This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Solonoid
Pages: 1 ... 384385386 387388 ... 449
11551
« on: February 28, 2015, 03:16:02 PM »
This was one of the best fights in Dragonball, I think only the duel between Goku and Jackie Chun comes close.
11552
« on: February 28, 2015, 03:12:54 PM »
The fucking end tho.
That was great.
11553
« on: February 28, 2015, 03:10:12 PM »
Slash pls
11554
« on: February 28, 2015, 12:01:06 PM »
In what sort of competition?
11555
« on: February 28, 2015, 11:25:28 AM »
I really, really, really like this image.
11556
« on: February 28, 2015, 10:40:09 AM »
So other than the obvious fact that all of these photos were staged and taken on a set, are you really saying you've never seen libtards with their Obama shirts, posters, and bumpersticlers?
There is a difference between campaign posters and what Putin does in Russia.
Like that shirtless crap
I bet Obama would post pictures of himself shirtless on vacation if he were good looking enough for it.
Boom, there you go. The only reason this isn't a meme? He's a filthy nigger.
11557
« on: February 28, 2015, 10:26:34 AM »
Infinitely less funny, somewhat related.
11558
« on: February 28, 2015, 10:16:57 AM »
11559
« on: February 28, 2015, 10:16:15 AM »
This meme is not dank.
11560
« on: February 28, 2015, 10:15:23 AM »
We already knew he was autistic, why the discussion?
11561
« on: February 28, 2015, 10:12:48 AM »
>people rooting for Roy
>killer of so many ishbalians
Oyy g0yim!
Sand Niggers had it coming.
What, why?
Because they were sand niggers. Duh.
11562
« on: February 28, 2015, 10:07:49 AM »
So other than the obvious fact that all of these photos were staged and taken on a set, are you really saying you've never seen libtards with their Obama shirts, posters, and bumpersticlers?
There is a difference between campaign posters and what Putin does in Russia.
Like that shirtless crap
I bet Obama would post pictures of himself shirtless on vacation if he were good looking enough for it.
11563
« on: February 28, 2015, 09:58:05 AM »
So other than the obvious fact that all of these photos were staged and taken on a set, are you really saying you've never seen libtards with their Obama shirts, posters, and bumpersticlers?
11564
« on: February 27, 2015, 04:25:13 PM »
After reading that, it is clear to me that Kupo is a master of web design.
11565
« on: February 27, 2015, 01:25:44 PM »
FUCKING YES Kill yourself you piece of shit weeaboo gook.
11566
« on: February 27, 2015, 01:14:53 PM »
I just love the moment when the gloves come off and you know it's fucking over.
11567
« on: February 27, 2015, 01:04:10 PM »
He was pretty cool.
the forum will be better.
11568
« on: February 27, 2015, 12:36:19 PM »
This...
This is a prank, right?
11569
« on: February 26, 2015, 09:43:53 PM »
11570
« on: February 26, 2015, 09:39:37 PM »
ITT: I proved that the dress was blue and black on page one using science and noelle argued for two more pages until so much evidence was finally piled up that she just stopped posting instead of admitting she was wrong.
11571
« on: February 26, 2015, 08:50:18 PM »
Nope the entire thing is blue with black trim
Nope.
Like I literally just said, the yellow at the top makes your theory impossible.
Sorry, but after submitting the image to electronic colour retrieval, I have verified using hexadecimal codes that it is blue and black.
11572
« on: February 26, 2015, 08:45:35 PM »
its blue and black. OP is a bad picture.
If you stare at only the bottom portion, then you can kinda see blue and black, but the top portion makes it literally impossible for it to be blue and black. That is clear and obvious yellow at the top, and no matter how the light is shining on it, the fabric would not be that shade if it were anything other than yellow.
Nope sorry it's black.
11573
« on: February 26, 2015, 07:46:42 PM »
The point is, unless you're dealing with solid colour tees you're paying for a bunch of unnecessary, and therefore unscalable things.
And I said it was overpriced myself, that was the point of the example.
The facts are:
-A $100 tee made of better materials and with better construction quality will be better quality than a $20 tee.
-Some people feel the higher quality of the tees are justifiable and buy them.
Whether or not you think it's worth it is purely subjective. I don't feel it is most of the time, and would only spend >$20 or so if I really loved the design of the shirt and I felt the quality was good. The point still remains that the shirts are STILL better quality, just maybe not justifiable to you price-wise.
You seem to have no concept of the value of a dollar.
I can get a tee that's just as good as any that costs $100, and only pay $20, and that's before discounts.
There are plenty of clothes that ascend in construction and material quality well beyond the hundred dollar range, but there's only so much that can be done with a tee shirt.
"I can get a tee that's just as good as any that costs $100"
This is subjective. The quality is objectively going to be better (depending of course where you get it from), but the value of the shirt is subjective and up to the person who is buying it.
"but there's only so much that can be done with a tee shirt."
Yes, but enough can be done to justify $100, not to mention the aesthetics of the shirt.
If we are going to start talking looks, this is a Rick Owens t shirt
Normal t shirts do not look like that, and they are made that way because Rick Owens is a talented designer and designs them that way. You cannot find a shirt like that at Walmart or the mall. The aesthetic justifies the price for some people as well.
No, I can buy a t-shirt that looks just like that one at any number of factory outlets.
Wrong
I always love it when people use Michael Scott reactions, because I am Michael Scott, and this is game over. You've never had any nice things, and you prbably never will, so you have no idea what you're talking about. The quality of a t-shirt caps at $20, if you pay more you're getting ripped off. GG, jimbo
11574
« on: February 26, 2015, 07:23:53 PM »
The point is, unless you're dealing with solid colour tees you're paying for a bunch of unnecessary, and therefore unscalable things.
And I said it was overpriced myself, that was the point of the example.
The facts are:
-A $100 tee made of better materials and with better construction quality will be better quality than a $20 tee.
-Some people feel the higher quality of the tees are justifiable and buy them.
Whether or not you think it's worth it is purely subjective. I don't feel it is most of the time, and would only spend >$20 or so if I really loved the design of the shirt and I felt the quality was good. The point still remains that the shirts are STILL better quality, just maybe not justifiable to you price-wise.
You seem to have no concept of the value of a dollar.
I can get a tee that's just as good as any that costs $100, and only pay $20, and that's before discounts.
There are plenty of clothes that ascend in construction and material quality well beyond the hundred dollar range, but there's only so much that can be done with a tee shirt.
"I can get a tee that's just as good as any that costs $100"
This is subjective. The quality is objectively going to be better (depending of course where you get it from), but the value of the shirt is subjective and up to the person who is buying it.
"but there's only so much that can be done with a tee shirt."
Yes, but enough can be done to justify $100, not to mention the aesthetics of the shirt.
If we are going to start talking looks, this is a Rick Owens t shirt
Normal t shirts do not look like that, and they are made that way because Rick Owens is a talented designer and designs them that way. You cannot find a shirt like that at Walmart or the mall. The aesthetic justifies the price for some people as well.
No, I can buy a t-shirt that looks just like that one at any number of factory outlets.
11575
« on: February 26, 2015, 02:52:49 PM »
The point is, unless you're dealing with solid colour tees you're paying for a bunch of unnecessary, and therefore unscalable things.
And I said it was overpriced myself, that was the point of the example.
The facts are:
-A $100 tee made of better materials and with better construction quality will be better quality than a $20 tee.
-Some people feel the higher quality of the tees are justifiable and buy them.
Whether or not you think it's worth it is purely subjective. I don't feel it is most of the time, and would only spend >$20 or so if I really loved the design of the shirt and I felt the quality was good. The point still remains that the shirts are STILL better quality, just maybe not justifiable to you price-wise.
You seem to have no concept of the value of a dollar. I can get a tee that's just as good as any that costs $100, and only pay $20, and that's before discounts. There are plenty of clothes that ascend in construction and material quality well beyond the hundred dollar range, but there's only so much that can be done with a tee shirt.
11576
« on: February 26, 2015, 02:45:34 PM »
Try eating chocolate that isn't shitty American chocolate then. British chocolate is even worse. Only belgian and italian chocolates are truly better than others.
11577
« on: February 26, 2015, 02:38:34 PM »
But you'll find a $20 sweater is just as good as the $80 most of the time.
Wrong.
I feel like there's no such thing as a $500 t-shirt, and if there was it wouldn't be nicer than a $40 one.
Now, the difference between a $5 t-shirt and a $20 t-shirt would be evident, but once you get above $20, you're really paying too much.
http://uscheckout.apc.fr/browse.cfm/4,3379.html
120 dollars for a white shirt designed by Kanye West and APC. Close enough because it's just as retarded.
But no, the quality of a shirt caps bout $100 which you can get for $60 or less used.
Of a shirt, sure the quality caps around $100.
But of a t-shirt?
No, $25 is being lenient in saying that the quality is still going up.
Wrong. You don't know what you're talking about.
Lol sounds like somebody ITT pays full price.
I have actually never bought a piece of designer clothing, but I like clothing a lot and I know the difference between a $20 shirt and a $100 one.
I only wear solid coloured tees, so I'm not paying for some obscure media reference, I'm paying for the quality of the shirt, and the value caps out around $20.
Example: Right now I'm wearing a $20 target brand shirt which is less quality than my $6 Arizona shirts, which are in turn lower quality than my $15 Gap shirts, which are equal in quality to the $35 shirts I got at Banana Republic.
Graphic tees my be skewing you perspective of pricing.
>graphic tees
where the fuck did you get that from? Not talking about graphic tees
And BR is overpriced so shit example
I didn't say I paid full price for any of it. The point is, unless you're dealing with solid colour tees you're paying for a bunch of unnecessary, and therefore unscalable things. And I said it was overpriced myself, that was the point of the example.
11578
« on: February 26, 2015, 02:26:10 PM »
But you'll find a $20 sweater is just as good as the $80 most of the time.
Wrong.
I feel like there's no such thing as a $500 t-shirt, and if there was it wouldn't be nicer than a $40 one.
Now, the difference between a $5 t-shirt and a $20 t-shirt would be evident, but once you get above $20, you're really paying too much.
http://uscheckout.apc.fr/browse.cfm/4,3379.html
120 dollars for a white shirt designed by Kanye West and APC. Close enough because it's just as retarded.
But no, the quality of a shirt caps bout $100 which you can get for $60 or less used.
Of a shirt, sure the quality caps around $100.
But of a t-shirt?
No, $25 is being lenient in saying that the quality is still going up.
Wrong. You don't know what you're talking about.
Lol sounds like somebody ITT pays full price.
I have actually never bought a piece of designer clothing, but I like clothing a lot and I know the difference between a $20 shirt and a $100 one.
I only wear solid coloured tees, so I'm not paying for some obscure media reference, I'm paying for the quality of the shirt, and the value caps out around $20. Example: Right now I'm wearing a $20 target brand shirt which is less quality than my $6 Arizona shirts, which are in turn lower quality than my $15 Gap shirts, which are equal in quality to the $35 shirts I got at Banana Republic. Graphic tees my be skewing you perspective of pricing.
11579
« on: February 26, 2015, 02:05:07 PM »
But you'll find a $20 sweater is just as good as the $80 most of the time.
Wrong.
I feel like there's no such thing as a $500 t-shirt, and if there was it wouldn't be nicer than a $40 one.
Now, the difference between a $5 t-shirt and a $20 t-shirt would be evident, but once you get above $20, you're really paying too much.
http://uscheckout.apc.fr/browse.cfm/4,3379.html
120 dollars for a white shirt designed by Kanye West and APC. Close enough because it's just as retarded.
But no, the quality of a shirt caps bout $100 which you can get for $60 or less used.
Of a shirt, sure the quality caps around $100.
But of a t-shirt?
No, $25 is being lenient in saying that the quality is still going up.
Wrong. You don't know what you're talking about.
Lol sounds like somebody ITT pays full price.
11580
« on: February 26, 2015, 02:02:50 PM »
"1995"
"35,450 original miles"
Hoooooooowwwwwww There's a '71 Ford Classic truck for sale up the street from me. Gorgeous paint job, only 17,000 miles. The Ferrari in Ferris Beuller's day off only had 300 miles on it at the start of the film, or something crazy like that.
Pages: 1 ... 384385386 387388 ... 449
|
Show Posts
