This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Sandtrap
Pages: 1 ... 121122123 124125 ... 390
3661
« on: October 04, 2015, 01:40:19 PM »
Are you going to die, and if so, how long do you think you have left?
Yep. If not from old age, the doctors I consulted numerous times gave me an estimate taking into account all my various conditions. Roughly 20 years or so. 30-40 if I'm extremely lucky. Me personally? I dunno. It all depends on what might get me. You want a consistent number with no basis out of my head? 15 years.
3662
« on: October 04, 2015, 08:28:51 AM »
Which are better, innies or outties?
There are so many "innies" and "outies" in context here that I'm going to pick the obvious choice of bellybuttons.
Probably innie because usually, fat people have outties.
But also black people...
Honestly, I've never encountered that many black people in my life.
Much less, stared at their stomachs to know that.
In my experience most black people have outties. I have no idea why though.
Some here might relate it to them being a sub-species of human.
But what if they're the next evolution?
After all the half and half ones are the best.
Evolution supposedly goes with "the strong survive." Judging by the amount of police shootings these days I'd hardly use the term "next evolution." Next evolution of advanced welfare drains, maybe.
3663
« on: October 04, 2015, 08:23:51 AM »
Which are better, innies or outties?
There are so many "innies" and "outies" in context here that I'm going to pick the obvious choice of bellybuttons.
Probably innie because usually, fat people have outties.
But also black people...
Honestly, I've never encountered that many black people in my life.
Much less, stared at their stomachs to know that.
In my experience most black people have outties. I have no idea why though.
Some here might relate it to them being a sub-species of human.
3664
« on: October 04, 2015, 08:22:02 AM »
Which are better, innies or outties?
There are so many "innies" and "outies" in context here that I'm going to pick the obvious choice of bellybuttons.
Probably innie because usually, fat people have outties.
But also black people...
Honestly, I've never encountered that many black people in my life. Much less, stared at their stomachs to know that.
3665
« on: October 04, 2015, 08:19:56 AM »
Which are better, innies or outties?
There are so many "innies" and "outies" in context here that I'm going to pick the obvious choice of bellybuttons. Probably innie because usually, fat people have outties.
3666
« on: October 04, 2015, 08:18:26 AM »
Confirm Op a Hologram
1) If your given the option to go 50 years in the future or 50 years in the past where would you go?
2) Your given the option to go back and meet your 10 year old self for a 5 minute conversation what would you say to him?
3) Your trapped in the elevator with 3 people of your choosing
1. 50 years in the past. Most likely, somewhere in Quebec. 2. Somebody made a thread like that on Bungle.net once, except that it involved writing a letter to yourself. Basically, same premise. I'd tell myself that there's a shit load of bad days coming. But that there's a light at the end of the tunnel no matter how dark it looks. 3. The calmest people from this site. Honestly I don't know how calm most of the people are here. The only name I can pull out of a hat is Verb. Being trapped in a box with three other people who will freak out would end in murder for me.
3667
« on: October 04, 2015, 08:12:12 AM »
I remember stupid shit that I probably shouldn't remember, like all my locker combinations from middle school AND high school, in order.
Ha. When I dropped out of highschool I took the locker door locks with me. Handy to have because they're durable as fuck.
3668
« on: October 04, 2015, 08:10:40 AM »
3669
« on: October 04, 2015, 08:10:19 AM »
Is this the right question?
No. It's a rather boring and irritating question that leaves me with fuck all room to work with.
Okay, sorry man.
What about this? Is this the right question?
No. It's more irritating now because I backtracked on the first statement and didn't want to offend after realizing that I might have. Then I got to your second part.
Let's not take that road.
What road?
The one that involves asking questions that have the substance of a sack of potatoes. Surely you've got something to ask of me with more merit than that.
Assuming I can remember all the bits and pieces, I have things to say. And I feel like saying them for once.
But I don't like exclaiming things out into the open on my own spontaneously because it's jarring for everybody involved.
Can birds get epilepsy?
I believe so. Cats and dogs can. I don't see why birds couldn't.
However, birds have drastically shorter lifespans than cats or dogs so their chances of developing a condition like it is minimal.
Why do birds have shorter lifespans?
Faster heart rate, more energy expendature in their actions. A body of that size spending so much energy needed to keep itself alive is going to burn out faster than something that lives an easier going lifestyle.
Do you think we should genetically engineer birds that live longer?
No. You try to modify the natural system as it functions and you create a domino effect. The stronger the modification, the stronger the domino effect.
Longer living birds with no slowed reproduction abilities would lead to a population explosion, over consumption, and then collapse, which then put more strain on other species that revolve around the consumption of those birds in some form.
Do you think that with longer lifespans a significant number of birds could develop epilepsy, thus preventing the population explosion?
No. Epilepsy is a slow development. Not only that, but it takes time to kill. You don't just have a seizure and a fall over dead. It takes time for it to completely break down your system.
Let's say it takes 20 years for a bird to pick up epilepsy once it reaches old age with it's new altered lifespan. In that time, it could have had multiple batches of eggs and reproduced a few hundred more of itself. And that's just one bird.
What lifespan would you suggest for birds, in order to have them live longer, but not so long that epilepsy won't stop them from reproducing? Keep in mind that we're talking about an avian form of epilepsy that comes on stronger and quicker and is coupled with a mild form of tourettes.
I wouldn't. Not my field of specialty, and not our network to tamper with for no reason. I don't mind birds. I like a few of them.
But they're birds. I ain't gonna put too much thought into that one. No more birds pls.
Do you think that future generations looking back on this conversation while researching extended lifespans in birds would feel a sense of closure at the end of the exchange about birds, or would they feel that questions had been left unanswered?
Again, I'm not going to bother thinking too hard on that one. And I'm not going to care either. I asked you for no more bird posting. Don't put me to sleep here. I'm trying to stay awake.
Do you think that I would be justified in saying that my previous question wasn't about birds?
I'm only slightly considering murdering you. It's a very soft murder. Maybe strangulation but not enough to kill. No, you wouldn't be justified because the question at hand routed back to birds in an abstract form.
3670
« on: October 04, 2015, 08:05:43 AM »
Is this the right question?
No. It's a rather boring and irritating question that leaves me with fuck all room to work with.
Okay, sorry man.
What about this? Is this the right question?
No. It's more irritating now because I backtracked on the first statement and didn't want to offend after realizing that I might have. Then I got to your second part.
Let's not take that road.
What road?
The one that involves asking questions that have the substance of a sack of potatoes. Surely you've got something to ask of me with more merit than that.
Assuming I can remember all the bits and pieces, I have things to say. And I feel like saying them for once.
But I don't like exclaiming things out into the open on my own spontaneously because it's jarring for everybody involved.
Can birds get epilepsy?
I believe so. Cats and dogs can. I don't see why birds couldn't.
However, birds have drastically shorter lifespans than cats or dogs so their chances of developing a condition like it is minimal.
Why do birds have shorter lifespans?
Faster heart rate, more energy expendature in their actions. A body of that size spending so much energy needed to keep itself alive is going to burn out faster than something that lives an easier going lifestyle.
Do you think we should genetically engineer birds that live longer?
No. You try to modify the natural system as it functions and you create a domino effect. The stronger the modification, the stronger the domino effect.
Longer living birds with no slowed reproduction abilities would lead to a population explosion, over consumption, and then collapse, which then put more strain on other species that revolve around the consumption of those birds in some form.
Do you think that with longer lifespans a significant number of birds could develop epilepsy, thus preventing the population explosion?
No. Epilepsy is a slow development. Not only that, but it takes time to kill. You don't just have a seizure and a fall over dead. It takes time for it to completely break down your system.
Let's say it takes 20 years for a bird to pick up epilepsy once it reaches old age with it's new altered lifespan. In that time, it could have had multiple batches of eggs and reproduced a few hundred more of itself. And that's just one bird.
What lifespan would you suggest for birds, in order to have them live longer, but not so long that epilepsy won't stop them from reproducing? Keep in mind that we're talking about an avian form of epilepsy that comes on stronger and quicker and is coupled with a mild form of tourettes.
I wouldn't. Not my field of specialty, and not our network to tamper with for no reason. I don't mind birds. I like a few of them.
But they're birds. I ain't gonna put too much thought into that one. No more birds pls.
Do you think that future generations looking back on this conversation while researching extended lifespans in birds would feel a sense of closure at the end of the exchange about birds, or would they feel that questions had been left unanswered?
Again, I'm not going to bother thinking too hard on that one. And I'm not going to care either. I asked you for no more bird posting. Don't put me to sleep here. I'm trying to stay awake.
3671
« on: October 04, 2015, 08:00:19 AM »
Is this the right question?
No. It's a rather boring and irritating question that leaves me with fuck all room to work with.
Okay, sorry man.
What about this? Is this the right question?
No. It's more irritating now because I backtracked on the first statement and didn't want to offend after realizing that I might have. Then I got to your second part.
Let's not take that road.
What road?
The one that involves asking questions that have the substance of a sack of potatoes. Surely you've got something to ask of me with more merit than that.
Assuming I can remember all the bits and pieces, I have things to say. And I feel like saying them for once.
But I don't like exclaiming things out into the open on my own spontaneously because it's jarring for everybody involved.
Can birds get epilepsy?
I believe so. Cats and dogs can. I don't see why birds couldn't.
However, birds have drastically shorter lifespans than cats or dogs so their chances of developing a condition like it is minimal.
Why do birds have shorter lifespans?
Faster heart rate, more energy expendature in their actions. A body of that size spending so much energy needed to keep itself alive is going to burn out faster than something that lives an easier going lifestyle.
Do you think we should genetically engineer birds that live longer?
No. You try to modify the natural system as it functions and you create a domino effect. The stronger the modification, the stronger the domino effect.
Longer living birds with no slowed reproduction abilities would lead to a population explosion, over consumption, and then collapse, which then put more strain on other species that revolve around the consumption of those birds in some form.
Do you think that with longer lifespans a significant number of birds could develop epilepsy, thus preventing the population explosion?
No. Epilepsy is a slow development. Not only that, but it takes time to kill. You don't just have a seizure and a fall over dead. It takes time for it to completely break down your system.
Let's say it takes 20 years for a bird to pick up epilepsy once it reaches old age with it's new altered lifespan. In that time, it could have had multiple batches of eggs and reproduced a few hundred more of itself. And that's just one bird.
What lifespan would you suggest for birds, in order to have them live longer, but not so long that epilepsy won't stop them from reproducing? Keep in mind that we're talking about an avian form of epilepsy that comes on stronger and quicker and is coupled with a mild form of tourettes.
I wouldn't. Not my field of specialty, and not our network to tamper with for no reason. I don't mind birds. I like a few of them. But they're birds. I ain't gonna put too much thought into that one. No more birds pls.
3672
« on: October 04, 2015, 07:51:37 AM »
Is this the right question?
No. It's a rather boring and irritating question that leaves me with fuck all room to work with.
Okay, sorry man.
What about this? Is this the right question?
No. It's more irritating now because I backtracked on the first statement and didn't want to offend after realizing that I might have. Then I got to your second part.
Let's not take that road.
What road?
The one that involves asking questions that have the substance of a sack of potatoes. Surely you've got something to ask of me with more merit than that.
Assuming I can remember all the bits and pieces, I have things to say. And I feel like saying them for once.
But I don't like exclaiming things out into the open on my own spontaneously because it's jarring for everybody involved.
Can birds get epilepsy?
I believe so. Cats and dogs can. I don't see why birds couldn't.
However, birds have drastically shorter lifespans than cats or dogs so their chances of developing a condition like it is minimal.
Why do birds have shorter lifespans?
Faster heart rate, more energy expendature in their actions. A body of that size spending so much energy needed to keep itself alive is going to burn out faster than something that lives an easier going lifestyle.
Do you think we should genetically engineer birds that live longer?
No. You try to modify the natural system as it functions and you create a domino effect. The stronger the modification, the stronger the domino effect.
Longer living birds with no slowed reproduction abilities would lead to a population explosion, over consumption, and then collapse, which then put more strain on other species that revolve around the consumption of those birds in some form.
Do you think that with longer lifespans a significant number of birds could develop epilepsy, thus preventing the population explosion?
No. Epilepsy is a slow development. Not only that, but it takes time to kill. You don't just have a seizure and a fall over dead. It takes time for it to completely break down your system. Let's say it takes 20 years for a bird to pick up epilepsy once it reaches old age with it's new altered lifespan. In that time, it could have had multiple batches of eggs and reproduced a few hundred more of itself. And that's just one bird.
3673
« on: October 04, 2015, 07:44:06 AM »
Is this the right question?
No. It's a rather boring and irritating question that leaves me with fuck all room to work with.
Okay, sorry man.
What about this? Is this the right question?
No. It's more irritating now because I backtracked on the first statement and didn't want to offend after realizing that I might have. Then I got to your second part.
Let's not take that road.
What road?
The one that involves asking questions that have the substance of a sack of potatoes. Surely you've got something to ask of me with more merit than that.
Assuming I can remember all the bits and pieces, I have things to say. And I feel like saying them for once.
But I don't like exclaiming things out into the open on my own spontaneously because it's jarring for everybody involved.
Can birds get epilepsy?
I believe so. Cats and dogs can. I don't see why birds couldn't.
However, birds have drastically shorter lifespans than cats or dogs so their chances of developing a condition like it is minimal.
Why do birds have shorter lifespans?
Faster heart rate, more energy expendature in their actions. A body of that size spending so much energy needed to keep itself alive is going to burn out faster than something that lives an easier going lifestyle.
Do you think we should genetically engineer birds that live longer?
No. You try to modify the natural system as it functions and you create a domino effect. The stronger the modification, the stronger the domino effect. Longer living birds with no slowed reproduction abilities would lead to a population explosion, over consumption, and then collapse, which then put more strain on other species that revolve around the consumption of those birds in some form.
3674
« on: October 04, 2015, 07:38:04 AM »
3675
« on: October 04, 2015, 07:37:43 AM »
Is this the right question?
No. It's a rather boring and irritating question that leaves me with fuck all room to work with.
Okay, sorry man.
What about this? Is this the right question?
No. It's more irritating now because I backtracked on the first statement and didn't want to offend after realizing that I might have. Then I got to your second part.
Let's not take that road.
What road?
The one that involves asking questions that have the substance of a sack of potatoes. Surely you've got something to ask of me with more merit than that.
Assuming I can remember all the bits and pieces, I have things to say. And I feel like saying them for once.
But I don't like exclaiming things out into the open on my own spontaneously because it's jarring for everybody involved.
Can birds get epilepsy?
I believe so. Cats and dogs can. I don't see why birds couldn't.
However, birds have drastically shorter lifespans than cats or dogs so their chances of developing a condition like it is minimal.
Why do birds have shorter lifespans?
Faster heart rate, more energy expendature in their actions. A body of that size spending so much energy needed to keep itself alive is going to burn out faster than something that lives an easier going lifestyle.
3676
« on: October 04, 2015, 07:26:21 AM »
Is this the right question?
No. It's a rather boring and irritating question that leaves me with fuck all room to work with.
Okay, sorry man.
What about this? Is this the right question?
No. It's more irritating now because I backtracked on the first statement and didn't want to offend after realizing that I might have. Then I got to your second part.
Let's not take that road.
What road?
The one that involves asking questions that have the substance of a sack of potatoes. Surely you've got something to ask of me with more merit than that.
Assuming I can remember all the bits and pieces, I have things to say. And I feel like saying them for once.
But I don't like exclaiming things out into the open on my own spontaneously because it's jarring for everybody involved.
Can birds get epilepsy?
I believe so. Cats and dogs can. I don't see why birds couldn't. However, birds have drastically shorter lifespans than cats or dogs so their chances of developing a condition like it is minimal.
3677
« on: October 04, 2015, 07:22:15 AM »
Damn, man, that's sad. Too much pride of course isn't good, but having some measure of it is good for your esteem.
It's not like I can change that. I don't even know if I want to. Being honest here, I think it's the one thing that keeps me on my feet. Never being satisfied means that I never stop. If I didn't have that sort of self loathing factor pushing me along, I would have given in a long time ago.
That actually makes a good amount of sense. We all need a driving force.
Since you're light on them here, I'll ask another question. If you could change one decision you've made, what would it be?
Tough one. My memory doesn't go back that far or that precise anymore. I think, though, on more recent events, letting myself essentially bleed out all over the place when I got my shit news about my tumor from the doc was a piss poor decision. Both on here and on Bungie.net. In fact, I'd say that letting myself bleed out in general was a fucking poor move. I ended up getting messier and messier in mental state because of it and I probably alienated every last fucking person around me who might have called me a friend or had any sort of healthy interaction with me. Feel free to ask more questions if you like. I get the feeling that you're going to be the only one asking the interesting shit for the most part.
3678
« on: October 04, 2015, 07:12:18 AM »
Is this the right question?
No. It's a rather boring and irritating question that leaves me with fuck all room to work with.
Okay, sorry man.
What about this? Is this the right question?
No. It's more irritating now because I backtracked on the first statement and didn't want to offend after realizing that I might have. Then I got to your second part.
Let's not take that road.
What road?
The one that involves asking questions that have the substance of a sack of potatoes. Surely you've got something to ask of me with more merit than that. Assuming I can remember all the bits and pieces, I have things to say. And I feel like saying them for once. But I don't like exclaiming things out into the open on my own spontaneously because it's jarring for everybody involved.
3679
« on: October 04, 2015, 07:03:54 AM »
Fuck the lore.
It's all about canoes.
What's so great about this "canoes"?
You can sit in them.
3680
« on: October 04, 2015, 07:01:29 AM »
Fuck the lore.
It's all about canoes.
3681
« on: October 04, 2015, 07:00:07 AM »
Damn, man, that's sad. Too much pride of course isn't good, but having some measure of it is good for your esteem.
It's not like I can change that. I don't even know if I want to. Being honest here, I think it's the one thing that keeps me on my feet. Never being satisfied means that I never stop. If I didn't have that sort of self loathing factor pushing me along, I would have given in a long time ago.
3682
« on: October 04, 2015, 06:54:10 AM »
What accomplishment in your life has made you the most proud of yourself?
Haven't got one. I'm never proud of myself. I always look back at something finished and spot what I did wrong. I'm never satisfied.
You've really never done something that made you proud of yourself? That's bleak.
Nothing that lasted long anyway. Here's the flowchart of how feeling proud of myself works. >I spot the one thing I mildly like about what I did >I then spot the million failures and what I did becomes rubbish That and the fact that I don't like pride too much, I think.
3683
« on: October 04, 2015, 06:51:18 AM »
Is this the right question?
No. It's a rather boring and irritating question that leaves me with fuck all room to work with.
Okay, sorry man.
What about this? Is this the right question?
No. It's more irritating now because I backtracked on the first statement and didn't want to offend after realizing that I might have. Then I got to your second part. Let's not take that road.
3684
« on: October 04, 2015, 06:49:00 AM »
What accomplishment in your life has made you the most proud of yourself?
Haven't got one. I'm never proud of myself. I always look back at something finished and spot what I did wrong. I'm never satisfied. If I did something, there was a stupid mistake in there somewhere. I always think of the best approach at the end of things.
3685
« on: October 04, 2015, 06:47:14 AM »
where is upendi?
I don't even know what the fuck that is.
3686
« on: October 04, 2015, 06:45:37 AM »
Is this the right question?
No. It's a rather boring and irritating question that leaves me with fuck all room to work with.
3687
« on: October 04, 2015, 06:43:58 AM »
No strings on me this morning, apparently. I've got little to no restrictions going for me. That includes good or bad. Ask away.
Shoot for multiple questions if you like.
3688
« on: October 04, 2015, 06:17:06 AM »
Crying from the end of Titanic
best way to start today
You wake up and spend your morning watching a roughly two/three hour long movie?
No it's just how I spent this particular morning
Don't even know how I'd manage that.
Foreign concept to me. I can't physically grasp how you'd wake up and then start watching a movie. So much other shit in the way first.
3689
« on: October 04, 2015, 06:09:32 AM »
Crying from the end of Titanic
best way to start today
You wake up and spend your morning watching a roughly two/three hour long movie?
No it's just how I spent this particular morning
Don't even know how I'd manage that.
3690
« on: October 04, 2015, 06:00:56 AM »
Lol early morning. I got up half an hour ago (11am).
Need to do laundry, restock fridge and then make my timetable for this year at uni.
Then grind tanks and battleships and get a bit further on wolfenstein.
I was going to say something here, but honestly, I've got nothing. So I'm saying that instead so it doesn't look like I just avoided you out of all the other people in here.
Pages: 1 ... 121122123 124125 ... 390
|
Show Posts
