can't go through any event without furthering her cause for war with Russia by bringing up baseless claims of Russia hacking the US.

Pages: 1 ... 456 78 ... 15