This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Solonoid
Pages: 1 ... 328329330 331332 ... 449
9871
« on: July 03, 2015, 09:59:45 AM »
I never got a chance to embrace the cephalopod part of my username
don't you fucking dare.
9872
« on: July 03, 2015, 09:54:54 AM »
If you would like to hear my honest opinion of you, just ask ITT.
9873
« on: July 03, 2015, 09:24:04 AM »
Don't bring them here pls.
...dude. I would be so rich.
You could promote it, you're the admin after all. It could be bad for us though, if it works and we are suddenly in the minority here.
In order to be an alternative to reddit, we would need private groups, and a forum that posted everything from every group you were in,as well as the main boards.
That would actually be quite easy if cheat has been working on groups, and then we could just make a "Year 1 users" group for ourselves.
What a way to integrate a community...
Why the fuck would I want to integrate with the reddit community? Almost all of them are disgusting faggots. And if we ever decide we like any of them, group staff could invite them. It would be a great honor to be part of the original community. The overall goal was to make cheat money.
9874
« on: July 03, 2015, 09:04:01 AM »
see this is why 4chan always has and always will be superior
Oh come on, moot fucking sold us out. He's ten times the Jew cheat is.
9875
« on: July 03, 2015, 08:59:14 AM »
He is.
And he has yet to mention it unpromptedly, let alone make two threads about it.
9876
« on: July 03, 2015, 08:58:00 AM »
Don't bring them here pls.
...dude. I would be so rich.
You could promote it, you're the admin after all. It could be bad for us though, if it works and we are suddenly in the minority here.
In order to be an alternative to reddit, we would need private groups, and a forum that posted everything from every group you were in,as well as the main boards. That would actually be quite easy if cheat has been working on groups, and then we could just make a "Year 1 users" group for ourselves.
9877
« on: July 03, 2015, 08:51:53 AM »
Das is infinitely closer.
9878
« on: July 03, 2015, 08:48:32 AM »
Okay, guy
when aang was frozen in the iceberg for a hundred years, he still came out in the mind and body of a 12 year old
so let's not act like he wasn't still a 12 year old in body and in mind
lol verb likes Chinese cartoons
9879
« on: July 03, 2015, 08:46:11 AM »
yo Chet fruit should be ambassador
Oh yeah sol, you're so wise
>Chet just deletes title altogether
And they say 9/11 wasn't an inside job.
9880
« on: July 03, 2015, 08:35:30 AM »
There is a grain of truth to this thread.
I just spent a little while arguing with someone on b.net who was convinced they had five different mental diseases, and the only one they actually made a case for was OCD, which if someone self diagnoses four other diseases, they probably don't have.
And basically he said, well it takes me twenty who minutes to get ready in the morning, because he likes to take 11 steps in his shoes.
And I'm like, "It takes me forty minutes to decode what color underwear to put on. I obsessively memorize random alphanumeric strings, I step on every crack on the ground I see and I grind my teeth so that every part of my jaw has touched the same part the opposite side has in perfect symmetry. The last one actually give me headaches"
Yet I don't have OCD, and then I went on to talk about how a huge portion of this wing of medicine is an insurance scam anyway, and how its really the minority of people who are diagnosed that realm need to be, and if he had been given medication, it was probably making him worse or even causing some of the symptoms he had self diagnosed as other mental diseases.
Bottom line, he was thirteen and a webMD addict. Probably also has cancer and diabetes.
This is a good example of a lot of people in this field, but not all. Some genuinely need help and are really suffering, and others are just attention whores who are diluting the problems of others.
9881
« on: July 03, 2015, 08:20:08 AM »
Instead of getting pissed and demanding justice when somebody acts racist (which this is not a case of, its just another case of antibipartisanship) shouldn't you laugh at/feel bad for them?
Not to mention, unless somebody is being racist on the surface, and has no better reason to dislike someone than the color of their skin (which is not the case with Obama) then how do you come to the conclusion that they're being racist, unless you're just always thinking about how he's black and the guy yelling is white, at which point you seem to be just as racially charged as you presume the man yelling at the president is.
9882
« on: July 03, 2015, 08:09:02 AM »
It's one of the best combos on the site. I've been looking for an 8/16 bit avatar to match my nameplate, but haven't settled on one yet.
9883
« on: July 03, 2015, 08:03:43 AM »
Didn't Decimator Omega make a script like this? Or am i thinking of someone else?
Nah, it was TOTD, and he pretty much decided what everybody's title would be and it was manual update.
9884
« on: July 02, 2015, 02:54:03 PM »
Are you there to pick up your Sentra?
9885
« on: July 02, 2015, 02:17:29 PM »
for you to think that the is all right, would mean that you agree with some things about him. no, it would just mean that i get along with him casually
i could probably chill with him offline, play some video games or go bowling or something stupid like that
some of my best friends offline are people who i disagree with on everything
i'm still able to hang out and get along with them though
it's hard to be me and find people who agree with you on a great deal of things anyway
Yeah, I admire how dedicated Verb is to his ideals, as I've never convinced him of pretty much anything, and I consider myself to be a persuasive individual. Well, not quite as persuasive here, because even though we like to call each other autistic a lot, the vast majority of Floodians are bright individuals who are somewhat well informed. And when I say that, I mean before b.next. As for desty, I guess I pick on him too much, but I generally make a. oint to never seriously state deference for anyone, as I would hate to lose even a single member of our community, because that I adverse to our growth, something I quite sincerely care about.
9886
« on: July 02, 2015, 02:06:41 PM »
Why does there always have to be a race issue with everything when Obama is involved?
Because racism is still a thing in our country, and his race is the most distinguishing thing between he and his predecessors. Again, I'm not saying it IS racism, but damn it sure seems like it.
Wait, isn't it more racist to bring up his race when nobody else has?
If you believe that the color of a person's skin is a distinguishable trait, then aren't you the one with the racially charged mindset?
acknowledging someone's race and treating them different because of it are two different things. talking about race is not racist.
The only path to a post racism culture is ignoring race.
By failing to do so you are perpetuating racism.
ok, tumblr.
thats the opposite of something a tumblrfag would say
but we aren't trying to become a world that ignores race.
Yeah, racist assholes like you are holding us back.
acknowledging that race exists is not racist.
Why bother making note of something if its inconsequential?
because race is the distinguishing factor between Obama and his predecessors. Did you not read any of this thread?
I find it odd that I don't consider race to be a trait that distinguishes people, but you do, and I'm the one who's racist just because I disagree with his political policies more than I disagreed with his predecessor's.
Had you ever considered that Obama would still be a bad president if he were white?
Again, I'm not even talking about his policies or even how you feel about him. I'm talking about how he is treated by his colleagues on the hill.
I explained to you earlier; that is the way the president has been treated by opposing politicians for a very long time.
Since John Adams.
If you don't remember his predecessors being treated that way, you were not paying attention.
Furthermore, race is not a distinguishing trait unless you ate a racist.
It has never crossed my mind that the flak Obama gets could be racial, because I'm not racist.
I see plenty of reason a person on the other side of the aisle would want to publicly heckle him, and as I have just stated, I have never presumed its about race.
Face it Max, you're the only racist in this thread.
I'm a racist because I realize that some people treat people differently because of their race?
Well fuck. Wish I lived in your perfect little bubble where you don't even know racism is a thing.
You're racist because you assert that race makes people different from each other in a way that is worth noting.
That's what racism is all about.
If a difference is worth noting, it is worth comparing objectively, and objective comparison results in the assertion that one I objectively better or worse.
Therefore, if one is not better or worse,it is not worth comparing, and therefore not worth noting.
I brought up race because, aside from his race, Obama does not differ much from his predecessors who were not treated the way he has been treated.
And you've made a point not to address it any of the times I've said they've been treated the same for 220 years. Shit, they used to get away with alot worse in the nineteenth century.
9887
« on: July 02, 2015, 02:03:58 PM »
If you are not a believer of affirmative action, then you are not a member of the feminist movement. I've never heard this before, from anybody else, so... I'm gonna take that with a tiny grain of salt. I don't consider myself to be a part of any social "movements" (except for maybe gay marriage, but lookey-loo, mission accomplished). I just have this belief that women ought to have the same rights as men, and I've been taught quite thoroughly that this is feminism at its core.
That's the problem, right there. I know what you meant to say, but in translation between your ideals and your rhetoric, a subconscious idea has affected the way you said it, and it basically means "Women should have more rights than they do now" when you should be saying "Everybody should enjoy the same rights any other person enjoys" You know what you meant, by in esposition to uninformed parties, you're presenting a very one sided argument, because feminism has been about the advancement of women to equality for 100 years, and now that we're as close as we are we need to abandon that movement and adopt a gender neutral name, and gender neutral rhetoric for equality.
9888
« on: July 02, 2015, 01:44:39 PM »
Why does there always have to be a race issue with everything when Obama is involved?
Because racism is still a thing in our country, and his race is the most distinguishing thing between he and his predecessors. Again, I'm not saying it IS racism, but damn it sure seems like it.
Wait, isn't it more racist to bring up his race when nobody else has?
If you believe that the color of a person's skin is a distinguishable trait, then aren't you the one with the racially charged mindset?
acknowledging someone's race and treating them different because of it are two different things. talking about race is not racist.
The only path to a post racism culture is ignoring race.
By failing to do so you are perpetuating racism.
ok, tumblr.
thats the opposite of something a tumblrfag would say
but we aren't trying to become a world that ignores race.
Yeah, racist assholes like you are holding us back.
acknowledging that race exists is not racist.
Why bother making note of something if its inconsequential?
because race is the distinguishing factor between Obama and his predecessors. Did you not read any of this thread?
I find it odd that I don't consider race to be a trait that distinguishes people, but you do, and I'm the one who's racist just because I disagree with his political policies more than I disagreed with his predecessor's.
Had you ever considered that Obama would still be a bad president if he were white?
Again, I'm not even talking about his policies or even how you feel about him. I'm talking about how he is treated by his colleagues on the hill.
I explained to you earlier; that is the way the president has been treated by opposing politicians for a very long time.
Since John Adams.
If you don't remember his predecessors being treated that way, you were not paying attention.
Furthermore, race is not a distinguishing trait unless you ate a racist.
It has never crossed my mind that the flak Obama gets could be racial, because I'm not racist.
I see plenty of reason a person on the other side of the aisle would want to publicly heckle him, and as I have just stated, I have never presumed its about race.
Face it Max, you're the only racist in this thread.
I'm a racist because I realize that some people treat people differently because of their race?
Well fuck. Wish I lived in your perfect little bubble where you don't even know racism is a thing.
You're racist because you assert that race makes people different from each other in a way that is worth noting. That's what racism is all about. If a difference is worth noting, it is worth comparing objectively, and objective comparison results in the assertion that one I objectively better or worse. Therefore, if one is not better or worse,it is not worth comparing, and therefore not worth noting.
9889
« on: July 02, 2015, 01:37:28 PM »
like to remind everybody that there was no Civil War.
Just another American Revolution.
You're a special person, you know that? Do us a favor and look up the definition of 'civil war'.
>implying the south lost WAKE UP SHEEPLE
9890
« on: July 02, 2015, 01:34:58 PM »
Femisim is a movement I neither support nor identify with, because of its sometimes radical nature and tendency on demanding affirmative action, which I believe is a form of racism and sexism.
Feminism isn't a philosophy, it's a social agenda.
it's a philosophy, though
and i'm also vehemently against affirmative action
you can't just shoehorn the feminists with which you disagree with ALL feminists
that's kinda unfair and stupid
He is unfair and stupid.
You're still mad about the automatic downvote thing? And no verb, it is a social movement. The philosophy you subscribe to is one of equality, and it has been around since long before the social movement which adopted the moniker "Feminism" in the 20th century. It may be a movement which ascribes to a philosophy of equality, but you can't let that movement define, and certainly not become synonymous with the philosophy, especially considering the change the movement has taken since its conception. Right now the biggest bullet on the feminist agenda is more affirmative action, often characterized in their "Glass Ceiling" argument. If you are not a believer of affirmative action, then you are not a member of the feminist movement. (and i think I was fair in saying sometimes radical) All other things I could pry on aside, the name of the movement (obviously) has a pro female lean, which is what attracts radicals. In order to put a stop to radicalism, we need to alienate ourselves from the movement, and align ourselves independently with the philosophy behind it. I guess the whole point though is that feminism is a movement that we can trace the founding of, and it abides by no philosophies that were not pre-existent at the time of its founding.
9891
« on: July 02, 2015, 01:16:18 PM »
Yep I do. Sorry i appreciate females.
Uh, aren't you married?
Non-consensually, as I understand.
9892
« on: July 02, 2015, 01:15:24 PM »
Where's damustr8bbygurl when you need him?
9893
« on: July 02, 2015, 01:12:10 PM »
i'm a feminist Man, trying to respect verb is a roller coaster.
Every time you think some of his opinions are valid, he says something stupid.
do you think women should have the same rights and liberties as men
if so, you're a feminist, whether you like it or not
Femisim is a movement I neither support nor identify with, because of its sometimes radical nature and tendency on demanding affirmative action, which I believe is a form of racism and sexism. Feminism isn't a philosophy, it's a social agenda.
9894
« on: July 02, 2015, 01:07:42 PM »
i'm a feminist Man, trying to respect verb is a roller coaster.
Every time you think some of his opinions are valid, he says something stupid.
You're a pussy if you don't dare to support equality, or you're not supporting equal rights for everyone. Either way, from your position you're wrong.
feminism isn't about equality anymore though, its about matriarchal supremacy. I believe in ignoring traits such as race and sex, not performing affirmative actions that feminists espouse. Ultimately the only way to get prejudice to go away is to get everybody to ignore race and sex, not demand statistical equality.
9895
« on: July 02, 2015, 01:00:28 PM »
Bump
9896
« on: July 02, 2015, 12:58:19 PM »
i'm a feminist Man, trying to respect verb is a roller coaster. Every time you think some of his opinions are valid, he says something stupid.
9897
« on: July 02, 2015, 12:47:44 PM »
Why does there always have to be a race issue with everything when Obama is involved?
Because racism is still a thing in our country, and his race is the most distinguishing thing between he and his predecessors. Again, I'm not saying it IS racism, but damn it sure seems like it.
Wait, isn't it more racist to bring up his race when nobody else has?
If you believe that the color of a person's skin is a distinguishable trait, then aren't you the one with the racially charged mindset?
acknowledging someone's race and treating them different because of it are two different things. talking about race is not racist.
The only path to a post racism culture is ignoring race.
By failing to do so you are perpetuating racism.
ok, tumblr.
thats the opposite of something a tumblrfag would say
but we aren't trying to become a world that ignores race.
Yeah, racist assholes like you are holding us back.
acknowledging that race exists is not racist.
Why bother making note of something if its inconsequential?
because race is the distinguishing factor between Obama and his predecessors. Did you not read any of this thread?
I find it odd that I don't consider race to be a trait that distinguishes people, but you do, and I'm the one who's racist just because I disagree with his political policies more than I disagreed with his predecessor's.
Had you ever considered that Obama would still be a bad president if he were white?
Again, I'm not even talking about his policies or even how you feel about him. I'm talking about how he is treated by his colleagues on the hill.
I explained to you earlier; that is the way the president has been treated by opposing politicians for a very long time. Since John Adams. If you don't remember his predecessors being treated that way, you were not paying attention. Furthermore, race is not a distinguishing trait unless you ate a racist. It has never crossed my mind that the flak Obama gets could be racial, because I'm not racist. I see plenty of reason a person on the other side of the aisle would want to publicly heckle him, and as I have just stated, I have never presumed its about race. Face it Max, you're the only racist in this thread.
9898
« on: July 02, 2015, 12:37:08 PM »
Post Golden Age Rap
Hip Hop
Squeal
2011-14.5 Pop
Adult Contemporary
Soft Pop (seriously, if you're softer than soft rock kys)
Deathmetal
House
Wubstep
There are more, but meh.
9899
« on: July 02, 2015, 12:23:36 PM »
Inb4somebodypostsbungieball
9900
« on: July 02, 2015, 12:21:08 PM »
Why does there always have to be a race issue with everything when Obama is involved?
Because racism is still a thing in our country, and his race is the most distinguishing thing between he and his predecessors. Again, I'm not saying it IS racism, but damn it sure seems like it.
Wait, isn't it more racist to bring up his race when nobody else has?
If you believe that the color of a person's skin is a distinguishable trait, then aren't you the one with the racially charged mindset?
acknowledging someone's race and treating them different because of it are two different things. talking about race is not racist.
The only path to a post racism culture is ignoring race.
By failing to do so you are perpetuating racism.
ok, tumblr.
thats the opposite of something a tumblrfag would say
but we aren't trying to become a world that ignores race.
Yeah, racist assholes like you are holding us back.
acknowledging that race exists is not racist.
Why bother making note of something if its inconsequential?
because race is the distinguishing factor between Obama and his predecessors. Did you not read any of this thread?
I find it odd that I don't consider race to be a trait that distinguishes people, but you do, and I'm the one who's racist just because I disagree with his political policies more than I disagreed with his predecessor's. Had you ever considered that Obama would still be a bad president if he were white?
Pages: 1 ... 328329330 331332 ... 449
|
Show Posts