The symbols nameplate...

It's Sangheili

Is it possible for 0-dimensional,1-dimensional, and 2-dimensional objects to exist? Obviously graphical representations don't count, I'm just asking about real-world things.

Also is time considered a fourth dimension? If you have time, it adds a whole other dimension of information you can include on a graph, does it not? (i.e. (x: 2, y: 4, z: 8, time: 400BC)). And if there is a fourth dimension, is there such thing as fifth dimension? What real-world form would that take?

Spent the whole day with the most beautiful girl in the world. Shit was so cash. I think I might be in love. Here's a pic from when we went out for dinner.


How was Friday for you guys?

Her name is Koko (female western lowland gorilla, 43 years old), and she has been trained since birth to understand English spoken language and sign language. She understands 2000 English words and 1000 English signs and has been tested to have an IQ somewhere between 70 and 95.

Many psychologists (oh boy here we go) have claimed that she doesn't actually understand the meaning behind the signs and the words, she's just been conditioned to memorize the translations because she's rewarded when she gets it right, similar to the story about the horse that could do math. However, her trainor says that she does understand meaning because she's been documented creating new signs. For example, her trainer said that nobody taught Koko the word for "ring," but to refer to it, Koko combined the words "finger" and "bracelet," and came up with the sign "finger-bracelet".

Do you think there is actually a gorilla out there that is more intelligent than the average IQ in Pakistan or is Koko just conditioned to understand the translations and doesn't actually understand the meaning?

inb4 a shitstorm solely because im posting

Or at least limit and regulate democracy to the point where uneducated people (for example anyone who uses this forum) cannot make decisions that affect policy. Political ideology was invented because without it the uneducated people (us) would probably destroy the country. Just letting any random person decide how we manage a country with millions of people is simply the most idiotic and sure way to end that country. And so, the powers that be have invented ideologies to help group us into little categories that can be controlled so that the masses don't destroy the country. Of course, however, ideology dumbs everyone down, so if we instead remove democracy (and thus ideology) we can take away at least some of the stupidity.

What is your view on ideological politics and democracy? Good things or bad things?

I could just be pretending that I am of low-average intelligence and low immaturity, you never know. Anyone making the claim that I am dumb is dumb themselves for making this logical fallacy.

Checkmate, bullies.

First and foremost, the ability to track terror groups on the internet is pivotal if they want to do anything about terrorism. There really isn't any real reason why anyone should be against it unless they have something to hide. Pretty sure the government doesn't care what kind of weird porn you watch, save for something that involves abuse.

The only downside I can recognize is the cost of more government security programs. Beyond that, there's reason to bitch and cry about the government watching you while you're masterbating or whatever the fuck it is you're afraid of.

When setting your gender, if one is to set it to female, I think they should be put into automatic moderated mode, where a moderator will have to approve every one of their posts. This should allow us to retain hierarchic order and make sure women aren't speaking without permission.

Do you think this is a good idea or no?

Say your country gets invaded by a superior force, and knowing that there's no logical reason to assume that you'd be able to fight them back, would you still fight? In this hypothetical, you do not win and it is clear you do not even have a chance at winning.

Everything has to happen on the timeline right? Well if time is only one dimensional (one dimension having no space for matter) then that must mean no matter exists, and thus the universe is disproven. Just because you subjectively think the universe is real doesn't mean it actually is.

You can't possibly consider it natural that we made the huge jump from living in caves to living in cities in such a short period of time. Evolutionary speaking, it's just not possible for our brains to evolve that fast. I could go on and on with the extraordinary amount of evidence, but here's the bottom line: the only way to disprove Ancient Alien Theory is for aliens to come down and tell us they didn't interfere with our development.

What are your opinions on the issue of mainstream historians not taking Ancient Alien Theory seriously enough and what are your thoughts on the theory as a whole?

By corporate masters, I mean that close to literally, as in they control the movement's direction (similar to how oil giants control the counter-environmentalist movement).

They can't ban us all

Ariana Grande porn.

She looks like she's 15 but she's an adult.

Good idea/bad idea?