It's because they believe the "Next-Gen" PR that makes out that they're powerhouses.
Is it locked at 30FPS? Don't feel like looking at link.If it's locked, I'm in support. 1080p30FPS(Locked)>900p60FPS(locked)
Quote from: Snake on February 03, 2015, 03:15:51 PMIs it locked at 30FPS? Don't feel like looking at link.If it's locked, I'm in support. 1080p30FPS(Locked)>900p60FPS(locked)It doesn't say. It's undoubtedly locked though.Also, framerate>resolution
Quote from: BritishLemön on February 03, 2015, 03:17:16 PMQuote from: Snake on February 03, 2015, 03:15:51 PMIs it locked at 30FPS? Don't feel like looking at link.If it's locked, I'm in support. 1080p30FPS(Locked)>900p60FPS(locked)It doesn't say. It's undoubtedly locked though.Also, framerate>resolutionYeah, sure, in multiplayer games. But in a single player game like W3, Arkham Knight, Second Son, etc. I'd rather my games look pretty.
Wow the Xbox is awful.And still no 60 FPS, are they really going to continue with that even on PS4.
Quote from: Snake on February 03, 2015, 03:20:24 PMQuote from: BritishLemön on February 03, 2015, 03:17:16 PMQuote from: Snake on February 03, 2015, 03:15:51 PMIs it locked at 30FPS? Don't feel like looking at link.If it's locked, I'm in support. 1080p30FPS(Locked)>900p60FPS(locked)It doesn't say. It's undoubtedly locked though.Also, framerate>resolutionYeah, sure, in multiplayer games. But in a single player game like W3, Arkham Knight, Second Son, etc. I'd rather my games look pretty.Games can look pretty at 900p and 720p.
Framerate > Resolution. Always.
High texture quality + 60fps 900p > High texture quality + 30fps 1080p
Quote from: BritishLemön on February 03, 2015, 03:22:15 PMQuote from: Snake on February 03, 2015, 03:20:24 PMQuote from: BritishLemön on February 03, 2015, 03:17:16 PMQuote from: Snake on February 03, 2015, 03:15:51 PMIs it locked at 30FPS? Don't feel like looking at link.If it's locked, I'm in support. 1080p30FPS(Locked)>900p60FPS(locked)It doesn't say. It's undoubtedly locked though.Also, framerate>resolutionYeah, sure, in multiplayer games. But in a single player game like W3, Arkham Knight, Second Son, etc. I'd rather my games look pretty.Games can look pretty at 900p and 720p.Yeah, of course. Halo 5 looked great. Snake Eater HD looked great.QuoteFramerate > Resolution. Always.Obviously. But that's not what I said.QuoteHigh texture quality + 60fps 900p > High texture quality + 30fps 1080pAgain, obviously. But that's not really relevant.
Quote from: Snake on February 03, 2015, 03:29:11 PMQuote from: BritishLemön on February 03, 2015, 03:22:15 PMQuote from: Snake on February 03, 2015, 03:20:24 PMQuote from: BritishLemön on February 03, 2015, 03:17:16 PMQuote from: Snake on February 03, 2015, 03:15:51 PMIs it locked at 30FPS? Don't feel like looking at link.If it's locked, I'm in support. 1080p30FPS(Locked)>900p60FPS(locked)It doesn't say. It's undoubtedly locked though.Also, framerate>resolutionYeah, sure, in multiplayer games. But in a single player game like W3, Arkham Knight, Second Son, etc. I'd rather my games look pretty.Games can look pretty at 900p and 720p.Yeah, of course. Halo 5 looked great. Snake Eater HD looked great.QuoteFramerate > Resolution. Always.Obviously. But that's not what I said.QuoteHigh texture quality + 60fps 900p > High texture quality + 30fps 1080pAgain, obviously. But that's not really relevant.i don't evenare you legitimately stupid?
Quote from: BritishLemön on February 03, 2015, 03:31:11 PMQuote from: Snake on February 03, 2015, 03:29:11 PMQuote from: BritishLemön on February 03, 2015, 03:22:15 PMQuote from: Snake on February 03, 2015, 03:20:24 PMQuote from: BritishLemön on February 03, 2015, 03:17:16 PMQuote from: Snake on February 03, 2015, 03:15:51 PMIs it locked at 30FPS? Don't feel like looking at link.If it's locked, I'm in support. 1080p30FPS(Locked)>900p60FPS(locked)It doesn't say. It's undoubtedly locked though.Also, framerate>resolutionYeah, sure, in multiplayer games. But in a single player game like W3, Arkham Knight, Second Son, etc. I'd rather my games look pretty.Games can look pretty at 900p and 720p.Yeah, of course. Halo 5 looked great. Snake Eater HD looked great.QuoteFramerate > Resolution. Always.Obviously. But that's not what I said.QuoteHigh texture quality + 60fps 900p > High texture quality + 30fps 1080pAgain, obviously. But that's not really relevant.i don't evenare you legitimately stupid?That's debatable. I think I have my moments of stupidity, but I don't regard this as one of them.All I said is that I prefer my single player games to be LOCKED at 30FPS if the tradeoff is gorgeous 1080p. I do NOT want 1080p if the framerate is going to all over the place (ala Crysis 2).
Quote from: Snake on February 03, 2015, 03:35:38 PMQuote from: BritishLemön on February 03, 2015, 03:31:11 PMQuote from: Snake on February 03, 2015, 03:29:11 PMQuote from: BritishLemön on February 03, 2015, 03:22:15 PMQuote from: Snake on February 03, 2015, 03:20:24 PMQuote from: BritishLemön on February 03, 2015, 03:17:16 PMQuote from: Snake on February 03, 2015, 03:15:51 PMIs it locked at 30FPS? Don't feel like looking at link.If it's locked, I'm in support. 1080p30FPS(Locked)>900p60FPS(locked)It doesn't say. It's undoubtedly locked though.Also, framerate>resolutionYeah, sure, in multiplayer games. But in a single player game like W3, Arkham Knight, Second Son, etc. I'd rather my games look pretty.Games can look pretty at 900p and 720p.Yeah, of course. Halo 5 looked great. Snake Eater HD looked great.QuoteFramerate > Resolution. Always.Obviously. But that's not what I said.QuoteHigh texture quality + 60fps 900p > High texture quality + 30fps 1080pAgain, obviously. But that's not really relevant.i don't evenare you legitimately stupid?That's debatable. I think I have my moments of stupidity, but I don't regard this as one of them.All I said is that I prefer my single player games to be LOCKED at 30FPS if the tradeoff is gorgeous 1080p. I do NOT want 1080p if the framerate is going to all over the place (ala Crysis 2).>wanting lower framerate in favour of resolution seriously what
No surprises. Both consoles are already outdated.
Quote from: LC on February 03, 2015, 02:31:58 PMMeanwhile on PChttp://webmshare.com/done/On19mthe human eye can't see past 30 frames anyway, so who cares?
Meanwhile on PChttp://webmshare.com/done/On19m
Hmm, that's not too bad.Is it still march release or have they delayed it more? <.<
Hmm, that's not too bad.
not too bad.
Atleast they are making up some BS excuse as to why its 30FPS.
Incorrect... I can tell the difference between 30 and 60... honestly, this battle is not worth fighting...
Witcher 3 console resolution and fps confirmed.
