This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Topics - Dustin
31
« on: February 21, 2015, 05:31:24 PM »
THE GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE SCAM
You stupid sheeps seriously need to reevaluate your pathetic little lives. Giving away all your hard earned money to the Jews WHO OWN THE BANKS AND INSURANCE COMPANIES AND THE MEDIA doesn't fucking save you money. How the fuck do you think insurance companies work? You really fucking believe they give out free money? No bitch niggers, you lose money. That's how the system stays afloat. YOU DO NOT SAVE ANY MONEY WITH INSURANCE YOU FUCKING RETARDS IT JUST DOESN'T FUCKING WORK THAT WAY IT'S CALLED PROFIT YOU DUMB NIGGERS, PROFIT.
32
« on: February 18, 2015, 02:22:55 PM »
Job of the modern government: make asking 'why' frowned and laughed upon.
And no, I'm not saying that I believe in any conspiracy theories, in fact I'm saying that the government invents them to decrease credibility to anyone who questions government decisions.
Tin foil hats are government propaganda. The un-enlightenment--the reversal process where asking why is frowned upon--is our modern age. Now go fuck yourselves.
33
« on: February 17, 2015, 10:30:01 PM »
Daily reminder of how pathetic you all are that this kind of kiddy shit makes you more active on the forum. Lol. You must be so depraved of attention that you actually need this to make it through the day. How fucking pathetic... truly just... so... disgusting. Don't really know how else to properly insult you. I mean 'pathetic' really hits it right on the mark. That's what you fucking are. Just so damn... pathetic. I mean, damn, your lives are really fucked aren't they?
34
« on: February 17, 2015, 10:19:54 PM »
Let's give transgenders DAILY hormone pills so they're all pissy 60/60/24/7/365.25 (ALL THE FUCKING TIME).
Don't even deny they're not, just look at every transgender on this forum further proving my claims.
LGB (drop the) T
Join the movement everybody!
35
« on: February 17, 2015, 09:55:17 PM »
My friend's ex (Jackie) claimed to have this other personality who called herself Angel. She would come in to school some days with blue eye contacts, wearing light, happy-colored clothing and pretty much she acted differently. I don't buy into it though. She literally has the choice to fucking stop that shit, she chooses not to because she's an attention whoring cunt. I literally don't care what Mr. P has to say about it: fucking multiple personalities don't fucking exist. End of story. End of discussion. Fuck it, even end of thread. Lock this shit mods. Spoiler Nah... don't really though
36
« on: February 17, 2015, 09:39:51 PM »
I really only know the fundamental theorem of capitalism and market forces as it was first theorized back during the American and French revolutions without actually understanding the extremely more complex economy of modern times, but I do think my opinion is valid on this.
Essentially what I'm saying is that American republicans aren't pro-capitalism because they protect businesses from competition, and American democrats aren't pro-capitalism because they protect individual people from competition. Now I'm sure there are plenty of people who will say those definitions are wrong, but assuming they're right, the only correct economic stance to take is the middle ground: shielding competition from nothing and no one. We should all at least agree that having the most amount of competition is the most efficient route to take in a capitalist society.
Am I right?
37
« on: February 17, 2015, 09:31:10 PM »
The idea that the laws of physics are ultimately, fundamentally derived from the notion that contradiction cannot exist (contradiction being a sentimental, mathematical representation of the unified theory) changes not the laws themselves but rather how they exist; the laws of physics describe actions that cannot happen, not actions that must happen. In this sense, we can make sense of how a universe could come from nothing: there is simply no contradiction in the spawn of a universe. In fact, we actually witness how particles spawn and disappear from nothing all the time. The best application of negative laws of physics are actually in quantum physics. The behavior of electrons indicates multiple paths the electrons can take. Unlike larger objects in which there is a threshold of only one possibility (all others unable to happen due to a contradiction), subatomic particles have a threshold of many possibilities.
Because negative laws of physics assume much less than positive laws of physics (in the sense that there's no need of a platonic heaven of physical laws), I think this is a better, and possibly, more apt way to understand the universe. Obviously, and I think I've beaten this point to death, I'm no expert, so I need more input on this idea. Should I bother to tinker with it or is it logically flawed in some way? Turkey is the only person who's been kind enough to contribute some input in another thread on the same topic, but I'd like yeah know... maybe at least one other opinion? What if this turns out to be correct and physicists adopt this idea one idea? (hopeful thinking = not going to fucking happen, I know). Still, please give me some input here, thanks.
38
« on: February 14, 2015, 09:51:29 PM »
Hey guys, I am going to come out to you. I am a huge fan of my friends who are you doing today. unfortunately, I don't actually know what works best. Definitely not the intended recipient. thank God that I have a headache. the other side of the retards who thinks that the company has been a while back and enjoy a nice day out.
39
« on: February 14, 2015, 09:46:13 PM »
Baldwin
Gregory
Beowolf
Marquise
Juliette
SecondClass
Imminent Explosion
Ember
Ryle
Of all the popularized scientists who knows what he was doing. if the reader of this message has been generated by this weekend. we will not only is this something I would be the same time, I don't think anyone's, I have to go in for an hour. the only thing that is why we have a good 750, and I decided to give you an opportunity.
40
« on: February 14, 2015, 09:32:26 PM »
Ryle
Nick
Cowpie
Zvezda
the
Elegiac
Grapes
Isara
Reciffo Smmoc
Slash
Shitows
BC
Mr P
Nasty
41
« on: February 14, 2015, 09:19:17 PM »
Daily reminder you are all poor and pathetic.
42
« on: February 13, 2015, 09:31:59 PM »
Child voting
Why exactly are children not allowed to vote? What separates them from adults? Because children don't pay taxes? Newsflash, they do pay taxes. Because children aren't required to sign up for the draft? Actually most adults don't have to sign up for the draft. Jury duty? No, many adults aren't required to do jury duty, and most won't ever have to step foot in a court room.
The reason children don't vote is because they're generally not seen as being smart enough. BINGO!
Americans don't believe unintelligent people should vote. They only make this exception for themselves because 1) they don't realize they're not intelligent and 2) they don't want to give up power.
Call bureaucracies slow all you want, congress is slower. Politicians need to get out so the entire system can put into power qualified and experienced experts. I am a capitalist, but the whole system doesn't run better under the care of the corporate faction. Capitalism fundamentally relies upon self interest--but how can that work when competition is suppressed? And competition is suppressed. Corporations know it's bad for business, at least for their business. So there's no wonder why corporations become buddy-buddy with the government: so they can set up laws that benefit themselves.
They must be so thrilled that socialists think government stands with the people and against the corporations.
Politicians above all us have to go. Whether you want to go the full way and remove democracy as a whole is up to you, but politicians that have been supporting the suppression of competition have to go--for the sake of the free market and the people that live in this goddamn country.
EDIT: Sorry this went slightly off topic, but you can discuss child voting, technocracy, and how politicians hurt capitalism.
43
« on: February 12, 2015, 10:58:54 PM »
Specifically talking about the current existence/non-existence of anthropogenic climate change. What is the probability it isn't happening?
44
« on: February 12, 2015, 10:39:48 PM »
Hey atheists, do you believe Jesus even existed or is he a lie too?
45
« on: February 12, 2015, 10:28:27 PM »
At this very moment there are at least a handful of scientists dedicating years of time to figure out how they can grow a human penis on a rat so they can surgically attach it to a woman's vagina.
All the while millions are dying from cancer and heart disease. And there are kids waiting in long lines at the hospital for their chemo treatment because there are people demanding their sex change surgery or they'll file a lawsuit against the hospital.
Just something to think about.
LGB (drop the) T
46
« on: February 12, 2015, 10:04:35 PM »
I mean, I love admirers but sometimes I just get weirded out over it. I'm pretty sure most of you feel the same way. So how exactly do you tell a queer you're not interested? Is it in a rude way or a straight to the point kind of way?
47
« on: February 12, 2015, 09:54:50 PM »
I've done it twice
Anyone else?
48
« on: February 12, 2015, 06:44:40 PM »
It's at least a choice for the kind of homosexuals who are attracted to feminine guys. They're attracted to femininity but they choose not fuck women because they know it doesn't give them sympathy and attention. I mean I don't know what they're motivation is for doing it, but you're not gay if you're attracted to feminine guy, end of story.
You can consider your asses kicked out of the LGBT movement, you privileged, attention-whoring fuck lords.
49
« on: February 12, 2015, 04:50:32 PM »
You gotta watch this show. It's something new that they just released on Fox about this gay guy, rapper business man, and mommy fetish dude. Okay I don't actually know what I'm talking about but it's still an awesome show.
50
« on: February 12, 2015, 07:40:41 AM »
The doctor wouldn't tell me much, just that the explosion was imminent. They were able to save some of his remains, but unfortunately most of it had been contaminated with autism. I guess the autism was real after all.
51
« on: February 12, 2015, 06:53:38 AM »
Being rude back to people who've been rude to you is justified in my opinion (sorry Jesus but I'm not going to turn the other cheek), but many of you act like dicks for no real reason. I honestly don't care if you have a shitty life or a shitty day, that doesn't mean you can take your frustration out on other people. And there's a pretty clear correlation among those with bad lives and bad attitudes, correct me if I'm wrong. Ultimately I don't have any control over what you do, and truthfully I dismally care, but I'd be lying if I said it wasn't annoying.
I mean I'm not trying to make a point with all this, but it's in your best interest to understand what other people think of you. And for a lot of you, a more positive attitude really couldn't hurt.
52
« on: February 11, 2015, 03:31:35 PM »
...Ought to be the last people you listen to. Not that there's anything wrong with informing yourself on a variety of topics but people--whether politicians or average citizens--who think it's humanly possible to be an expert on everything are simply delusional. The real experts ultimately know best and you shouldn't let your narcissistic attitude take them for granted. This is not to say that intelligent people can't figure it out, but that unintelligent people shouldn't have decision-making power.
53
« on: February 10, 2015, 11:42:24 PM »
For a society that's so focused around being uber-efficient, it's funny how slow we allow bureaucratic systems to become. Bureaucratic systems are still the best way to organize people for a cohesive division of labor and flow of information up and down the pyramidal hierarchy. But the system generally creates grid-locking conflicts between strict rule enforcement and allowing for easy solutions to problems. There's always the OCD boss that demands (for example) that all company donations must fill out an unnecessarily comprehensive, complicated, and boringly long signed agreement that's just going to get filed away for the next fifty years and never get looked at again. Or say that someone's report on a financial matter has to be thrown away because it doesn't meet up with the company's official formatting standards.
I just feel like common sense and reasonableness are done away with in bureaucracies, and it's ultimately suppressed by some asshole with severe OCD who has the delusion that everything will function better if painful restrictions are made on anything that strays away from the official policy by even a minimal degree. Maybe I'm just emotionally reacting to bullshit, but it seems to me that bureaucracy would function much faster without assholes with OCD.
54
« on: February 10, 2015, 07:26:45 PM »
He stopped at the last second though
Fucking Kanye, but you the real mvp tho
55
« on: February 10, 2015, 06:41:00 PM »
Reaction images and gifs are permitted, in moderation. If it gets out of hand, expect a verbal warning. Ignore that, expect more. Daily reminder the mods suck at their job
56
« on: February 08, 2015, 08:50:21 PM »
Government suppressing the free, REAL media once again I see.
You can clearly see four different videos of a nuclear bomb going off. Leave it to the government to try and play it off as fireworks or something. We can clearly tell that the size and shape of that explosions leads to only one conclusion: that it was nuclear. Stop plugging your ears with I love bit gov't radio and look at the evidence yourself.
57
« on: February 08, 2015, 08:44:21 PM »
I feel like the majority of you hate on feminism just because you're not female.
Feminism helps men too, don't yall have mothers?
58
« on: February 08, 2015, 07:57:45 PM »
59
« on: February 08, 2015, 07:14:01 PM »
What will you do when the fallout comes?
60
« on: February 08, 2015, 04:52:56 PM »
ITT: Post memes 
|
Show Posts
