https://plug.dj/sep7

join figgits

I'm curious

http://money.cnn.com/2014/12/15/news/economy/2-dollar-gas/index.html?hpt=hp_t2

Jesus, OPEC really wants to screw with our shale oil corporations.

gg Cheat

Metro

We were going to say that Bungie had made no effort at all in any aspect of the game, but that’s not quite true. In terms of taking ruthless advantage of their fans they’ve left no corner unturned.

Destructoid -6.5/10

For now, there's an easy test to judge whether or not you should pick up The Dark Below: did you play Destiny from launch all the way up until the first expansion? If so, you'll want to get it as soon as possible. If your enthusiasm has faltered over the past few months and you never really got into the first raid, you can wait or pick up the Season Pass at a later date after more incremental improvements have been made.

Gamezone

The Dark Below is a great reminder of what Destiny could be, but isn’t. Its best content is the raid, the gunplay is smooth and playing with friends is a great time. Unfortunately, Bungie doesn’t seem to have any clue how to give players a sense of progress without giving them hundreds of hours of grinding and then releasing better gear. If all of the content was like that found in the raids, Destiny would be so much better. That and I think the whole Light armor system is broken and stupid.

This review will be updated upon completing the new raid

Polygon -5/10

The Dark Below is thin on content, and it fails to expand the scope of Destiny in any meaningful way. Bungie has adopted language from the MMO genre to describe this DLC as an "expansion," but the studio doesn't establish any legitimate claim to the term.

Lzygmrs -5/10

Bungie have squandered their chance to regain any faith following the shooter’s less than desired response from the community. Apart from the entertaining Crota’s End raid and new weapons and armor, the expansion experiences the same issues that caused widespread dismay in the first place. The biggest downfall still remains the price, for $19.99/£19.99 you expect more effort, but The Dark Below feels rushed and lazy like it was thrown together last week to meet a deadline, ultimately not worth the price.

Attack of the fanboy -1.5/5

Destiny: The Dark Below is a combination of all of the worst parts of the original game. It offers little value to all except the most dedicated of players and revisits the same overused locations that we've seen a dozen times.

Trusted Reviews -6/10

Pros
-Core combat mechanics still work brilliantly
-New weapons, armour and loot
-Higher level cap and faster levelling
-Some creepy new locations to explore
Cons
-Not enough genuine new content
-Priced too high for what it is
Verdict
An expansion that could have confirmed Destiny’s greatness only leaves you feeling underwhelmed. If you want more Destiny, here’s more Destiny, and it’s still a lot of fun. There’s more loot to collect, more weapons and armour to try out, and a handful of new strikes and activities to try with your Destiny friends. When we’ve played the new Raid there’s a chance that it might all seem incredibly worthwhile. For now, however, the main reason to buy The Dark Below is that it gives you more reason to keep plugging away and a handful of new activities, not because it adds anything that new or substantial to the game.

>Am trying to get an apartment
>Need father to sign apartment lease
>Father refuses to sign lease saying he wants me to live with him

like wtf

I'm a hardcore gamer!

So with Destiny's DLC being released today Bungie decided that only people with DLC can play Weekly and Nightfall strikes. Bungie has also removed any loot (engrams) from the Strike playlist for Non DLC owners.

So it you don't own bend over and give Bungie $15 then you are stuck with a game in which you can not even level up your character.

https://www.onnit.com/alphabrain/

Has anyone tried this

I want to try it

Wreck of the Titan is a book that came out in 1898 about an ocean liner called the Titan that is hit by an iceberg on her maiden voyage and sinks.

14 years before the sinking of the real Titanic.

Similarities between the Titan and the Titanic
-Both were triple screw (propeller)
-Described as "unsinkable"

-The Titanic carried only 16 lifeboats, plus 4 Engelhardt folding lifeboats, less than half the number required for her passenger and crew capacity of 3000.
-The Titan carried "as few as the law allowed", 24 lifeboats, which could carry less than half of her total complement of 3000.

-Moving at 22½ knots, the Titanic struck an iceberg on the starboard side on the night of April 14, 1912, in the North Atlantic, 400 nautical miles (740 km; 460 mi) away from Newfoundland.
-Moving at 25 knots, The Titan also struck an iceberg on the starboard side on an April night in the North Atlantic, 400 nautical miles (740 km; 460 mi) from Newfoundland .

-The Titanic sank on her maiden voyage, and more than half of her 2200 passengers and crew died.
-The Titan also sank on her maiden voyage, and more than half of her 2500 passengers drowned.

December 7th, 1941

http://www.drinksmixer.com/drink7588.html
http://www.drinksmixer.com/drink12294.html
http://www.drinksmixer.com/drink11335.html

Post recipes fgts

And I just woke up 3 hours later

Discuss contact problems