Inb4 lock

White women prefer sex with tall, muscular black men over skinny white boys with small and unsatisfying cocks

Next time I see another one of these protests I'm getting my guys and we're going all in, mob one verse mod two.

What I'm about to do is absolutely necessary

Also Jim admitted to being attracted to men, lol

I don't despise homosexuality myself, though admittedly I do find it a bit repulsive sometimes (like how they like to eat each other's poop). But some people just weren't instilled with the belief that homosexuals are better than normal people and deserve more rights and privileges than us. And of course you cannot expect someone to change their religious beliefs just because they offend you; religious people have every right to believe in the Bible.

Are you open minded enough to understand all the hate on homosexuals?

Right off the bat you should know it's just media headline bait simply because homosexuality makes it extremely difficult to pass on genes to children. But even then, we have a very small understanding of human neurology compared to what we need to know to understand these sorts of things that it's truly an irrelevant endeavor to search for a specific gene that only homosexuals have.

Why does the LGBT movement feel that there needs to be some sort of natural-ness to homosexuality in order to make it justifiable? It's simply ridiculous that homosexuality can't be an environmental factor in order to acceptable.

There is no gay gene, and if you demand homosexuality is genetic, you are only separating yourself from science.

Is real.

Get over your obsession already atheists

Every time I do it makes me laugh

Perhistoric slothe

Fuck you and your gay moose.

If this thread doesn't belong in Serious just lock it, don't bother moving it to the Spam board. Although both Icy and Mr P have argued in favor that this board is about personal identity and not about objective debating, so having a political conversation about ourselves certainly should be within their rules.

Moving forward:

It's no surprise to anyone that the government has 'agents' on various forums around the Internet, mostly geared towards the radical crew of people. But say there's a government agent who watches this forum. Do you think they would put any of us on a watch list of some sort? We know that the government doesn't like communists and anarchists, but what about everything else that doesn't fall under the two main American political parties? I'm curious about my own stance on technocracy. The elimination of democracy, would you not think that would be a radical enough stance for the government to get involved? Certainly if there were larger numbers they'd take some notice. Or is it more about one's tendency to act violent? Though I don't think I've ever advocated a violent revolution, many of you may have at some point.

For anyone else with a similar situation, do you think the government would put you on a watch list because of your (radical) political beliefs at any point since 2001?

The reason why mods tell you to PM them when you have a complaint is because they don't want other people to agree with the complaints.

Unless you're an idiot, it's pretty common ground that people are more likely to get depressed simply by being around other depressed people. So why the fuck are depressed people always trying to share their stories with other people? It's like they want other people to be depressed with them. Well yeah know, misery loves company, and honestly you're not a good person for making other people feel like shit.