Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Pippen

Pages: 1 ... 124125126 127128 ... 219
3751
The Flood / Re: Big Bass's 2016 Hunger Games (Now in session)
« on: January 15, 2016, 02:20:14 PM »
BIG BOSS DOWN DAY ONE

FUCKING LOL

3752
Gaming / Re: The Division may not be Watch Dogs 2.0.
« on: January 15, 2016, 02:19:21 PM »
Hype Levels:

-2

It should be at 0 tbh.

Never even consider getting hyped

3753
The Flood / Re: Big Bass's 2016 Hunger Games (SIGN IN HERE)
« on: January 15, 2016, 02:06:16 PM »
Let's try once more

AKA sign me the fuck up

3754
He has to make sure everyone else is dead in 2016

3755
Gaming / Re: The Division may not be Watch Dogs 2.0.
« on: January 15, 2016, 11:25:49 AM »
It seems like a TPS Destiny to me

Density looks worse than this.
Plus gotta keep your hopes up, even if it's Ubisoft.

3756
Gaming / Re: The Division may not be Watch Dogs 2.0.
« on: January 15, 2016, 11:24:50 AM »
I agree with you on the HUD too, its so pretty and very cool, hopefully they keep that.

It's a very simple, modern looking HUD that doesn't fill your screen and instead shows it up when you are nearby. Not connected to the screen.

It's just perfect.

3757
Gaming / The Division may not be Watch Dogs 2.0.
« on: January 15, 2016, 11:04:52 AM »
YouTube


Just found this today and...I may consider getting it now.

I wasn't ever interested in the division, but this game is really interesting now that i've seen some unscripted gameplay of it. The fluid co-op will be fun to have friends join in and out as you explore New York, and you can apply different strategies and abilities to take out the enemy. It isn't another run and gun game, you actually have to work with a team or be extremely careful on your own.

The items in the game are...okay I guess. We don't get a good look at them in this video. I kinda wish it pointed out the items a little better but that's fine.

One thing I REALLY like is the HUD/Menu. It reminds me of the HUD in the game Remember Me, which I loved the style in Remember Me. So this is a plus.

So now that you've seen some gameplay, what do you think?

3758
Septagon / Re: Ban ponies.
« on: January 15, 2016, 10:53:40 AM »
And to clarify

/b/ banned ponies because it was spammed everywhere, there is two known active bronies on this site and i'm the only one who really posts any amount of pony. I get hated for it.

Yet Flee talks about Fluttershy and still gets to be Best Friend ;-;
No, some of REAL AMERICANS still give Flee shit.
Yeah, I still get shit for it on a regular basis. Such is life.

You are still best friend ;-;
That' probably because Fluttershy is a much better pony than Celestia.

The fuck did you just say?



Celestia is best.

3759
Gaming / Re: Streaming You Gay Hoes
« on: January 15, 2016, 10:33:28 AM »
Stop.
Just stop typing brand names like that.

It's not witty, it's not funny. It's retarded.
It has long become a gimmick of yours. And you know, all gimmicks are shit.

>Motion control on Wii gimmick

Excuse me?

3760
Septagon / Re: Ban ponies.
« on: January 15, 2016, 10:32:39 AM »
And to clarify

/b/ banned ponies because it was spammed everywhere, there is two known active bronies on this site and i'm the only one who really posts any amount of pony. I get hated for it.

Yet Flee talks about Fluttershy and still gets to be Best Friend ;-;
No, some of REAL AMERICANS still give Flee shit.
Yeah, I still get shit for it on a regular basis. Such is life.

You are still best friend ;-;

3761
The Flood / Re: Only fags havent seen this movie
« on: January 14, 2016, 07:35:10 PM »
Guess I'd better take up that rainbow flag with pride then.

3762
Gaming / Re: Video Games, consent, and you.
« on: January 14, 2016, 12:44:59 PM »
Even though I have valid points.
You've had the least valid points out of everyone here. You're making Dark Souls fans look really bad.

Good thing to note.
I never actually said I was a fan of the series. Yet you assumed so just because I defend a mechanic.

3763
Gaming / Re: Video Games, consent, and you.
« on: January 14, 2016, 12:41:41 PM »
Can you go 20 minutes without saying Consent? No? Got it.
Considering that it's the basis of my argument? No, probably not.

Can you go 20 minutes without saying some incredibly stupid shit?

No?

Got it.

I like how you have gone down to just calling me a complete dumbass. Even though I have valid points.

3764
Gaming / Re: Video Games, consent, and you.
« on: January 14, 2016, 12:40:13 PM »
You're the dumbest user in this thread.

I think most people on this thread are going



To you.

3765
Gaming / Re: Video Games, consent, and you.
« on: January 14, 2016, 12:35:03 PM »
I cannot go ahead and say skydiving is a horrible thing because i've never felt the thrill of it.
Skydiving is pretty fucking stupid, because of all the risks involved. I've never skydived, and I can say this, because I have a fucking brain that can deduce simple facts that I've gathered through observation.

Quote
You cannot say invasions in DKS are a horrible thing until you have actually gotten invaded.
Anything nonconsensual is horrible.

This is axiomatic.

Can you go 20 minutes without saying Consent? No? Got it.


3766
Gaming / Re: Video Games, consent, and you.
« on: January 14, 2016, 12:32:47 PM »
I'm saying you can't have a good fucking opinion on invasions without actually trying it out.
Which doesn't make any logical fucking sense.

You can't have a good opinion on bestiality if you've never fucked a dog before.
You can't have a good opinion on cutting if you've never cut yourself before.
You can't have a good opinion on eating shit if you've never ate shit before.

See how retarded that sounds?

Those are horrible examples. Seriously.

You can't say how amazing an experience would be without experiencing it.
Like skydiving, riding a rollercoaster or getting invaded by another player in Dark Souls.

I cannot go ahead and say skydiving is a horrible thing because i've never felt the thrill of it.

You cannot say invasions in DKS are a horrible thing until you have actually gotten invaded.

3767
Gaming / Re: Video Games, consent, and you.
« on: January 14, 2016, 12:25:36 PM »
Just because you know how a gun works doesn't mean you can fucking shoot it.
What does that have to do with anything?
Quote
Knowing does not equal experiencing.
Except the argument isn't about experience. No one's arguing experience. We're arguing about whether or not invasions should be in Dark Souls.

They shouldn't, because they're nonconsensual, and the best way to have fun with other players is through consent.

I'm saying you can't have a good fucking opinion on invasions without actually trying it out.

Can't your small peanut brain figure that out without twisting words?

3768
Gaming / Re: Video Games, consent, and you.
« on: January 14, 2016, 12:22:15 PM »
You never actually experienced the invasion mode, you are just assuming that it's bad.
Because I fucking know how it works. I don't NEED to experience it to know how it works.

If it isn't consensual, I don't WANT to fucking experience it.

Quote
And by the way, invasions never have been consented to. Ever.
which

is

the

fucking

problem

Just because you know how a gun works doesn't mean you can fucking shoot it properly.

Knowing does not equal experiencing.

3769
Gaming / Re: Video Games, consent, and you.
« on: January 14, 2016, 12:17:48 PM »
Because you never actually tested it!
That means a lot!

Just because you watched a video means you don't know how it felt.
I never watched a video. I've never seen it in action.

Because I don't have to. It's irrelevant. I know how it works, and I know I'd fucking hate it.

BECAUSE IT'S NONCONSENSUAL.

You just made your entire argument irrelevant.
You never actually experienced the invasion mode, you are just assuming that it's bad.
You're calling everyone else a dumbass?

And by the way, invasions never have been consented to. Ever.

3770
Gaming / Re: Video Games, consent, and you.
« on: January 14, 2016, 12:14:32 PM »
Yet you are complaining about a mechanic that you never actually tried yourself?
I know enough about how it works, so what the fuck does it matter?

Because you never actually tested it!
That means a lot!

Just because you watched a video means you don't know how it felt.

3771
Gaming / Re: Video Games, consent, and you.
« on: January 14, 2016, 12:12:14 PM »
Wait a minute
You never played the fucking game?

Yet you are complaining about a mechanic that you never actually tried yourself?

This just makes me sad Verb, you used to be good at this.

3772
Gaming / Re: Video Games, consent, and you.
« on: January 14, 2016, 12:10:51 PM »
Except that's not what I want. I don't want the game to let you choose if you have a chance of dying--I want the game to let you choose whether or not you want to duel other players.

That's it.

This is the dumbest post i've read from you so far.
Dueling players = chance of dying. Connect the dots Verb.

Breaking consent is always wrong.
"I didn't give consent, even though I bought the game, played it and used the item which lets invasions happen with full knowledge that invasions exist."
Seriously, your argument is like tissue paper.

3773
Gaming / Re: Video Games, consent, and you.
« on: January 14, 2016, 11:58:14 AM »
I think a simple mechanic in a game that does nothing bad is wrong, so i'm going to complain and debate about it because I want "consent" in a video game.

Verb's argument in a nutshell.

3774
Gaming / Re: Video Games, consent, and you.
« on: January 14, 2016, 11:56:43 AM »
When the slogan is "prepare to die".

Letting you choose if you have a chance of dying from a possible enemy is just stupid.

3775
Gaming / Re: Video Games, consent, and you.
« on: January 14, 2016, 11:55:21 AM »
Verb really wants From Software to get rid of one of the core online features of Dark Souls...

He really is a dumbass.

3776
Gaming / Re: Video Games, consent, and you.
« on: January 14, 2016, 11:48:23 AM »
"Invasion:
an unwelcome intrusion into another's domain."
Are you a retard?

No, I just find it retarded that you are complaining about this.

3777
Gaming / Re: Video Games, consent, and you.
« on: January 14, 2016, 11:37:35 AM »
Your argument is little more than you repeating that you don't consent to invasions
Because I've yet to receive a cogent refutation.

Quote
your personal criterion of consent for enjoyment isn't universal or objective.
Consent is objective. You enjoy it for poor, unsubstantiated reasons, as opposed to my reasons for not enjoying it.

"Invasion:
an unwelcome intrusion into another's domain."

3778
The Flood / Re: Welcome to the "Cool Kids Only™" thread.
« on: January 14, 2016, 11:03:55 AM »

3779
The Flood / Re: Welcome to the "Cool Kids Only™" thread.
« on: January 14, 2016, 11:00:21 AM »
I expect to be called a faggot when I post.

3780
Gaming / Re: Video Games, consent, and you.
« on: January 14, 2016, 10:57:26 AM »
You.don't.consent.to.invasions.in.anything.
Which.is.the.problem.

"Invasion:
an unwelcome intrusion into another's domain."


Pages: 1 ... 124125126 127128 ... 219